UK Finance Ministry to Discuss Crypto Banking Woes With Lawmakers

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-12-18Última atualização em 2023-12-19

Resumo

Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt said U.K., and London in particular, has become "the global crypto hub."

U.K.'s Finance Minister Jeremy Hunt on Tuesday agreed to have his ministry discuss banking troubles faced by crypto companies in the country with lawmakers focused on the issue.

In line with Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's plans to turn the country into a hub for crypto, the U.K. introduced and passed legislation that recognizes crypto and stablecoins as regulated financial activities. Despite crypto's new regulatory status in the country, firms have found it difficult to interact with local banks.

9.9K

Lisa Cameron, head of an All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) for crypto and digital assets, asked Hunt on Tuesday if he'd be willing to discuss why regulated companies are struggling to open bank accounts.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"The U.K., London in particular, has become the global crypto hub, but to make sure that the market really can take off in the way that was intended in a responsible way, we need to regulate it, which is why we've introduced regulations for stablecoins, for promotion of crypto services," Hunt replied.

He agreed to have the new Economic Secretary of the Treasury, Bim Afolami, meet with the APPG to discuss progress.

Camomile Shumba contributed reporting.

Edited by Nikhilesh De.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

"Why DeFi Insurance Remains Unpurchased" explores the paradox of decentralized finance insurance. While DeFi insurance promises automatic, unbiased payouts via smart contracts—eliminating traditional insurers' denial practices—it struggles to attract users. The core issue is economic viability. Premiums are prohibitively high relative to the yields from DeFi protocols. For example, insuring a deposit on Aave or Maple Finance can consume most or even all of the annual yield, leaving returns comparable to or worse than traditional savings. Only the safest protocols, like MakerDAO, offer affordable premiums. Furthermore, the DeFi insurance model is structurally fragile. Unlike traditional insurance where risks are uncorrelated, DeFi risks are highly interconnected (e.g., oracle failures, bridge hacks). A single major exploit can simultaneously threaten multiple protocols, potentially bankrupting the entire insurance pool, which holds only millions against billions in total value locked. The governance model also creates a conflict of interest. In platforms like Nexus Mutual, token holders who vote on claims risk their own capital if payouts are approved, incentivizing denials. Consequently, the market is tiny and shrinking. Nexus Mutual dominates with $81.56 million in assets, but the industry lacks the capacity to cover a catastrophic event like the $292M Kelp DAO hack. Other providers have dwindled or shut down. The article concludes that DeFi insurance faces a "tragedy of the commons": its stability requires widespread adoption, but individual users have no incentive to pay for it, as premiums destroy their yields. Current solutions involve preventative measures like bug bounties and seeking external capital from traditional reinsurance, acknowledging that on-chain capital alone is insufficient to cover on-chain risks.

marsbitHá 2h

Why Is No One Buying DeFi Insurance?

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片