The False Startup Boom: 5.8 Million New Companies Registered Annually in the US, 70% Will Never Hire Anyone

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-29Last updated on 2026-07-29

Abstract

Despite record-breaking business applications in the US (nearly 6 million in a recent year), a striking 70% of these new entities are classified as "likely non-employers," meaning they never intend to hire anyone. This trend, dubbed the "Fake Startup Boom," reveals a surge in businesses that are often hobbies or side projects registered as LLCs—a process now cheaper and faster than a typical date. The author argues this reflects a cultural "cult of the founder," where the social capital and identity of being a "founder" are pursued more than building viable, job-creating companies. This is fueled by platforms like LinkedIn, where adding "founder" to profiles spiked 69%. However, real entrepreneurship remains extremely difficult, with high failure rates and minimal VC funding success. The piece warns against the illusion that meaningful ventures can be built casually, urging a more deliberate choice between pursuing a real business or a genuine hobby, rather than inhabiting a middle ground that dilutes both effort and potential meaning.

Author: Ed Elson

Translated by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: The number of new business registrations in the US hit a record high last year, but behind the data lies an awkward truth – 70% of new companies have no intention of hiring anyone. They are merely part-time hobbies dressed up in the shell of an LLC. When "founder" becomes the trendiest social label and starting a company is cheaper than a date, genuine entrepreneurial spirit is being diluted into an Instagram persona.

The US economy doesn't have much good news right now. Oil prices are soaring, mortgage rates are rising, labor force participation is plummeting, and the cost-of-living crisis is intensifying.

However, there is indeed one bright spot that many economists find encouraging: the rise of American entrepreneurial spirit. Nearly 6 million new business applications were filed last year (a record high), and we are on track to break that record in 2026. Setting aside everything else, America may be more entrepreneurial than ever.

That's why I was shocked when my colleague Dan Chiolan shared the following data last week: of the 5.7 million new businesses started last year, only 30% are expected to ever create any jobs... ever.

Wait... what?

Yes, you read that correctly. According to the US Census Bureau, roughly 70% of new US businesses are classified as "likely non-employer businesses," meaning they are expected to create no jobs at all. How do we know? Through various factors, such as whether the business owner provided a date for first paying wages or indicated they were hiring. The data tells us America isn't creating more businesses, it's just filing more paperwork.

Is this an outlier? No. Over the past two decades, the share of new businesses unlikely to hire has doubled. Meanwhile, the share of "high-propensity" businesses (i.e., those likely to hire) has halved, with the actual number stagnating, meaning (genuine) American entrepreneurship has actually been at a standstill.

Chart: US new business registration application trends from 2006–2026. Light pink represents "likely employer," dark orange represents "likely non-employer." Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Stripe.

How is this possible? Is it AI related? Probably not, as this trend started long before ChatGPT. Look at the spike in 2020; it's more likely related to COVID, which probably means it's related to people being bored at home with nothing to do. Allow me to introduce my latest economic theory:

The False Startup Boom

What we are witnessing is not a rise in entrepreneurship, but the rise of what I call false businesses. What is a false business? Exactly what it sounds like. It's the "creative side project" your high school friend launched out of boredom during pandemic lockdowns. It's your distant cousin's "lifestyle brand" that hasn't sold a single product but already has a Substack. It's the "collective" whose mission isn't to collect revenue but to collect Instagram followers. It's the kind of business you can barely make time for without quitting your day job because... it's not a real business at all. It's a hobby you happen to have registered.

How do people have time to register hobbies as companies? Because now creating an LLC takes about 15 minutes. It costs roughly $130—about 30% less than the average price of a date. In other words, America's most accessible hobby isn't pottery or pickleball... it's entrepreneurship.

Can I prove my theory? No. But like gravity, I don't know what other theory fits. The number of non-employer businesses is surging, while the revenue generated by these businesses is plummeting, meaning there are millions of new businesses with almost no sales. Given how many of my friends have launched Instagram accounts disguised as "companies," one can only look at the evidence and conclude: they are the problem.

Chart: US non-employer business count (left) vs. average revenue (right) from 1997–2023. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bloomberg.

The Cult of Entrepreneurship

So the question is, why would anyone start a false business? Why not just have a hobby on the side? Why make it an LLC? The answer, like all trends, is simple: because it's cool now.

The world's hottest job today is "founder." From Jensen Huang to Elon Musk, founders are the rock stars of our digital age. The data reflects this: roughly 70% of Gen Z say owning a business is "part of the American Dream" (significantly higher than other demographics), and nearly half say they don't want a regular 9-to-5 job at all.

Yet, more important than being a founder is being *able* to call yourself one. The word "founder" evokes independence, fearlessness, and courage—precisely the traits people like to showcase on dating apps or social media. As a result, the number of Americans adding "founder" to their LinkedIn profiles surged 69% last year.

Chart: Surge in US LinkedIn users adding "Founder" title to their profiles last year, up 69%. Source: LinkedIn.

I suspect most of these new "founders" are running false businesses. Honestly, I get it. Unlike starting a real business (which requires significant sacrifice), a false business lets you keep your real job while also being a "business owner." It's all the great taste of being a founder, with none of the calories. Does it matter what your business does or if it makes money? Of course not! All that matters is that you have one.

The Cult of the Founder...

Why is this happening? Over the past two decades, our society has been psychologically conditioned into a state of founder worship. Founders are no longer just businesspeople—they are trendsetters, celebrities, cowboys, and tastemakers. They grace magazine covers and billboards. They host podcasts, write manifestos, dominate our algorithms. Founders are a unique blend of wealth and relevance, something many dream of but few achieve.

Chart: Count of Joe Rogan podcast episodes featuring guests with titles containing CEO, Founder, or Entrepreneur from 2018–2025. Source: Spotify, Prof G Analysis.

Thus, there is immense social capital in being a founder. Starting a company today doesn't just make you rich; it makes you interesting. For a generation that says its lives lack meaning, this is a powerful proposition. Where people once filled internal voids with alcohol, affairs, and eventually yoga, today they fill them with startups.

...Gone Astray

The unhealthy obsession with founderhood can lead to dark places. I know countless examples of people who have ruined themselves due to a deep-seated desire to be Steve Jobs (Elizabeth Holmes, SBF, Charlie Javice, etc.). However, what fascinates me most recently is a scandal involving Phoebe Gates, daughter of Bill Gates.

The 23-year-old Stanford graduate is currently under investigation after her shopping startup, backed by Hailey Bieber and valued at $185 million, was exposed for faking sales data. This fraud, known as "cookie stuffing," is common in the affiliate marketing industry, but it also raises a deeper, more interesting question: Why did the daughter of the world's nineteenth-richest person feel the need to fake her way into being a founder? We now have our answer: because it's cool.

I should have known, from the moment she publicly announced her Series A, which looked less like a funding round and more like a Coachella lineup. I also should have known when she and her co-founder launched the quintessential false business of the moment: a podcast. Or when she achieved the holy grail of false businesses: appearing on Call Her Daddy. The point is, there were signs.

Harder Than You Think

You may have gathered by now that I dislike the false startup boom. Fakeness aside, I despise the lie it promotes, which could mislead millions in their careers: that entrepreneurship is easy.

Let's be clear: it's not. One-fifth of US businesses fail in their first year, half disappear within five years. While the dream of raising venture capital is alluring, for most it's just a dream: only 0.05% of startups ever raise venture funding, and among those that do, roughly three-quarters fail to return a single dollar to investors.

Chart: US business failure rates by years in business, showing nearly 80% gone after 20 years. Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Clarify Capital.

I'm not trying to discourage anyone from starting a business. Done right, it can be transformative. But we should also acknowledge the truth about being a founder: it's extremely difficult, often unrewarding, requires immense personal sacrifice, and likely won't end well. This isn't an opinion—it's a statistical fact.

Many seem to believe they can avoid the negatives of entrepreneurship by starting a false business. "Do it on the side," they think, "so you don't have to go all in." What they fail to realize is that nothing meaningful is ever achieved on the side. There's an important reason for that: meaning doesn't come from the outcome; it comes from the process. That's why it's called meaning. It's proportional to how much you're willing to sacrifice.

The better option is to make a choice. Either choose to start a business, or choose not to, but don't fool yourself into thinking you can choose both. This applies to every other area of life, too. From side hustles to "situationships," young people have developed an allergy to making decisions. We can barely decide what to eat or watch, let alone what to do with our careers. It may stem from our addiction to algorithms, as the more we outsource responsibility to our phones, the less we take for ourselves. But for too many young people, the result is that we're not living our lives; we're letting life happen to us.

This state of limbo is something we have the power to reject. Whether as a founder or not, immense meaning is within anyone's grasp. It exists both inside and outside your work, in your current job and your next one. It's there for the taking. All you have to do is choose.

See you next week.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument presented in the article regarding the recent surge in new business applications in the US?

AThe article argues that the surge represents a 'Fake Startup Boom,' where the majority of new businesses are unlikely to ever hire employees. These are often hobbies or side projects registered as LLCs for social status rather than genuine entrepreneurial ventures aimed at creating jobs or substantial revenue.

QWhat does the data from the U.S. Census Bureau reveal about the employment expectations of new businesses formed in the last year?

AAccording to the U.S. Census Bureau data cited, approximately 70% of new businesses formed last year were classified as 'likely non-employer' businesses, meaning they are not expected to create any jobs at all. Only 30% are considered likely to hire.

QWhat reasons does the author suggest for the rise of 'fake' businesses?

AThe author suggests several reasons: the ease and low cost of forming an LLC (cheaper than an average date), the social cachet and trendiness of the 'founder' title on platforms like LinkedIn and Instagram, and a societal 'cult of the founder' that glorifies entrepreneurship as a path to being interesting and significant, even if the business isn't viable.

QHow does the article characterize the actual difficulty and success rate of starting a genuine business?

AThe article characterizes genuine entrepreneurship as extremely difficult with low success rates. It states that one-fifth of U.S. businesses fail within the first year, half within five years, and nearly 80% are gone after 20 years. Only 0.05% of startups ever receive venture capital, and about three-quarters of those fail to return any money to investors.

QAccording to the author, what is the fundamental problem with starting a 'fake' business as a side project?

AThe author argues that the fundamental problem is self-deception and avoiding meaningful commitment. 'Fake' businesses allow people to avoid the sacrifices required for genuine entrepreneurship while still claiming the social title. The author contends that real meaning and achievement come from the process and level of sacrifice, which cannot be attained through a casual, part-time endeavor that is not treated seriously.

Related Reads

Goldman Sachs: July Smashes Through Crowded Trades, U.S. Stock Bull Market Not Broken but Harder to Navigate

Goldman Sachs: July Sees Crowded Trades Unwound, U.S. Bull Market Intact but Getting Tougher. The U.S. stock market in July did not see an index-level crash, but rather a significant unwinding of speculative positions. While the S&P 500 remained stable—trading within a narrow 3.5% range and staying within 2% of its high—underlying market dynamics were volatile. Heavily crowded trades, particularly in high-momentum tech, AI-linked stocks, and Asian strategies, faced severe pressure and forced deleveraging. Data indicates this was a meaningful cleanse, not a minor adjustment. Global tech exposure saw its largest sell-off in over five years, leverage in Korean equity ETFs plummeted, and Goldman's prime brokerage recorded the largest gross exposure reduction since late 2022. Leverage on momentum factors among fundamental long/short clients fell to the 28th percentile of its one-year range. The AI trade narrative shifted from pure potential to a focus on tangible returns. While Meta failed to show clear AI monetization, Microsoft and Amazon provided evidence that massive capital expenditure is translating into scalable revenue and product growth, preventing a blanket sell-off of the AI sector. The Federal Reserve's more opaque communication style and volatility in long-end Treasury yields have introduced new friction, particularly for rate-sensitive growth and tech stocks. The broader outlook for U.S. equities remains favorable, supported by a strong economy, robust earnings, and substantial AI capital expenditure. However, risk/reward is no longer cheap, and the market's upward elasticity has weakened. The Nasdaq 100's trajectory—up 12% year-to-date despite significant pullbacks—illustrates that the bull trend persists but the path is becoming more difficult. The key lesson from July is that the market no longer rewards crowded, highly leveraged trades, requiring more disciplined and liquid portfolio approaches.

marsbit30m ago

Goldman Sachs: July Smashes Through Crowded Trades, U.S. Stock Bull Market Not Broken but Harder to Navigate

marsbit30m ago

Interview with Robinhood Executive: Meme + Tokenized US Stocks as "Barbell" Customer Acquisition Strategy, All Business Lines Achieve Hundreds of Millions in Revenue

Interview with Robinhood executive Johann Kerbrat reveals the company's "barbell" customer acquisition strategy for its new Robinhood Chain, combining meme tokens with tokenized stocks. Three weeks after mainnet launch, the chain has seen over $3B in weekly DEX volume and 105M transactions. Kerbrat explains the logic behind the permissionless chain: meme tokens attract DeFi users, while tokenized real-world assets (RWA), currently over 90 US stocks and ETFs accessible in 120+ countries, serve global users. The goal is to bring Robinhood's 27 million funded accounts on-chain by simplifying DeFi with a user-friendly interface, exemplified by features like Robinhood Earn which offers yield without requiring wallet management. Built on Arbitrum's technology stack for its speed, low cost, and Ethereum's security, the chain focuses on financial products like Earn, spot trading, and perpetuals. Kerbrat downplays direct competition with platforms like Base, emphasizing the goal of expanding the overall market for on-chain assets. He details selective partnerships (e.g., Morpho, Lighter) based on compliance, unique UX, and differentiation. While regulatory clarity is pending for US perpetuals, the expansion continues via Bitstamp in Europe. Finally, Kerbrat positions Robinhood as a "super app" integrating stocks, options, crypto, banking, and AI trading, with all major business lines generating hundreds of millions in revenue. For the chain, current priority is driving adoption over maximizing gas fee revenue.

marsbit2h ago

Interview with Robinhood Executive: Meme + Tokenized US Stocks as "Barbell" Customer Acquisition Strategy, All Business Lines Achieve Hundreds of Millions in Revenue

marsbit2h ago

Fidelity Q3 Report: BTC, ETH, and SOL Continue to Build Bottoms; How Much Further Will This Crypto Bear Market Go?

Fidelity's Q3 Crypto Signal Report analyzes the current bear market, noting Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Solana (SOL) are in a prolonged bottoming phase. Key indicators like the weighted Net Unrealized Profit/Loss (NUPL) have turned negative (-0.01), signaling the market is slightly below its aggregate cost basis, with BTC acting as the primary stabilizing asset. BTC's dominance has risen to 68%, indicating a lack of capital rotation to other digital assets. Performance has been weak across the board, with BTC, ETH, and SOL down significantly year-to-date. Market sentiment is depressed, exacerbated by substantial outflows from spot ETPs and a challenging macro environment. The report compares the current ~203-day downtrend to historical ~300-day bottoming cycles, suggesting the process may be two-thirds complete, with late 2026 as a potential timeframe to monitor. For Bitcoin, NUPL at 0.09 indicates cautious sentiment, while momentum signals remain negative. The Yardstick metric points to potential undervaluation relative to network security (hashrate). Ethereum's NUPL is deep in the "capitulation" zone at -0.43, a historically positive signal for future returns, though its momentum and network fee revenue are negative. Solana shows the deepest NUPL at -0.72 but demonstrates relative resilience in on-chain activity and stablecoin transfer volume. The report concludes that while several metrics are near historical capitulation levels, a definitive market bottom has not yet been established. The path forward likely involves continued consolidation, with BTC's relative strength and fundamental on-chain usage for ETH and SOL providing key areas for investor observation.

marsbit2h ago

Fidelity Q3 Report: BTC, ETH, and SOL Continue to Build Bottoms; How Much Further Will This Crypto Bear Market Go?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片