一览Messari分析师持仓情况:Solana成为投资共识

Odaily星球日报Publicado em 2023-12-20Última atualização em 2023-12-20

Resumo

整体来看,Messari 的分析师贯彻了在年度报告中分享的预测和理念。

原文作者:深潮 TechFlow

如约而至,知名加密数据和研究机构 Messari 发布了《Messari Theses 2024 》,其中也披露了 Messari 各位分析师的持仓,包括获利最多的仓位、亏损最多的仓位、现在持有的代币以及喜欢哪些赛道或者概念。

整体来看,Messari 的分析师贯彻了在年度报告中分享的预测和理念,看多比特币和 Solana,看好 AI 代币,大部分都持有 SOL 或者相关的生态代币,其次是 OLAS\AKT\TAO\RNDR 等 AI 概念代币,Messari 在 2024 的趋势报告中看空以太坊,但是大部分分析师依然持有 ETH 作为 Beta,尽管一位分析师 KEl 认为他 2023 年最大的亏损是没有尽快出售 ETH。

Messari 分析师持仓

TBI

获利最多:GBTC、SOL

亏损最多:流行的 VC 币,以及为什么我不能抛弃 ZEC? 

持有:BTC、ETH、SOL

喜欢:你在阅读这份报告

Maartje

获利最多:RNDR

亏损最多:与 CRV 分道扬镳

持有:BTC、ETH、RNDR

喜欢:DePIN

Dustin

获利最多:SOL、OLAS、NOS

亏损最多:USDC

持有:SOL、OLAS、NOS、LIKE、HBB

喜欢:人工智能相关的加密货币

Kunal

获利最多:RUNE, AKT, TAO

亏损最多:PEPE

持有:ETH, TIA, RPL, AKT

喜欢:EigenLayer(特征层)和重新质押协议。对安全性的需求推动了L1资产的价值,而 EigenLayer 显著扩大了以太坊的安全市场。

Sami

获利最多:RNDR, AKT, TAO

亏损最多:没有买更多的 TAO

持有:BTC, ETH, SOL, HONEY, TAO, RNDR, AKT, LPT

喜欢:DePIN 和去中心化人工智能将成为加密货币的杀手级应用。ZK 协处理器将使加密货币应用在功能和性能方面达到与Web2应用的同等水平。

Ally

获利最多:SOL, TIA, RNDR, MKR

亏损最多:MATIC

持有:SOL 生态代币、 以太坊上的 meme

喜欢:僵尸/假人活动相对较少的网络和应用程序,消费者应用程序的创新和发展轨迹

Steph

获利最多:PEPE

亏损最多:MARBLES

持有:BITCOIN (HPOS 10), TIA, ETH, BTC, SOL

喜欢:基础设施和 MEME

Kel

获利最多:SOL

亏损最多:没有尽快的出售 ETH

持有:SOL, Solana 生态代币 , NFTs, LIKE

喜欢:Solana 生态系统项目。代币估值在短期内可能过热,但现实情况是,大多数人只是在最近才对 Solana 产生好感,我预计这类人群将在中长期内进一步流入。

Seth

获利最多:RNDR, SOL

亏损最多:ALCX

持有:BTC, ETH, SOL, RNDR, LPT

喜欢:将链外计算和状态引入链上应用,密钥管理基础设施。

Toe

获利最多:AKT

亏损最多:HAMS

持有:AKT, TAO, SOL + Solana ecosystem, DYDX

喜欢:DePIN 找到产品与市场的契合点、Solana 协议与新图表、衍生品 DEX(VRTX、AEVO、Hyperliquid)、ZK 协处理器、一些 DeFi(Ethena Labs、OSMO、SOMM)。

Mihai

获利最多:RNDR, SOL

亏损最多:ATOM

持有:BTC, ETH, SOL, RNDR

喜欢:零知识机器学习、密钥管理解决方案,扩展解决方案。

JTVL

获利最多:GBTC

亏损最多:ATOM, not riding the RWA train

持有:BTC, ETH, SNX, PENDLE, LBR, GNS, LINK, LQTY

喜欢:RWA 和 LST 带来更多的链上收益率,LSTFi 和 永续 DEX 仍将是增长领域,尤其是后者价格合理。将您的财富以 Satoshis 计价,拥抱价值储存。

Nick

获利最多:AKT

亏损最多:SYN

持有:AKT, DYDX, ILV, SYN

喜欢:移动应用、EIP-4844、ETH 链抽象、重定向和 LST 以及与选举有关的 MEME 币。

Peter

获利最多:SOL, Mad Lads

亏损最多:老板的 friend.tech key

持有:SOL, BONK, ETH, COIN

喜欢:Solana 生态

Red

获利最多:COIN

亏损最多:XMR

持有:BTC, ETH, XMR

喜欢:Alt-VM 以太坊 Roll up,用于捕获以太坊用户和流动性,而不受 EVM 的影响。比特币可编程性,用于开发者实验和信任最小化的比特币流动性访问,人工智能引领 DePIN 叙事。

Micah

获利最多:COIN, PEPE

亏损最多:LYX

持有:BTC, ETH, SOL, AKT, RNDR, LYX, $COIN

喜欢:ZK--处理器、永续合约、比特币可编程性、账户抽象。

AJC

获利最多:BTC

亏损最多:Chasing meme coins

持有:BTC, ETH, LINK, ARB, Milady, WINR, GMX, GRAIL

喜欢:SocialFi/声誉层(friend.tech)、永续合约和链上期权 从 CEXs 抢占市场份额、资本从以太坊流向 Arbitrum 生态系统和 Dencun 升级之后的其他 L2s、BTC 和 ETH 的 ETF 批准,以及 GambleFi

Mike

获利最多:BTC.D and Remilia NFTs

亏损最多: friend.tech keys

持有:BTC, ETH, SOL, Remilia NFTs

喜欢:新周期代币: TAO、TIA 和 SOL。

加密货币文化不断获胜: Remilia NFTs 和 SocialFi / Gambling(博彩) / 预测市场 2.0 (都是一回事)。

Leituras Relacionadas

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

This text explores the unexpected connection between Pinduoduo founder Colin Huang and blockchain, as suggested in his article *Turning Capitalism Upside Down*. Huang argues Pinduoduo's core business is about managing "uncertainty." He posits that wealth flows to the rich because they absorb life's uncertainties (e.g., illness, job loss) that devastate the poor, who pay a premium for certainty through insurance or stable prices. Pinduoduo's model attempts a "reverse insurance": by aggregating consumer demand via group-buying and flash sales, it creates a large, predictable order for manufacturers. This certainty allows factories to remove risk premiums, passing savings back as lower prices, thus partially reversing the wealth flow. The key obstacle, Huang notes, is that an individual's buying intent is an unreliable promise. He then asks if blockchain is the natural solution for this "reverse insurance." The text elaborates that blockchain, through smart contracts with binding deposits, could transform casual intent into a costly-to-break, enforceable commitment. This replaces interpersonal trust with coded rules, making promises credible, pricable, and resistant to fraud. Finally, the author draws a parallel to Bitcoin, framing two paths to creating certainty: the "Pinduoduo path" of aggregating decentralized will into scale, and the "Bitcoin path" of locking rules into immutable code. Both sacrifice something—personal freedom or system flexibility—to manufacture trust and predictability.

链捕手Há 1h

What's the Connection Between Pinduoduo's Huang Zheng and Blockchain?

链捕手Há 1h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

**Summary:** "The Memory Magnate Who Built a Trillion-Dollar Empire, Yet Never Became the Richest" explores the journey of Zhu Yiming, founder of GigaDevice (603986) and co-founder of the soon-to-IPO ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT). The article positions GigaDevice, a fabless chip designer now valued at ~¥340 billion, as a prequel to the massive IDM (Integrated Device Manufacturer) venture, CXMT. Starting in 2005 with minimal capital, Zhu strategically "picked up the pieces" by focusing on niche markets like NOR Flash and microcontrollers (MCUs), areas major players were exiting. This allowed GigaDevice to grow into a diversified semiconductor company, maintaining robust profitability even during industry downturns by controlling costs. However, the piece argues that in the highly cyclical and capital-intensive memory chip industry, the fabless model has limits. True resilience and scale require the ability for "counter-cyclical expansion" – investing heavily during downturns – a tactic only possible for IDMs like Samsung or SK Hynix. This insight led Zhu to partner with the Hefei city government in 2016 to establish CXMT, an IDM focused on DRAM. Zhu's symbolic moves, like forfeiting salary and diluting his equity, were crucial in securing the massive state and bank funding needed. CXMT's equipment base is now valued even higher than that of BYD's vast auto manufacturing empire. Despite the potential for CXMT to reach a market cap of ¥1-2 trillion upon its IPO, Zhu's indirect stake in both companies is estimated below 3%, placing his personal wealth far below that of China's top billionaires. The article concludes that his strategic vision built a trillion-yuan memory landscape, but the capital structure necessary to achieve it precluded a personal fortune of similar scale.

marsbitHá 1h

The Storage Magnate Who Conquered a Trillion-Dollar Kingdom, Yet Ultimately Could Not Become the Richest

marsbitHá 1h

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

The XRP Ledger is drawing attention as daily network fees have fallen below $400. While low fees align with XRPL's design for affordable transactions and are often seen as a strength, the metric can also serve as an indicator of network demand and paid transaction volume. This data point of around $3,100 in weekly fee burn highlights the stark contrast with higher-fee chains like Ethereum and Bitcoin. The development fuels an ongoing debate. Proponents view low fees as a sign of efficiency and accessibility, while critics may question if the network is generating sufficient high-value activity relative to its market cap and payments-focused narrative. The article cautions against overstating the finding, noting a single low-fee day does not signify network failure. It instead adds context to discussions about XRPL's usage, especially alongside Ripple's broader initiatives in stablecoins (RLUSD), AI payments, and enterprise infrastructure. The report recommends monitoring for a fee rebound, checking transaction counts for a fuller picture, and confirming the trend via native explorers like Bithomp. It frames the story within a larger market shift where on-chain data, protocol updates, and infrastructure developments are becoming crucial alongside price action. The editorial stance is to present the verified data, explain its significance for assessing network activity, and avoid hype, positioning it as part of the daily crypto conversation.

bitcoinistHá 5h

XRP Ledger Daily Fees Drop Below $400 As Network Activity Question Returns

bitcoinistHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片