Messari data shows Binance’s 2025 listings down 71% on average

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-10Last updated on 2026-03-10

Abstract

A new analysis by Messari reveals that investors who purchased every new token listed on Binance's spot market in 2025 would have suffered an average loss of 71%. The study simulated a portfolio allocating $100 to each of the 92 non-stablecoin tokens at their day-one closing price, totaling a $9,200 investment. By March 2026, the portfolio's value had plummeted to approximately $2,600. The findings challenge the common belief that exchange listings lead to sustained gains. Instead, listings often act as liquidity events where early investors, such as venture capital funds and team members, sell their tokens, creating downward pressure. The report also highlights the impact of token supply dynamics, noting that many new tokens have low circulating supplies at launch with significant future unlocks, leading to persistent selling pressure as more tokens enter the market. This trend, combined with increased competition for investor capital, has shifted the narrative around exchange listings from bullish catalysts to events carrying substantial downside risk.

Data from a new analysis by the crypto research firm Messari suggests that investors who bought newly listed tokens on Binance in 2025 would be sitting on steep losses today.

The study simulated a portfolio that allocated $100 to every token listed on Binance’s spot market in 2025, entering positions at the day-one closing price. After excluding stablecoins, the portfolio comprised 92 tokens, totaling $9,200 in capital deployment.

As of March 2026, the portfolio would be worth roughly $2,600, implying a loss of about $6,600, or −71%.

The findings challenge a common perception among retail traders that exchange listings typically lead to sustained price gains.

Simulated listing portfolio reveals sharp losses

According to Messari’s dataset, the simulated portfolio tracked the cumulative value of all tokens listed on Binance throughout 2025.

The analysis shows that while total capital deployed steadily increased as new tokens were added, the portfolio’s value consistently lagged behind. By the end of the period studied, the portfolio’s value had fallen to just 29 cents for every dollar invested.

The chart also shows that the portfolio experienced temporary recoveries during periods of broader market strength in 2025. However, these gains faded as prices declined later in the year, pushing the simulated fund deeper into losses.

The data illustrates how buying tokens immediately after listing can expose investors to significant downside risk.

Listings often act as liquidity events

Exchange listings typically bring new liquidity and trading access to crypto tokens. However, they can also coincide with selling pressure from early investors.

Projects often distribute tokens to venture capital funds, team members, and early supporters well before an exchange listing. Once a token begins trading on major platforms such as Binance, those early holders may gain their first opportunity to realize profits.

As a result, listing events can sometimes mark the beginning of price discovery rather than the start of sustained upward momentum.

Token supply dynamics shaping market returns

The Messari findings also highlight broader structural changes in the crypto market.

Many modern token launches involve low circulating supply at listing and large future unlock schedules, meaning a substantial portion of tokens enters the market over time. As additional supply becomes available, prices can face persistent selling pressure.

At the same time, the growing number of token launches across the industry has increased competition for investor capital, potentially diluting returns across newly listed assets.

A shifting narrative around exchange listings

For years, major exchange listings were widely seen as bullish catalysts that could drive sharp price increases.

While some tokens continue to outperform after listing, Messari’s analysis suggests the average outcome in 2025 was far less favorable.

The results indicate that buying newly listed tokens without considering supply dynamics, unlock schedules, and broader market conditions may carry substantial risks.


Final Summary

  • Messari’s simulation shows that buying every Binance spot listing in 2025 at the day-one closing price would have resulted in a roughly 71% loss.
  • The data highlights how exchange listings increasingly serve as liquidity events, with token supply dynamics playing an increasingly important role in price performance.

Related Questions

QAccording to Messari's simulation, what was the average percentage loss for investors who bought every token listed on Binance's spot market in 2025 at the day-one closing price?

AThe average loss was 71%.

QHow many tokens were included in the simulated portfolio after excluding stablecoins, and what was the total capital deployed?

AThe portfolio comprised 92 tokens with a total capital deployment of $9,200.

QWhat was the value of the simulated portfolio as of March 2026, and what does this value represent per dollar invested?

AThe portfolio was worth roughly $2,600, which represents just 29 cents for every dollar invested.

QWhy can exchange listings sometimes lead to selling pressure and price declines instead of gains, according to the article?

AListings can provide the first opportunity for early investors, such as venture capital funds and team members, to realize profits by selling their holdings, creating selling pressure.

QWhat two broader structural changes in the crypto market does the article suggest are contributing to the poor performance of newly listed tokens?

AThe two changes are: 1) Token launches with low circulating supply and large future unlock schedules that create persistent selling pressure, and 2) Increased competition for investor capital due to the growing number of token launches.

Related Reads

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

SpaceX, OpenAI, and Anthropic are poised for historic IPOs within weeks, potentially raising a combined $180 billion—a sum exceeding the entire internet bubble's fundraising. The hosts of the Limitless Podcast argue this isn't just individual company financing but an unprecedented capital concentration for AI infrastructure, driven by an insatiable need for compute, data centers, power, and chips. SpaceX's IPO is notable for reportedly changing market index rules to allow faster inclusion, potentially funneling trillions in passive retirement funds into its stock, despite its unproven space-based data center business model. In contrast, Anthropic demonstrates explosive growth, with ARR reportedly hitting $45 billion and approaching profitability, fueled by strong enterprise adoption of products like Claude Code. Google's separate $80 billion raise highlights the immense capital pressure, even for giants. The discussion acknowledges bubble risks but leans optimistic. The hosts contend the massive spending is building essential physical infrastructure for the next technological era. A key bottleneck isn't capital but the real-world limits of chip manufacturing and construction speed. As long as demand for AI compute outstrips supply, this investment cycle represents a foundational build-out rather than a purely financial bubble. All three companies are seen as foundational bets on the future, with Anthropic often cited as the most immediately compelling due to its proven revenue trajectory.

marsbit1h ago

SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic: The Three AI Giants Racing for IPO, Which One Is Worth Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

From "Vintage Tech" to "New AI Darlings": How AI Revalues Old Infrastructure One year ago, tech giants like Dell, Nokia, Cisco, and Western Data were seen as slow-growth, low-valuation stories, far from the AI spotlight dominated by players like Nvidia. Now, these legacy tech stocks are gaining market attention, sparking debate on whether this is genuine industry revaluation or a temporary narrative. As AI moves from model parameters to real-world data centers, the market is recognizing companies with proven delivery and infrastructure capabilities. This shift marks a change in the AI investment thesis: from pure model and GPU focus to the complex systems engineering required for deployment. Companies like Dell, HPE, and Corning are being revalued not for being "sexy" AI innovators, but for their decades of accumulated expertise in supply chains, enterprise delivery, and infrastructure—assets that have become critical in the AI buildout phase. The revaluation is unfolding across three key infrastructure lines: 1. **Servers & System Integration:** Dell and HPE are emerging as crucial system integrators or "general contractors" for AI data centers, translating GPU orders into complete, deployable server racks integrated with power, cooling, and networking. 2. **Networking & Connectivity:** AI's scale demands robust high-speed connections. Corning (fiber optics), Nokia (AI-RAN, 6G), and Cisco (data center switches) are gaining importance for enabling efficient data transfer within and between AI clusters. 3. **Storage:** Beyond high-speed memory (HBM/DRAM), the AI data explosion is driving demand for high-capacity hard drives (HDDs) from companies like Western Digital and Seagate to handle training data, logs, and cold storage cost-effectively. For this revaluation to be substantive and not just a narrative, three criteria are key: 1) Concrete AI-related order and revenue growth (e.g., Dell's AI server sales), 2) Upward revisions to company financial guidance, and 3) Sustainable improvements in profit quality, not just top-line revenue spikes. In essence, AI's transition to a real construction phase is re-pricing "old assets" against "new demand." The opportunity, however, is selective. Only those legacy firms that are demonstrably integrated into the capital expenditure chains of data center and enterprise AI deployment are likely to experience a true "logic re-rating" rather than just a temporary valuation bounce.

marsbit1h ago

From 'Old Guys' to 'New Favorites': How AI Is Revaluing Old Infrastructure from Dell to Nokia?

marsbit1h ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

OpenAI is shifting its strategic focus from ChatGPT to Codex, merging them along with the browser tool Atlas into a unified desktop super-app. This move signals an internal belief that Codex, originally a programming tool, represents the next evolution of AI more than conversational models like ChatGPT. Over the past year, Codex's weekly active users have surged past 5 million. The key distinction is that while ChatGPT answers questions, Codex executes tasks. Enterprises increasingly value this ability to get work done over simply receiving advice. Consequently, Codex is attracting professionals beyond developers, including analysts, bankers, marketers, and product managers. OpenAI's reorganization and increased investment in Codex stem from recognizing that the future of AI competition lies in execution capabilities, not just conversation. The company is launching role-specific plugins (e.g., for data analysis, sales, design) to transform Codex into a broad knowledge work platform that automates and redefines white-collar workflows. Beyond being a tool, Codex reflects OpenAI's ambition to redefine software. New features like "Sites"—which generates interactive websites from documents—and collaborative "Annotations" aim to create a paradigm where the AI understands the goal and handles the tools and steps, functioning more like a digital colleague than traditional software. The ultimate goal is a unified experience where the user cares only about the completed task.

marsbit1h ago

The Merger of Codex and ChatGPT Marks the Beginning of a Major Reshuffle in Programming Tools

marsbit1h ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

Invesco Great Wall Fund has released its "2026 China Corporate Globalization Report," titled "The 'Great Navigation Era' of Chinese Enterprises." The report analyzes the new trends and investment opportunities as Chinese companies expand globally, moving from simple product exports to comprehensive overseas operations involving services, branding, and local production. Driven by factors like trade friction, the pursuit of higher profit margins abroad, and policy support, globalization is becoming essential for Chinese companies. The report outlines an evolution: from early product export ("Globalization 1.0") to the current "Globalization 2.0," characterized by overseas capacity, capital goods investment, consumer brand expansion, and service exports. Chinese firms' competitive advantages are highlighted, including a vast engineer talent pool, low-cost and robust infrastructure, and complete industrial clusters. Specific sectors with significant出海 potential are identified: * **Capital Goods** (e.g., engineering machinery, power equipment): Benefiting from global demand, especially in Belt & Road markets and the AI-driven power grid upgrade cycle. * **Consumer Brands**: Transitioning from cost to brand advantage, leveraging供应链 efficiency. * **Technology & Innovation**: Including AI applications, optical modules within global tech supply chains, and new energy vehicles focusing on local production. * **Pharmaceuticals**: Chinese biotech firms are becoming preferred partners for global pharma, with potential for breakthrough drugs in areas like oncology and weight loss. The report concludes that corporate globalization represents a sustained, core theme for China's capital markets, though companies must navigate challenges like geopolitics and localization.

marsbit1h ago

Interpreting Investment Opportunities in the Age of Great Navigation, Invesco Great Wall Fund Releases '2026 Report on Chinese Enterprises Going Global'

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片