一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-12-28Última atualização em 2023-12-28

Resumo

zk Rollup、Rollup 中间件、互操作性、比特币生态……

原文作者:Layergg

原文编译:Luffy,Foresight News

牛市的号角已经吹响,即将到来 2024 年,我们需要关注哪些赛道和项目呢?以下列出了明年值得关注的 10 个趋势和项目代表。

一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

zk Rollup

2022 年之前 Rollup 领域的争论主要集中在 Optimistic 和 zk Rollup 哪种技术更具优势。

但是,随着 EIP-4844 之后的 L2 成本降低以及一些大型项目的启动,之前平静的 L2 战争预计将重新全面爆发。关键在于 L2 能够如何构建其生态系统。

关注项目:zkSync、Starknet

一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

Rollup 中间件

EIP-4844 使 Rollup 的成本下降之后,Rollup 的普及才会真正开始。这个赛道包含以下细分领域:

  • Rollup 即服务

  • 共享排序

  • Rollup SDK

围绕几个主流 Rollup 项目,将会出现数百到数千个 AppRollups。

关注项目:Gelato Network、AltLayerEspresso Systems

一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

互操作性

随着区块链数量的不断增加,跨链基础设施的需求将呈指数级增长。但它们还存在一些无问题:

  • 成本高

  • 黑客事件

  • 合成资产

  • 流动性分散

尽管现有的跨链桥存在各种问题,但新发布的跨链解决方案有望取得突破。

关注项目:LayerZeroWormhole

一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

并行化 EVM

并行化 EVM 的优势在于:

  • 更快的出块时间

  • 更高的 TPS

  • 低费用

这项技术已经通过铭文压力测试得到验证,将对 DApp 开发人员产生强大的吸引力。

关注项目: Sei Network、Neon、Monad 

数据可用性 

数据可用性层对于区块链网络的可扩展性、安全性和效率至关重要。 它的特点和优势是:

  • 提高可扩展性 

  • 透明度和易于验证 

  • 与 L2 解决方案兼容 

  • 降低成本 

作为模块化叙述的核心,DA 层将被众多项目采用。

关注项目:CelestiaAvailEigenLayer一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

比特币生态

比特币现货 ETF 很有可能在 2024 年第一季度推出。此外,随着 Inscription (BRC-20) 的发展,比特币生态系统仍将是 2024 年的重点关注领域。

而且,解放比特币 8300 亿美元流动性的努力还会继续下去。

 关注项目:StackBabylon

一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

去中心化机器学习

人工智能将继续在 2024 年的叙述中发挥核心作用,人工智能算力将成为主流领域之一。

随着人工智能的不断发展,预计市场将越来越多地将注意力转向数据挖掘,这是人工智能技术的一个基本方面。

关注项目:gensyn、Bittensor 一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

去中心化社交

大多数 SocialFi 尚未获得庞大的用户群。尽管如此,friend.tech 的故事是一个令人信服的例子,它证明了用户驱动的社交网络的无限潜力。

关注项目:friend.tech、Lens ProtocolFarcaster一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

分布式验证器技术

DVT 允许多个节点充当一个以太坊 PoS 验证器,从而提高安全性和去中心化。正如 Vitalik Buterin 警告的那样,主要的质押服务提供商目前面临着中心化问题。

这里的要点是,LSD 在未来几年将继续成为一个高增长行业,并且在此过程中自然会激发人们对 DVT 的兴趣。

关注项目:ssv network、Obol Network、diva一览2024年值得关注的10大加密趋势与代表项目

以太坊重新质押

「重新质押」是指在充当各种协议验证器的节点重新利用质押的以太坊或其他加密货币。

这里需要注意的一个关键点是 EigenLayer 的潜在收入。

以太坊质押年利率 (~ 5 %) + Eigenlayer 重新质押奖励 (~ 10 %) + LRT 协议代币发行 (~ 10 %) =潜在年利率

当以太坊进入牛市时,人们可能会更加关注重新质押协议的潜力。

关注项目:EigenLayer

Leituras Relacionadas

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

Gate Research Institute: Chart Pattern Analysis and Breakout Trading Strategies Chart patterns are crucial tools in technical analysis for observing market supply and demand shifts, trend continuations, and reversals. This analysis involves a comprehensive evaluation of trend, volume, support/resistance, time cycles, and breakout validity, not just rote pattern recognition. Patterns are broadly categorized into reversal patterns (e.g., Double Tops/Bottoms, Head and Shoulders) and continuation patterns (e.g., Flags, Triangles, Rectangles). An effective breakout, key for trading, requires clear support/resistance, prolonged consolidation, a prevailing trend backdrop, and volume confirmation. However, breakouts are not guaranteed, as false breakouts are common. Risk must be managed through position sizing, stop-loss orders, pullback confirmations, and profit-taking in stages. Key pattern types discussed include: * **Rectangle Patterns:** Indicate market indecision within parallel support and resistance, with breakouts projecting a move equal to the pattern's width. * **Flag & Pennant Patterns:** Short-term continuation patterns following sharp price moves ("flagpoles"). * **Triangle Patterns:** Symmetrical, Ascending (bullish bias), and Descending (bearish bias) triangles, representing consolidation before a directional move. * **Head and Shoulders Patterns:** Major reversal patterns signaling trend exhaustion. The article details breakout trading strategies, defining valid breakouts by price closing beyond a key level with increased volume and minimal immediate re-entry into the prior range. It contrasts range trading with breakout trading and outlines entry methods (immediate entry, pullback entry, scaling in), stop-loss placement (based on pattern failure), and profit-taking techniques (target-based, structure-based, trend-following). It further classifies breakout outcomes: 1. **Valid Breakouts:** Strong, sustained moves in the breakout direction. 2. **Pullback Breakouts:** Price breaks out, retests the breakout level as support/resistance, then resumes the trend—offering a lower-risk entry. 3. **False Breakouts:** Price briefly breaches a level but quickly reverses back into the prior range, a common risk managed by strict stop-losses. Key validation tools for breakouts include volume analysis, the principle of support/resistance role reversal, and momentum indicators like ATR, Moving Averages, Bollinger Bands, and RSI. In conclusion, while chart patterns and breakout analysis provide a structured framework, their effectiveness relies on multiple confirming factors—trend context, volume, and proper risk management. They should be integrated into a broader trading system rather than used as standalone signals.

marsbitHá 25m

Gate Research Institute: Analysis of Chart Patterns and Breakout Trading Strategies

marsbitHá 25m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

In a speech titled "The Industrialization of Trust," Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom (former BlackRock digital assets head) discussed the future transformation of global finance. Drawing from 20 years at BlackRock, where he led the launch of Bitcoin/ETH ETFs and tokenized funds, Chalom highlighted the immense hidden costs of establishing trust in traditional finance—estimated at over $9.3 trillion annually in the US alone due to fragmented systems, multi-day settlements, and countless reconciliations. He argued that Ethereum is emerging as the global financial "settlement layer for trust," with its robust, decentralized infrastructure securing over $300 billion in on-chain assets and most stablecoins and tokenized assets. The future, he stated, will be driven by three accelerating pillars: stablecoins (evolving beyond crypto gateways to become efficient cross-border payment rails), tokenized assets (enabling 24/7 trading and reshaping capital markets), and DeFi (providing automated, accessible financial services). A potential game-changer, Chalom added, is the fourth pillar: "Agentic Finance," where AI agents autonomously execute programmable financial transactions via smart contracts and stablecoins. He envisions individuals soon having AI-powered "CFOs in their pockets" to optimize idle capital and manage tokenized portfolios. This shift, facilitated by Ethereum's trustless settlement, could multiply on-chain transaction volume 1000x within a year, moving finance toward a seamless, digitized future.

marsbitHá 25m

Joseph Chalom: Ethereum is Becoming the "Settlement Layer of Trust" for Global Finance

marsbitHá 25m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

The article analyzes the recent significant de-pegging of Strategy's perpetual preferred stock, STRC, whose price fell to approximately $89, far below its $100 face value. This discount has pushed its simple yield to around 12.9%, creating a paradox. The stock was designed as a high-yield instrument trading near par, and Strategy maintains an 11.5% annual dividend, even recently switching to semi-monthly payments to support the price. The author explores several reasons why the high yield hasn't attracted enough buying pressure to restore the par value. A key factor is potential reverse deleveraging from carry trades, where leveraged investors may be forced to sell due to margin calls as the price falls, creating a self-reinforcing downward spiral. Additionally, the tokenization and integration of STRC into DeFi protocols (like Apyx, Saturn, Pendle) have introduced faster, more transparent, and potentially more volatile price adjustment mechanisms through leverage and yield-splitting products. The emergence of a competing product, Strive's SATA, offering a 13% yield with daily dividends, has also changed the yield benchmark, challenging STRC's unique high-yield narrative. Furthermore, the market is questioning the distinction between Strategy's substantial Bitcoin reserves, which provide long-term balance sheet coverage, and the certainty of stable near-term cash flow for dividends. Ultimately, the price dip represents a stress test for this type of BTC-backed, high-yield financing tool. The future path of STRC depends on whether Strategy acts to reinforce the $100 peg (e.g., by adjusting dividends), whether DeFi-related leverage unwinds further, and how investors ultimately price the risks of leverage, competition, and cash flow uncertainty against the offered yield.

marsbitHá 37m

STRC Severely Unpegged, What Risks Is the Market Pricing In?

marsbitHá 37m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

The LIT token of decentralized perpetual exchange Lighter surged to a six-month high above $1.90 on June 18th, with a market cap of $425 million. After a price correction earlier this year, the recent rebound is attributed to its core "buyback flywheel" mechanism. All protocol fee revenue is used for programmatic, hourly market buybacks of LIT. Since its TGE in December 2025, approximately 15 million LIT (6% of circulating supply) has been repurchased for around $21 million. Additional price support comes from the LLP (Lighter Liquidity Pool), where providers must stake LIT worth 10% of their deposited USDC, locking significant token supply. However, challenges persist. Trading volume has declined amidst a sluggish market, with total volume at $1.68 trillion, significantly lower than leading competitor Hyperliquid's $4.37 trillion. While Lighter focuses on perpetual contracts, RWA, and Pre-IPO markets, Hyperliquid has expanded into prediction markets and boasts a U.S. spot ETF, attracting institutional investment and influencer endorsements like from Arthur Hayes. In contrast, LIT currently lacks similar high-profile backing. With 75% of LIT's total 1 billion supply still locked (team and investor tokens begin a 3-year linear unlock in December 2026), there is no immediate unlock selling pressure. The token's future performance hinges on sustaining trading volume growth, successful product iteration, and executing its transparent buyback strategy against a dominant competitor.

Foresight NewsHá 56m

LIT Token Hits Six-Month High: How Long Can the Buyback Flywheel Keep Burning Fuel?

Foresight NewsHá 56m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片