Ethereum eyes $2.7K, but will weak demand stop ETH’s gains?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-24Last updated on 2026-03-24

Abstract

Ethereum (ETH) faces mixed signals as it attempts to reclaim the $2,000 level. While the weekly chart shows a bullish structure, with key Fibonacci support at $2,147, the daily trend remains bearish. A potential rally toward $2,770–$3,049 is possible if Bitcoin strengthens and reaches $83k–$89k. However, weak demand, indicated by a declining OBV, and the threat of profit-taking near the $2,353–$2,400 realized price zone may limit gains. Despite $80.2 million in recent liquidations, ETH's unrealized profit ratio has turned positive, though momentum remains uncertain.

Ethereum [ETH] saw $80.2 million in liquidations in the past 24 hours, with $65.6 million being long liquidations. These numbers were relatively tame compared to the $1.1 billion in ETH liquidations on the 31st of January.

That did little to lighten the mood around the leading altcoin. Crypto and stock markets were in the same boat of extreme despair after recent losses.

The Ethereum whales’ unrealized profit ratio climbed back into positive territory again as prices pierced the $2k level. While this seemed to suggest bullish momentum can build, AMBCrypto highlighted the $2,353 level as the aggregate realized price.

In other words, the $2.4k area could arrest any potential rally, as ETH holders might exit the market at breakeven, given the extremely fearful conditions. The longer-term trends gave a mixed picture.

The bullish long-term swing structure of ETH

Source: ETH/USDT on TradingView

On the weekly timeframe, ETH has a bullish swing structure. Based on the 2025 rally from $1,383 to $4,955, a set of Fibonacci retracement levels was plotted. It showed that the 78.6% level was at $2,147.

The ETH bulls have been fighting to reclaim this retracement level as support since losing it in February and were close to rallying the price back above it.

One concern was that the OBV had made a lower low compared to April 2025. At the same time, the MACD was yet to form a bullish crossover, a sign that higher timeframe momentum has not begun to change.

Source: ETH/USDT on TradingView

Meanwhile, the 1-day structure was bearish, and the H4 swing structure was bullish. These were conflicting signs, unlike Bitcoin [BTC], which was bearish on both the weekly and daily timeframes.

Which way should Ethereum investors and traders anticipate the price to go?

Ethereum tends to follow Bitcoin, and the leading crypto has a bearish long-term trend. In the coming weeks, a rally toward $83k-$89k was possible. This could take Ethereum toward the $2,770-$3,049 Fibonacci golden pocket on the daily timeframe.

Therefore, a sustained Bitcoin rally could push ETH toward $2.5k-$2.7k. This was the optimistic scenario. A lack of strong demand, as the OBV’s weekly timeframe lower low hints at, could severely curtail any Ethereum rally.

Investors should also remember the aggregate realized price and the threat of profit-taking if a rally materializes.


Final Summary

  • Ethereum gave mixed signals on multiple timeframes. Its bullish weekly and bearish daily charts posed a challenge for investors.
  • A rally toward $3k is possible, but it depends on Bitcoin climbing above $80k in the coming weeks and a shift in crypto market sentiment.

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount of Ethereum liquidations in the past 24 hours, and how much of that were long liquidations?

AThe total Ethereum liquidations in the past 24 hours were $80.2 million, with $65.6 million of that being long liquidations.

QWhat key price level did AMBCrypto identify as the aggregate realized price, which could act as a barrier to a rally?

AAMBCrypto identified the $2,353 level as the aggregate realized price, suggesting the $2.4k area could arrest any potential rally.

QOn which timeframe does Ethereum have a bullish swing structure, and what is the significant Fibonacci retracement level mentioned?

AEthereum has a bullish swing structure on the weekly timeframe. The significant Fibonacci retracement level mentioned is the 78.6% level at $2,147.

QAccording to the article, what two conflicting technical indicators on the weekly chart suggest a potential weakness in a rally?

AThe two conflicting indicators are the On-Balance Volume (OBV), which made a lower low compared to April 2025, and the MACD, which was yet to form a bullish crossover.

QWhat is the optimistic price target for Ethereum's potential rally, and what does it depend on?

AThe optimistic price target for Ethereum is a rally toward $2.5k-$2.7k. This depends on a sustained Bitcoin rally toward $83k-$89k and a shift in overall crypto market sentiment.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片