STRC Hits Historic Low, Saylor's Perpetual Motion Machine Grinds to a Halt

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-19Last updated on 2026-06-19

Abstract

STRC, the perpetual preferred stock issued by MicroStrategy to fund its Bitcoin purchases, hit a historic low of $85.32, a 17% discount to its $100 par value. Designed as a "digital credit engine" to trade stably near par and enable continuous share issuance for buying Bitcoin, its plunge signals a breakdown in this model. Three key factors drove the decline: 1. Bitcoin's price fell over 50% from its peak, trading around $63,000 amid hawkish Fed signals. 2. MicroStrategy's cash reserves were depleted after a $1.5 billion convertible note repayment, slashing the dividend coverage for STRC's 11.5% yield to ~7 months. The company then sold 32 BTC to cover dividends—Michael Saylor's first Bitcoin sale since 2022—damaging the "never sell" narrative. 3. A competing Bitcoin-backed preferred stock, Strive's SATA, offers a higher yield (~13%) and daily dividends, drawing investors away from STRC. The drop triggers a negative cycle: STRC below par halts ATM share issuances, cutting off a key funding source for Bitcoin buys and potentially forcing more BTC sales for dividends, further eroding confidence. While Saylor argues the model is mathematically sound—needing only 2.3% annual Bitcoin growth to sustain itself—the market is testing the resilience of the leveraged Bitcoin treasury strategy in a bear market. The STRC price now reflects rising skepticism about this financial machinery's durability during downturns.

Author: Xiao Bing, Deep Tide TechFlow

Last July, when Michael Saylor pitched STRC to Wall Street, he used a clever analogy: it was a "digital credit engine." Investors bought this preferred stock, receiving high annual dividends of 11.5%. Strategy would use the raised funds to buy Bitcoin. Bitcoin would rise, STRC would stabilize near its $100 face value, and the company would continue issuing more shares and buying more Bitcoin. Capital would flow endlessly in this closed loop, with every participant winning.

Less than a year later, that engine has stalled.

On June 19th, STRC hit a historic low of $85.32 during trading. The previous trading day, it had briefly touched $82.53, a discount of over 17% to its face value. The RSI fell to 24, entering an extremely oversold zone. Trading volume surged to nearly 8 million shares, far exceeding the average daily volume of 3.6 million shares.

For a preferred stock designed to "stabilize near $100," falling to $85 signals a loosening of its underlying logic.

What Kind of Machine Did Saylor Build?

To understand STRC's collapse, one must first understand the purpose for which it was created.

STRC stands for "Variable Rate Series A Perpetual Stretch Preferred Stock." It listed in July 2025 at an issue price of $90, with approximately 28 million shares issued, raising $2.5 billion. Its dividend rate adjusts monthly and is currently set at 11.5%. The design intent was clear: through a floating-rate mechanism, STRC would always trade close to its $100 face value.

When STRC trades above $100, Strategy could continuously issue new shares via its ATM (at-the-market) offering plan, converting the premium into cash, which would then be funneled entirely into Bitcoin. This was the core gear of Saylor's capital machine. The MSTR common stock was meant to absorb Bitcoin's volatility, while STRC was meant to provide a steady stream of ammunition.

In the April proxy statement, Strategy was still boasting about this machine's data: STRC market cap of $6.4 billion, 30-day average trading volume of $339 million, volatility of just 1.7%. Saylor called it an "acyclical financing tool," meaning the machine could run regardless of Bitcoin's price movements.

Reality gave him a resounding slap.

A Triple Blow

STRC's collapse is driven by three mutually reinforcing factors.

First, Bitcoin's price has been halved. BTC fell from its all-time high last October to around $63,000, a drop of over 50%. On June 17th, the first FOMC meeting chaired by new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh released hawkish signals. The dot plot showed 9 officials forecasting a rate hike in 2026, the PCE inflation expectation was raised to 3.6%, and forward guidance on interest rates was completely removed. Bitcoin decoupled from U.S. stocks that day; while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq soared on news of a U.S.-Iran peace deal, BTC bucked the trend and fell.

Second, the dividend coverage ratio is in distress. In May, Strategy used $1.5 billion in cash to repay convertible bonds maturing in 2029. This single move directly compressed STRC's dividend coverage period from 24 months to about 7 months. For 28 million shares of STRC, an annualized dividend rate of 11.5% based on a $100 face value requires over $320 million in annual cash dividend payments. After the cash reserves shrank, the market began to question: where will the money come from?

The answer was revealed on June 1st. Strategy disclosed that between May 26th and 31st, the company sold 32 Bitcoins at an average price of $77,135, raising approximately $2.5 million to pay STRC's dividends.

This was Saylor's first Bitcoin sale since 2022.

32 BTC is negligible against Strategy's holdings of 840,000 Bitcoin, accounting for less than 0.004%. The amount is also only $2.5 million. Saylor's own explanation was "taking a vaccine"—selling once proactively to acclimate the market and eliminate panic expectations.

The market didn't buy it. MSTR fell over 4% in after-hours trading. Investors' logic is simple: when someone who promised to "never sell Bitcoin" starts selling, regardless of the amount, the faith has cracked.

Third, competitor Strive's SATA is drawing investors away from STRC. SATA is also a Bitcoin-backed preferred stock, currently trading near its $100 face value with an annual yield of about 13%, higher than STRC's 11.5%. More crucially, starting June 16th, SATA switched to paying dividends every business day, a much higher frequency than STRC's semi-monthly payments. Strive has no outstanding debt, and SATA sits at the highest priority in the capital structure, not needing to compete with convertible bond holders for cash flow.

The price gap between STRC and SATA has widened to about $15, a historic record. Both are Bitcoin-backed high-yield preferred stocks, one trading at face value, the other at a 17% discount. The market is voting with its feet.

The Reverse Flywheel

The chain reaction triggered by STRC falling below face value is precisely the mirror image of Saylor's intended capital machine design.

The positive cycle was: STRC above $100 → ATM issuance → cash inflow → buy Bitcoin → Bitcoin rises → STRC stabilizes → continue issuing.

The reverse flywheel is: Bitcoin falls → STRC falls below face value → ATM suspended → financing channel closed → forced to sell Bitcoin for dividends → market confidence damaged → STRC falls further.

Strategy has already suspended its ATM premium issuance plan for STRC. This means the company has lost a key Bitcoin acquisition tool. Meanwhile, short-selling activity for STRC has noticeably increased in the options market.

Saylor's rebuttal has some logic: in a recent public appearance, he did the math—for every 1 BTC sold to pay dividends, Strategy could buy back 10 to 20 BTC through other capital operations. The entire model only needs Bitcoin to appreciate 2.3% annually to run perpetually. Strategy currently holds over 840,000 Bitcoin with an average cost of about $75,540. At the current price of $63,000, that's a paper loss exceeding $10 billion, with Q1 already recording a net loss of $12.54 billion.

Mathematically, Saylor's argument might hold water. The problem is, the market never looks at math alone. When STRC's price signal continues to deteriorate, when the "sell Bitcoin for dividends" narrative replaces the "never sell Bitcoin" faith, even the most precise model can't stop capital outflows.

The STRC Test is a Test of Faith

STRC falling to $85 does not threaten Strategy's survival. Preferred stock ranks above common stock but below debt in the capital structure, so bondholders' interests are unaffected. There is also no risk of Saylor's 840,000 Bitcoin being forcibly liquidated.

What is truly being tested is something more fundamental: can the Bitcoin treasury company model sustain its financing machine during a bear market?

Last year, STRC was Saylor's proudest invention, a financial product that allowed traditional fixed-income investors to participate in the Bitcoin narrative. Today, it has become a mirror, reflecting the fragility of leveraged strategies in a counter-cyclical environment.

Bitcoin only needs to rise 2.3% to get this machine running again. But against the backdrop of the Fed releasing hawkish signals, rekindled rate hike expectations, and a Fear & Greed Index dropping to 22 (Extreme Fear), that seemingly insignificant 2.3% carries more weight than ever before.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the core purpose of creating the STRC preferred stock according to the article, and why is its current price drop significant?

AThe STRC preferred stock was designed as a 'digital credit engine' or a non-cyclic financing tool to raise capital for MicroStrategy to purchase Bitcoin. Its mechanism aimed to trade around a $100 face value. The current drop below $85 is significant because it indicates a failure of its underlying 'stable near par' logic, halts its ATM issuance program for raising funds, and triggers a negative feedback loop for the company's capital strategy.

QWhat are the three main drivers, according to the article, that led to the sharp decline in STRC's price?

AThe three main drivers are: 1) The sharp decline in Bitcoin's price (over 50% from its peak). 2) The strained dividend coverage for STRC after MicroStrategy used cash to repay a convertible note, reducing its cash cushion, and then selling a small amount of Bitcoin to pay the dividend, breaking its 'never sell' narrative. 3) Competition from Strive's SATA preferred stock, which offers a higher yield and more frequent dividend payments, drawing investors away from STRC.

QExplain the 'reverse flywheel' effect described in the article in relation to STRC's price drop.

AThe 'reverse flywheel' is the negative cycle triggered when STRC trades below its $100 face value. It works as follows: Bitcoin price falls → STRC trades below par → MicroStrategy's ATM (at-the-market) share issuance program is halted → the company loses a key funding channel → it may be forced to sell Bitcoin to pay STRC dividends → this damages market confidence → causing STRC's price to fall further. This is the opposite of the intended positive cycle where a price above par fuels more Bitcoin purchases.

QWhat specific action did MicroStrategy take in May 2025 that severely reduced STRC's dividend coverage, and what was the market's reaction to its subsequent action to cover the dividend?

AIn May 2025, MicroStrategy used $1.5 billion in cash to repay a convertible note due in 2029. This action slashed STRC's dividend coverage period from 24 months to about 7 months. To cover the dividend, the company sold 32 Bitcoins for approximately $2.5 million in late May. The market reacted negatively, with MSTR stock falling over 4% after-hours, as this sale broke Michael Saylor's long-standing 'never sell Bitcoin' pledge and shook investor faith in the model.

QBeyond the immediate financial mechanics, what does the article suggest is the fundamental thing being tested by STRC's price collapse?

AThe article suggests that STRC's collapse is testing the fundamental viability of the 'Bitcoin Treasury' corporate model itself—specifically, whether its leveraged capital-raising machinery can continue to function effectively during a bear market or adverse macroeconomic conditions. It challenges the resilience of a business model built on perpetual financing to buy and hold Bitcoin when market sentiment turns negative.

Related Reads

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

For years, the prevailing view has been that options struggle to gain traction in DeFi due to complexity, fragmented liquidity, and lack of natural demand compared to products like perpetual futures. However, a recent algorithmic stablecoin design proposed by Vitalik Buterin presents a different perspective, using options not as a standalone trading product, but as foundational infrastructure for other financial instruments. In this design, one unit of ETH is split into two components: a "stable" side (P) that retains value up to a specified strike price, and an "upside" side (N) that captures all appreciation above that strike. Combined, they always equal one ETH, eliminating debt, margin, and liquidation risks inherent in typical collateralized debt position (CDP) stablecoins. The stable component essentially mimics the payoff of a covered call option. To function as a stablecoin, this structure requires continuously rolling deep in-the-money calls, which introduces challenges like rollover slippage, predictable transaction flow vulnerable to front-running, and persistent liquidity needs. A core hurdle is finding consistent buyers for the leveraged ETH upside exposure (N). While it offers leverage without funding rates or liquidation, it must compete with simpler alternatives like direct call options or perpetuals. The system's scalability depends on a sustained demand for this specific form of leverage. The author draws parallels to their experience with Rysk, where earlier versions of DeFi options protocols struggled. The breakthrough came with Rysk V12, which aligns incentives: asset holders generate yield by selling covered calls against their holdings, while market makers efficiently acquire the desired option exposure. This demonstrates that options can find product-market fit when embedded as a risk distribution and pricing engine within structured products, stablecoins, or yield-generating assets, rather than marketed as a complex direct trading instrument. Vitalik's proposal reinforces this architectural approach—using fully collateralized, non-custodial, and physically settled options as a fundamental building block. The real opportunity for options in DeFi may lie not in becoming the next perpetual swap, but in powering the next generation of on-chain financial products.

marsbit32m ago

Options Don't Work in DeFi? Vitalik Might Not Agree

marsbit32m ago

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

Frontier tech investor Zheng "Didier" Di discusses the recent Bitcoin price drop, the financial strategy shift at MicroStrategy, the AI-driven surge in U.S. stocks, and the evolving role of crypto exchanges. Didier posits that the recent BTC decline stems less from macro factors or ETF outflows, and more from market repricing due to MicroStrategy's new financial structure. Following a wave of preferred stock and debt issuance (STRC, STRZ, etc.), MicroStrategy must now manage cash flow to pay dividends, potentially leading to a market expectation of sustained, small-scale BTC sales to maintain its "per-share bitcoin neutral" principle. Didier views this as a financial "experiment" testing market capacity for such recurring sell pressure, which, while creating near-term structural headwinds, likely avoids a true "death spiral" absent major new external shocks. Shifting to AI, Didier argues that tokens are becoming the new form of labor, with AI models and compute (tokenized inputs) increasingly replacing human roles in execution and middle-management. This drives enterprise efficiency and higher margins, fueling the sustained rally in U.S. semiconductor, data center, and infrastructure stocks. He foresees an emerging "machine economy" where automated agents transact and collaborate on-chain. Regarding crypto exchanges offering U.S. equities, Didier sees this as a natural evolution. With few crypto-native assets generating lasting value, exchanges are pivoting towards real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and bonds. This doesn't necessarily cannibalize crypto but reflects a maturing industry focusing on blockchain's core utilities: decentralized choice and efficient settlement. He notes that trading logic for crypto natives doesn't need to drastically change, as meme-driven and fundamentalist strategies find analogs in U.S. markets. The "1011 event" (likely referring to a major market crash) severely damaged crypto market liquidity, marking a probable end to the altcoin speculative cycle, with capital flowing towards the deeper liquidity of U.S. markets. For the macro outlook, Didier is cautious about near-term market pressure from potential mega-IPOs (e.g., SpaceX) and the U.S. midterm elections, which could bring more regulatory scrutiny. Long-term, he remains bullish on AI's productivity gains and its convergence with blockchain/Web3, predicting a shift from speculative frenzy to a more institutionalized, industrial phase for the crypto sector.

marsbit1h ago

Conversation with Investor Zheng Di: MicroStrategy's Coin Sale Experiment, AI Economy, and Opportunities in US Stocks

marsbit1h ago

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

Playnance's native token, $GCOIN, has been listed on the cryptocurrency exchange KoinBX as of June 18. This move aims to enhance accessibility for its rapidly growing community, particularly in India, where the blockchain-powered Web3 iGaming ecosystem has gained significant traction. Over 130 partners in Playnance's "Be the Boss" program have built communities engaging thousands of active players in the region. The "Be the Boss" model allows participants to create and manage their own gaming communities, earning rewards tied to community activity. CEO Pini Peter noted India's high engagement, with community leaders successfully building player networks. One partner, Dr. Nicolas, reported earning over $57,000 through the program in recent months, highlighting both the financial rewards and the opportunity to grow an engaged community. $GCOIN serves as the ecosystem's core utility token, incentivizing participation and aligning the interests of players and community leaders ("Bosses"). The listing on KoinBX is part of Playnance's strategy to expand globally, increasing the token's utility and accessibility by combining community ownership, gamified engagement, and blockchain-based incentives. Founded in 2020, Playnance is a Web3 iGaming infrastructure company focused on creating live, non-custodial, on-chain products to onboard mainstream users. It currently processes approximately one million transactions daily, aiming to simplify the user experience while maintaining full on-chain transparency.

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

Playnance’s $GCOIN Lists on KoinBX Amid Rapid Growth in India

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

**Title:** Grayscale's Guide to Bottom-Fishing: Valuing Cryptoassets Using Cash Flows **Summary:** This report by Grayscale Research presents a fundamental valuation framework for cryptocurrency assets, moving beyond pure speculation to analyze those with underlying cash flows. It distinguishes between "commodity-like" assets (e.g., Bitcoin) and "cash-flow" assets, primarily within DeFi. Using the leading decentralized lending protocol Aave as a case study, the analysis applies traditional financial methodologies like Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Price-to-Earnings (P/E) multiples. Key findings indicate that AAVE tokens are currently undervalued. Despite recent challenges, the protocol's strong revenue growth, ~50% net profit margin, and diversified treasury support a fundamental valuation range of $80-$100 per token (compared to a ~$75 market price at the time of writing). In a base-case scenario driven by stablecoin adoption and regulatory clarity, the fair value could rise to around $175 within a year. The report emphasizes that protocol success does not automatically translate to token value. It critically examines the "value capture" mechanisms—such as buybacks, burns, and staking rewards—that channel protocol profits to token holders. Furthermore, it addresses the legal and governance complexities of Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs), noting their difference from traditional corporate equity but highlighting how robust, transparent governance can align protocol economics with holder interests. The conclusion is that the crypto market is maturing, with capital increasingly flowing towards projects with demonstrable fundamentals, real adoption, and disciplined capital allocation, creating opportunities for value-based investors.

marsbit3h ago

A Guide to Grayscale’s ‘Bottom Fishing’: Using Cash Flow to Assess Cryptocurrency Value

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片