Do Kwon Sentenced to 15 Years in Prison, Crypto's Prison All-Stars Welcome Another Heavyweight Guest

Odaily星球日报Published on 2025-12-12Last updated on 2025-12-12

Abstract

Do Kwon, co-founder of Terraform Labs, has been sentenced to 15 years in prison by a U.S. federal court. The ruling follows his extradition from Montenegro and guilty plea to charges of conspiracy fraud and wire fraud. Kwon was the mastermind behind Terra (LUNA) and its algorithmic stablecoin UST, which collapsed dramatically in May 2022, erasing tens of billions in market value and triggering a prolonged crypto market downturn. The failure of Terra’s “algorithmic” mechanism—which lacked sufficient collateral—led to widespread investor losses, with reports of tragic outcomes including suicides. After the collapse, Kwon fled South Korea and evaded international authorities using forged documents before eventually being captured in Montenegro in March 2023. He was later extradited to the U.S. in late 2024. Prosecutors had sought a 12-year sentence, while Kwon’s defense argued for five years. The judge, however, imposed a stricter sentence, citing the unprecedented scale of fraud, Kwon’s attempt to evade justice, and the need for deterrence. Kwon now joins other high-profile convicted crypto figures like SBF and Alex Mashinsky, marking a symbolic end to an era of reckless expansion and fraud in the industry.

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Azuma (@azuma_eth)

On December 11th Eastern Time, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York held a sentencing hearing for former Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon in Courtroom 1305. During the hearing, Judge Paul Engelmayer announced a sentence of 15 years imprisonment for Do Kwon.

Do Kwon has become another high-profile industry figure to receive a heavy sentence, following FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried and Celsius Network founder Alex Mashinsky.

The Myth and Collapse of Terra

The algorithmic stablecoin project Terra (project token LUNA, stablecoin UST), developed by Terraform Labs, was once the brightest project in the last bull market.

Algorithmic mechanisms were a hot trend in stablecoin innovation during the last cycle. Different from the mainstream over-collateralization mechanism, algorithmic stablecoins do not require full collateral but are designed around market supply and demand to dynamically maintain the "peg" of the coin's price. Taking Terra as an example, the protocol allowed market participants to mint UST by burning an equivalent value of LUNA, or conversely, to burn UST to redeem an equivalent value of LUNA. When demand for UST increased and its price rose above $1, arbitrage opportunities would drive the market to burn LUNA to mint UST, profiting from the premium; conversely, if UST demand decreased and its price fell below $1, the market would be driven to burn UST and mint LUNA, profiting from the discount.

This "stepping on each other's feet to reach the sky" technique between LUNA and UST once forged Terra's growth miracle. The circulating supply of UST once reached $18.7 billion, posing a significant challenge to the stablecoin king USDT; the price of LUNA once approached $120, with a market capitalization as high as $41 billion, once ranking among the top five in the cryptocurrency market cap rankings.

However, history has proven that all stablecoin mechanisms without sufficient collateral are bubbles. They might operate temporarily in normal market conditions but have extremely poor resistance to extreme situations. In May 2022, Terra's bubble finally burst. Under collective panic, Terra's algorithmic stablecoin mechanism instead caused it to sink deeper into a death spiral. Within a few days, LUNA's tens of billions in market capitalization and UST's billions in "value" evaporated.

From a macro perspective, Terra's collapse is considered by many industry insiders to be one of the core events that caused the subsequent prolonged market downturn. From a micro perspective, Terra's crash caused countless investors to suffer huge losses, and some users even chose to commit suicide out of despair.

Flight, Hiding, Capture, and Extradition

After Terra's collapse, prosecutors in both South Korea and the U.S. brought charges against Do Kwon, including conspiracy to commit fraud, commodities fraud, wire fraud, securities fraud, and conspiracy to engage in market manipulation and money laundering. In September 2022, South Korean prosecutors issued a Red Notice through the global police agency Interpol, requesting police worldwide to assist in arresting Do Kwon.

Although Do Kwon remained active on social media and once responded by saying "I'm not on the run," no one knew his specific whereabouts. It wasn't until a year later that people learned Do Kwon had been hiding in Serbia and Montenegro to evade Interpol's pursuit.

On March 23, 2023, Do Kwon and Terraform's CFO Han Chang-joon attempted to fly from Podgorica, Montenegro, to Dubai using forged Costa Rican passports but were detained by local police at the airport. About two hours before Do Kwon's arrest, an informant told Montenegro's top police officer, Interior Minister Filip Adžić, that Do Kwon might be in the country. Adžić, describing the arrest process to the WSJ, said the informant sent Do Kwon's passport details to his phone, and when he called the border police chief, the police had just detained Do Kwon at the airport.

That interior minister said in the call to the border police chief: "Do you know who that person is? He is very famous and has a lot of money."

Odaily Note: Photo from the scene of Do Kwon's arrest.

After his arrest, Do Kwon was first held alone in the pre-trial detention area of Montenegro's Spuž Prison, and then on June 19, 2023, was sentenced to 4 months in prison by a Montenegrin court for passport forgery. At that time, both South Korea and the United States sought Do Kwon's extradition from Montenegro. At the request of U.S. and South Korean authorities, the High Court of Montenegro subsequently extended Do Kwon's detention period.

In March 2024, Do Kwon was allowed to leave prison, but considering he still faced criminal charges from several countries, the High Court of Montenegro ordered his passport confiscated to prevent him from leaving the country. At that time, the decision on Do Kwon's extradition was still pending. Montenegrin prosecutors opposed extraditing Do Kwon to South Korea, preferring him to be sent to the United States, where he could face a longer sentence if convicted.

The suspense was finally revealed on the last day of 2024, when the Prime Minister of Montenegro, Milojko Spajic, officially announced that the procedures for extraditing Do Kwon to the United States had been completed.

On January 2, 2025, Do Kwon first appeared in the public eye in a U.S. court. During a hearing at the Manhattan federal court that day, Do Kwon pleaded not guilty. However, as the case progressed, Do Kwon pleaded guilty in August of this year to two of the multiple charges (conspiracy to commit fraud and wire fraud).

Finally, on December 11, Judge Paul Engelmayer announced Do Kwon's fate.

Sentencing Controversy

Regarding Do Kwon's sentencing, the prosecution and the defense each had their say.

Last Thursday, U.S. federal prosecutors submitted a request to the judge of the Southern District of New York, asking for a 12-year prison sentence for Do Kwon.

On the other hand, Do Kwon's defense team requested a five-year sentence, citing that Do Kwon had already served time in Montenegro and might face further prosecution in South Korea. But U.S. officials argued that only a long prison term could reflect the scale of the fraud and deter similar behavior.

The prosecution argued that only a long prison sentence could reflect the scale of Do Kwon's fraud and deter similar behavior. For reference, the losses related to Terraform's collapse exceeded the combined losses from SBF's FTX, Alex Mashinsky's Celsius, and OneCoin. SBF is serving a 25-year sentence, while Mashinsky has been sentenced to 12 years in prison for fraud.

Odaily Note: Representative cryptocurrency figures sentenced in recent years.

The prosecution wrote in the filing: "The collapse of Terraform triggered a series of crises that swept through the cryptocurrency market, indirectly causing the subsequent industry winter. Do Kwon fled from this crisis. While in hiding, he was evasive in interviews and tweets, shifting blame to others, and after being captured, he resisted extradition...... Do Kwon's misconduct, the criminal consequences, and his reaction to the exposure of the plot are all sufficient to warrant a heavy sentence. In fact, the criminal circumstances alone are enough to support the maximum penalty."

Surprisingly, the sentence finally handed down by the judge even exceeded the prosecution's request for a 12-year term. Judge Paul Engelmayer stated that Do Kwon "chose to lie" and "made the wrong choices."

The Messy End of an Era That Has Already Concluded

From SBF to Do Kwon, those names once admired by countless people are now ending in an extremely messy manner.

In the narrative of the last bull market, projects like Terra and FTX represented the most radical, ambitious, and blindly expansionist forces in the crypto world. They rapidly accumulated vast capital and prestige in the name of technological innovation, but under the multiple pulls of regulatory absence,失控的风险 (uncontrolled risk), and human greed, they ultimately fell into the abyss.

But the industry's development does not stop because of the downfall of individuals. The crypto market has long entered a new cycle. New stablecoin models, new financial primitives, and stricter regulatory requirements are redefining the underlying order of the industry. History will remember Terra's past glory, but it will remember even more the price it left behind — this is the reality and warning that all newcomers must face.

Related Questions

QWhat was the sentence handed down to Do Kwon by the New York Southern District Court?

ADo Kwon was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

QWhat were the two specific charges that Do Kwon pleaded guilty to in August?

ADo Kwon pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit fraud and wire fraud.

QWhat was the core mechanism behind the Terra (LUNA) algorithmic stablecoin system that ultimately failed?

AThe mechanism allowed users to burn LUNA to mint the stablecoin UST, or burn UST to mint LUNA, relying on arbitrage to maintain the peg. This created a 'death spiral' during extreme market conditions, leading to its collapse.

QWhich two countries initially sought the extradition of Do Kwon after his arrest in Montenegro?

ASouth Korea and the United States both sought his extradition.

QHow does the scale of losses from the Terraform Labs collapse compare to those from FTX and Celsius, according to the prosecution?

AThe prosecution stated that the losses related to Terraform's collapse exceeded the combined losses from SBF's FTX and Alex Mashinsky's Celsius and OneCoin.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit50m ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit50m ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit1h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit1h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit2h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片