Inside Ripple’s Buying And Selling Cycle — And Its Impact On XRP

bitcoinistPublished on 2026-03-15Last updated on 2026-03-15

Abstract

Ripple's recent $750 million share buyback has sparked division within the XRP community. Critics, led by analyst @WhaleFUD, argue that Ripple sells XRP to fund these buybacks, prioritizing private equity holders and venture capitalists over retail XRP investors. They contend this cycle provides no direct benefit to XRP holders and that Ripple has little incentive to support the token's long-term value, especially with products like its new stablecoin competing with the XRP Ledger. Conversely, supporters like researcher BankXRP view the buyback as a sign of Ripple's strength and confidence. The $50 billion valuation and recent strategic acquisitions are cited as evidence of the company's robust liquidity and long-term commitment to the XRP ecosystem, despite ongoing market uncertainty and price pressure.

Ripple’s latest $750 million share buyback has split the XRP community in two. While some members see the internal buy-and-sell cycle as a sign of strength for both the crypto payments company and XRP, others argue that the move exposes a cycle that has always put retail XRP holders at the bottom of the food chain.

Ripple’s Buyback Leaves Retail Questioning XRP Loyalty

Crypto analyst @WhaleFUD has ignited a new debate within the crypto community by revealing details on Ripple’s internal buy and sell cycle and how it impacts XRP. In an X post on Wednesday, he noted that Ripple sells XRP and uses the proceeds to fund share buybacks for its own private equity.

According to him, venture capital (VC) firms and institutional investors are buying shares in Ripple, the crypto company, rather than XRP, the native token of the XRP Ledger (XRPL). This means that any increase in Ripple’s corporate value does not directly benefit XRP holders. As @WhaleFUD put it, “Retail is the liquidity,” while “Wall Street is the winner.”

Unsurprisingly, the post triggered a sharp reaction from various members of the XRP community, with many criticizing Ripple for favoring equity holders over XRP holders. Community members argued that this structure gives Ripple zero incentive to support XRP’s long-term success.

Some alleged that Ripple’s leadership profits from XRP transactions by using escrow sales to fund buybacks and increase share prices ahead of the company’s initial public offering (IPO). They pointed to the launch of the RLUSD stablecoin as a product that competes with the XRPL’s use cases, further implying that retail investors are being sidelined.

XRPUSD currently trading at $1.38. Chart: TradingView

Additionally, they compared Ripple’s internal buy-and-sell cycle to historical crypto trends, citing the 2017 initial coin offerings (ICOs) and 2021 layer-1 (L1) launches, in which retail holders provided liquidity while early investors repeated the financial rewards. Another member added that Ripple now has no reason to ensure XRP holders profit, suggesting that the company has handed itself to VC backers and now prioritizes institutional gains.

Others Say Buyback Signals XRP Confidence

While criticism from many in the crypto community rose, blockchain researcher BankXRP responded to the buyback news with a more positive take. He argued that Ripple’s latest buyback move signals strength in the company and XRP.

According to reports, Ripple has launched a $750 million share buyback from investors and employees, placing the company at a $50 billion valuation. This represents a 25% increase from the crypto company’s $40 billion market value following its $500 million funding round in November 2025.

BankXRP sees the tender offer as evidence of Ripple’s liquidity and long-term confidence in the XRP ecosystem. Notably, the buyback is moving forward despite ongoing uncertainty in the crypto market and downward pressure on the XRP price. The initiative is further supported by Ripple’s recent strategic acquisitions, including its $1 billion GTreasury purchase and the $1.25 billion acquisition of Hidden Road, among others.

Featured image from Pexels, chart from TradingView

Related Questions

QWhat is the main controversy surrounding Ripple's recent $750 million share buyback within the XRP community?

AThe main controversy is that it has split the community. Some see it as a sign of strength for Ripple and XRP, while others argue it exposes a cycle that benefits institutional investors and venture capital firms at the expense of retail XRP holders, who provide liquidity without directly benefiting from Ripple's increased corporate value.

QAccording to crypto analyst @WhaleFUD, how does Ripple's internal buy-and-sell cycle work and who does it benefit?

AAccording to @WhaleFUD, Ripple sells XRP and uses the proceeds to fund share buybacks for its own private equity. This benefits venture capital firms and institutional investors who buy shares in Ripple the company, not XRP the token, making 'Wall Street the winner' while 'retail is the liquidity'.

QWhat specific criticism did some community members level against Ripple regarding its new RLUSD stablecoin?

ACommunity members criticized the launch of the RLUSD stablecoin, alleging that it competes with the XRP Ledger's (XRPL) own use cases, which they see as further evidence that retail investors are being sidelined and that Ripple prioritizes its own products over the success of the XRP ecosystem.

QHow did blockchain researcher BankXRP interpret Ripple's $750 million share buyback?

ABankXRP interpreted the buyback positively, seeing it as a signal of strength and a show of Ripple's liquidity and long-term confidence in the XRP ecosystem, especially as it proceeded despite market uncertainty and downward pressure on XRP's price.

QWhat valuation did Ripple's latest share buyback place the company at, and how does it compare to its previous valuation?

AThe $750 million share buyback placed Ripple at a $50 billion valuation. This represents a 25% increase from its $40 billion market value following a $500 million funding round in November 2025.

Related Reads

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

Investors Turn to Bilibili and Xiaohongshu to Source AI Projects The AI hardware boom is in full swing in 2025, with a surge in smart wearables like AI glasses, rings, toys, and companion robots. This frenzy has investors scrambling, not just sifting through business plans, but actively hunting for promising "under-the-radar" projects on youth and tech-enthusiast content platforms like Bilibili and Xiaohongshu. The logic is straightforward: for consumer-facing AI hardware, genuine user demand and potential pitfalls are often revealed earlier in public discussions, comments, and critiques on these communities than in formal pitches. As one industry insider notes, these products must ultimately be tested and understood by real people. This shift highlights a crucial challenge in the sector: user education. The success of AI hardware depends on moving beyond mere efficiency gains to fulfilling higher-order needs like "unleashing personal creativity." Products must convince users they are natural, unobtrusive additions to daily life. Early hype, as seen with devices like the Rabbit R1, often fades if the product fails to clearly solve real-world problems, leading to high return rates and market rejection. The market is now entering a shakeout phase. 2026 is seen as a year of commercial validation. Some projects have already stalled or been canceled due to market resistance, lack of differentiation, or financial woes. However, the long-term opportunity remains vast, with forecasts predicting a multi-trillion dollar global AI hardware market by 2030. The competition is intensifying. With giants like OpenAI and Meta preparing their own hardware, and Chinese companies launching diverse AI-powered products, the battle for user attention, product excellence, and market understanding is just beginning. The core principle endures: in the AI era, it remains a user-sovereign market.

marsbit32m ago

Investors Are Now Hunting for AI Projects on Bilibili and Xiaohongshu

marsbit32m ago

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

Surprisingly, in the newly released "Agents' Last Exam" (ALE) benchmark from UC Berkeley, GPT-5.5 has outperformed the recently launched and highly-regarded Claude Fable 5. ALE tests AI agents on their ability to perform real-world tasks across 55 professional domains—such as 3D modeling in Siemens NX, creating game scenes in Unreal Engine, and visual effects work in Adobe After Effects—by granting them full GUI and command-line access. In the core task completion rate ranking, GPT-5.5 configurations secured the top two spots (24.0% and 23.0%), while Claude Fable 5 with Claude Code came in third (22.0%). Notably, the highest pass rate was only 24%, and the most difficult "Last-Exam" tier saw most top models, including GPT-5.5 and Fable 5, scoring zero. The benchmark also revealed significant cost and efficiency gaps: Fable 5 spent over four times more money than GPT-5.5's most expensive configuration for a slightly lower score, and was much slower. ALE differs from previous knowledge-based benchmarks by evaluating practical "ability to do" rather than static knowledge retrieval. Its tasks are derived from real expert projects, automatically scored, and designed to prevent cheating through a rotating pool of private challenges. The results suggest that high performance on traditional benchmarks does not necessarily translate to proficiency in complex, open-ended real-world work. The study also notes that agents often fail by prematurely declaring tasks complete without proper verification, and that no single model excels uniformly across all diverse domains.

marsbit38m ago

"Agents' Last Exam", Claude Fable 5 Actually Loses to GPT 5.5

marsbit38m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片