Exploring Bitcoin Valuation in 2026 from Macro and On-Chain Structural Perspectives

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-22Last updated on 2026-04-22

Abstract

Tiger Research analyzes Bitcoin's valuation outlook for 2026 from macro and on-chain perspectives. Despite a 27% price drop in Q1, the macro environment remains supportive. Global M2 hit a record $13.44 trillion, but Chinese liquidity, which contributed over 60% of M2 growth, has limited access to Bitcoin markets. The Iran conflict pushed oil prices higher, raising March CPI to 3.3% and narrowing the Fed's rate cut path. However, the easing direction remains intact. Bitcoin ETF flows turned positive in March after five months of outflows, and corporate accumulation continues. On-chain metrics show a shift from undervaluation to early equilibrium. Key indicators like MVRV-Z and NUPL have exited panic zones. The critical resistance is at $78k, the long-term holder cost basis, while the key support is at $54k. Although transaction counts increased, active addresses and average transfer size declined, indicating superficial growth rather than real network expansion. BTCFi ecosystem growth has weakened, leading to a -10% adjustment in fundamental metrics. The 12-month price target is set at $143k, based on a $132.5k neutral benchmark adjusted by -10% (fundamentals) and +20% (macro). This represents a 103% upside from current levels. Short-term catalysts include a break above $78k, sustained ETF inflows, and a Fed policy shift post-geopolitical de-escalation.

Author: Tiger Research

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

Key Takeaways

The macro environment remains supportive, albeit at a slower pace: Global M2 has reached a new all-time high of $13.44 trillion, and Bitcoin ETF flows have turned net positive for the first time in 14 months. However, the oil shock triggered by the Iran conflict pushed March CPI to 3.3%, narrowing the Fed's rate cut path.

Bitcoin on-chain metrics are shifting from undervalued to early equilibrium: Key on-chain indicators have moved out of the Q1 panic zone. The current price of $70.5K is about 13% below the Long-Term Holder average cost basis of $78K. A decisive break above this level would be a key signal for a short-term trend reversal.

The $143K price target and 2x upside potential remain valid: Based on a neutral baseline of $132.5K, adjusted by -10% for fundamentals and +20% for macro factors. This is a downward revision from the Q1 target of $185.5K, but the significant spot price correction means the actual upside potential from the current price has actually increased.

Macro Tailwinds Persist, But Momentum Has Slowed

Since the release of the Q1 report, Bitcoin has fallen approximately 27%, with the average price hovering around $70.5K in early April. The Iran conflict introduced a new variable, but the overall macro environment remains favorable. What changed is not the direction, but the speed.

Liquidity Hits Record Highs, But Fails to Translate Effectively to Bitcoin

As of February 2026, global M2 continued to expand to near a record high of $13.44 trillion. Yet Bitcoin is down 27% from Q1. Liquidity and price are moving in opposite directions.

The source of this liquidity explains the divergence. Over the past year, over 60% of the M2 growth from the four major economies (China, US, Eurozone, Japan) came from China, benefiting from the PBoC's RRR cuts and its formal shift to an easing stance in Q1.

The US contribution was only 10%. The problem is that channels for China-sourced liquidity to enter the Bitcoin market are limited. Domestic crypto trading restrictions remain, and indirect channels through Hong Kong and Singapore primarily serve institutional capital. Global liquidity is at historic peaks, but the share that can actually reach the Bitcoin market is shrinking.

Iran Conflict Slows Fed Rate Cut Pace

With the transmission of China-sourced liquidity blocked, dollar liquidity remains the primary driver for Bitcoin. But even this part has been delayed by the Iran conflict.

Following the US-Israel strikes on Iran on February 28th, the Strait of Hormuz was blocked. Brent crude surged to $118/barrel in mid-March, and Dubai crude hit a record high of $166/barrel. This shock directly pushed inflation higher. US March CPI rose to 3.3% from 2.4% in February, a two-year high. The Fed's room for rate cuts subsequently narrowed. The March dot plot reduced 2026 rate cut expectations to just one.

Nevertheless, the direction of easing has not changed. In mid-April, the Strait of Hormuz partially reopened, and oil prices fell sharply to around $90. Core CPI stabilized at 2.6%, indicating the shock had not yet broadly spread through the economy. President Trump formally nominated Kevin Warsh as the next Fed Chair at the end of January, with Senate confirmation hearings ongoing. Powell's term ends on May 15th, and an easing bias is highly likely to continue. The number of cuts may be reduced, but the direction remains.

Institutional Flows Begin to Reverse

The institutional outflows that drove the Q1 decline have begun to reverse. Bitcoin spot ETFs recorded their worst monthly outflows since their November 2025 launch and were in net outflow for five consecutive months. However, since March, monthly net inflows have turned positive. As of mid-April, year-to-date cumulative flows turned positive, with total AUM recovering to $96.5 billion.

Corporate accumulation is also accelerating. Strategy purchased 34,164 BTC for $2.54 billion in a single week (April 13-19), increasing its total holdings to 815,061 BTC. However, the number of companies participating in this trend has not increased significantly.

Macro Indicator Adjusted Down to +20%

Structural tailwinds remain intact: liquidity expansion, policy easing bias, institutional flows back on track, and progress on the US CLARITY Act. Recent headwinds—the Iran-induced oil shock and slower Fed cuts—partially offset these positives. The Q2 macro indicator is adjusted down 5 percentage points from Q1, set at +20%.

Shifting from Undervalued to Early Equilibrium

On-chain metrics have moved out of the extreme panic zone and are transitioning towards the border between undervalued and equilibrium. Key indicators like MVRV-Z, NUPL, and aSOPR have exited the Q1 panic area into an early recovery phase. While a sharp rally like those from panic zones is less likely, historical data shows that the average one-year return starting from this region consistently remains in the double digits. The risk-reward ratio at this point remains among the most favorable.

Notably, the average cost basis for Short-Term Holders (STH) is gradually declining. This suggests speculative capital is exiting, while new buyers are accumulating at lower prices. The timing aligns with the restart of ETF net inflows and Strategy's large purchases, supporting the view that institutional investors are consistently accumulating in the discounted range, thereby pulling down the average entry cost.

The key risk level is $54K, the network's average cost basis. A break below this level would put the entire network into an unrealized loss state, forming a bottom in an extreme scenario. The strongest resistance is at $78K, coinciding with the Long-Term Holder average cost basis.

The current price of $70.5K is about 13% below this resistance level, leaving a significant amount of recently entered short-term capital in unrealized loss. A decisive break above $78K in the short term is worth close attention.

Superficial Growth, Underlying Stagnation

Bitcoin's average daily transaction count reached 564,000 in the first half of April, up 37.9% year-on-year. The surface data is impressive, but the details tell another story.

Active addresses fell to 428,000 in the same period, down 13.2% year-on-year and 4.2% quarter-on-quarter. The average transfer size per transaction fell to 1.19 BTC, down 34.1% from 1.80 BTC last quarter. Transaction count is rising, but both participants and value per transaction are declining. This pattern reflects a small number of users repeatedly making small transfers, rather than broad economic utilization of the network. A significant portion of the transaction growth likely comes from mechanical flows like exchange deposits, unrelated to real growth.

The Q1 report maintained the fundamental indicator at 0%, based on expectations of BTCFi ecosystem expansion. Entering Q2, this thesis has clearly weakened. According to The Block's "2026 Digital Asset Outlook," Bitcoin L2 TVL has fallen 74% year-to-date, total BTCFi TVL is down 10%, accounting for only 0.46% of total Bitcoin supply (91,332 BTC). While individual protocols like Babylon and Lombard have seen growth, the overall ecosystem has contracted.

Fundamental Indicator Adjusted Down to -10%

Superficial growth has failed to translate into real network expansion, and the underlying data supporting the BTCFi thesis has weakened. The balance of offsetting positive and negative signals present in Q1 has been broken. The Q2 fundamental indicator is adjusted down from 0% to a baseline of -10%.

Target Price $143K, 2x Upside Potential Remains

Using the TVM method, the neutral baseline calculated from the average price in early April 2026 is $132.5K. Applying the fundamental adjustment of -10% and macro adjustment of +20%, the 12-month target price is set at $143K.

This figure is about 23% lower than the Q1 target of $185.5K. However, the actual upside potential has instead increased. Calculated from the average price, the upside has expanded from +93% in Q1 to +103% in Q2.

The lower target price does not represent pessimism. The macro direction and on-chain structure still support a medium-to-long term bull thesis.

Three short-term watch points:

  • A decisive break above the network's mid-term equilibrium level of $78K;
  • Sustained net inflows into ETFs;
  • A Fed policy pivot following the easing of geopolitical risks.

If these three conditions materialize simultaneously, the $143K target remains achievable.

Related Questions

QWhat is the 12-month target price for Bitcoin according to the Tiger Research report, and what is the upside potential from the current price?

AThe 12-month target price for Bitcoin is $143,000, representing an upside potential of approximately 103% from the current price of around $70,500.

QHow did the Iran conflict and oil shock impact the U.S. Federal Reserve's monetary policy outlook?

AThe Iran conflict and subsequent oil shock, which pushed Brent crude to $118/barrel, caused the U.S. March CPI to rise to 3.3%. This narrowed the Fed's path for interest rate cuts, leading its March dot plot to reduce 2026 rate cut expectations to just one.

QWhat is the significance of the $78,000 price level for Bitcoin's short-term trend reversal?

AThe $78,000 level represents the average entry cost for Long-Term Holders (LTHs). The current price is about 13% below this level. A decisive break above $78,000 would be a key signal for a short-term trend reversal as it would put a significant portion of recently entered short-term capital back into a state of unrealized profit.

QWhy was the fundamental indicator for Bitcoin adjusted down to -10% from 0% in the previous quarter?

AThe fundamental indicator was adjusted down because the growth in transaction count was not accompanied by real network expansion. Active addresses declined, and the Bitcoin DeFi (BTCFi) ecosystem contracted, with L2 TVL falling 74% and total BTCFi TVL representing only 0.46% of the total Bitcoin supply.

QWhat was the primary reason for the divergence between record global M2 liquidity and the 27% decline in Bitcoin's price in Q1?

AThe divergence occurred because over 60% of the M2 growth from the top four economies came from China, where strict domestic crypto trading restrictions limit the flow of that liquidity into the Bitcoin market. The U.S. contribution was only 10%, and this dollar-based liquidity is the primary driver for Bitcoin.

Related Reads

Warsh Hearing Concludes: What Are the Notable Signals for the Crypto Industry?

The Senate Banking Committee held a confirmation hearing for Judy Shelton, a Federal Reserve nominee, who faced intense questioning regarding her ability to maintain the central bank's independence amid pressure from President Trump to lower interest rates. Shelton denied any pre-arranged commitments on rate cuts and emphasized her independence, though Democrats remained skeptical, citing contradictions with Trump's public statements. Shelton characterized post-pandemic inflation as a major policy failure and called for a "regime change" in the Fed’s approach, including reforms to inflation measurement and communication strategies. She criticized the current practice of Fed officials frequently signaling future rate moves and did not commit to maintaining post-meeting press conferences, suggesting potential reductions in transparency. Regarding crypto markets, Shelton’s extensive investments in digital asset companies—including Solana, DeFi, and blockchain infrastructure—were noted, though she has pledged to divest these holdings due to ethics rules. Her familiarity with the crypto industry and deregulatory leanings may signal a more open, though cautious, stance toward digital assets. However, concerns were raised about potential conflicts of interest, especially given Trump family involvement in crypto-financial ventures. The timing of her confirmation remains uncertain, pending a Justice Department investigation into current Chair Powell. Shelton’s potential leadership could lead to a more hawkish, productivity-focused Fed with tighter policy communication—factors that may significantly influence liquidity conditions and macro narratives for crypto markets.

marsbit32m ago

Warsh Hearing Concludes: What Are the Notable Signals for the Crypto Industry?

marsbit32m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片