Financial Regulators Reiterate Call for Legislation to Address Crypto Risks

CoinDeskPolicyPublicado em 2023-12-13Última atualização em 2023-12-14

Resumo

The Financial Stability Oversight Council met Thursday, releasing a report detailing all of its concerns from the past year.

Congress still needs to pass legislation to address concerns the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC) has about crypto, a new report by the intragovernmental group said Thursday.

FSOC, a financial stability watchdog composed of the heads of most major U.S. financial regulators, published its annual report after one of the group's meetings, taking a look at the past year in climate, banking, cybersecurity, artificial intelligence and other issues. As it has in years past, crypto received a section.

10

The council is recommending that Congress pass legislation defining and addressing crypto spot markets, as well as stablecoins. These are the same recommendations FSOC had at the end of 2022, the report noted.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"The Council urges Congress to pass legislation that provides federal financial regulators with explicit rulemaking authority over the spot market for crypto-assets that are not securities. Congress should also pass legislation that would create a comprehensive prudential framework for stablecoin issuers that would also address the associated market integrity, investor and consumer protection, and payment risks."

The House of Representatives has two bills addressing these issues sitting before it, after Financial Services Committee Chair Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) secured enough support to move these two bills out of committee.

It's unclear whether these bills will make it to a Senate vote. While McHenry reportedly tried to get the bills into annual must-pass defense legislation, Congress ultimately did not include any crypto provisions in this year's National Defense Authorization Act.

But as it did last year, FSOC said regulators may need to act if there is no Confessional action.

"The Council remains prepared to consider steps available to it to address risks related to stablecoins in the event comprehensive legislation is not enacted," the report said.

Vulnerability concerns

Thursday's report flagged vulnerabilities like price volatility, a huge amount of leverage within the industry, cybersecurity and other risks to investors and financial markets as some of the group's concerns around crypto.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The report mentioned this year's Curve Finance hack, which saw the protocol lose $50 million. Though Curve later regained 73% of those funds, the report said one of the major concerns was that the loans backed by CRV might fall apart with the loss of so much collateral.

"The drop in CRV’s price reportedly put over $100 million worth of loans taken out by Curve Finance’s founder at risk of being liquidated on other decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms," the report said. "Given that DeFi protocols sell underlying collateral in the market if a user is unable to maintain their position, platforms holding CRV as collateral were at risk of experiencing significant losses if the loans liquidated and the price of CRV continually declined."

The report also continued to mention concerns about investor protections and market integrity, saying some companies may be operating outside existing law.

Stablecoins, which have long been a concern for finance regulators in the U.S., received its own subsection in the report.

"if a stablecoin were to scale significantly, a run on the stablecoin could lead to fire sales of the traditional assets backing the stablecoin like bank deposits, MMFs, Treasury securities, and commercial markets is also small relative to the crypto-asset market and the traditional financial system," the report said as one example.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Another section of the report focused on nonbank financial institutions, which are becoming increasingly active and must be monitored for potential risks, the report said.

Edited by Aoyon Ashraf.

Leituras Relacionadas

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

DeepSeek has updated its DeepSeek V4 model with the DSpark speculative decoding framework, achieving a significant 60-85% speedup in generation for Flash models and 57-78% for Pro models while maintaining the same overall throughput. This engineering-focused update, rather than a core architectural change, introduces DSpark to address latency and throughput bottlenecks in high-concurrency production environments. DSpark combines high-throughput parallel generation with adaptive load-aware verification. Its key innovations include a semi-autoregressive generation architecture to model dependencies within token blocks and a hardware-aware confidence-scheduled verification system. This system uses a confidence head to predict token acceptance probabilities, allowing it to dynamically optimize verification length per request and allocate compute only to tokens with the highest expected payoff. The asynchronous scheduler is designed for real-world deployment, ensuring zero-overhead scheduling and continuous CUDA graph replay while preserving the target model's output distribution. In tests across mathematical reasoning, code generation, and daily dialogue, DSpark outperformed state-of-the-art models like Eagle3 and DFlash, increasing average acceptance length by 26.7%-30.9% and 16.3%-18.4% respectively on Qwen3 target models. DeepSeek also open-sourced DeepSpec, a full-stack codebase for training and evaluating speculative decoding draft models, providing a standardized toolkit that includes data preparation tools, model implementations, training code, and evaluation scripts.

marsbitHá 3h

Just now, DeepSeek V4 updates with DSpark, improving inference speed by 80%

marsbitHá 3h

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

The Bitcoin mining industry is undergoing its most complex structural adjustment since inception. Despite Bitcoin's price holding near $61,000 and the network hash rate approaching a record 1 ZH/s, miner profitability is deteriorating. The industry is operating close to its breakeven point, with the 2028 halving expected to accelerate consolidation. The challenges extend beyond the halving's subsidy reduction; the industry's revenue model has yet to successfully transition towards a fee-driven structure. Increasingly, mining companies are evolving from simple Bitcoin producers into infrastructure and energy operators, including providers of AI/HPC computing power. Competition is shifting from pure hash rate expansion to business model upgrades. Economic pressure is evident. The theoretical daily mining revenue at current prices is around $78 million, yet the actual figure is only about $33 million—a 136% gap. Transaction fees remain low at roughly $220k daily, far below historical implied levels. With a current estimated industry-wide breakeven price near $65,000, mining alone is struggling to generate ideal profits. The 2028 halving is projected to push the fundamental production cost floor to approximately $93,289. This will likely accelerate a shift towards consolidation among larger, well-capitalized miners with diversified revenue streams. Competitive advantage will belong to institutionalized players with access to low-cost energy, AI/HPC hosting operations, and stronger balance sheets. In essence, Bitcoin mining is transitioning from a "mining business" to an "infrastructure business." Future profitability and resilience will depend less on block rewards and more on diversified income sources like energy management and computational infrastructure services. For investors, the key question is not the halving itself, but which miners can successfully navigate this business model transformation.

marsbitHá 4h

BIT Research: The 2028 Halving Is Not the End, the Real Shake-Up of the Bitcoin Mining Industry Is Just Beginning

marsbitHá 4h

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

Andrej Karpathy, a prominent figure in AI, has reportedly joined Anthropic, leading to a noticeable decrease in his open-source contributions and social media activity. A document claiming to be his personal "CLAUDE.md" file—a set of instructions for the Claude AI to follow within a specific codebase—has been circulating online. While its authenticity is unverified, the content aligns closely with Karpathy's publicly shared principles on effective AI-assisted programming. The document outlines key rules for AI coding assistants, emphasizing the importance of reading existing code thoroughly before writing new code to maintain consistency. It advises against over-engineering, advocating for simple, surgical modifications that match the project's existing style. Other guidelines include clarifying assumptions upfront, writing meaningful tests, thoughtful debugging, and carefully considering dependencies. The core message is that these principles help prevent common AI coding failures, such as introducing unnecessary abstractions, style drift, or making invisible architectural decisions. The community has noted that even experts like Karpathy require detailed instructions to guide AI effectively, akin to managing a junior developer. A related GitHub repository, "andrej-karpathy-skills," which encapsulates these ideas, is reported to significantly reduce Claude's code error rate. Ultimately, the advice stresses that the best CLAUDE.md is tailored to one's own tech stack and coding practices.

marsbitHá 4h

This is How God Karpathy Uses Claude?

marsbitHá 4h

Trading

Spot
活动图片