MSCI’s crypto treasury rules could spur $15B of forced selling

cointelegraphPublished on 2025-12-18Last updated on 2025-12-18

Abstract

MSCI is considering a proposal to exclude crypto treasury companies—those holding a majority of their assets in cryptocurrency—from its indexes. According to BitcoinForCorporations, this could trigger forced selling of up to $15 billion in crypto assets. The group argues that using a single balance sheet metric is unfair, as it fails to reflect a company’s actual business operations and financial health. Major firms like MicroStrategy, which could face $2.8 billion in outflows, have objected, stating the rule biases MSCI against crypto as an asset class. MSCI’s final decision is expected by January 15, with implementation planned for February 2026.

Crypto treasury companies could be forced to sell as much as $15 billion in crypto if the Morgan Stanley Capital International Index (MSCI) goes ahead and excludes them from its indexes.

BitcoinForCorporations, a group campaigning against MSCI’s proposal, projected outflows of between $10 and $15 billion based on a “verified preliminary list” of 39 companies with $113 billion in total float-adjusted market capitalization.

It added that JPMorgan’s analysis estimated that Michael Saylor’s Strategy could see $2.8 billion in outflows if it were removed from the MSCI. The Bitcoin treasury firm represents 74.5% of the total impacted float-adjusted market cap.

Analysts calculated potential outflows could total $11.6 billion across all impacted companies. Such a large outflow would put more selling pressure on crypto markets, which have already been trending downward for almost three months.

The BitcoinForCorporations petition letter had 1,268 signatures at the time of writing.

Balance sheet not a fair metric

The MSCI announced in October that it was consulting with the investment community about whether to exclude crypto treasury companies that have the majority of their balance sheet in crypto.

MSCI’s indexes serve as critical benchmarks that determine which companies passive investment funds must hold, making inclusion decisions highly consequential for companies’ access to capital.

However, BitcoinForCorporations said that a balance sheet metric is unfair for judging a company.

“A single balance sheet metric cannot reflect whether a company is an operating business. The rule would remove companies even when their customers, revenue, operations, and business model remain unchanged.”

Related: Strategy survives first Nasdaq 100 shakeup since entering the index

They added that MSCI should “withdraw the proposal and continue to classify companies based on their actual business model, financial performance, and operational characteristics.”

MSCI’s final conclusions will be announced by Jan. 15, and proposed implementation will be included in the February 2026 Index Review.

Growing objections to the proposal

Several large industry players have recently voiced their objections to the MSCI proposal.

On Dec. 5, Nasdaq-listed Strive urged the MSCI to “let the market decide” whether they want to include Bitcoin-holding companies in their passive investments.

A few days later, Strategy stated in a letter that the proposed policy change would bias the MSCI against crypto as an asset class, rather than the index company acting as a neutral arbiter.

Magazine: Do Kwon sentenced to 15 years, Bitcoin’s ‘choppy dance’: Hodler’s Digest

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

The article discusses using dice rolls to generate secure Bitcoin wallet seeds, providing entropy independent of potentially flawed hardware random number generators. It explains that each fair dice roll offers about 2.585 bits of entropy, with around 50 rolls needed for a standard 12-word seed phrase and 99+ recommended for higher security. This method gained attention after a vulnerability was revealed in some Coldcard hardware wallets, where a faulty firmware RNG (dating back to 2021) compromised generated keys. The analysis notes that while a dice-generated main seed was safe from this specific flaw, other Coldcard functions (like creating paper wallets, backup keys, or passwords) could still be vulnerable if they used the defective RNG. The piece argues that while dice-based entropy is technically robust, the manual process is error-prone, tedious, and unrealistic for most new users, who might make mistakes in recording or inputting rolls. It concludes that while manual entropy generation should remain an option for advanced users, the long-term goal is to develop reliable, user-friendly hardware and software that securely generates randomness without requiring specialized knowledge. Coldcard users are advised to check their firmware version and replace any secondary secrets (like paper wallet keys) created with vulnerable devices, while also considering multi-signature setups with devices from different manufacturers for added security.

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Thanks to Dice Rolls, Bitcoin Keys Are Stored Offline, But Not Everyone Will Do It

cryptonews.ru3h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片