Here’s why OpenAI’s $110B raise is a major headwind for crypto

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-28Last updated on 2026-02-28

Abstract

The race for AI dominance is accelerating, particularly among U.S. tech firms, as illustrated by recent FUD surrounding Anthropic. OpenAI’s $110 billion capital raise reinforces U.S. investment in AI infrastructure, which may indirectly pressure liquidity in the crypto market. This comes at an unfavorable time for crypto, as Bitcoin’s 90-day Realized Profit/Loss Ratio has fallen below 1.0, indicating that realized losses exceed gains—a sign of deteriorating investor profitability and tighter liquidity. Historically, such conditions reduce risk appetite and limit capital inflows into crypto. Meanwhile, capital continues flowing into tech equities, giving them a structural liquidity advantage over digital assets, a resilience currently absent in crypto markets.

The race for dominance in Artificial Intelligence (AI) is clearly accelerating.

While the U.S and China have long competed to lead the sector, competition is now intensifying within U.S-based tech firms as well. The recent FUD surrounding Anthropic clearly illustrates this shift.

In this climate, OpenAI’s $110 billion capital raise carries weight. It reinforces the United States’ investment capacity in AI infrastructure, a development that may indirectly pressure liquidity across the crypto market.

Notably, the timing of this move is particularly unfavorable for crypto.

As the chart above indicates, Bitcoin’s [BTC] 90-day Realized Profit/Loss Ratio has fallen below 1.0, signaling that realized losses are now exceeding realized gains. This is a direct deterioration in net investor profitability.

Historically, this has aligned with tighter liquidity, as rising losses tend to reduce risk appetite and limit capital inflows into the crypto market. Against this backdrop, OpenAI’s move further concentrates capital in tech, giving equities a relative liquidity edge over digital assets.

In fact, hard data seemed to confirm this divergence further.

Despite sentiment shocks tied to Anthropic and DeepSeek, inflows into tech remain structurally intact. According to AMBCrypto, this structural resilience is precisely what is currently absent in the crypto market.

Related Questions

QWhy is OpenAI's $110 billion capital raise considered a major headwind for the crypto market?

AIt reinforces U.S. investment capacity in AI infrastructure, which may indirectly pressure liquidity across the crypto market by concentrating capital in tech and giving equities a relative liquidity edge over digital assets.

QWhat does Bitcoin's 90-day Realized Profit/Loss Ratio falling below 1.0 indicate?

AIt signals that realized losses are now exceeding realized gains, indicating a direct deterioration in net investor profitability.

QHow have historical trends linked the Realized Profit/Loss Ratio to crypto market liquidity?

AHistorically, a ratio below 1.0 has aligned with tighter liquidity, as rising losses reduce risk appetite and limit capital inflows into the crypto market.

QWhat does the article suggest about capital flows into tech compared to crypto currently?

ADespite sentiment shocks, inflows into tech remain structurally intact, a resilience that is currently absent in the crypto market.

QWhat broader competitive shift does the article highlight beyond just U.S.-China rivalry in AI?

ACompetition is now intensifying within U.S.-based tech firms themselves, as illustrated by the recent FUD surrounding Anthropic.

Related Reads

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手6m ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手6m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片