US DOJ Bitcoin Sales Spark Concern From US Senator

bitcoinistPublicado a 2026-01-07Actualizado a 2026-01-07

Resumen

US Senator Cynthia Lummis expressed deep alarm after the US Department of Justice transferred and likely sold approximately 57.55 BTC (worth around $6.3 million) seized in a criminal case. The action contradicts a 2025 executive order by the President directing the creation of a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and requiring seized bitcoin to be held, not sold. Blockchain data showed the bitcoin was sent to a Coinbase Prime wallet and later liquidated. Lummis, who chairs a Senate subcommittee on digital assets, questioned the move and called for greater policy clarity and transparency. The incident has sparked broader questions about the government’s handling of seized crypto assets.

US Senator Cynthia Lummis on Tuesday pushed back after reports that the US Department of Justice moved and likely sold seized Bitcoin that some lawmakers expected to be held as a national asset.

According to on-chain tracking and multiple news outlets, about 57.55 BTC, roughly $6.3 million, was sent to a Coinbase Prime account and the receiving wallet later showed a zero balance, a sign the coins were probably liquidated.

Senator Lummis Raises Alarm

Based on reports, Senator Cynthia Lummis said she was “deeply concerned” that the transfer ran counter to a presidential directive issued earlier.

The directive, Executive Order 14233 signed in March 2025, sets out a plan to create a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and calls for seized Bitcoin to be held rather than sold.

Lummis, who chairs a Senate subcommittee on digital assets, questioned why seized coins were moved to an exchange custody account instead of being placed in reserve.

On-Chain Moves Point To Sale

Blockchain analysts flagged the movement after addresses tied to the seizure were traced to Coinbase Prime. Reports show the Coinbase address ended with a zero balance shortly after the transfer, which many observers read as an on-chain signal that the assets were sold.

Based on reports, the transfer involved digital assets seized from defendants linked to a recent criminal case, and the US Marshals Service executed the order from the Justice Department to move the coins.

BTCUSD now trading at $93,708. Chart: TradingView

Market Reaction And Numbers

The market showed a small reaction around the time of the reported sale. Bitcoin’s price dipped slightly from about $94,760 to near $93,600 at one point, according to price snapshots cited by news sites.

The said number of BTC is a small fraction of total circulating supply, but the trade drew attention because of the policy questions it raised and the political backdrop of a national reserve plan.

Questions About Policy And The Reserve

Lawmakers and crypto policy watchers now want clearer answers about when and how seized crypto is converted to cash. Reports have called for the Justice Department to explain its decision-making and to clarify whether current administration guidance requires holding seized Bitcoin for the Strategic Reserve.

Senator Lummis has pushed for formal rules and possible legislation that would prevent similar sales in the future.

So far, public statements from the Justice Department and the US Marshals Service have been limited in the public record, while Lummis and other proponents of the reserve have pressed for transparency.

Based on reports, some legal experts argue the government has discretion over forfeited property, while others say the new executive directive should reshape that practice.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Preguntas relacionadas

QWhy is Senator Cynthia Lummis deeply concerned about the US Department of Justice's recent Bitcoin transfer?

AShe is deeply concerned because the transfer and likely sale of seized Bitcoin runs counter to Presidential Executive Order 14233, which directs that such assets be preserved for a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve instead of being liquidated.

QWhat on-chain evidence suggests that the seized Bitcoin was sold?

ABlockchain analysts tracked the movement of about 57.55 BTC from addresses tied to the seizure to a Coinbase Prime account. The receiving wallet later showed a zero balance, which is a strong on-chain signal that the assets were liquidated.

QWhat is Executive Order 14233 and what does it mandate regarding seized Bitcoin?

AExecutive Order 14233, signed in March 2025, sets out a plan to create a US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. It explicitly calls for seized Bitcoin to be held as a national strategic asset rather than being sold.

QWhich government agency was responsible for executing the transfer of the Bitcoin to the exchange?

AThe US Marshals Service executed the order from the Justice Department to move the seized coins to the exchange custody account.

QWhat has been the reaction from lawmakers and policy watchers following this event?

ALawmakers and crypto policy watchers are calling for clearer answers and transparency from the Justice Department. They want to know when and how crypto is converted to cash and are pushing for formal rules or legislation to prevent similar sales in the future to align with the strategic reserve plan.

Lecturas Relacionadas

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

Coinbase's new Vice President, Ryan VanGrak, declared that regulatory wars in the cryptocurrency sector are over. Since taking office on July 9, 2026, he has shifted the company's approach from litigation and sanctions to focusing on growth and innovation. The industry can now concentrate on development rather than fighting for its right to exist. He highlighted that the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (CLARITY Act), which aims to establish a clear federal regulatory framework dividing oversight between the SEC and CFTC, has gained significant momentum. This framework is intended to provide proper supervision, investor protection, and maintain U.S. leadership in digital assets. VanGrak's appointment marks a strategic shift from a "wartime" to a "peacetime" advisor, replacing former Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal, who oversaw major litigation, including a dismissed 2023 SEC lawsuit. With his background at Citadel Securities and the SEC, VanGrak brings deep regulatory and institutional finance expertise as Coinbase expands beyond a simple exchange into a broader financial services provider, offering stocks, futures, prediction markets, and AI tools. For investors, bipartisan support for crypto legislation like the CLARITY Act represents a major shift from the enforcement-focused environment of 2023-2024. Lawmakers are now focused on *how* to regulate crypto, not *if* it should exist. However, risks remain, as the bill's passage is not yet guaranteed.

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Coinbase Vice President: The Wars Over Cryptocurrency Regulation Are Over

cryptonews.ruHace 9 min(s)

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

A Deep Dive into FWA: The “On-Chain Gacha” Experiment for NFTs Fake World Assets (FWA), created by TokenWorks, introduces an innovative “NFT gacha machine” fully operating on-chain. Users can deposit eligible NFTs paired with ETH (called Backing) to create a Position, acting as a prize pool. Others can then pay a uniform Acquisition Price for a chance to win a random NFT from the pool. The core mechanism features a reverse probability system: Positions with lower Backing have a higher chance of being selected, serving as common prizes, while high-Backing Positions are rare “jackpots.” The acquisition price is calculated based on the harmonic mean of all Backings, keeping entry costs low. When a Position is won, the purchaser must choose: keep the NFT or accept the Standing Bid (85% of the Backing, claimable in ETH or $FWA tokens), returning the NFT to the original depositor. The protocol involves two main roles. Depositors provide liquidity (NFT + ETH), earning a share of fees from each draw, distributed equally per active Position, plus potential $FWA rewards. Purchasers pay to spin the gacha, receiving $FWA rewards for participation. A special “Crown” reward goes to the Position with the highest Backing. The $FWA token has a fixed supply and is initially obtainable only through protocol participation (depositing or purchasing), with external buying disabled early on to reduce sell pressure. Its value is supported by a built-in buy pressure: when purchasers opt for the $FWA settlement on a Standing Bid, the protocol uses the backing ETH to buy $FWA from the market. Revenue for the protocol comes from a 1% fee on each draw, a 1% settlement fee when an NFT is kept, and the 15% discount from Standing Bid settlements (currently allocated to the protocol). The design cleverly blends Uniswap-style liquidity provision, gacha mechanics, and tokenomics to create a novel, self-regulating marketplace for NFT liquidity and engagement.

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

Deep Dive into FWA: An Intriguing Experiment Turning NFTs into "On-Chain Gachapon"

marsbitHace 23 min(s)

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

OpenAI has launched the "ChatGPT for Academic Researchers" program, offering free one-year access to its flagship models for 100,000 university researchers globally, with 10,000 spots available this summer. Selected institutions include prestigious centers like ENS Paris and the IAS at Princeton. The initiative provides an integrated research workspace within ChatGPT, bundling tools like ChatGPT, ChatGPT Work, and Codex, along with expanded Deep Research capabilities, higher usage limits, and specialized tools for life sciences. The suite connects to platforms like Zotero and GitHub, aiming to streamline the entire research workflow from literature review and coding to data analysis and manuscript drafting. OpenAI notes that about 1.3 million people already use ChatGPT weekly for advanced science and math. The program targets building long-term user dependency by embedding these tools into daily research habits. However, access comes with limitations: it does not include API credits or model weights, and eligibility is restricted to verified academic researchers from supported countries. This approach contrasts with Anthropic's "AI for Science" program, which offers API credits but not an integrated workspace. Both companies emphasize preventing misuse by withholding model weights, a point of contention for AI researchers seeking transparency. The core strategy remains clear: provide a powerful, integrated environment to foster user reliance ahead of the post-free period.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

10,000 Scientists Get 1 Year of Free Access: OpenAI Brings the Scientific Research Pipeline into ChatGPT

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

Gigadevice Innovation, a leading Chinese memory chip company, has executed a controversial financial maneuver. The company's controlling shareholder and chairman, Zhu Yiming, sold approximately 44 billion RMB worth of his shares between early May and mid-June 2026, capitalizing on a soaring stock price that peaked at 846.66 RMB on June 29th. Following a subsequent stock crash—plummeting to around 350 RMB in 22 trading days and erasing over 330 billion RMB in market value—Zhu announced a combined "market rescue" plan on July 29th. This plan includes his personal commitment to buy back at least 1 billion RMB in shares and a company proposal to repurchase 1 to 2 billion RMB worth of stock. This sequence of high-selling followed by a low-buying plan has confused and unsettled many of the company's 240,000 retail investors. The stock's dramatic decline was attributed to several factors: the successful IPO of its sister company, Changxin Technologies, which ended Gigadevice's status as a primary investment proxy for the domestic memory sector; a Morgan Stanley report warning of a potential peak in the memory chip cycle; and a severe loss of market confidence triggered by the chairman's massive sell-off. While the sell-off was procedurally compliant, its timing has been criticized. The company's fundamentals appear strong, with preliminary H1 2026 results showing revenue up 177% year-on-year to 11.5 billion RMB and net profit skyrocketing 1099% to 6.9 billion RMB, driven by a boom in memory chips and MCU demand. However, a significant portion (2.05 billion RMB) of this profit came from non-recurring gains like securities investment, and the memory industry is notoriously cyclical. Analysts highlight the company's role in the domestic substitution of niche DRAM and NOR Flash memory, with some maintaining bullish price targets. Yet, the recent events underscore key risks: its fabless model creates dependency on foundries like Changxin, and the chairman's actions have raised serious questions about management's alignment with minority shareholders. The promised buybacks cannot commence until December 13th due to a mandatory six-month cooling-off period following an insider sale, leaving the stock vulnerable in the interim.

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

What's Going On with Gigadevice? Major Shareholder Cashes Out 44 Billion, Then Announces 20 Billion Buyback

marsbitHace 28 min(s)

Trading

Spot
活动图片