Tokenization arrives onchain for institutions — AMA recap with Redbelly Network

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

Sponsored content: During a Cointelegraph AMA, Redbelly Network and AMAL Trustees discussed how tokenization and deterministic finality can modernize institutional asset workflows, moving beyond manual processes like spreadsheets and delayed reconciliations. The conversation highlighted the shift from experimental pilots to production-grade tokenization infrastructure, particularly in regulated markets and private credit. A key focus was Project Acacia, a Reserve Bank of Australia CBDC pilot, where a smart asset-backed security demonstrated streamlined issuance, servicing, and secondary trading on a single source of truth. Redbelly's deterministic consensus ensures irreversible settlement and high throughput, while its zkIdentity system enables compliance checks without exposing private data. The partnership aims to upgrade asset lifecycle management by combining Redbelly's technical infrastructure with AMAL's fiduciary expertise.

Sponsored Content

Routing trillions in assets through spreadsheets and monthly reconciliations creates delays, blind spots and operational risk. During a recent Cointelegraph AMA, Alan Burt, executive chairman of Redbelly Network, and Luke Andersen, chief product officer at AMAL Trustees, outlined how tokenization and deterministic finality can streamline these workflows without breaking existing fiduciary responsibilities.

“It’s 2025 — institutions should not be relying on email-based confirmations and delayed reconciliations when assets and cash move,” Andersen said, stressing that infrastructure must now match the scale and speed of capital markets.

From experiments to an endorsed infrastructure

The discussion began with an overview of the state of institutional tokenization. Over the past two years, administrators, asset servicers and central banks have moved from lab pilots to production-grade initiatives. For Redbelly, the focus is on regulated markets and private credit, where much of the infrastructure still runs on siloed databases and manual processes.

Burt explained that Redbelly set out to bring “all the lovely things we like in permissionless DeFi” to regulated environments, with an identity and custody layer that enables collateral mobility under existing rules. He pointed to private credit and alternative assets as a starting point, where tokenization can structure workflows and prepare assets for broader distribution over time.

Andersen added that for AMAL and IQ-EQ, tokenization has shifted from an innovation theme to a board-level agenda: “Tokenization is no longer treated as a moonshot experiment, but a strategic infrastructure upgrade that C-suite and board committees are actively exploring.”

Project Acacia: smart ABS and CBDC settlement on a public chain

A central part of the AMA focused on Project Acacia, the Reserve Bank of Australia’s CBDC pilot, where Redbelly and AMAL/IQ-EQ implemented a smart asset-backed security (ABS). The goal was to show how tokenized assets and wholesale CBDC can simplify issuance, servicing, reporting and secondary trading.

Burt walked through the current flow in securitization: an originator runs a loan book, a bank provides warehouse funding and a trustee then manages payments to multiple investor tranches. Each party maintains separate systems and reconciles data every month. In Project Acacia, the underlying loans, the ABS structure and secondary trading all moved to a shared infrastructure.

“What this allowed us to do is connect the originator, the warehouse and the trustee on a single source of truth, and then add secondary trading on the Australian Bond Exchange,” Burt said. “You know exactly what you’re holding and can see through to the underlying assets before you price or impair it.”

Andersen described the pilot as a proof point for the trustee’s role in tokenized markets, showing how fiduciary oversight and digital execution can coexist. Securitization still relies on trust law and investor protection, but tokenization compresses timelines, reduces manual breakpoints and replaces document-driven flows with embedded rules, eligibility checks and deterministic settlement.

Deterministic finality, zkIdentity and a shared control layer

The AMA then turned to infrastructure requirements and risk management. For institutions, throughput alone is not enough; they need predictable costs, audit-ready accountability and guarantees that every transaction resolves in a single, irreversible state.

Burt explained Redbelly’s deterministic consensus and fixed gas model, which are designed for capital markets workloads. All validator nodes propose transactions to each other and agree on a combined “super block” before it is committed, which removes forks and reorganizes risk. This approach, developed through research at the University of Sydney and the CSIRO, Australia’s national research lab and backed by a patent, has been benchmarked at over 97,000 transactions per second with zero transaction loss under stress tests.

“We believe settlement is the core competency of the network,” Burt said. “Institutions need to know that once a block is created, there are no rollbacks, and that each transaction executes in the right sequence.”

Both speakers highlighted Redbelly’s zkIdentity system as another key piece. Rather than duplicating KYC and eligibility checks at every venue, users receive verifiable credentials that prove, in zero-knowledge, that they meet requirements for a given product or jurisdiction. Eligibility is checked at the network layer, while underlying data remains private and issuers still operate within their licences.

For AMAL/IQ-EQ, this addresses a structural compliance problem. Andersen noted: “zkIdentity lets us verify eligibility at the network layer without exposing private data, which enables regulated markets to operate on public rails while keeping controls and safeguards in place.”

The partnership between Redbelly and AMAL/IQ-EQ combines this technical foundation with existing licences, balance sheet strength and established transaction flows. AMAL Trustees brings the fiduciary role, legal enforceability and reporting obligations; Redbelly provides the shared ledger, deterministic settlement and identity layer. Together, they position tokenization as an upgrade to the way asset lifecycles are managed and funded.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main problem that tokenization and deterministic finality aim to solve for institutional asset management?

AThey aim to solve the problems of delays, blind spots, and operational risk caused by routing trillions in assets through spreadsheets, email-based confirmations, and manual monthly reconciliations.

QAccording to the AMA, how has the perception of tokenization changed at institutions like AMAL and IQ-EQ?

ATokenization has shifted from being treated as a moonshot experiment to a strategic infrastructure upgrade that is now a board-level agenda, with C-suite and board committees actively exploring it.

QWhat was the goal of Project Acacia, the pilot project with the Reserve Bank of Australia?

AThe goal was to demonstrate how tokenized assets and a wholesale CBDC can simplify the issuance, servicing, reporting, and secondary trading of a smart asset-backed security (ABS) on a shared infrastructure.

QWhat are two key technical features of the Redbelly Network that make it suitable for institutional use?

ATwo key features are its deterministic consensus mechanism, which provides irreversible settlement and removes fork risk, and its zkIdentity system, which allows for verifiable eligibility checks without exposing private user data.

QHow does the partnership between Redbelly Network and AMAL/IQ-EQ combine their respective strengths?

AThe partnership combines Redbelly's technical foundation (shared ledger, deterministic settlement, identity layer) with AMAL/IQ-EQ's existing licenses, balance sheet strength, established transaction flows, fiduciary role, legal enforceability, and reporting obligations.

Related Reads

Solana Ecosystem Shows Signs of Recovery: On-Chain Governance Upgrade, Tokenized Stocks and Meme Coins Heat Up

Solana Ecosystem Shows Signs of Revival: Governance Upgrades, Tokenized Stocks, and Memecoins Heat Up While the broader crypto market faces a downturn, Solana has shown relative strength with its price rising nearly 15% recently. This resilience is attributed to warming ecosystem activity, particularly in tokenized stocks and memecoins, coupled with a major upgrade to its on-chain governance. In the Real World Assets (RWA) sector, Solana now leads all public chains in both the number of unique holder wallets and the quantity of RWA assets. Its tokenized stock weekly trading volume has surged to a record $1.42 billion, capturing about 96% of the market share, largely driven by the Backpack exchange. Simultaneously, the Solana memecoin sector has reignited, fueled by the rapid ascent of the ANSEM token following endorsements from a prominent crypto influencer. This has boosted activity across platforms like Pump.fun and increased fee revenue for several Solana-based exchanges. A key development is the launch of Solana Governance Proposals (SGP), a new on-chain mechanism. It allows validators with at least 100,000 SOL delegated to submit proposals for community vote, enhancing decentralized decision-making. SGP will operate alongside the existing technical proposal process (SIMD), focusing on broader ecosystem governance. Despite these positive signals in specific areas, overall on-chain activity and transaction volumes still lag behind previous bull market peaks, indicating the recovery remains partial rather than ecosystem-wide.

marsbit17m ago

Solana Ecosystem Shows Signs of Recovery: On-Chain Governance Upgrade, Tokenized Stocks and Meme Coins Heat Up

marsbit17m ago

While Semiconductor Stocks Plunge, Anthropic Plans to Develop a 2nm Chip

Anthropic, the AI company behind Claude, is exploring the development of its own custom AI chip, according to a report from The Information. The company is in early discussions with Samsung Electronics to manufacture the chip using Samsung's most advanced 2-nanometer process and packaging technology. While the project is still in preliminary stages, including defining chip specifications, and could be abandoned, it marks a strategic step for Anthropic. The move comes as the company seeks greater control over its computing costs and hardware optimization, particularly for inference tasks to run its models more efficiently and cheaply. Samsung's potential involvement follows its participation as a strategic investor in Anthropic's recent $65 billion funding round. For Samsung, partnering with a major AI lab represents a significant opportunity for its foundry business to compete with market leader TSMC in advanced semiconductor manufacturing. Anthropic's CEO, Dario Amodei, has previously highlighted the immense financial challenge of securing enough computing power for anticipated growth, making cost-effective inference a critical focus. The company would join other tech giants like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI in pursuing custom AI silicon. However, analysts note this trend creates deeper interdependencies rather than independence, as US AI labs become more tightly woven into Asian semiconductor supply chains. Despite this move, Anthropic remains heavily reliant on a multi-cloud, multi-vendor strategy for its immediate computing needs. It has secured massive, long-term commitments for capacity from Amazon Web Services (Trainium chips), Google (TPUs), and even leased a large GPU cluster from xAI. For now, Nvidia continues to dominate the AI chip market, with its share reportedly growing to 74%.

链捕手19m ago

While Semiconductor Stocks Plunge, Anthropic Plans to Develop a 2nm Chip

链捕手19m ago

Korean Companies Following Strategy in Accumulating Cryptocurrency: From Bull Market to Delisting?

Title: Korean DAT Companies Following "Strategy" Bitcoin Hoarding Model Face Delisting Amid Bear Market Summary: Several Korean KOSDAQ-listed companies, known as Digital Asset Trusts (DATs), are at risk of being delisted due to a combination of stricter regulatory thresholds and a downturn in crypto markets. These firms, inspired by models like Strategy and Japan's Metaplanet, raised capital to buy Bitcoin, relying on a cycle of rising crypto prices to boost their stock value. However, recent reforms in Korea have raised the minimum market capitalization required to stay listed from 150 billion won to 200 billion won (approx. $1.3M), with a further increase to 300 billion won set for next January. The new rules also close loopholes like reverse stock splits used to artificially inflate share prices. The situation is exacerbated by a significant drop in Bitcoin's price from its 2025 peak and a weak KOSDAQ market. While the main KOSPI index has surged nearly 95% year-to-date, KOSDAQ has fallen about 10%, draining liquidity from smaller companies. Many DATs now hover near or below the new market cap thresholds and must also book substantial valuation losses on their Bitcoin holdings. Analysts suggest that without a sustained recovery in both crypto prices and broader market interest in KOSDAQ stocks, these companies have limited options to avoid delisting, marking a precarious moment for Korea's crypto-linked public companies.

marsbit28m ago

Korean Companies Following Strategy in Accumulating Cryptocurrency: From Bull Market to Delisting?

marsbit28m ago

Korean Companies That Learned to Hoard Coins from MicroStrategy: From Bull Market to Delisting?

South Korean companies that adopted the “Digital Asset Treasury” (DAT) strategy—issuing shares to buy and hold Bitcoin, inspired by MicroStrategy—now face delisting risks on the KOSDAQ market. New regulations effective July 1, 2026, tightened listing maintenance rules, notably raising the minimum market capitalization threshold from 150 billion KRW to 200 billion KRW (about $1.3 million), with a further increase to 300 billion KRW scheduled for January 2027. Companies failing to meet both the share price and market cap requirements for specified periods risk being designated for delisting, with fewer options for financial engineering like stock splits to artificially boost prices. The downturn in cryptocurrency prices has severely impacted these firms. Bitcoin, which peaked above $120,000 in mid-2025, has fallen below $60,000, forcing DAT companies to report large valuation losses. Compounding this, the KOSDAQ index has dropped about 10% year-to-date, while the main KOSPI index surged nearly 95%, diverting investor interest away from smaller-cap stocks. Examples like BitPlanet (holding 300 BTC) and Parataxis Ethereum currently hover just above the new market cap limits, but face heightened scrutiny and potential delisting starting in 2027. Industry analysts warn that the combination of weak crypto markets, a struggling KOSDAQ, and stricter regulations creates a significant survival challenge for these companies, highlighting the risks of business models overly reliant on volatile digital asset prices.

链捕手33m ago

Korean Companies That Learned to Hoard Coins from MicroStrategy: From Bull Market to Delisting?

链捕手33m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片