Please Be Kind to Jack Yi

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

This article details the investment journey of Jack Yi (Yi Lihua), founder of Trend Research and Liquid Capital, a prominent figure in the Asian crypto space. In early 2025, Yi successfully bought ETH at lows around $1,800, leveraged his position, and sold near $4,700, realizing significant profits and solidifying his reputation. However, after the market downturn in October 2025, he re-entered, accumulating over 650,000 ETH with an average cost of $3,180, heavily leveraged. A sharp price drop in February 2026 pushed his position to the brink of liquidation, forcing him to sell 200,000 ETH to avoid a total loss. Despite this, he incurred a massive $763 million loss, erasing his previous gains and part of his principal. Yi admitted to misjudging the market's bottom and the risks of overconfidence post-success. He remains a vocal, transparent long-term bull on crypto, advocating for ETH reaching $10,000+ and BTC surpassing $200,000. The piece argues that despite the setback, the market needs more transparent, research-driven investors like him to attract serious capital and counter the industry's casino-like reputation.

Author: Gu Yu, ChainCatcher

With the sharp decline in BTC and ETH prices over the past few days, the position of Jack Yi (Yi Lihua), founder of Trend Research and Liquid Capital (formerly LD Capital), has drawn significant attention from crypto investors. His leveraged position of 650,000 ETH is now in a precarious state, teetering on the brink of liquidation under the current market conditions.

For this staunch ETH bull, a rare on-chain transparent trader, and a representative figure in Asia's crypto institutional circle, this situation appears particularly cruel and lamentable. After all, concepts like "transparency," "bullishness," and "research-driven" align with mainstream crypto values. To some extent, Yi Lihua's current "battle" is also a "battle for legitimacy" for the crypto industry.

So, how did this happen? Why did Yi Lihua go from successfully exiting at the top to getting trapped while buying the dip? What lessons and insights can we draw from this?

From Buying the Dip to Exiting the Top

Yi Lihua is an early OG in the Chinese crypto community. Since 2015, he has invested in hundreds of blockchain projects. Early investment cases include EOS, Qtum, VeChain, etc. After 2017, through LD Capital, he invested in well-known projects like Near, CertiK, MEXC, Sentient, and others.

Some of LD Capital's investment cases Source: RootData

Since early 2025, Yi Lihua shifted his focus from the crypto primary market to the secondary market. In April 2025, the price of ETH fell to a new low since 2022, dropping to a minimum of $1,385. Yi Lihua's dip-buying began quietly at this time.

At the end of April, Trend Research publicly released a research report bullish on ETH when it rose to $1,800, stating, "Under the trend, more upside is coming for the Crypto market."

At the end of May 2025, the frequent large-scale on-chain accumulations by Trend Research were discovered and disclosed by on-chain analyst Yu Jin. Yi Lihua promptly claimed these addresses on X. By then, ETH had risen to $2,600, and Trend Research's on-chain addresses cumulatively held 133,000 ETH, with a total value of $360 million.

It should be noted, however, that Trend Research's operations were not entirely cash-based purchases. A significant portion of the funds used to buy ETH were borrowed through Aave by collateralizing the ETH purchased earlier, meaning leverage of several times was applied.

In June 2025, Trend Research published another article titled "On the Eve of the Surge: Why We Are Bullish on ETH," mentioning that the institution's underlying logic for being bullish on ETH remained: The Trump administration is committed to building a stablecoin system... and the most important infrastructure for stablecoins and on-chain finance is Ethereum. The influx of stablecoins and the continued development of RWA will bring further prosperity to DeFi, increase Ethereum's consumption and gas fee revenue, and push its market capitalization higher.

At that time, the price of ETH was around $2,800. Yi Lihua also publicly stated that he believed ETH's long-term price could break through $5,000, and optimistically, BTC could reach over $300,000 in this cycle, with ETH有望 potentially reaching $10,000. Simultaneously, Yi Lihua mentioned having purchased 100,000 ETH options.

In July 2025, Yi Lihua tweeted that the market had彻底 entered a long bull market, possibly without the traditional 4-year cycle规律. Stablecoins and blockchain represent the best opportunity for the US to globalize the dollar. Investing in crypto stocks with the left hand and earning interest on stablecoins with the right hand, the market will continuously attract new users and capital.

Thereafter, Yi Lihua几乎 added to his position every month until early October, when he began warning of market risks and quickly transferred most of his ETH holdings to the Binance exchange for sale at around $4,700,恰好 escaping the 1011 event.

Through this round of precise dip-buying (starting from around $1,800 in the first half of the year) and profit-taking at the high, Yi Lihua achieved significant doubled profits, solidifying his influence as a top trend investor in the Chinese-speaking community.

Second Position Trapped

In the market reshuffled by the 1011 event, Yi Lihua saw another opportunity to build a position. In early November, Yi Lihua tweeted again, stating that ETH was starting to rebound and that he continued to be optimistic about the subsequent行情 and the strategy of buying the dip. Subsequently, he stated that $3,000-$3,300 was the spot buying range for ETH. As ETH continued to correct, Yi Lihua, under his dip-buying strategy, stated that he was already fully invested in ETH at a price of $2,700. He then continued to add to his position through leveraged borrowing during further declines. By January of this year, his ETH holdings exceeded 650,000, with a reported average cost of $3,180.

"At the moment ETH fell to over $1,000, we saw through the主力's intention to wash out以太OG bulls and successfully bought the dip. When ETH rose to over $4,500, we saw through the market rising to a震荡 top and successfully liquidated. Trend Research has proven successful dip-buying and top-exiting performance in 2025. We will not change our investment strategy based on emotion," Yi Lihua was still cheering on the market in January.

But no one could have predicted that the market would deal this battle-hardened investor a heavy blow at this time. The price of ETH连续 broke through key levels of $2,200, $2,000, and $1,800 in early February, approaching his liquidation price.

Yi Lihua止损 sold approximately 200,000 ETH within a few days, lowering the liquidation price to around $1,600, narrowly escaping the sharp drop in the early hours of today. According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's analysis today, Trend Research's long position this time has resulted in a loss of $763 million, not only wiping out all profits from the previous round but also losing $448 million in principal.

In recent days, Yi Lihua tweeted to admit his mistake, "Since liquidating at the top, it was indeed wrong to be bullish on ETH too early because when BTC was around $100,000, ETH remained at $3,000, which we considered undervalued. Currently, the profits from the previous round have been given back. Position determines perspective. While controlling risks, we continue to wait for the market to move upward. Thank you for your concern. Investment and trading are the most difficult. Being in the industry, one can't help but be bullish at all times."

"Why can't I help but be bullish? It's related to my past entrepreneurial experience. Back then, I truly couldn't find a job and started a business. After earning my first bucket of gold, I didn't dare to spend lavishly and instead invested in tech projects. Entering the crypto circle in 2015, I caught that golden age, which was a harvest from consistently being long. But later, major losses from bear market investments + couldn't endure the bear market and liquidated BTC too early, ultimately missing the big bull market after 312. We experienced two bear markets followed by bull markets, so this time, after exiting the top, we were overconfident and bought the dip too early. While controlling risks, we continue to wait."

Zhu Su, founder of Three Arrows Capital, posted on X discussing this matter, "In my experience, selling at the top is often more dangerous than selling on the way down. This is because the excitement from selling at the top leads to premature追加 buying and overconfidence. I suspect Jack Yi made a similar arrogant mistake after making nine-figure profits on October 10th."

But after going through these twists and turns, Yi Lihua still expressed his firm view on the future market, "As a bull in this round, we still看好 the performance of the new bull market: ETH reaching over $10,000, BTC exceeding $200,000. We merely made some adjustments to control risks. I know everyone is disappointed with the industry and the leaders, especially the liquidity shortage and some platform manipulation brought by the 1011 event, but I believe the long-term trend of the crypto circle remains unchanged. Now is completely the best time to buy现货. Volatility is the biggest characteristic of the crypto circle. Countless bulls in history have been shaken off by this volatility, but often followed by加倍 rebounds."

Currently, the price of ETH has rebounded to around $1,900, significantly reducing the risk for Trend Research's position. However, the impact and启示 of this event on the industry will continue to发酵.

The Market Needs More Bulls and Transparency

As one of the very few institutional representatives who choose "on-chain transparency" and publicly share all their thoughts and positional dynamics, Yi Lihua's every statement and every operation无形中 becomes a mirror for the industry: it reflects the信念 of trend investing and also magnifies the nonlinear risks of leverage; it demonstrates the power of逻辑兑现 in a bull market and also exposes the fragile balance between emotion and position during a retreat phase.

But in a market still dominated by anonymous market makers, platform manipulation, and information asymmetry, Yi Lihua's public choice is itself a rare act of courage—he uses real on-chain operations, not just talk, to verify his judgments. While this approach brings immense personal pressure and阶段性 floating losses, it also provides the most直观 textbook for countless retail investors and small institutions: how to exit at the top in a bull market, how to buy the dip in a bear market, how to manage leverage, and how to克制 emotion.

In the highly volatile and uncertain arena of the crypto market, even the most glorious success stories and profound cycle insights cannot completely exempt participants from the market's残酷 lessons—because every cycle轮回 tests participants anew, in new forms, with new intensity, and with new variables. In this cycle, the crypto market has become closely intertwined with the macro-economic environment (CPI, US stocks, gold, etc.) and geopolitical events. Any major change outside the industry has the potential to reverse the cyclical trends within the industry.

This experience once again proves that what truly determines whether an investor can weather the cycles is not the correctness of a single directional choice, but whether enough survival space is预留 for every judgment amidst持续 uncertainty, and the ability to止损 and restart promptly when mistakes occur. Respecting the market is a principle every investor must always abide by.

It is also worth noting that Trend Research, as one of the top three ETH holding entities in the market, has become a bellwether for institutional crypto investors in the Asia-Pacific region. Its successes and failures also concern the voice and status of the Asian market in the crypto industry. There is also market sentiment that the Asian market, as a major source of liquidity in the current crypto market with a relatively high proportion of retail structure and more intense情绪传导, could likely become a passive recipient of North American narratives and liquidity once transparent bulls are broken.

Fortunately, Yi Lihua and his Trend Research are still at the table. The crypto industry needs more steadfast "bulls," more "transparency," and more "Yi Lihuas."

It must be understood that Trend Research's story will be seen by more mainstream institutions and deep-pocketed organizations. The crypto industry needs more stories of achieving returns through注重 research,遵守 investment discipline, and controlling risk, not more MEME-style wealth transfers from left hand to right hand. The former can bring incremental investors, while the latter can only exacerbate the赌场化 of the crypto industry.

Related Questions

QWho is Jack Yi and what is his role in the cryptocurrency industry?

AJack Yi, also known as Yilihua, is the founder of Trend Research and Liquid Capital (formerly LD Capital). He is a prominent figure in the Asian crypto community, an early investor in blockchain projects like EOS and Qtum, and a well-known on-chain, transparent trader who is a staunch Ethereum bull.

QWhat was the outcome of Jack Yi's first major ETH trading strategy in 2025?

AIn his first major strategy, Jack Yi successfully bought ETH at around $1,800 in early 2025 and sold near the peak at approximately $4,700 in October, achieving significant profits and solidifying his reputation as a top trend investor. This move allowed him to avoid the major '1011 event' market crash.

QWhat caused Jack Yi's significant financial loss in his second ETH investment attempt?

AHis second attempt resulted in a reported loss of $763 million. After successfully selling at a high, he re-entered the market too early, accumulating over 650,000 ETH with leverage at an average cost of $3,180. A sharp price drop in February to near $1,800 brought his positions dangerously close to liquidation, forcing him to sell 200,000 ETH to avoid being wiped out.

QWhat lesson does the article suggest investors learn from Jack Yi's experience?

AThe article suggests that the key lesson is that what determines an investor's ability to survive market cycles is not just making the right directional bets, but also maintaining enough survival space (risk management), the ability to cut losses promptly, and the humility to restart after a mistake. It emphasizes respecting the market's unpredictability.

QWhy does the article argue that the market needs more figures like Jack Yi, despite his recent losses?

AThe article argues that the crypto market needs more transparent, research-driven, and openly bullish figures like Jack Yi because his on-chain,明牌 (ming pai - open card) approach provides valuable, real-world lessons for retail and institutional investors. It contrasts this with anonymous market manipulation and argues that such transparency can attract incremental, serious investors rather than reinforcing the industry's 'casino' image.

Related Reads

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News35m ago

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News35m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News53m ago

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News53m ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

MicroStrategy's Debt Risk: A Turning Point in the "Never Sell" Strategy As of June 3, 2026, MicroStrategy holds 843,706 bitcoins (valued at ~$53.1B) but faces significant financial obligations. Its capital structure includes $6.75B in convertible notes and $15.48B in perpetual preferred stock (led by the $8.5B STRC series), creating an annual payout burden of ~$1.71B. With software revenue at only ~$500M, interest and dividend obligations far exceed operating income. A critical shift occurred in late May 2026 when the company sold 32 bitcoins for ~$2.5M to cover dividends, breaking CEO Michael Saylor's long-standing "never sell" pledge. This symbolic move triggered a sharp decline in both Bitcoin's price and MSTR stock, reflecting market fears about cash flow sustainability. The core of the strain is the STRC perpetual preferred stock, designed as a "permanent loan" with no maturity date but requiring high monthly dividends (currently 11.5%). Its business model relies on a three-part cycle: issuing new STRC shares, using proceeds to buy more Bitcoin and fund a USD reserve, and using that reserve to pay dividends. This cycle depends on continuous investor demand for STRC and Bitcoin's price appreciation. Analysis shows Bitcoin needs to appreciate at least 2.3% annually to cover the $1.71B in yearly obligations at current holdings. With Bitcoin price down ~22% from March 2026 highs, this pressure has intensified. The company's $900M USD reserve can only cover about 7 months of payments if STRC issuance stalls. Key risks are not immediate bankruptcy or forced Bitcoin liquidation (as BTC is not collateral), but rather: 1) The erosion of MSTR's premium to its Bitcoin holdings (mNAV), which would cripple its ability to raise cheap capital; 2) A vicious cycle where stagnant Bitcoin prices reduce STRC demand, draining the USD reserve and forcing BTC sales, further depressing prices. The period from February 2027 to September 2028 is a crucial test, with over $5.9B in convertible notes facing put options or maturity. In essence, MicroStrategy has evolved from a simple Bitcoin holder into a complex financial entity acting like a "private Bitcoin bank," leveraging its BTC holdings to create layered financial products. Its survival depends on maintaining Bitcoin's price trend, its stock premium, and market appetite for its preferred shares. The recent token sale marks not a betrayal of its Bitcoin thesis, but an admission that the leveraged strategy must eventually be paid for.

marsbit1h ago

How Much Debt Does Strategy Really Have? Is There a Risk of Implosion?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片