Here’s what made Splinterlands the most active blockchain game

cryptoslatePublicado em 2022-04-24Última atualização em 2022-04-24

Resumo

Since its launch in 2018, Splinterlands’ success demonstrates the game’s potential and its huge appeal to gamers.

Since its launch in 2018, Splinterlands’ success demonstrates the game’s potential and its huge appeal to gamers. As of April 12, Splinterlands ranked first in daily active users and averaged over 350,000 daily users, about 100,000 users ahead of the second place Alien Worlds.

In Splinterlands, players can participate in the game for only $10, which is a low barrier to entry compared to similar games. Players can earn income by playing games, trading cards, leasing and staking, and can quickly compete with other players to produce scarce and valuable NFTs. 

Here’s how Splinterlands became so active in an industry where most projects struggle for regular users. 

About Splinterlands

Splinterlands is a turn-based card battling game on the Hive chain. 

Players have their own series of cards with different attributes and abilities, and they can combine different decks to play against other players, with each match taking only 2 to 3 minutes. After winning a battle, users are rewarded with cards and $DEC.

Cards can be used in battle, upgraded, sold or rented to other players, and rare cards have greater collector value.

Screenshot Source - Splinterlands Website

Screenshot Source – Splinterlands Website

According to Footprint Analytics, as of April 12, Splinterlands ranks number one with more than 350,000 daily active users, leaving the second, third titles far behind.

Footprint Analytics - Top 10 Games Ranking by Players（Latest 5 days）

Footprint Analytics – Top 10 Games Ranking by Players（Latest 5 days）

Why is Spinterlands so Playable?

After July 2021, witness the unprecedented growth of Splinterlands as the trading card game becomes popular in the Metaverse. According to Footprint Analytics data, the number of users and transactions has gradually increased and stabilized.

Footprint Analytics -  Splinterlands Transaction Trend & Users Trend

Footprint Analytics –  Splinterlands Transaction Trend & Users Trend

Splinterlands single-handedly promoted the development of Hive, mainly due to the following factors: 

Simple and varied gameplay 

Splinterlands’ gameplay is simple and varied. The game has a low barrier to entry, with players needing only $10 to participate and the ability to earn in the game. Here’s how:

  • Complete daily tasks to earn rewards. Winning five games as required will give you a chance to open a treasure chest with random rewards such as $DEC or cards. Currently, bronze (there are 6 league levels in the game, Bronze is the second level in the game league and the highest is the 6th championship level) can only open one treasure chest per day. The higher the level, the more rewards you can open to complete the task.
  • Participate in qualifying. Players can get Dark Energy Crystals ($DEC) rewards by participating in ranked matches. But entry requires paying some $DEC as a ticket, and even beginners and seasoned players can improve their skills in qualifying.
  • Sell cards. Each card is unique and can be traded on the marketplace. The higher the level of the card, the better the stats obtained; when the maximum value is reached, the card can gain special abilities.
  • Card rental. After collecting a large number of cards, players can rent them out to other players to earn revenue, while still maintaining ownership of the cards.
  • Pledge $SPS for proceeds.
  • There are also land sales and land leases.

Therefore, every player who enters the game has a different goal, it can be earning money, entering a championship, league, collecting cards or just for fun.

Card NFTization

Splinterlands NFTs various cards to increase card liquidity, solving the problem that some card games do not allow players to trade or sell game assets to other players.

Fast battle speed, at only 2 to 3 minutes per game

Splinterlands has more room for innovation, such as the land-based metaverse world, supporting players to create guilds (the threshold for entering guilds is currently high, and you need to reach a certain point ranking to enter), building castles, and creating a more innovative metaverse space.

Splinterlands of Tokenomics

Splinterlands uses a dual coin model, with $SPS as the governance token and $DEC as the game token.

$SPS

$SPS is used as a governance token, whose value represents the value of the game. The role of $SPS is mainly for community governance voting, in-game rewards, and obtaining pledge rewards. The most influential one is the governance vote, where the holder pledges the $SPS token to participate in the vote and decide changes in the project.

According to Footprint Analytics data, the overall price of $SPS has not changed much in the past 3 months, hovering above $0.1. 

Footprint Analytics - $SPS Token Price & Trading Volume

Footprint Analytics – $SPS Token Price & Trading Volume

From the market cap trend of $SPS, price fluctuations help the total market value of all its cards to increase or decrease.

Footprint Analytics - $SPS Market Cap
Footprint Analytics - $SPS Market Cap

Footprint Analytics – $SPS Market Cap

$DEC

$DEC is mainly used for in-game purchases of various card packs, props, lands, improving personal rankings, etc. It is similar to Axie Infinity’s token $SLP. It can be obtained in the following two ways:

  • By winning matches and completing missions. 
  • By purchasing it outside the game.

With $DEC, more cards can be purchased, thus increasing the player’s win rate in battle and gaining more rare cards and battle rewards.

Summary

Splinterlands has become the game project with the most active users in GameFi, having a low barrier to entry, simple gameplay, fast combat speed, and a unique reward system.

Leituras Relacionadas

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbitHá 1h

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbitHá 1h

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbitHá 1h

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbitHá 1h

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbitHá 1h

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbitHá 1h

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbitHá 1h

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbitHá 1h

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow