Has the Cryptocurrency Market Hit Bottom? Here's What Institutions Think

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-06-16Last updated on 2026-06-16

Abstract

"Has the crypto market bottomed out? Major institutions are divided on the outlook, according to a recent analysis by Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer of Bitwise. Three prominent research firms published in-depth reports on the topic with differing conclusions. Galaxy Digital argues Bitcoin has not yet found its bottom, pointing to only 4 out of 13 historical bottoming indicators being met. Their analysis suggests a potential bottom range of $30,000 to $54,000. NYDIG adopts a more cautious stance, noting that while metrics are close to historical bear market lows, a classic panic-selling capitulation event is missing. They acknowledge the possibility of a bottom but consider it unlikely, citing structural changes from institutional adoption. In contrast, Standard Chartered Bank asserts the bottom is already in at around $59,000. Their revised bullish view, predicting a year-end target of $100,000, hinges on anticipated reductions in ETF selling pressure linked to events like a potential SpaceX IPO. Despite the surface-level disagreement on the exact price floor, the reports share significant common ground crucial for long-term investors. All three institutions agree that a market bottom will likely form within the current year, that current prices are closer to the bottom than to previous cycle highs, and that Bitcoin is poised for another major bull cycle in the future. The core takeaway is that while the precise bottom level remains debated, the long-term value prop...


Authored by: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News


Over the past two weeks, three cryptocurrency research firms I have long followed—other than Bitwise—have published in-depth reports addressing the same issue: Has the cryptocurrency market reached its bottom?


  • Galaxy Digital: Bitcoin has not bottomed yet; data points to a potential bottoming zone.
  • NYDIG: What factors are currently suppressing Bitcoin's price performance?
  • Standard Chartered: The market bottom has already occurred.


The three reports are detailed, containing a wealth of data and complete logical reasoning, and are worth reading in full. However, if you're looking for a simple, unified answer, you might be disappointed: the judgments given by these three authoritative institutions are completely different.


Has the Market Bottomed?


  • Galaxy Digital: No
  • NYDIG: Possibly, but not very likely
  • Standard Chartered: Yes


Below, we break down the core logic of each institution one by one.


Three Institutions, Three Views


Galaxy Digital


Galaxy Digital reviewed Bitcoin's full 17-year price history and summarized 13 indicators that typically appear simultaneously when the market truly bottoms out. These cover six dimensions: valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, price trends, bull/bear cycles, and market sentiment. Long-term Bitcoin investors are familiar with these indicators, including the 200-week moving average, Fear & Greed Index, Mayer Multiple, etc.


Galaxy found that currently only 4 indicators fully meet the criteria, 2 are partially met, and the remaining 7 have not triggered a bottom signal. The report concludes that the bottom range for this Bitcoin cycle is between $30,000 and $54,000, with a neutral baseline bottom of $40,000 to $46,000.



NYDIG


NYDIG also adopts a multi-indicator comprehensive analysis framework, comparing the current market with historical cycles, assessing the market status from dimensions such as the duration of maximum drawdown and holder profit/loss (what Bitcoin users call 'MVRV,' or the market value to realized value ratio).


NYDIG believes that current indicators are very close to the extreme ranges of historical major bottoms, but the hallmark widespread panic selling seen in past major bear markets has not yet occurred. However, the report introduces a variable: the entry of institutional funds has fundamentally changed Bitcoin's cycle logic. The magnitude of this correction might be smaller than in historical bear markets. From this perspective, the bottom might also have already appeared.



Standard Chartered


Standard Chartered is not unwaveringly bullish on Bitcoin. Back in February when Bitcoin was at $67,000, the bank lowered its full-year price forecast, warning that the price could fall to $50,000, citing a weaker macroeconomic environment and sustained selling pressure from Bitcoin ETFs.


But last Friday, Standard Chartered updated its view, identifying $59,000 as the bottom of this cycle. The two main logics supporting this view are: a potential diplomatic agreement between the US and Iran, and the highly anticipated upcoming SpaceX IPO. Standard Chartered believes that the substantial selling by ETF holders was to raise funds for participating in the SpaceX listing, and this selling pressure will gradually subside. Standard Chartered's latest forecast is that Bitcoin will challenge $100,000 within the year.


Consensus Far Outweighs Differences in the Three Reports


You might wonder, what useful information can be extracted from three reports with seemingly opposing views? In fact, the underlying consensus in these three reports far outweighs the surface differences. For long-term investors, the conclusions they agree on are far more valuable than their disagreements:


  • All three judge that the market bottom for this cycle will occur within this year.
  • All three believe the current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous high.
  • All three unanimously remain bullish, expecting Bitcoin to usher in a new bull market in the future.


At the time of writing this article, Bitcoin is trading around $67,000. One report claims the bottom at $59,000 has already occurred, one sees a potential drop to $50,000, and another a neutral baseline bottom of $43,000. But the core conclusion is highly unified: a bottom will definitely be reached within the year.


This is the key point long-term investors should focus on. Whether the bottom is at $40,000, $50,000, or $60,000, the difference is actually limited. What truly matters is whether Bitcoin can subsequently surge to $100,000, $200,000, or even $1 million. As long as it reaches those levels, entering and holding long-term at the current price offers considerable upside potential.


A rather ironic phenomenon in the current market is that everyone is obsessing over whether the market has bottomed, while overlooking a more important question—has the top already appeared? In my view, as long as the peak has not arrived, Bitcoin retains its long-term allocation value.


The core logic supporting Bitcoin's long-term value has not only persisted but continues to strengthen: government debt continues to accumulate worldwide with no effective resolution in sight; inflation constantly erodes the real purchasing power of wealth; public trust in centralized institutions like governments and banks continues to decline; the global digitalization process keeps accelerating; Bitcoin's trading and investment channels are constantly improving; and the early crypto-native demographic is aging, with their assets and industry influence growing simultaneously.


Of course, potential risks remain in the market, including threats from quantum computing and tightening global regulation. However, on balance, the current situation looks better than in any previous crypto winter.

Related Questions

QWhat are the three major research institutions mentioned in the article and their respective views on whether the crypto market has bottomed?

AThe three institutions are Galaxy Digital, NYDIG, and Standard Chartered. Their views are: Galaxy Digital believes the market has not bottomed yet. NYDIG considers it possible but unlikely that the bottom has been reached. Standard Chartered asserts that the bottom has already appeared at $59,000.

QAccording to Galaxy Digital, how many out of its 13 identified bottoming indicators are currently signaling a market bottom?

AAccording to Galaxy Digital's analysis, only 4 of the 13 indicators are fully met, 2 are partially met, and 7 have not yet signaled a bottom.

QWhat is the core consensus shared by the three research reports despite their differing views on the exact bottom price?

AThe core consensus is threefold: 1) The market bottom will occur within this year. 2) The current price is closer to the bottom than to the previous all-time high. 3) All three institutions are optimistic that Bitcoin will experience a new bull market in the future.

QWhat two specific reasons did Standard Chartered give for revising its view and declaring that the market bottomed at $59,000?

AStandard Chartered based its revised view on two primary reasons: 1) A potential diplomatic agreement between the US and Iran. 2) The upcoming, highly anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe led to ETF selling pressure as investors raised funds to participate, and this pressure is expected to subside.

QWhat does Matt Hougan, the author and Bitwise CIO, suggest is a more important question for long-term investors than whether the market has bottomed?

AMatt Hougan suggests that a more important question for long-term investors is whether the market top has already appeared. He argues that as long as the peak has not been reached, Bitcoin retains its value as a long-term investment.

Related Reads

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit8m ago

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit8m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit13m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit13m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报22m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片