长推:详细解读SEC的起诉CZ的文件内容

MarsBitPublicado em 2023-06-06Última atualização em 2023-06-06

Resumo

起诉的目标是3家Binance的实体+CZ本人

注:本文来自@Loki_Zeng 推特,其是@Foresight_News专栏作者,原推文内容由MarsBit整理如下:
找到了SEC的起诉文件
https://courtlistener.com/docket/67474542/v-securities-and-exchange-commission/

binance


描述:美国证券交易委员会提交了针对 BAM MANAGEMENT US HOLDINGS INC.、BAM TRADING SERVICES LIMITED、BINANCE HOLDINGS LIMITED、CHANNGPENG ZHAO 的投诉,即起诉的目标是3家Binance的实体+CZ本人
第一项指控:Binance在CZ的领导下提供证券的三项核心服务:交易所、经纪-交易商、清算。Binance意识到按照美国法律从事这些业务需要注册,但选择了不注册,以逃脱监管。
第二项指控:Binance and BAM Trading非法提供和销售未注册证券,包括BNB Vault、Staking、Simple Earn。用户没有完全获取实际信息,包括潜在的风险。
注:这一条指控类似之前对Gemini的指控
第三项指控:Binance and BAM Trading对Binance US做出了虚假称述。并藉此获得了大约2亿美元的投资和数十亿美元的交易额。

binance


SEC认为,Binance从2018年开始通过一个多步计划逃脱美国监管。 Binance CCO承认:【我们永远不希望Binance受到监管】

binance


Binance成立了BAM Management 和BAM Trading两家主体用于Binance US的运营。尽管名义上独立,但CZ和Binance仍保持对Binance US的控制直到2020年11月。
BAM Trading 的时任CEO曾向Binance的CFO表示,【整个团队(BAM Trading)被当成了傀儡】

binance


SEC认为尽管自19年US站成立后,Binance一直在宣成Binance主站 不服务美国用户,并采取了相关措施避免。
但在实际行动上,CZ指示币安秘密协助某些【高净值用户】摆脱限制。
SEC认为CZ的目的是【不会使得监管找麻烦】的同时【减少损失】

binance


这种做法使得数十亿美国投资者的资金被置于风险之中,由Binance和CZ直接控制。
Binance和CZ拥有自由转移资金的能力,它们也这样做了,例如,2个平台(Binance US和Binance)的资金被转移到同一个实体(Merit Peak Limited),并在之后转移到了第三方地址。

binance


注:这解释了之前【币安混合用户资金】的传闻,关键点不在于【用户资金】,而在于这些资金属于Binance US的美国投资人。
第10条是对CZ的谴责,不重要。
BAM Trading and BAM Management声称监控(上文没说是什么监控)是为了避免Binance US上的市场操纵行为。

binance


但SEC认为BAM Trading and BAM Management未能实施有效的交易监视或操纵交易控制(按照这里说的,前文的【监控】应该指的是合规层面的内控工作)。
SEC认为那些有效的措施都不存在,存在的都是无效的措施。

binance


至少能够确定的一点是:CZ控制的Sigma Chain AG在Binance在2019-2022年期间从事虚假交易,夸大了Binance US的交易量。
SEC最后总结:
依据《证券法》和《交易法》,CZ和上述的几家公司违反并将继续违反:
1)发行和销售未注册证券
2)在Binance平台上影响未注册证券的交易
3)组合核心证券市场功能并故意逃避登记
4)明显违反利益冲突原则
注:有说法称是13条指控,指的是SEC一共总结了13条,不是说有13条罪名
相关主体架构

binance


Binance2019年的内部报告显示其有147万名美国用户,有3500名【VIP】,这些VIP提供了大量的交易量和流动性

binance


接下来详细介绍了Binance的顾问和CZ的规避方法,包括让美国使用VPN、使用新的KYC等... 到2021年5月,美国VIP仍占据币安VIP交易量的63%。

binance


SIGMA CHAIN的刷量占比,最高占到日交易量的35.5%

binance


详情中还提到了发行的BNB和BUSD都是未注册证券,CZ的许多公开发言甚至6年前的论坛发言也被当做佐证的一部分.
除了BUSD和BNB以外,Binance和Binance US还提供其它【未注册证券】的交易,包括: SOL/ADA/Matic等

binance


总结:性质上还是民事诉讼,最坏情况就是关停Binance US,Binance主站彻底退出US市场,并且罚款。
关于理财/Staking认定为证券可以参考Coinbase/Gemini的案子。
如果这几项指控成立,罚金预计不会低,但大概率也就仅此而已。
补充另外一个维度的数据:2022财年SEC共发起760项执法行动,下令支付总额为64.39亿美元。

binance


关于1100万美元的游艇:原文说的是在2021年,至少145M资金从BAM Trading转到Sigma Chain,另外45M资金从信托账户转到Sigma Chain。
然后SigmaChain用1100万美元买了游艇。没有一句话表明这1100万是客户的钱,拿自己/自己实控公司的钱买游艇有啥问题?

binance

Leituras Relacionadas

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

The stock price of Marvell Technology surged 32.5% on June 2nd, driven by NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang highlighting its custom ASICs and optical interconnects as core to AI data center architecture. This event brought attention to the Chinese semiconductor family behind Marvell: the Dai siblings. The story centers on three siblings, all UC Berkeley graduates, whose three-decade entrepreneurial journey aligns with major semiconductor industry shifts. In 1995, youngest sister Dai Wei Li co-founded Marvell with her husband Sehat Sutardja and his brother, focusing on storage controllers. Eldest brother Dai Wei Min founded EDA company Ultima, later sold to Cadence, and later founded VeriSilicon (芯原) in China, becoming a leading semiconductor IP provider. Second brother Dai Wei Jin co-founded EDA firm Silicon Perspective (sold to Cadence) and GPU IP company Vivante, later acquired by VeriSilicon. The combined "Dai-Sutardja" family network extends beyond Marvell. Their ventures and investments form a comprehensive ecosystem for the post-Moore's Law, chiplet era. Key holdings include: Dream Big Semiconductor (AI SuperNICs, acquired by Arm), Alphawave (high-speed SerDes IP, acquired by Qualcomm), and Silicon Box (a chiplet advanced packaging foundry). VeriSilicon itself thrives on the AI ASIC and IP boom in China. Collectively, the family's AI infrastructure-related portfolio is estimated at over $22 billion. Their strategy represents a distinct path: building critical components for open standards and key manufacturing capacity in the chiplet era, rather than pursuing standalone AI chip dominance. While this path may not create the next NVIDIA, it has enabled repeated successful exits and sustained influence within the global semiconductor industry.

marsbitHá 59m

After Marvell's 32% Surge, the Chinese Chip Family Behind It Emerges

marsbitHá 59m

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

Microsoft, once the defining force of the PC era, now faces a familiar challenge in the AI age: the risk of being relegated to a profitable but invisible infrastructure provider. This anxiety was laid bare at Build 2026, where CEO Satya Nadella unveiled a major strategic pivot. The catalyst was a quiet April agreement that dissolved Microsoft's exclusive licensing and cloud-hosting deal with OpenAI, its once-vital partner. This erased Microsoft's key AI moat. With OpenAI and Anthropic defining AI applications and gaining enterprise traction—even within Microsoft's own ranks—Nadella had to answer: without exclusivity, what is Microsoft's role? The answer was a suite of seven in-house AI models, a developer-focused AI workstation (Surface RTX Spark Dev Box), and, most crucially, the Agent 365 platform for enterprise AI governance. The models, notably targeting Anthropic's strengths in coding and enterprise, signal a defensive move. However, the broader strategy is to make the models themselves less decisive. Financially, Microsoft's AI revenue is strong, driven largely by Azure running others' models. Yet its user-facing products like Copilot show weak penetration and engagement. Microsoft earns infrastructure money but lacks direct user mindshare. Nadella's core fear is being "hollowed out." As OpenAI and Anthropic prepare for IPOs and gain financial independence, they may build their own infrastructure, threatening Azure's lucrative AI revenue stream. Microsoft's window is to entrench itself deeper: not as the model creator, but as the indispensable platform for securely deploying, managing, and governing all AI models within the enterprise through Agent 365. Build 2026 revealed Microsoft's bet: in the AI era, the ultimate power lies not in any single model, but in the enterprise "operating system" that controls them. Nadella is determined to ensure Microsoft is the driver of this new era, not just a passenger.

marsbitHá 1h

Microsoft is Afraid of Being Marginalized by AI Giants

marsbitHá 1h

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

Over the past three years, AI computing power narratives have been dominated by GPUs. However, starting in 2026, this story began to shift. While training large models remains GPU-intensive, the rapid growth of inference and AI agent workloads, which require high levels of task orchestration, concurrency, and data flow management, has highlighted a renewed critical role for CPUs. These are tasks GPUs are not designed to handle. Intel's recent launch of the Xeon 6+ processor, built on its Intel 18A process and featuring up to 288 efficiency cores (E-cores), exemplifies this strategic pivot. It is positioned not as a mere companion to GPUs but as the essential "control plane" for AI infrastructure, optimized for high-density, energy-efficient, and high-throughput workloads characteristic of AI agents and inference. This "CPU resurgence" is not about CPUs outperforming GPUs in raw computation. It reflects a systemic bottleneck: as AI scales from training single models to deploying countless intelligent agents, the demand for coordination and data handling surges. Major cloud providers are also developing their own high-density ARM-based server CPUs for similar workloads. However, Intel's success with this strategy faces significant challenges. Competition includes NVIDIA's integrated CPU-GPU solutions, the expanding adoption of cloud vendors' in-house ARM CPUs, and the crucial market test of Intel's 18A manufacturing process against rivals like TSMC's N2. In conclusion, CPUs are indeed reclaiming a central, though redefined, role in AI compute—managing the complex orchestration that enables massive-scale AI deployment. While the trend is clear, which company will ultimately lead this CPU resurgence remains an open question to be decided in the data centers of 2027 and beyond.

marsbitHá 1h

CPU, Quietly Returning to the Center of the AI Computing Power Stage

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片