From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution and Transformation of Perp DEX

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

Title: From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution of Perp DEX The 2025 period was a "great filtering era" for the derivatives sector. Surviving Perp DEX platforms have moved beyond being mere "low-cost versions" of CEXs by solving the core cost in finance: trust. With the adoption of full-chain abstraction, users in 2026 can perform seamless cross-chain transactions while retaining asset sovereignty, as funds are secured in smart contracts rather than held by intermediaries. On-chain derivatives now consistently account for over 25% of total trading volume, marking a fundamental shift in user behavior. Over 90% of Perp DEXs failed due to product homogeneity, reliance on subsidized "rented liquidity," and soaring customer acquisition costs. Merely forking existing code or offering token incentives proved unsustainable. Four successful models have emerged: 1. **Hyperliquid**: Achieved near-CEX performance by building its own L1 blockchain optimized for low-latency order books, attracting quantitative capital. 2. **Aster**: Leveraged the Binance ecosystem to offer enhanced capital efficiency, allowing users to earn yield on collateral (e.g., staking rewards) while trading. 3. **Lighter**: Built an app-specific ZK-Rollup to provide a verifiable, mathematically-proven trading infrastructure with anti-MEV properties, appealing to institutions. 4. **Decibel**: Unified high performance and full-chain composability on Aptos, achieving...

Author: Max.s

The year 2025 is often regarded as the "Great Filter Era" for the derivatives sector. As we stand before the current power landscape of Perp DEX, it is clear: the vast majority of once-prominent forked projects have faded into obscurity, while the surviving ones are reshaping the financial order with a全新的的姿态.

The survival of Perp DEX does not stem from being faster or cheaper than centralized exchanges (CEX), but from addressing the core cost in the financial system — trust. After several crises involving opaque清算 mechanisms in second-tier exchanges (the Double-Ten crash left all market makers in agony!), the market has reached a consensus: transparency is not an option but the foundational logic of infrastructure.

Early Perp DEXs were often seen as "low-end versions" of CEXs. However, with the普及 of full-chain abstraction (Chain Abstraction) technology, users in 2026 can achieve seamless cross-chain experiences. User assets no longer need to be custodied by intermediaries but are locked in smart contracts. This return of "asset sovereignty" is the底气 for Perp DEX to claim a share of the market from CEXs.

Currently, on-chain derivatives trading volume has stably captured over 25% of the total market share. This is not merely numerical growth but a migration in user behavior patterns. When清算 logic, funding rates, and order matching are recorded on an immutable ledger, Perp DEX has evolved from experimental DApps to essential infrastructure in the crypto market.

The demise of most Perp DEXs: mediocrity is the original sin. Behind the prosperity lies an极其残酷 elimination race. Over the past two years, more than 90% of Perp DEXs have fallen into silence. The "causes of death" for these failures are highly consistent: product homogeneity, reliance on subsidies for liquidity, and lack of technical depth.

During the "Points" frenzy, numerous projects attracted users with inflated liquidity mining rewards. However, once points were redeemed and airdrops distributed, these platforms fell into a death spiral of "liquidity draining to zero." This model reliant on rented liquidity will gradually disappear from professional markets starting in 2026.

Note: Rented liquidity refers to the model where DEXs incentivize users to provide capital to support trading depth by distributing points or token subsidies. Simply put, the protocol does not truly "own" this liquidity but temporarily rents users' funds by paying high "rent" (token or point rewards).

Another reason for the downfall of DEXs is the soaring customer acquisition cost. In the absence of a unique niche, merely tweaking a UI or forking GMX's code is no longer sufficient to survive in this highly competitive market. Projects without core advantages in order matching engines or strong ecosystem backing are essentially expensive liquidity mining pools, not real exchanges.

Four existing DEX models值得后来者们借鉴学习:

Hyperliquid Model: Vertical Integration and Technological Hegemony

On the list of surviving DEXs, Hyperliquid is an unavoidable monument. It proves that if general-purpose公链 cannot support high-frequency trading, the best solution is to build your own chain.

Hyperliquid attracts substantial quantitative capital because it addresses order book latency through L1底层 optimization. It no longer寄生 on Arbitrum or other Layer 2 solutions but has built a consensus mechanism specifically designed for derivatives. This "vertical integration" grants it matching performance close to CEXs while maintaining on-chain transparency.

More importantly, Hyperliquid has successfully built a "quant-friendly" ecosystem. When third-party market makers发现这里的 API latency is extremely low and slippage is controllable, endogenous liquidity begins to grow organically. This "performance barrier" constructed through hard technological strength makes it从容 in facing competition from generic DEXs lacking distinctive features.

Aster Model: Ecosystem Premium and Asset Management Layer

If Hyperliquid relies on hardcore technology, then Aster and its backing from the Binance ecosystem represent another survival logic:极致 resource efficiency and asset appreciation — essentially, having a strong "backer."

Aster is not just a trading venue; it更像是一个 "leveraged layer for yield-bearing assets." Through deep integration with the Binance ecosystem, it introduces collateral like asBNB or USDF, allowing users to earn Staking or Re-staking yields while holding positions. This optimization of capital efficiency is难以企及 for standalone DEXs.

For large capital users, funding cost is a core consideration. When users open a position on Aster, their margin continues to generate annualized yields. This logic of "liquidity assetization" turns Aster into a highly sticky financial gateway, not merely a speculative tool.

Lighter Model: ZK-Powered Verifiable Financial Infrastructure

The Lighter model represents the pinnacle of "financial infrastructure-ization." It does not seek to become a traffic入口 but provides institutions with a交易底层 offering mathematical certainty through its self-built application-specific ZK-Rollup (App-specific ZK-rollup).

Lighter's uniqueness lies in solving the "mathematical honesty" problem. It encodes order matching and清算 logic into "ZK circuits." This means that the matching and清算 of every trade no longer rely on the "reputation" of nodes but on verifiable mathematical proofs. This is extremely attractive to institutional investors who despise "black-box清算."

Furthermore, Lighter's ZK-Orderbook design inherently possesses anti-MEV properties, protecting the strategy privacy of high-frequency traders. This combination of "verifiability + privacy protection + extremely low latency" makes it a standard interface linking real-world assets (RWA) with on-chain derivatives, building a high compliance and technological moat.

Decibel Model: Unification of Extreme Performance and Full-Chain Composability

In the 2026 market, Decibel represents the third evolutionary model for the new generation of Perp DEXs: the乐高 combination of a "high-performance engine" and "composability." As a full-chain trading engine rising within the Aptos ecosystem, Decibel彻底终结了 the fate that "speed and decentralization cannot be兼得".

Decibel's core competitiveness lies in its deeply optimized Trading VM. Leveraging Aptos's Block-STM parallel execution architecture, it is advancing towards sub-20 millisecond (sub-20 ms) block times and the ability to process over 1 million orders per second. This makes on-chain order matching no longer an "illusion" but a reality capable of competing with top-tier CEXs.

Unlike traditional isolated DEXs, Decibel provides a highly programmable financial platform. It unifies spot trading (Spot), perpetual contracts (Perps), margin trading (Margin), and vaults (Vaults). This "full-stack" design means users can use a single cross-chain margin account to collateralize various assets like APT, USDC, BTC, ETH simultaneously, greatly释放了 capital efficiency.

Decibel's "X-Chain Accounts" technology further breaks down cross-chain barriers. Users can directly fund their accounts using wallets from Ethereum or Solana (like MetaMask or Phantom) without configuring complex cross-chain bridges. This "seamless access" capability, combined with 100% on-chain matching logic, positions Decibel to potentially become the new favorite for on-chain high-frequency traders and institutions in 2026.

New Directions Post-2026: Intent, AI, and Dynamic Pricing

From an industry practitioner's perspective, the future evolution of Perp DEX will focus on the following three dimensions:

Intent-Centric Trading Experience. Future users will no longer need to manually adjust funding rates or slippage but will express an intent. The system will find the optimal execution path across chains through solvers. This model will significantly lower the barrier for retail users to access complex derivatives.

The Explosion of AI Agents. With the maturation of on-chain automation tools, DEXs will built-in AI strategy engines. A significant portion of future open interest will be driven by AI. This means DEXs need to provide more powerful computing capabilities and lower data latency to accommodate the high-frequency博弈 of robots.

Evolution of Pricing Models. Current AMMs or simple order books remain fragile during extreme market conditions. We are seeing more projects introduce complex dynamic risk engines that automatically adjust system parameters in real-time through more scientific formulas:

实时调节系统参数。This automated adjustment based on real-time volatility and position deviation will make the system robustness of Perp DEX truly surpass that of traditional centralized institutions.

The second half for Perp DEX is a survival race about "efficiency." Projects that attempted to sustain themselves through mediocre subsidies have long turned to dust. The future winners will either possess impeccable technological foundations like Hyperliquid, have irreplicable ecosystem resources like Aster, or have found the perfect balance between performance limits and full-chain composability like Decibel.

In this field, there is only one reason to survive: Do you provide an execution efficiency that capital and strategies cannot refuse?

Related Questions

QWhat is the core value proposition of Perp DEXs that allows them to compete with CEXs, according to the article?

AThe core value proposition is not being faster or cheaper than CEXs, but rather solving the most fundamental cost in the financial system: trust. Perp DEXs provide transparency, with清算 logic, funding rates, and order matching recorded on an immutable ledger, which has become a consensus requirement after crises involving opaque清算 on second-tier exchanges.

QWhat is 'Liquidity Renting' and why did it lead to the failure of many Perp DEX projects?

ALiquidity Renting refers to a model where a DEX induces users to provide capital to support trading depth by distributing points or token subsidies. The protocol doesn't truly 'own' this liquidity but temporarily rents users' funds by paying a high 'rent' (token or point rewards). This model failed because once the points were redeemed and airdrops distributed, these platforms fell into a 'liquidity to zero' death spiral, as the liquidity was not sustainable without continuous subsidies.

QHow does the Hyperliquid model achieve its competitive advantage in the Perp DEX space?

AHyperliquid achieves its advantage through vertical integration and technical hegemony. It built its own L1 blockchain specifically optimized for derivatives trading, solving the order book latency issues of general-purpose blockchains. This gives it CEX-like matching performance while maintaining on-chain transparency. It also created a 'quant-friendly' ecosystem with low API latency and controllable slippage, fostering endogenous liquidity growth and building a strong performance barrier.

QWhat unique problem does the Lighter model solve with its ZK technology, and for which user base is it particularly attractive?

AThe Lighter model solves the problem of 'mathematical-level honesty' by building an application-specific ZK-Rollup. It encodes order matching and清算 logic into ZK circuits, meaning every trade's execution and清算 relies on verifiable mathematical proofs rather than the 'reputation' of nodes. This is extremely attractive to institutional investors who are averse to 'black box清算'. Additionally, its ZK-Orderbook design is naturally resistant to MEV, protecting the strategy privacy of high-frequency traders.

QWhat are the three key future evolution directions for Perp DEXs mentioned in the article's conclusion?

AThe three key future evolution directions are: 1) Intent-centric trading体验, where users express an intent and the system finds the optimal execution path across chains. 2) The爆发 of AI Agents, where a significant portion of open interest will be driven by AI, requiring DEXs to provide greater computational power and lower data latency. 3) The evolution of pricing models, moving beyond simple AMM or order books to incorporate complex dynamic risk engines that automatically adjust system parameters based on real-time volatility and position deviation for superior robustness.

Related Reads

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit8m ago

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit8m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit13m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit13m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报22m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片