Polyhedra Network推出基于zkBridge的比特币互操作生态系统

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2024-01-22Última atualização em 2024-01-22

Resumo

Polyhedra Network已经与比特币生态系统内的关键建设者进行合作,其中涵盖了基础设施、钱包、比特币二层、DeFi 和工具。

比特币作为最古老的一条区块链正在不断演进。自从 Ordinals 协议出现以来,其生态系统正在迅速扩展。为了进一步加强比特币的生态系统,市场迫切需要一个解决方案,以实现比特币及其二层网络间的无缝互操作,同时也需要实现比特币生态系统与以太坊等其他区块链生态系统的互操作。

为了解决这种互操作性的需求,Polyhedra Network推出了基于zkBridge的比特币跨链消息传输协议。这一创新性方案拓展了比特币的功能,使其能够与多种区块链网络,包括各种一层和二层区块链网络实现互操作。

由 Polyhedra Network 设计并实施的 zkBridge 互操作协议,是一个基于零知识证明技术的无需信任且高效的跨链解决方案。这不仅适用于比特币生态系统内部,也适用于比特币与其他区块链网络之间的互操作。

基于 zkBridge 的比特币跨链消息传输协议

作为比特币、以太坊及其他网络间首个无需信任的互操作协议,zkBridge 正与开发者合作,应用于比特币生态的各类基础设施、比特币二层网络、钱包、DeFi 协议和工具。

zkBridge 互操作协议将帮助比特币生态系统安全高效地触及更多加密用户。资产将不再仅限于在比特币网络或单个其他区块链网络之中。开发者可以专注于打造项目,无需担忧将比特币与其他链相连接。zkBridge 简化了围绕钱包和账户的复杂性,让开发者能专注于提供卓越的用户体验。zkBridge 基于零知识证明技术实现了安全并且高效的跨链互操作,无需依赖对于任何第三方的信任。

通过 zkBridge,比特币网络现在可以安全地传输其当前和历史数据到 20 多个区块链网络,其中包括比特币二层、以太坊和以太坊二层。该协议还能与比特币网络中的新兴资产兼容,如 Ordinals、BRC-20 和 Atomicals,并且使得其他区块链网络(如以太坊和比特币二层)上的智能合约,能够无信任地访问比特币数据和协议,并进行各种计算逻辑,其安全性都由零知识证明技术来保证。

此外,当用户想要从另一个区块链向比特币安全地发送消息或者跨链转移资产时,需要克服比特币缺乏智能合约的问题。zkBridge 的解决方案引入了权益证明机制,验证者可以在发送链上质押代币,从而被授权在比特币网络上写入数据,确保安全的跨链交易;通过与 EigenLayer 和 Babylon 等基础设施集成,并引入一个巧妙构建的罚没机制来通过加密经济安全来进一步增强系统的安全性。

基于 zkBridge 构建最大的比特币可互操作生态系统

目前,加密行业正处于比特币生态系统开发和扩展的早期,通过 zkBridge 构建高效且安全的比特币互操作协议,可以充分支持比特币生态的建设者们。

Polyhedra Network 已经与比特币生态系统内的关键建设者进行合作,其中涵盖了基础设施、钱包、比特币二层、DeFi 和工具。

基于 zkBridge 构建最大的比特币可互操作生态系统的首批合作伙伴包括:比特币生态系统一站式入口OKX Wallet、面向比特币 Ordinals 和 BRC-20 资产的开源 Chrome 浏览器扩展程序UniSat Wallet、利用以太坊质押和验证节点为去中心化网络的启动提供支持的EigenLayer、解锁 2100 万个比特币以保障去中心化经济安全的Babylon、数据可用性解决方案 PoDA 的基础平台Syscoin、比特币二层网络Bitmap、基于 BitVM 的比特币安全等效的二层网络Bitlayer、通过 ZK Rollup 和链上逻辑门承诺验证机制实现的比特币二层网络B² Network、基于 Taproot 构建的与 EVM 兼容的比特币二层网络BEVM、允许用户在比特币网络上创建并执行智能合约和 dApps 的 EVM 兼容的比特币侧链Rootstock、基于 ZK-rollup 的比特币二层网络LumiBit、以 bitUSD 为支撑的比特币 DeFi 协议bitSmiley、Atomicals 协议和 ARC-20 资产的交易市场和浏览器Atomicals Market、聚合交易和自动抢购 BRC-20 资产的 Telegram 机器人BTCBot、专注于社交参与和孵化计划的ReadOn:REON、具有质押和未来再质押收益的全链流动性分发网络StakeStone、建立了比特币上账户抽象协议 BTC Connect 的Particle Network

Polyhedra Network推出基于zkBridge的比特币互操作生态系统


Leituras Relacionadas

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

Behind the AI scorecards that dominate industry discussions—benchmarks like MMLU-Pro, MMMU, and MMMU-Pro—stands a Chinese-Canadian researcher: Wenhu Chen. As an assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of the TIGER Lab, Chen has become a key "exam-setter" for evaluating large language and multimodal models. Chen first gained broader recognition with MMLU-Pro, a more challenging and stable update to the popular MMLU benchmark. As top models like OpenAI’s o3 began achieving near-perfect scores on the original MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. MMLU-Pro introduced more complex reasoning questions, expanded answer choices, and filtered out ambiguous or simple items, effectively reintroducing differentiation among state-of-the-art models. His work on MMMU addressed the evaluation of multimodal models, requiring them to integrate visual information (like charts, diagrams, or tables) with textual knowledge across diverse academic subjects. Even the strongest models initially scored only around 56-59%, highlighting significant room for improvement in genuine multimodal reasoning. MMMU-Pro further refined this by preventing models from bypassing visual cues. Chen’s research focus has long been on complex information understanding and reasoning. His background—including a PhD at UC Santa Barbara, research at Google/DeepMind on Gemini, and now a role in Meta’s superintelligence lab—provides deep insight into model development and their potential weaknesses. His TIGER Lab also builds models (e.g., for video understanding and generation), ensuring his evaluation benchmarks are grounded in practical challenges. While AI headlines often spotlight company leaders and product launches, Chen’s work exemplifies the critical, behind-the-scenes contributions of researchers crafting the rigorous standards that define and drive progress in AI capabilities.

marsbitHá 11m

Behind the AI Scorecards Lies a Chinese 'Question Setter'

marsbitHá 11m

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock of MicroStrategy, is experiencing a persistent de-pegging from its target par value of $100, with the discount recently widening to over 11%. This de-anchoring challenges the core design of STRC, which was intended as a stable, income-oriented security operating near $100. As a crucial funding engine for MicroStrategy's Bitcoin acquisition strategy, STRC's price reflects market confidence in the company's entire capital model. The company's "capital flywheel" relies on issuing STRC at or above $100 via an At-the-Market (ATM) program to raise cash for buying Bitcoin, thereby boosting company equity and theoretically supporting STRC's value. A monthly adjustable dividend mechanism was designed to maintain this peg. Despite raising the dividend to 11.5% and increasing payment frequency, the de-pegging persists. Market concerns extend beyond technical factors like leveraged arbitrage unwinding. Analysts point to MicroStrategy's limited cash reserves relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation for preferred shares. While the company counters that its vast Bitcoin holdings could cover decades of payments, this argument hinges on the potential need to sell Bitcoin—a shift from its longstanding "hodl" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of BTC, framed as a test, amplified these liquidity and strategy concerns. If STRC remains discounted, impairing MicroStrategy's ability to raise cheap capital, fears may grow that the company could sell more Bitcoin to meet obligations. This scenario could transform MicroStrategy from a major market buyer into a potential seller, posing significant downside risk for Bitcoin. The re-pegging of STRC is thus a key indicator for the health of MicroStrategy's capital structure and its market impact.

Odaily星球日报Há 25m

STRC Unpegged by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Turning?

Odaily星球日报Há 25m

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

Silicon Valley's New Most Wanted Job: The Rise of the Forward Deployment Engineer The AI industry is witnessing a significant shift. The focus has moved from developing cutting-edge models to deploying them effectively within enterprises. This has made the "Forward Deployment Engineer" (FDE) a critical and highly sought-after role at major firms like OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. For the past three years, the industry prioritized model scientists. However, companies are now facing a harsh reality: purchasing powerful AI tools does not guarantee productivity gains or organizational change. The biggest hurdle is not the technology itself, but integrating it into complex legacy systems, workflows, and corporate cultures. This includes challenges like data silos, compliance requirements, and internal resistance. The FDE role, pioneered by Palantir Technologies, addresses this "last-mile" problem. FDEs are deployed on-site with clients for extended periods. Their job is to deeply understand the client's specific organizational structure, processes, and pain points, then tailor and implement the AI solution accordingly. They combine skills in technology, project management, and organizational change. A clear signal of this trend emerged in May 2026 when three AI giants made major moves. Anthropic launched a $1.5B joint venture for enterprise deployment. OpenAI formed an independent deployment subsidiary, DeployCo, with over $4B in commitments and acquired a deployment consultancy. Google Cloud's CEO publicly announced a large-scale recruitment drive for FDEs. This shift represents a fundamental change in the software business model: from selling tools to selling guaranteed outcomes. FDEs are the agents of this change, responsible for delivering a working system within the production environment, not just a demo. Real-world cases, such as challenges at Goldman Sachs (compliance barriers) and Target (internal cultural resistance), illustrate that the primary obstacles to AI adoption are organizational, not technical. An FDE's value lies in navigating these human and procedural complexities to facilitate a successful "AI migration." In essence, as core AI technology becomes more accessible and affordable, the true premium is shifting to the human expertise required to understand organizations and drive change—making the FDE role pivotal for the next phase of the AI revolution.

marsbitHá 25m

Silicon Valley's Most Sought-After New Role Has Emerged

marsbitHá 25m

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

World Cup as a Catalyst for Agentic Wallets: From Web2 to Web3 This article explores how the World Cup provides a real-world scenario for observing the evolution of digital wallets from simple asset managers towards "Agentic Wallets"—intelligent, AI-powered interfaces. Using the example of prediction markets like Polymarket, it illustrates how AI Agents can lower the barrier to Web3 interaction. Instead of navigating complex DApps, users can express intent in natural language (e.g., "I think Portugal will win") within platforms like Discord or web pages. The Agent then interprets this intent, finds the relevant market, and seamlessly guides the user through the on-chain transaction via their wallet. The core shift is from wallets as mere "function menus" for signing transactions to "intent interpreters" that understand user goals. The article highlights parallel developments in traditional finance, such as Mastercard's "Agent Pay" and WeChat Pay's AI tests, which focus on granting AI controlled, authorized, and auditable payment capabilities. This underscores a broader trend of AI entering the financial layer. However, the article emphasizes that the primary challenge for Agentic Wallets in Web3 is not automation but establishing clear security boundaries. Unlike traditional systems with chargebacks, on-chain transactions are often irreversible. Therefore, future wallets must ensure users retain ultimate control and comprehension. They need to transparently communicate an Agent's permissions, spending limits, authorized durations, and provide easy ways to pause or revoke access. The World Cup experiments represent early steps toward wallets that are not just applications but ubiquitous, intelligent interfaces that simplify Web3 while keeping users securely in control.

marsbitHá 1h

When the World Cup Collides with Agents: From Web2 to Web3, How Are Wallets Evolving into Agentic Wallets?

marsbitHá 1h

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbitHá 2h

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片