Solana bulls absorb despite falling prices – Can SOL hold $78.5?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-09Last updated on 2026-02-09

Abstract

Despite a 4.37% price drop to $84.47, Solana (SOL) saw significant exchange outflows of over 1 million SOL in 72 hours, suggesting strategic repositioning rather than panic selling. However, SOL remains in a bearish descending channel, struggling below the 50-day EMA near $119. Key support lies at $78.5. While the RSI is oversold at 28, indicating potential exhaustion, the structure remains unresolved. Despite buyer-dominant spot activity absorbing selling pressure, the trend hasn't reversed. Liquidation clusters around $85–$86 could trigger volatility if breached. Overall, SOL shows signs of absorption but requires structural improvement to shift the bearish bias.

Over the past 72 hours, roughly 1.077 million SOL have been withdrawn from centralized exchanges, significantly reducing readily available sell-side liquidity. This supply contraction has unfolded alongside a sharp price decline,

At press time, Solana [SOL] was trading near $84.47, down 4.37% over the last 24 hours, at press time. Importantly, these withdrawals did not follow a relief rally.

Instead, market participants reduced exchange exposure while the price weakened, pointing toward strategic repositioning rather than panic-driven selling.

Although declining exchange balances typically limit sudden spot dumps, the price has not stabilized yet.

As a result, downside pressure increasingly shifts toward derivatives markets, where leverage rather than spot distribution now drives short-term price behavior.

Solana price grinds within a bearish structure

SOL continues to trade within a clearly defined descending channel, maintaining a persistent sequence of lower highs and lower lows.

Price has repeatedly failed to reclaim the 50-day EMA near $119, reinforcing bearish control over the broader trend. Each rebound attempt has stalled beneath prior resistance, preventing any meaningful structure repair.

Price now trades closer to the lower boundary of the channel, directing attention toward the $78.5 support zone, which previously acted as a demand area.

While downside momentum has slowed slightly near current levels, structure remains unresolved. Without a decisive reclaim of key moving averages, sellers continue to dictate directional bias.

Momentum conditions reinforce the fragile state of the trend. At the time of writing, the RSI has slipped to around 28, pushing deep into oversold territory. Such readings usually emerge during mature phases of downside moves rather than at confirmed reversal points.

In this case, RSI has flattened near these lows, suggesting selling pressure may be losing intensity rather than accelerating. However, momentum has not rotated back toward neutral territory. This behavior signals exhaustion, not confirmation.

Short-term relief attempts may develop, yet without structural improvement, those moves often fade quickly. As long as RSI remains suppressed below key thresholds, bearish control continues to dominate.

Buyers absorb aggressively despite falling prices

Despite persistent price weakness, Spot Taker CVD remains decisively buyer-dominant across the 90-day window.

Aggressive market buys continue to outweigh sells, indicating absorption rather than capitulation. This divergence highlights an important tension. Buyers actively step in, yet the price continues to trend lower.

Such behavior often reflects a larger supply being distributed into demand rather than retail panic selling. While sustained absorption can eventually stabilize the price, confirmation requires a visible structural response.

Until that occurs, taker dominance primarily slows downside velocity instead of reversing trend direction, keeping pressure firmly in place.

Volatility risk ahead?

The Binance SOL/USDT liquidation heatmap shows dense leverage clusters above the current price, concentrated around the $85–$86 region, while SOL trades through a darker, low-liquidity zone near $84.4.

This positioning indicates a buildup of short-side exposure rather than vulnerable longs. If price pushes higher into that band, forced short liquidations could trigger rapid upside acceleration through mechanical buy orders.

However, until price reclaims that zone, liquidation pressure remains dormant. With limited leverage at current levels, the price may continue to compress while waiting for a catalyst.

This setup creates asymmetric risk, where upside volatility could expand quickly if buyers regain control, despite the broader bearish structure still in place.

What lies ahead for Solana?

Solana continues to show signs of supply absorption and slowing downside momentum; however, price structure remains decisively bearish.

Exchange outflows and buyer-dominant taker activity suggest positioning rather than capitulation, yet failure to reclaim key moving averages keeps downside risks elevated.

Until structure improves and leverage clears decisively, SOL remains vulnerable to further volatility despite emerging exhaustion signals.


Final Thoughts

  • Supply absorption hints at strategic positioning, yet bearish structure continues to dominate Solana’s directional bias.
  • Solana likely needs clear structural repair before internal demand signals can meaningfully influence trend direction.

Related Questions

QWhat is the significance of the 1.077 million SOL withdrawn from exchanges in the last 72 hours?

AThe withdrawal of 1.077 million SOL from centralized exchanges significantly reduced readily available sell-side liquidity, indicating strategic repositioning by market participants rather than panic-driven selling.

QWhat key price level is acting as a crucial support zone for Solana according to the article?

AThe $78.5 price zone is acting as a crucial support level for Solana, as it previously acted as a demand area.

QWhat does the buyer-dominant Spot Taker CVD indicate despite falling prices?

AThe buyer-dominant Spot Taker CVD indicates that aggressive market buys continue to outweigh sells, showing absorption of selling pressure rather than investor capitulation.

QAccording to the Binance liquidation heatmap, what could trigger rapid upside price acceleration?

AIf the price pushes into the $85–$86 region where dense leverage clusters of short positions are concentrated, forced short liquidations could trigger rapid upside acceleration through mechanical buy orders.

QWhat is required for Solana's internal demand signals to meaningfully influence its trend direction?

ASolana needs clear structural repair, such as reclaiming key moving averages, before internal demand signals can meaningfully influence the trend direction.

Related Reads

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

The AI infrastructure (AI Infra) industry chain is facing unprecedented systemic bottlenecks, despite the rapid emergence of applications like DeepSeek and Seedance 2.0. The surge in global computing demand has exposed critical constraints across multiple layers of the supply chain—from core manufacturing equipment and data center cabling to specialty materials and cleanroom facilities. Key challenges include four major "walls": - **Memory Wall**: High-bandwidth memory (HBM) and DRAM face structural shortages as AI inference demand outpaces training, with new capacity not expected until 2027. - **Bandwidth Wall**: Data transfer speeds lag behind computing power, causing multi-level bottlenecks in-chip, between chips, and across data centers. - **Compute Wall**: Advanced chip manufacturing, reliant on EUV lithography and monopolized by ASML, remains the fundamental constraint, with supply chain fragility affecting production. - **Power Wall**: While energy demand from data centers is rising, power supply is a solvable near-term challenge through diversified energy infrastructure. Expansion is further hindered by shortages in testing equipment, IC substrates (critical for GPUs and seeing price hikes over 30%), specialty materials like low-CTE glass fiber, and high-end cleanroom facilities. Connection technologies are evolving, with copper cables resurging for short-range links due to cost and latency advantages, while optical solutions dominate long-range scenarios. Innovations like hollow-core fiber and advanced PCB technologies (e.g., glass substrates, mSAP) are emerging to meet bandwidth needs. In summary, AI Infra bottlenecks are multidimensional, spanning compute, memory, bandwidth, power, and supply chain logistics. Advanced chip manufacturing remains the core constraint, while substrate, material, and equipment shortages present immediate challenges. The industry is moving toward hybrid copper-optical solutions and accelerated domestic supply chain development.

marsbit14m ago

Where Is the AI Infrastructure Industry Chain Stuck?

marsbit14m ago

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

DeepSeek V4's repeated delay in early 2026 has sparked global discussions on "de-CUDA-ization" in AI. The highly anticipated trillion-parameter open-source model is undergoing deep adaptation to Huawei’s Ascend chips using the CANN framework, representing China’s first systematic attempt to run a core AI model outside the CUDA ecosystem. This shift, however, comes with significant engineering challenges. While the model uses a MoE architecture to reduce computational load, it places extreme demands on memory bandwidth, chip interconnects, and system scheduling—areas where NVIDIA’s mature CUDA ecosystem currently excels. Migrating to Ascend introduces complexities in hardware topology, communication latency, and software optimization due to CANN’s relative immaturity compared to CUDA. The move highlights a broader strategic dilemma: short-term compatibility with CUDA offers practical benefits and faster adoption, as seen in CANN’s efforts to emulate CUDA interfaces. Yet, long-term over-reliance on compatibility risks inheriting CUDA’s limitations and stifling native innovation. If global AI shifts away from transformer-based architectures, strict compatibility could lead to technological obsolescence. Despite these challenges, DeepSeek V4’s eventual release could demonstrate the viability of a full domestic AI stack and accelerate CANN’s ecosystem growth. However, true technological independence will require building an original software-hardware paradigm beyond compatibility—a critical task for China’s AI ambitions in the next 3-5 years.

marsbit32m ago

Autonomy or Compatibility: The Choice Facing China's AI Ecosystem Behind the Delay of DeepSeek V4

marsbit32m ago

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

AI Agents are rapidly evolving into autonomous economic participants, but they face critical gaps in identity, payment, and trust infrastructure. They currently lack standardized ways to prove who they are, what they are authorized to do, and how they should be compensated across different environments. Blockchain technology is emerging as a solution to these challenges by providing a neutral coordination layer. Public ledgers offer auditable credentials, wallets enable portable identities, and stablecoins serve as a programmable settlement layer. A key bottleneck is the absence of a universal identity standard for non-human entities—akin to "Know Your Agent" (KYA)—which would allow Agents to operate with verifiable, cryptographically signed credentials. Without this, Agents remain fragmented and face barriers to interoperability. Additionally, as AI systems take on governance roles, there is a risk that centralized control over models could undermine decentralized governance in practice. Cryptographic guarantees on training data, prompts, and behavior logs are essential to ensure Agents act in users' interests. Stablecoins and crypto-native payment rails are becoming the default for Agent-to-Agent commerce, enabling seamless, low-cost transactions for AI-native services. These systems support permissionless, programmable payments without traditional merchant onboarding. Finally, as AI scales, human oversight becomes impractical. Trust must be built into system architecture through verifiable provenance, on-chain attestations, and decentralized identity systems. The future of Agent economies depends on cryptographically enforced accountability, allowing users to delegate tasks with clearly defined constraints and transparent operation logs.

marsbit1h ago

How Blockchain Fills the Identity, Payment, and Trust Gaps for AI Agents?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片