Crypto Hacks Drop to $26.5M in February Amid Security Gains

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-02Last updated on 2026-03-02

Abstract

Crypto hacks and scams plummeted to a multi-year low in February, totaling approximately $26.5 million across 15 incidents. This represents a significant 69.2% decrease from January's $86 million in losses. The two largest attacks accounted for the majority: a $10 million price manipulation hack on YieldBlox’s lending pool and an $8.9 million private key exploit on IoTeX. Security firm PeckShield attributed the sharp decline to a lack of "mega-hacks" and a shift in focus due to market volatility. Analysts suggest capital is becoming more selective, rewarding protocols with stronger security, and that improved risk controls, audits, and AI-powered tools are contributing to a broader trend of enhanced crypto security.

Last month recorded the lowest level of crypto hacks and scams since March 2025, having $26.5 million stolen since February, as reported by the blockchain security company PeckShield.

Around 15 cases were reported in the month, in which two accounted for the majority of the losses, with the biggest accounting for the $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool through a price manipulation hack on February 21, as reported by PeckShield at X on March 1.

The second-biggest hack targeted the decentralised identity protocol IoTeX, which lost around $8.9 million to a private key exploit on Feb 21. In total, February indicates a 69.2% month-on-month fall from January, which listed more than $86 million in losses.

What Did the Spokesperson Mention?

A spokesperson from PeckShield mentioned that mega-hacks, like the $1.5 billion Bybit hack in February last year, did not inflate last month’s statistics, and market volatility resulted in a significant cooling period in exploit activity.

The spokesperson further mentioned that a sharp market correction in early February, having Bitcoin slip below $70,000, moved the focus of the industry toward institutional deleveraging and math-based sell-offs.

At the time of high-volatility periods, the tactical aim mostly shifts away from protocol exploits toward navigating market liquidity. Dominick John, a Kronos Research analyst, mentioned that the shift could also show tighter risk controls, stronger counterparty standards and amplified real-time monitoring over major venues.

He further went on, mentioning that Capital is shifting to become more selective, rewarding protocols with mature security frameworks. John mentioned losses could carry on to slip by the year as audits, monitoring, and institutional risk frameworks mature.

AI might also intensify the shift, backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier in the lifecycle. Crypto security is intensifying, and protocols are doubling down on audits, formal verification, and real-time monitoring.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Will AAVE Reset Monthly Momentum or Lose Steam and Remain in the Red?

TagsBybitCrypto AttackHack

Related Questions

QWhat was the total amount stolen in crypto hacks and scams in February, as reported by PeckShield?

A$26.5 million.

QWhich two major hacks accounted for the majority of the losses in February, and what were the amounts?

AThe $10 million theft from YieldBlox’s DAO-managed lending pool and the $8.9 million hack targeting the IoTeX protocol.

QWhat was the month-on-month percentage decrease in crypto losses from January to February?

AA 69.2% decrease.

QAccording to the spokesperson, what factor contributed to a significant cooling period in exploit activity?

AMarket volatility.

QHow might AI contribute to improving crypto security, as mentioned in the article?

ABy backing automated code reviews, anomaly detection, and pre-deployment attack simulations to catch vulnerabilities earlier.

Related Reads

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

WEEX Exchange Launches "TradFi Trading Competition" with a 50,000 USDT Prize Pool Amidst a crypto market downturn, WEEX Exchange highlights the growth of tokenized traditional finance (TradFi) assets as a key trend, allowing users to trade stocks, ETFs, and commodities using crypto. The platform has launched a "TradFi Trading Competition" from July 9th to 23rd, featuring a 50,000 USDT prize pool. The campaign offers three reward tiers: 1. **New User Bonus (25,000 USDT pool):** New users depositing ≥100 USDT, completing a specified spot trade, and one TradFi contract trade (margin ≥10 USDT) receive 200 USDT. 2. **Volume-Based Rewards (20,000 USDT pool):** All users can earn tiered bonuses for achieving TradFi contract trading volumes of 5,000 USDT (3 USDT), 20,000 USDT (10 USDT), and 100,000 USDT (50 USDT). Rewards are stackable. 3. **Participation Reward:** Any user opening a TradFi contract trade during the event receives 5 USDT instantly. The article promotes WEEX's TradFi features, which include trading tokenized shares of companies like NVIDIA and Tesla using USDT, 24/7 trading, fractional share investing starting from $5, and high leverage up to 100x for hedging. It positions these features as solutions to traditional investing barriers like high fees, strict trading hours, and high share prices. The summary concludes by encouraging users to join the competition and leverage WEEX's platform to access global TradFi markets.

marsbit1h ago

WEEX TradFi Trading Competition Kicks Off, 50,000 USDT Prize Pool First-Come, First-Served, Open a Position and Get 5 U

marsbit1h ago

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

Recent months have witnessed a wave of established blockchain projects migrating to new public chains, notably Base and Arbitrum, coupled with strategic pivots in their business models—essentially "re-starting" elsewhere. Examples include Sophon (moving from ZKsync to Base to cut $3M+ annual costs and focus on consumer apps), Moonbeam (shifting from Polkadot to Base to pursue decentralized AI), and Secret Network (planning a move from Cosmos to Arbitrum to explore privacy-AI integrations, though its token price plunged 30% post-announcement). A common thread is that these migrating projects are primarily layer-1 or layer-2 chains now seeking relevance in AI and real-world consumer applications. This trend highlights the relative stagnation of ecosystems like Polkadot and Cosmos, which are seeing significant outflows. However, the community remains skeptical about whether such chain-hopping truly enables a turnaround. Historical cases like y00ts NFTs (which moved from Solana to Polygon and back to Ethereum) and Synthetix (which retreated from a multi-chain strategy) show that migration often fails to deliver expected benefits and can add complexity. In today's more rational market, devoid of easy narrative or airdrop红利, simply changing chains is unlikely to be a silver bullet. For both migrating projects and destination chains, the real challenge lies not in attracting projects but in developing actual use cases that retain users.

marsbit1h ago

Switching Chains for Another Shot at Success: Can It Really 'Change One's Destiny'?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片