SUI breaks out, but a $1.70 pullback could be next – Here’s why

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-06Last updated on 2026-01-06

Abstract

SUI surged 15.9% in 24 hours, becoming the top-performing crypto among the top 20 by market cap. After dipping to $1.39 on January 1, it rallied nearly 40% to break out of its previous $1.30–$1.68 range, reaching $1.95. Despite bullish short-term signals like rising open interest and strong spot demand, the longer-term trend remains bearish unless SUI surpasses $2.23. Key resistance lies at $1.95–$2.16, which may trigger a pullback to $1.70–$1.75. Traders are advised to consider taking profits and waiting for a retracement or a confirmed breakout above $2.23 before entering new long positions.

Sui [SUI] has rallied 15.9% in the past 24 hours, at press time, making it the top-performing crypto asset in the top 20 assets by market capitalization on CoinMarketCap.

Towards the end of 2025, AMBCrypto reported that the monthly Sui unlock of 1.15% of the released supply could add selling pressure that the market might not be able to absorb. This trend of selling pressure and a lack of demand has turned around remarkably.

On the 1st of January, SUI dipped to a low of $1.39 before rallying. In just over five days, the token has rallied 39.95% to reach $1.95. In doing so, it burst out above the $1.30-$1.68 range formation highlighted in another report.

Has the long-term trend of Sui flipped bullishly?

The 1-day chart showed that the internal structure was flipped bullishly when the price breached the $1.51 local swing high. While encouraging for short-term bulls, the swing structure remained bearish. A move past $2.23 is required to change this.

The $1.95-$2.16 region was a supply zone for SUI on the D1 timeframe.

The 6-hour chart showed that $1.87 and $2.03 were key local resistance levels. These were based on the Fibonacci retracement levels plotted from the price drop to $1.31 in December.

Additionally, the $2.03 level has confluence with the supply zone highlighted on the 1-day timeframe. This supply zone could stall the upward momentum and potentially cause a retracement toward $1.70-$1.75.

The bullish case for SUI

The Open Interest was up 18% in 24 hours, according to Coinalyze data. The rising spot CVD indicated high spot market demand, and the funding rate showed bullish market sentiment and traders willing to go long.

Together, it showed spot and speculative strength that can drive prices to $2.23 and beyond, if sustained.

Should you take profits and wait?

The range breakout has yielded remarkable success, and Sui was closing in on the psychological $2 resistance. The higher timeframe structure was bearish, despite the recent gains.

Holding out for a sustained rally as Bitcoin [BTC] nears the $96.5k liquidity pocket could be risky. SUI traders can wait for a retracement, or a breakout and retest of the $2.23 area before going long again.


Final Thoughts

  • Sui has strong spot demand and speculative interest driving its rally toward $2.
  • Traders can look to book profits and wait for the market to show its next move before entering positions.

Disclaimer: The information presented does not constitute financial, investment, trading, or other types of advice and is solely the writer’s opinion.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage increase in Sui's price in the past 24 hours, making it a top performer?

ASui's price increased by 15.9% in the past 24 hours, making it the top-performing crypto asset in the top 20 by market capitalization.

QWhat key price level must SUI breach to change its higher timeframe structure from bearish to bullish?

ASUI must breach the $2.23 level to change its higher timeframe swing structure from bearish to bullish.

QAccording to the analysis, which price zone is identified as a potential target for a pullback?

AThe analysis identifies the $1.70-$1.75 zone as a potential target for a pullback.

QWhat two metrics from Coinalyze data support the bullish case for SUI?

AThe two metrics are an 18% increase in Open Interest and a rising spot CVD, which indicate high spot market demand and bullish sentiment.

QWhat is the main recommendation for traders regarding their SUI positions, according to the article's final thoughts?

AThe main recommendation is for traders to consider booking profits and waiting for the market to show its next move before entering new positions.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit1h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片