"Transparency" Act Will Not Save U.S. Treasury Market, Analyst Warns

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-24Last updated on 2026-08-24

Abstract

An analyst warns that the proposed "Digital Asset Market Clarity Act" will not save the U.S. Treasury bond market. While some proponents believe the legislation would enable stablecoins to boost demand for U.S. debt, investment manager Lawrence Lepard argues this is a misconception. He notes the total market cap of stablecoins (primarily backed by Treasuries held by firms like Circle and Tether) is around $255 billion and has stabilized, which is insufficient against the trillions in debt the Treasury must refinance annually. He estimates stablecoins would cover only about 3% of the needed funding. Most analysts agree clear regulations would increase stablecoin demand, but Lepard contends expecting it to significantly offset declining foreign investor demand—down from 57% post-financial crisis to 32% in 2025—is unrealistic. However, figures like Coinbase's Fariar Shizarad stress that dollar-pegged stablecoins could convert global digital dollar demand into Treasury demand, which is needed across the yield curve.

While some supporters of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent believe the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act is a key element to fixing the U.S. government debt market, others dismiss the idea as misguided.

Lawrence Lepard, an investment manager and author of "The Big Print," emphasizes that even if the CLARITY Act overcomes all hurdles and secures the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate, the demand for U.S. debt from stablecoins would still be insufficient to normalize the current situation.

"Just want to dispel one misconception that seems widespread among some Bessent supporters. The notion that passing CLARITY will lead to stablecoins rescuing the Treasury market is not supported," Lepard stated on social media.

Lepard pointed out that the current market capitalization of stablecoins, primarily backed by Treasury bonds purchased by Circle and Tether, has reached $255 billion and has been declining since January when it hit $263 billion, indicating a stabilization in the growth curve of these stable assets.

"The Treasury needs to roll over more than $8 trillion in debt annually. 3% coverage is not that much. It would require the 'Clarity Act' and significant growth. This reminds me of DOGE," he concluded.

While most analysts agree that clear regulatory status would undoubtedly boost demand for payment stablecoins, Lepard's comments suggest expecting a significant surge in demand capable of offsetting the need for debt instruments seems unrealistic.

However, these new sources of liquidity need to be found if the U.S. aims to maintain healthy demand for its debt instruments, as the share of debt held by foreign investors has declined from 57% post-financial crisis to 32% in 2025.

Coinbase's Chief Strategy Officer, Faryar Shirzad, recently highlighted the need to at least kickstart this market. "Dollar-pegged stablecoins turn growing overseas demand for digital dollars into demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. We need this across all segments of the yield curve," he concluded.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument that analyst Lawrence Lepard makes against the idea that the CLARITY Act will save the U.S. Treasury market?

ALawrence Lepard argues that even if the CLARITY Act is passed, the demand for U.S. debt from stablecoins would be insufficient to normalize the situation. He points out that the current market cap of stablecoins is around $255 billion and is stabilizing or declining, while the Treasury needs to refinance over $8 trillion annually. Stablecoin demand would only cover a small fraction (around 3%) of this need.

QWhat does the author state has happened to the share of U.S. debt held by foreign investors since the financial crisis?

AThe article states that the share of U.S. debt held by foreign investors has fallen from 57% after the financial crisis to 32% in 2025.

QAccording to the article, why do some, like Coinbase's Farjaar Shirsad, believe stablecoins are still important for the U.S. Treasury market?

AFarjaar Shirsad argues that dollar-pegged stablecoins convert growing overseas demand for digital dollars into demand for U.S. Treasury bonds. He states this source of demand is needed "across the yield curve" as a new source of liquidity.

QWhat does Lawrence Lepard use the example of DOGE (Dogecoin) to illustrate in his critique?

ALawrence Lepard uses the example of DOGE (Dogecoin) to illustrate that the expectation that the CLARITY Act will lead to a massive, market-saving influx of stablecoin demand for Treasuries is unrealistic and speculative, likening it to a meme-driven hype cycle.

QWhat is the current trend in the total market capitalization of stablecoins, and what assets primarily back them according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the total market capitalization of stablecoins, primarily backed by Treasury bonds purchased by companies like Circle and Tether, reached $255 billion. This figure has been decreasing since January when it peaked at $263 billion, indicating a stabilization or slowdown in their growth curve.

Related Reads

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

The Ethereum client Besu, developed by the Hyperledger community, has patched five security vulnerabilities discovered by blockchain security firm CertiK. These vulnerabilities, detailed in four security advisories on August 14, were all addressed in version 26.7.1, an urgent security update initially released on July 27. The intentional delay between the patch release and the public disclosure of details gave node operators a crucial window to update. JiaLiang Chang, CertiK's Director of Security Engineering, explained this "patch first, details later" model provides defenders a time advantage, allowing them to identify affected systems, test the update, and coordinate deployments—particularly important for institutional or permissioned blockchain networks requiring formal change management. The vulnerabilities, found through CertiK's "Chain Scan" attack methodology, involved issues in block announcement handling, consensus proposal buffering, WebSocket subscription limits, and JSON-RPC filter creation. If exploited, they could have allowed an attacker to exhaust a node's memory or thread resources, compromising its availability and the consensus process. Chang highlighted that while the open-source ecosystem is moving toward more formalized security testing (like differential fuzzing and bug bounty programs), coverage remains uneven. Testing often focuses more on protocol compliance than on continuous resource exhaustion, race conditions, or deployment-specific failures. He emphasized that third-party research remains vital for uncovering attack vectors beyond routine development, advocating for a mature, cumulative security model combining continuous integration, multi-node attack testing, independent audits, and regression testing for each confirmed vulnerability.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Besu Patches Vulnerabilities in 5 Components: What Node Operators Need to Know

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

Decentralized lending protocol Term Finance lost $8.5 million due to an exploit of its governance mechanism, not a smart contract hack. The attacker manipulated the low voter turnout in the Meta Vaults system. By depositing just 0.5 ETH, they received a token (tmvETH) representing a share in the vault. Most users did not convert this token into a separate voting token (gtmvETH). The attacker did, gaining control of 90.66% of the issued voting power despite owning only 0.017% of the vault's capital. The attacker created a legitimate governance proposal to disable the 7-day withdrawal timelock and add their own contract to receive user funds. The proposal, publicly viewable for about 145 hours, passed due to a quorum requirement of only 5% and simple majority rule. After voting ended on August 23, 2026, the proposal was executed, allowing the immediate theft of 2,841 WETH and 1.68 million USDC (later swapped for DAI) from several vaults. The incident highlights systemic risks in decentralized governance when voting rights are separated from economic stake and low participation thresholds exist. Security mechanisms like timelocks were ineffective as the attacker could disable them from within the proposal itself. In response, Term Labs irrevocably closed all Meta Vaults and revoked DAO roles. The core lending protocol remained unaffected. The attack underscores the need for governance designs where security parameters are protected from modification through ordinary proposals.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Hack of Term Finance: Attacker Withdraws $8.5 Million Through Governance System Vulnerability

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片