Staking 'Net Outflow' Ends: Can Ethereum Achieve a Strong Breakthrough?

marsbitPublished on 2025-12-30Last updated on 2025-12-30

Abstract

By the end of 2025, the Ethereum network has reached a pivotal moment: the validator entry queue has surpassed the exit queue for the first time in months. This reversal indicates that more capital is seeking to stake ETH than to unstake, signaling a potential shift in market sentiment and underlying network strength. Currently, approximately 739,824 ETH are waiting to enter the staking queue, with an estimated wait time of nearly 13 days, while only 349,867 ETH are in the exit queue, requiring about 6 days to process. Total ETH staked stands at around 35.5 million, accounting for 29.27% of the total supply, with over 983,600 active validators. This change reflects reduced selling pressure and suggests growing confidence among institutional players. Key drivers include large staking moves by treasury firms like BitMine, which staked over 342,560 ETH in late December, and SharpLink, which has staked nearly all of its ETH. The Pectra upgrade—implemented in May 2025—also improved staking efficiency by raising the maximum validator balance and enabling reward compounding. Additionally, the deleveraging process in DeFi, which previously caused significant exit pressure, appears to be nearing its end. While challenges remain and the sustainability of this trend is yet to be confirmed, the shift toward net staking inflow marks a possible turning point for Ethereum’s security and capital accumulation cycle heading into 2026.

As 2025 draws to a close, the Ethereum network has reached a critical turning point: the validator "entry queue" has reversed and surpassed the "exit queue."

This means that, after months of market turbulence, the amount of capital attempting to stake Ethereum and become validators has far exceeded the amount seeking to unstake and exit.

This shift is more than just a numerical change—it is a barometer of market sentiment and network fundamentals. It signals that the sustained selling pressure of recent months is gradually easing and indicates that, driven by factors such as the return of institutional confidence, optimizations from the Pectra upgrade, and the clearing of DeFi leverage, the Ethereum network is entering a new cycle of enhanced security and capital accumulation.

Reversal of Ethereum Validator Queues

According to the latest data from Ethereum Validator Queue, approximately 739,824 ETH is currently queued to enter the network, with an estimated wait time of 12 days and 20 hours. The exit queue holds only 349,867 ETH, which would take about 6 days to clear.

Additionally, the total amount of ETH staked is currently around 35.5 million, accounting for 29.27% of the total supply, with the number of active validators reaching 983,600.

What is the Validator Queue? Why is it Important?

Under Ethereum's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, to ensure consensus stability, the protocol stipulates that nodes cannot join or leave at will. Instead, it regulates this through a "Churn Limit" mechanism.

Currently, the maximum number of validators that can be activated or exited per epoch (approximately 6 minutes and 24 seconds) is set at 256 ETH, equivalent to a daily processing capacity of about 57,600 ETH.

· Entry Queue: The queuing channel for staking 32 ETH to apply to become a validator. Growth in this queue indicates strong staking demand and long-term bullish sentiment.

· Exit Queue: The queuing channel for applying to withdraw funds. Growth in this queue typically signals selling pressure, liquidity needs, or deleveraging activities.

Therefore, the validator queue is not only an indicator of network health but also a barometer of market sentiment.

How Did the Validator Queue Change in 2025?

Throughout 2025, the Ethereum validator queue experienced significant fluctuations:

· First half to Autumn: The exit queue repeatedly reached record highs, primarily due to institutional rotation, profit-taking, DeFi deleveraging (e.g., soaring Aave lending rates triggering the unwinding of stETH looped borrowing positions), and isolated security incidents (such as Kiln exiting all its validator nodes in September).

· Mid-September: The exit queue peaked at 2.67 million ETH, with a waiting time of up to 46 days at that point.

· September-October: The "entry queue" briefly surpassed the exit queue but was later dominated by the "exit queue" again.

· November: The "entry queue" grew again to over 1.5 million ETH, but the "exit queue" once reached over 2.5 million ETH.

· End of December: The "entry queue" reversed the trend. Currently, approximately 739,824 ETH is queued to enter the network, while only 349,867 ETH is in the exit queue.

Four Core Drivers Behind the December Reversal

This reversal is not accidental but the result of the combined effect of capital, technology, and the macro environment:

Large-Scale Staking by Treasury Companies like BitMine

Just two days before the reversal occurred (December 25-27), BitMine staked a cumulative 342,560 ETH (approximately $1 billion), directly pushing the queue to reverse.

Furthermore, BitMine had previously stated its plan to launch dedicated staking infrastructure—the Made in America Validator Network (MAVAN)—in the first quarter of 2026, demonstrating its long-term commitment to the Ethereum staking ecosystem.

Simultaneously, another leading treasury company, SharpLink, has staked nearly 100% of its ETH holdings, further adding momentum to the capital inflow.

Although the crypto treasury sector currently faces severe challenges, with some institutions slowing their ETH accumulation pace or even seeing cases like ETHZilla reducing holdings for cash, the significant moves by key players like BitMine and SharpLink have largely stabilized the fundamental landscape of Ethereum staking.

Pectra Upgrade Optimizes Staking Experience

The Pectra upgrade implemented in May 2025 introduced key improvements via EIP-7251: increasing the maximum effective validator balance from 32 ETH to 2048 ETH and enabling reward compounding and validator consolidation. This reduces the operational costs for institutions managing thousands of validator nodes, providing technical convenience for large capital entry.

Kiln's Restaking Reopening

Kiln exited validators on a large scale following a security incident in September 2025. Although it's unclear exactly when Kiln resumed staking, according to Beaconcha.in data, Kiln currently holds a 1.68% share in the Ethereum staking ecosystem.

DeFi Deleveraging Nearing Completion

Previously, in June and July, rising lending rates on Aave forced the unwinding of stETH looped strategies, triggering阶段性 selling pressure. Recently, as the deleveraging process has largely cleared, related exit demand has gradually subsided, allowing market inflow demand to dominate.

Some Institutions Buying the Dip

The market has been adjusting for many days, and some institutions are bullish on ETH's long-term value. Trend Research is preparing to use $1 billion to continue accumulating ETH. On December 25th, Ai Yi confirmed with Jack Yi himself that the actual cost basis for the 645,000 ETH accumulated by Jack Yi's Trend Research since November is around $3,150, meaning the current floating loss on the holding is approximately $143 million. After the subsequent $1 billion investment, the expected average cost of ETH is projected to be controlled at around $3,050.

Summary

The reversal of the Ethereum validator "entry queue" surpassing the "exit queue" marks the initial formation of a net staking inflow-dominated格局 for the first time since July. This change is far more than a mere numerical crossover; it is a crucial signal of rebuilding market confidence. Of course, whether this leading trend can be sustained and solidified remains to be tested by time.

Although Ethereum spot ETFs have not yet shown significant net inflows, the improvement in on-chain fundamentals is evident. As SharpLink Gaming Co-CEO Joseph Chalom stated this month, the surge in stablecoins, tokenized RWA, and growing interest from sovereign wealth funds could potentially drive Ethereum's TVL to grow 10-fold in 2026.

Standing at the tail end of 2025, is Ethereum ready to gather momentum for a breakthrough in 2026? The answer will be revealed in time.

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit38m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit38m ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

A researcher discovered a critical "infinite mint" vulnerability in the Zcash cryptocurrency's Orchard protocol using Claude Opus 4.8, leading to a swift fix but also a 50% market drop, erasing billions in value. This incident highlights a new era where powerful, accessible AI models are dramatically lowering the barrier to finding software vulnerabilities. Previously, the security community feared specialized models like Claude Mythos Preview, capable of finding decades-old zero-day exploits. The Zcash case, however, involved a publicly available, general-purpose model. This shift makes advanced security auditing—and attack capabilities—accessible to far more people, not just experts. The mass democratization of vulnerability discovery brings a dual challenge: a flood of low-quality, AI-generated false reports that overwhelm maintainers, and the real, rapid uncovering of deep, dangerous bugs. Open-source projects, often understaffed and unfunded, are particularly vulnerable to this "attention DDoS." The article cites examples like curl shutting down its bug bounty program due to the unsustainable workload. Our perceived digital safety has often been luck, relying on the high cost and effort required to find deeply hidden flaws in complex systems, as seen with historical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or Baron Samedit. AI changes this cost structure, effectively "mass-producing flashlights" to illuminate every corner of our codebase. While large companies operate extensive security chains involving external white-hat hackers and massive defensive operations, the global cybersecurity workforce faces a severe shortage, especially of experienced personnel capable of analyzing complex threats and coordinating fixes. The core dilemma emerges: AI makes *finding* bugs cheap and scalable, but *fixing* them remains a slow, expensive, and human-intensive process. The article concludes that AI won't destroy the internet but acts as a bright light, revealing that our digital existence is not inherently secure but is precariously maintained by ongoing human effort. The true cost in the AI era may not be discovery, but whether there will be enough people left willing and able to do the hard work of repair.

marsbit1h ago

Claude Opus 4.8 Finds a $4.5 Billion Bug: The AI Era is Mass-Producing Hackers

marsbit1h ago

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Could Double While Cardano (ADA) and This Newcomer Token Near 500% Rally

As the cryptocurrency market anticipates a potential bull cycle, investor focus is shifting toward projects with high return potential. Ethereum (ETH), currently at approximately $2,014, is highlighted for its long-term value, with predictions suggesting a possible 2x increase to over $4,000. Cardano (ADA), trading around $0.2329, remains a choice for its research-driven development and scalability focus, though some seek higher upside elsewhere. Significant attention is drawn to Little Pepe (LILPEPE), a new Layer 2 Ethereum-compatible token priced at $0.0022 in its presale stage, which has raised over $28.19 million. The project aims to build a dedicated blockchain for meme communities, offering lower costs and faster transactions. Backers speculate a potential 500% gain, driven by strong presale demand, planned ecosystem features like staking and a launchpad, and active community engagement through giveaways. While Ethereum and Cardano are viewed as foundational investments, LILPEPE represents a newer, high-growth opportunity for investors targeting the meme coin sector.

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

Ethereum Price Prediction: ETH Could Double While Cardano (ADA) and This Newcomer Token Near 500% Rally

TheNewsCrypto1h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

"Codex Goal Mode: How to Make AI Work Continuously Toward a Specific Goal" OpenAI's Codex "goal mode" (/goal) transforms the AI from a reactive code assistant into a proactive execution agent capable of working autonomously for hours or even days to achieve a defined objective. To maximize its effectiveness, follow these key principles: 1. **Define Clear, Verifiable Exit Criteria:** The goal prompt should be a concise, measurable success condition, not a lengthy specification. Use quantifiable metrics like "reduce build time by 30%" or "achieve 100% test parity." 2. **Provide Initial Guidance and Tools:** Direct Codex toward likely problem areas and specify available tools (e.g., browsers, testing environments) to prevent it from exploring unproductive paths. 3. **Enable Progress Measurement:** Equip Codex with ways to track advancement, such as creating comparison tools for visual tasks or evaluation sets, ensuring it can gauge its own progress. 4. **Use a Realistic Execution Environment:** For tasks like performance optimization, provide access to environments that closely mimic production (e.g., similar configs, databases) to yield valid results. 5. **Be Cautious with Visual Goals:** Avoid vague "pixel-perfect" instructions. Instead, supplement visual references with functional checklists or design system specifications to prevent Codex from obsessing over minor details. 6. **Implement Progress Tracking:** For long-running tasks, have Codex commit code to draft PRs, update progress documents, or send Slack updates to maintain visibility into its work. 7. **Review and Consolidate Results:** Once the goal is met, instruct Codex to review its work, clean up ineffective experimental code, and reflect on what strategies succeeded or failed. Ultimately, using goal mode shifts the developer's role from writing prompts to managing a persistent engineering agent—defining objectives, establishing metrics, configuring environments, and conducting final reviews.

marsbit2h ago

Codex Goal Mode Usage Guide: How to Make AI Continuously Pursue a Specific Objective

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

Hot Articles

How to Buy SFP

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing SafePal (SFP) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy SafePal (SFP) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your SafePal (SFP)After purchasing your SafePal (SFP), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade SafePal (SFP)Easily trade SafePal (SFP) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

669 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.22Updated 2026.06.02

How to Buy CTR

Welcome to HTX.com! We've made purchasing Citrea (CTR) simple and convenient. Follow our step-by-step guide to embark on your crypto journey.Step 1: Create Your HTX AccountUse your email or phone number to sign up for a free account on HTX. Experience a hassle-free registration journey and unlock all features.Get My AccountStep 2: Go to Buy Crypto and Choose Your Payment MethodCredit/Debit Card: Use your Visa or Mastercard to buy Citrea (CTR) instantly.Balance: Use funds from your HTX account balance to trade seamlessly.Third Parties: We've added popular payment methods such as Google Pay and Apple Pay to enhance convenience.P2P: Trade directly with other users on HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): We offer tailor-made services and competitive exchange rates for traders.Step 3: Store Your Citrea (CTR)After purchasing your Citrea (CTR), store it in your HTX account. Alternatively, you can send it elsewhere via blockchain transfer or use it to trade other cryptocurrencies.Step 4: Trade Citrea (CTR)Easily trade Citrea (CTR) on HTX's spot market. Simply access your account, select your trading pair, execute your trades, and monitor in real-time. We offer a user-friendly experience for both beginners and seasoned traders.

537 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.06.02

What is USOIL

USOILUSDT Perpetual Contract is the trading symbol for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) Crude Oil priced in US dollars, representing 1 barrel of crude oil.

540 Total ViewsPublished 2026.05.25Updated 2026.05.25

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of A (A) are presented below.