Crypto market’s weekly winners and losers – CC, DASH, PIPPIN, MYX

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-28Last updated on 2025-12-28

Abstract

The crypto market remained quiet and range-bound this week amid broader risk-off sentiment in traditional markets. Despite the muted environment, several assets posted significant gains. Canton [CC] led weekly winners with a 20% rally, showing strong technical and on-chain support and potentially targeting $0.12. Zcash [ZEC] followed with a 17% gain, indicating accumulation after a major sell-off. DASH [DASH] rose 16%, though a sustained reversal remains uncertain. Among altcoins, Islamic Coin [ISLM] surged 143%. On the losing side, Pippin [PIPPIN] fell 10% amid high volatility and leveraged trading pressure. XDC Network [XDC] dropped after failing to break key resistance at $0.05, while MYX Finance [MYX] declined due to repeated rejections at $3.80. Other notable losers included Legacy Token [LGCT], down 72%. The week featured sharp moves, underscoring the need for cautious trading and research.

The crypto market was quiet and range-bound this week.

However, legacy markets saw notable inflows into safe-haven assets, with gold, silver, and platinum rising in tandem, raising investor concerns about economic stress and keeping risk assets under pressure.

Despite this, select assets still managed to outperform the broader market.

Weekly winners

Canton [CC] — Smart-contract platform delivering back-to-back gains

Canton [CC] topped this week’s gainers chart with a solid 20% rally, making this weekly run a strong FOMO-trigger. For context, CC has been on a roll lately with back-to-back weekly gains, averaging 20% per week.

Naturally, the question remains: Is it too much too soon? From a technical perspective, the RSI on CC’s daily chart still shows room to run, with no overextension signal yet. Supporting this is CC’s strong bullish conviction.

The week began with a 9% dip, which, following last week’s 37% rally, could have easily triggered panic selling. Yet, a 13% rebound over the next few days reinforced CC’s bid support.

Notably, this follow-through pushed CC past the $0.117 resistance zone.

Additionally, AMBCrypto recently highlighted strong spot accumulation driving this rally. With both technical and on-chain support, Canton looks poised for another strong week, potentially targeting the $0.12 level next.

Zcash [ZEC] — Privacy token reached a key inflection point

Zcash [ZEC] was the second-biggest weekly winner with a 17% pop. Looking at the weekly chart, this move looks like a classic accumulation phase, especially after ZEC’s big November sell-off.

For context, ZEC posted a 60%+ decline, wiping out all previous month gains. Remarkably, 100% of these losses occurred in just three weekly candles, a classic HODLer sell-off.

Given this setup, ZEC’s back-to-back uptrend appears to be solid accumulation, confirming $300 as the base. If this trend holds, a breakout toward the $600 zone could be closer than expected.

DASH [DASH] — Digital coin showed much-needed bullish momentum

DASH [DASH] grabbed third place among weekly gainers with a 16% bounce, tracking close to ZEC. That said, unlike ZEC, this move doesn’t yet look like full accumulation.

Technically, DASH just printed its first green weekly close after six straight red weeks, dropping from the $150 November high to around $44. That kind of drawdown makes a confirmed bottom too early to call.

For now, $50 is the key level. A clean break and hold there keeps momentum alive. If bulls can defend higher levels over the next few weeks, DASH may start shaping a proper bottom and a potential trend reversal.

Other notable winners

Outside the majors, altcoin rockets stole the spotlight this week.

Islamic Coin [ISLM] led the charge with a 143% jump, followed by NUMINE Token [NUM] climbing 101%, and Apro [AT] rounding out the leaderboard with a 75% gain.

Weekly losers

Pippin [PIPPIN] — Digital currency ran into resistance this week

Pippin [PIPPIN] topped this week’s losers chart with a 10% dip. Notably, this marks an extremely volatile week for PIPPIN, which started bullish but ended on a bearish note.

Looking at its daily chart, PIPPIN remains caught in a tight bull-versus-bear zone. The week began with a 15% dip following its breakout past the $0.50 resistance, but a 28% rebound the next day reinforced bid support.

Momentum, however, was short-lived.

Over the next two days, PIPPIN posted another 11% rally, bringing the mid-week total gain to 20%. Yet, with the weekly close at -10%, the end of the week saw a massive sell-off, highlighting strong bearish pressure.

Looking at on-chain data, this drop wasn’t just random.

Instead, as AMBCrypto noted, there was a huge leverage sweep, with PIPPIN’s Open Interest (OI) spiking over 90%. With the price now back at $0.40, a return of bullish activity could set up a classic reset scenario.

Otherwise, a deeper correction back to $0.35 cannot be ruled out.

XDC Network [XDC] — Blockchain’s bullish momentum faced scrutiny

XDC Network [XDC] ended up as one of the bigger weekly losers based on daily price action. While the broader weekly trend still looks bullish, the late-week push has clearly put that momentum to the test.

XDC popped about 12% early in the week, tagging the $0.05 level. It is a zone it’s failed to clear five times since November, making it a stubborn resistance.

The rejection didn’t take long.

A 4% drop on the 27th of December after hitting that level brought sellers back in, and a small follow-up dip kept pressure on price. If this weakness carries over, XDC could stay on the defensive heading into next week.

MYX Finance [MYX] — DeFi platform tested crucial price zones

MYX Finance [MYX] landed third among the week’s biggest losers. With the way price has been moving, the similarities to XDC are pretty clear, putting MYX firmly on the watchlist.

MYX showed some early strength, pushing back toward $3.8, but the breakout never came. Instead, price faded back to $3.5, which looks a lot like the early-December move that eventually dragged MYX down to $2.90.

That $3.8 zone continues to be the level to beat. If price gets rejected there again, longs look high-risk, and the next few weeks will likely decide whether MYX stabilizes or rolls over further.

Other notable losers

In the broader market, downside volatility hit hard.

Legacy Token [LGCT] led the losers with a steep 72% drop, followed by Infrared Finance [IR] falling 55%, and FLOW [FLOW] slipping 32% as momentum sharply cooled.

Conclusion

This week was a rollercoaster. Big pumps, sharp dips, and nonstop action. As always, stay sharp, do your own research, and trade smart.


Final Thoughts

  • Canton [CC], Zcash [ZEC], DASH [DASH] led the week in gains.
  • Pippin [PIPPIN], XDC Network [XDC], MYX Finance [MYX] saw significant declines.

Related Questions

QWhich cryptocurrency was the top weekly gainer and by what percentage?

ACanton [CC] was the top weekly gainer with a solid 20% rally.

QWhat was the key resistance level that Canton [CC] managed to break past during its rally?

ACanton [CC] broke past the $0.117 resistance zone.

QWhich privacy-focused cryptocurrency was the second-biggest weekly winner and what was its potential price target mentioned?

AZcash [ZEC] was the second-biggest weekly winner with a 17% gain, and a potential breakout toward the $600 zone was mentioned.

QWhat was the primary on-chain reason cited for Pippin [PIPPIN]'s sharp price drop at the end of the week?

AThe drop was attributed to a huge leverage sweep, with PIPPIN’s Open Interest (OI) spiking over 90%.

QWhat was the common, stubborn resistance level that both XDC Network [XDC] and MYX Finance [MYX] struggled to break?

ABoth XDC and MYX faced a key resistance level at $3.8, which they failed to break, leading to price rejections.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit3m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit3m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit10m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit10m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit19m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit19m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit22m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit22m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit24m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit24m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片