Don't Worry, USDC and USDT's Public Chains Won't Shake Ethereum

marsbitPublished on 2026-02-27Last updated on 2026-02-27

Author: LanHu Notes

Some have suggested that if stablecoin issuers like Circle (USDC) and Tether (USDT) build public chains, could it cause Ethereum to fade away? I originally had no intention of addressing this. However, several friends have privately messaged me asking about it. So, let's briefly discuss it.

First, the conclusion: Ethereum will not fade because of this. Overall, it will even benefit.

In the future stablecoin war, the most important aspects are the front-end distribution channels—Meta, MrBeast (Tom Lee's Bitmine has invested $2 billion), Robinhood, Aave, Polymarket, Lighter, Uniswap, exchanges, wallets... Stablecoin issuers are not the strongest in the entire chain, and the L1 chains they build do not naturally have network effects.

Major players like Meta will not only support Circle's chain but will support multiple chains; channels like MrBeast, which are expected to deeply integrate with the Ethereum ecosystem, will prioritize supporting Ethereum; Robinhood is also building its L2 network based on Arbitrum (Ethereum ecosystem), and it might become an independent L2 in the future; Polymarket also plans to build an Ethereum L2...

The places that reach users are the source of network effect power. As long as Ethereum L1/L2 fees are low enough and speeds are fast enough (at the same level), its security and decentralization advantages are unparalleled. Currently, Ethereum L1 is moving towards 10,000 TPS, and L2 is advancing towards over a million TPS. In the future, fees and speed will not be issues.

Issuers building their own chains will not lead to large-scale migration of traffic; instead, they might eventually gradually become Ethereum L2s.

Arc is an L1 chain developed by Circle, supporting USDC as the native gas fee, sub-second settlement, and institutional-grade privacy/compliance, expected to launch later this year. Even so, USDC is still issued on multiple chains, including Ethereum, Solana, etc., with the Ethereum ecosystem still holding the majority share. As for how it will develop after launch, there are still many unknowns. Tether's USDT also operates on multiple chains.

If each stablecoin issuer builds an L1 chain, there will be competitive pressure among them, making it difficult to operate on each other's chains. The Ethereum ecosystem is inclusive and will still be the most important chain for hosting different stablecoins.

Multi-chain issuance of stablecoins is the norm. This means that even if ARC launches, it will only be a supplement to the existing ecosystem, not a replacement. It will have its own institutional trading scenarios, but the market share it ultimately captures does not entirely depend on the stablecoin issuer but on the distribution channels and high-frequency application scenarios of the stablecoin. For distribution channels, fees, speed, and security are all important, and currently, Ethereum has the best balance of these three. Distribution channels will not and cannot ignore Ethereum.

Looking at the current market share of stablecoins, Ethereum dominates, and its share is still growing.

In February 2026, the total stablecoin market capitalization was about $3.1-3.2 trillion (DefiLlama/TRM Labs data), of which:

• Ethereum: 52-60% (~$1.53-1.65 trillion), grew 40% in 2025 (from $1.15 trillion to $1.53 trillion). It is the largest share, handling over half of stablecoin activity.

• Tron: 25-30% (~$830-840 billion), dominated by USDT, but growth is slowing (fees increased to $0.50 per transaction).

• Solana: 4.5% (~$130 billion), USDC accounts for 77%, benefiting from low fees (<$0.01 per transaction).

• Others: BNB Chain grew 133% (2025), but its share is small; Arbitrum/Base and other L2s account for ~$100 billion. The total Ethereum ecosystem (L1 + L2) exceeds 70%.

Additionally, by currency, USDT ~$1.84 trillion (59%), USDC ~$750 billion (24%). USDC is growing faster (+6.39% in February 2026), but mostly on Ethereum.

In terms of transaction volume, stablecoin transfers exceeded $10.5 trillion in January 2026 (a historical high). Ethereum handles most institutional/DeFi traffic (annual forecast over ~$40 trillion), far exceeding PayPal ($20 trillion) and approaching Visa ($15 trillion). These all have network effects. Do you think users will naturally migrate just because a stablecoin chain is born?

Ethereum still has the largest developer ecosystem, the most vibrant DeFi ecosystem, and stable operation without downtime. Would institutions place their trading scenarios on a centralized L1 chain that might experience downtime?

Ethereum's competitors have always been itself, not any other chain. As long as its fees and speed are not inferior to any other L1 chain, its security and decentralization advantages will be incomparable.

Ethereum's future, besides stablecoins, includes asset tokenization, DeFi, and the AI agent economy. These are all major trends. The L1 chains built by stablecoin issuers are not enough to make Ethereum fade away.

By the way, how is Plasma chain, supported by the largest stablecoin issuer Tether, doing now?

Related Questions

QWill the launch of stablecoin-native blockchains like Circle's ARC or Tether's chain cause Ethereum to become irrelevant?

ANo, Ethereum will not become irrelevant. It will continue to benefit and remain the dominant ecosystem due to its superior security, decentralization, and the network effects of its vast developer and DeFi community. Most stablecoin activity and value are still concentrated on Ethereum and its Layer 2s.

QWhat is the most important factor in the future competition among stablecoins according to the article?

AThe most important factor is the front-end distribution channels, such as major platforms like Meta, MrBeast, Robinhood, Aave, and exchanges. The reach to end-users is the source of network effect, not just the blockchain built by the stablecoin issuer.

QWhat percentage of the total stablecoin market cap does Ethereum ecosystem (L1 + L2) hold as of February 2026, based on the article?

AThe Ethereum ecosystem (L1 + L2s) holds over 70% of the total stablecoin market share.

QWhat are the key advantages that the article claims give Ethereum a competitive edge over other chains?

AEthereum's key advantages are its unparalleled security and decentralization, combined with low fees and high speed on its Layer 2 scaling solutions. The article states that when Ethereum's fees and speed are on par with other L1s, its security and decentralization become unbeatable.

QDoes the article suggest that stablecoin issuers building their own chains will lead to a mass migration of users away from Ethereum?

ANo, the article argues the opposite. It states that such chains are more likely to become a supplement to the existing multi-chain reality rather than a replacement for Ethereum. Most distribution channels will support multiple chains, and Ethereum's inclusive ecosystem will remain the most important chain for hosting different stablecoins.

Related Reads

House Committee Unveils 7 Crypto Tax Drafts—A Major Overhaul Of How Digital Assets Are Taxed

The US House Ways and Means Committee has released seven crypto tax discussion drafts, marking a major legislative effort to clarify how digital assets are taxed. This initiative, backed by committee leadership, aims to establish clearer rules on the timing and treatment of taxes for activities like crypto mining, staking rewards, and stablecoin transactions, including potential capital gains exemptions. The package also seeks to extend wash sale restrictions to digital assets. Lawmakers are working with the Treasury, Commerce Department, and White House on the measures, while Senate tax writers are also developing their own legislation, signaling a move toward a more unified approach to crypto taxation.

bitcoinist58m ago

House Committee Unveils 7 Crypto Tax Drafts—A Major Overhaul Of How Digital Assets Are Taxed

bitcoinist58m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit2h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit2h ago

Solana Treasury Giant Sends 455,784 SOL To Coinbase Prime: Selling Move?

Forward Industries, the largest corporate holder of Solana (SOL), has deposited 455,784 SOL (worth approximately $31.87 million) to Coinbase Prime. This move is seen as a potential sign the company may be preparing to sell, as its treasury strategy is currently at a significant loss. The firm accumulated 6.83 million SOL at an average price of $232.08 in 2025, but with SOL now trading around $65, its holdings are valued at just $452 million, representing a steep decline. This action follows similar pressures on other major crypto treasury firms, like Bitcoin holder Strategy, which are also deep in the red due to the broader market downturn. Solana's price has fallen over 19% in the past week.

bitcoinist2h ago

Solana Treasury Giant Sends 455,784 SOL To Coinbase Prime: Selling Move?

bitcoinist2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow