Crypto VC Investment Drops 70% In One Year: Report

CointelegraphPublicado em 2023-07-03Última atualização em 2023-07-03

Resumo

Venture capital investments in cryptocurrency companies have plummeted over 70% over the past 365 days, according to information published by RootData, a crypto data provider. During the month of June 2022, the digital asset space received $1.81 billion in 149 rounds, whereas this year, only 83 projects registered $520 million—the lowest funded month to date.

Venture capital investments in cryptocurrency companies have plummeted over 70% over the past 365 days, according to information published by RootData, a crypto data provider. During the month of June 2022, the digital asset space received $1.81 billion in 149 rounds, whereas this year, only 83 projects registered $520 million—the lowest funded month to date.

The RootData numbers show a clear downtrend for VC’s interested in the digital asset space, despite several in-between months that managed increases. September 2022 was the highest on record, for example, with $1.85 billion in funding, investing in a second-best 138 rounds. And June last year had the most recipients, with 149 rounds.

Crypto fundraising trends. Source: RootData

According to the data platform, the infrastructure category leads the way, with $213 million in funding last month for 26 projects. This still represents a nearly 50% drop from the previous month, in which 28 projects received $410 million.

Gensyn AI, a UK based startup was the category’s winner, with a whopping $43 million in a Series A round led by a16z crypto.

CeFi, or centralized finance—which features companies like OPNX and Chiliz—is the second most funded category, receiving $101 million, generating nearly 20% of all financing. Games slid in at third, with $62 million, more than half of which flowed into Mythical Games, which raised $37 million in its Series C1. DeFi and NFT’s round off the list of categories, in that order.

Over the past year, Ethereum had 1,826 projects funded, followed from afar by Polygon (MATIC), with 1,076 funding rounds. Separated by location, the United States received 34% of funding—the most by any single nation on their list–although that appears ripe for a change.

The platform names Coinbase Ventures as the most active VC, having participated in 71 rounds this past year, followed by Hashkey Capital and Shima Capital, funding 54 and 49 projects respectively.

The former high flying crypto asset class has taken a back seat to other investments–namely artificial intelligence.

In a previous interview with Decrypt, Mysten Labs co-founder and CEO Evan Cheng said this shift is due to the ability of AI products and applications to cater to a broader audience while the crypto industry continues to focus on itself.

Cheng considers AI, however, to be complementary with Web3—Justin Sun’s newly launched $100 million AI development fund is one such example.

Diminished interest from venture capitalists in the crypto asset space could be due to a variety of other reasons as well. The dismal actions by companies such as FTX and Terra might be to blame, along with the banking turmoil that took down all four of the “crypto friendly banks.” Adding to the mix is the recent regulatory clampdown occurring in the United States, the country that has nonetheless led the way for crypto investments.

Leituras Relacionadas

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

"Tokenizing Real Estate: Rights, Risks, and the Path to Liquidity" While tokenizing real-world assets (RWA) gains traction, real estate presents unique complexities. Beyond technical token issuance, critical challenges remain: enforcing legal rights, managing the underlying physical asset, and creating genuine secondary market liquidity. This article explores these issues through OneAsset, a Dubai-based commercial real estate (CRE) tokenization platform. OneAsset moves away from simply offering asset fragmentation. Instead, it focuses on institutional-grade infrastructure, prioritizing asset quality, legal enforceability, and operational fundamentals. Each property is held in an independent, single-asset vault, backed by a legally separate Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) for bankruptcy remoteness. Investors acquire tokens representing the economic rights to a specific property, with precise legal claims defined by the underlying SPV structure. OneAsset emphasizes that tokenization cannot transform a poor-quality asset. Its initial focus is on institutional investors and quality Dubai-based CRE, selected for stable tenant cash flows and a clear regulatory environment. The platform integrates compliance by design, aiming to embed investor qualification and transfer rules directly into the token architecture. A core insight is that asset fragmentation does not automatically create liquidity. True liquidity depends on the asset's inherent quality—its location, cash flow, and valuation—as well as sufficient buyer demand. The goal is not just tradability, but making real estate rights more easily priced, verified, and reallocated. Looking ahead, the article discusses the potential for "AiFi" (AI-powered finance). For AI agents to autonomously allocate capital, investment assets like real estate tokens must become truly "machine-readable." This requires a high degree of standardization in legal rights, valuations, cash flows, and compliance data—a direction OneAsset is pursuing through its structured data reporting. In conclusion, real estate tokenization is shifting from a technology narrative to a focus on asset fundamentals. Blockchain can enhance efficiency and programmability, but it cannot replace sound underwriting, property management, or legal execution. The real work begins after the asset is on-chain.

marsbitHá 23m

When Real Estate Ownership Goes Digital: What Happens to Your Rights, Risks, and Liquidity?

marsbitHá 23m

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

After more than two decades, a legal parallel has emerged. In 1998, major U.S. tobacco companies settled for $206 billion, leading to strict advertising bans and warning labels that significantly reduced smoking rates. On August 26, 2026, Meta reached a landmark settlement with U.S. attorneys general, agreeing to pay up to approximately $18 billion and implement mandatory changes to Facebook and Instagram. This historic settlement, one of the largest against a tech company, stems from allegations that Meta deliberately designed addictive features like infinite scroll and push notifications, harming youth mental health and violating child privacy laws. Facing a potential $1.4 trillion lawsuit and a series of unfavorable jury verdicts, Meta chose to settle on the eighth day of trial to avoid a catastrophic ruling. The core of the agreement is not just the financial penalty, which Meta will pay over 10 years, but a series of strict, 10-year product mandates for young users. These include a hard two-hour daily time limit (combined across apps), a default "nighttime block" from midnight to 6 AM, restricted notifications during school hours, hidden "like" counts, an optional non-algorithmic feed, and stronger age verification. An independent auditor will monitor compliance. Crucially, roughly 30% ($5.3 billion) of Meta's payment is contingent on YouTube and TikTok adopting similar measures and paying around $5 billion each. This move aims to create an industry-wide standard and prevent Meta from being competitively disadvantaged. The settlement is being likened to Big Tobacco's "tobacco moment." By legally framing addictive algorithm design as a "public nuisance," it sets a powerful precedent. Nearly 3,000 similar cases are pending against other social media giants, signaling a fundamental shift in regulatory pressure. The era where platforms could deny the addictive impact of their designs on children is effectively over.

marsbitHá 29m

After Affecting Two Generations, Meta Ordered to Pay $18 Billion in Damages

marsbitHá 29m

Trading

Spot
活动图片