Crypto card payments overtake P2P stablecoin transfers: Artemis report

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-15Last updated on 2026-01-15

Abstract

According to a blockchain analytics report by Artemis, crypto card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer (P2P) stablecoin transfers as the primary driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. The data shows that crypto card payments now operate at a monthly run rate exceeding $15 billion, compared to approximately $11 billion for P2P transfers. This shift indicates that stablecoins are increasingly being used through traditional card networks rather than through direct on-chain transactions. Visa dominates this segment, accounting for over 80% of the tracked volume, while Mastercard holds a smaller but growing share. The growth is attributed to expanding merchant acceptance and integration with existing payment infrastructure, allowing users to spend stablecoins without requiring merchants to directly accept crypto. Although P2P transfers remain important for remittances and cross-border settlements, their growth has been slower. The report highlights a structural evolution in stablecoin usage—from infrastructure-led to interface-led adoption—where cards act as the primary user-facing access point, embedding crypto liquidity into global commerce and driving mainstream adoption.

Crypto-linked card payments have surpassed peer-to-peer [P2P] stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity. This is according to a new report published on 15 January by blockchain analytics firm Artemis.

The report, titled Stablecoin Payments at Scale: How Cards Bridge Digital Assets and Global Commerce, shows that stablecoin volumes routed through crypto cards now exceed direct wallet-to-wallet payments. It marks a structural shift in how stablecoins are being used in practice.

Artemis data indicates that crypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

While P2P usage continues to grow steadily, card-based payments have accelerated faster. The growth is driven by expanding merchant acceptance and tighter integration with existing payment rails.

Cards emerge as stablecoins’ primary payment interface

Rather than replacing traditional payments outright, stablecoins are increasingly being used behind the scenes through familiar card networks.

The report highlights that most stablecoin-backed card transactions ultimately settle through major card processors.

This allows users to spend dollar-pegged tokens without requiring merchants to accept crypto directly.

Visa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report. Mastercard represents a smaller but growing share, while regional card programs contribute marginally.

This model has allowed stablecoins to scale in consumer payments without requiring new merchant infrastructure. It effectively embeds crypto liquidity into existing global commerce systems.

P2P payments remain relevant but grow more slowly

Artemis notes that P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

However, growth in this segment has been more incremental compared with the rapid expansion seen in card-linked spending.

The divergence suggests that while stablecoins are widely used for moving value between wallets, everyday consumer usage is increasingly mediated through cards rather than direct on-chain payments.

Stablecoin usage shifts from rails to interfaces

The report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption.

Stablecoins remain the settlement layer. However, cards have become the dominant user-facing access point, lowering friction for mainstream users and businesses.

According to Artemis, this dynamic helps explain why stablecoin transaction volumes continue to rise even as direct on-chain payment activity grows at a slower pace.

The findings underline how stablecoins are integrating into traditional financial systems. They do this not by replacing them outrightly, but by quietly powering familiar payment experiences at scale.


Final Thoughts

  • The Artemis report shows a clear shift in how stablecoins are being used, with card-based payments now playing a central role in everyday transactions.
  • As traditional payment rails increasingly bridge digital assets and commerce, stablecoin adoption appears to be moving closer to mainstream consumer behavior rather than remaining a niche crypto-native activity.

Related Questions

QAccording to the Artemis report, which method has become the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity?

ACrypto-linked card payments have surpassed P2P stablecoin transfers as the dominant driver of on-chain stablecoin activity.

QWhat is the monthly run rate of crypto card payments compared to P2P stablecoin transfers as reported by Artemis?

ACrypto card payments have reached a monthly run rate of over $15 billion, compared with roughly $11 billion in P2P stablecoin transfers.

QWhich card network dominates the stablecoin card payment segment and what is its market share?

AVisa dominates this segment, accounting for more than 80% of stablecoin card volume tracked in the report.

QWhat key role do P2P stablecoin transfers continue to play, according to the report?

AP2P stablecoin transfers continue to play a critical role in remittances, treasury movements, and cross-border settlements, particularly in emerging markets.

QHow does the report frame the evolution of stablecoin adoption in terms of infrastructure and interfaces?

AThe report frames the trend as an evolution from infrastructure-led adoption to interface-led adoption, where stablecoins remain the settlement layer but cards have become the dominant user-facing access point.

Related Reads

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

Michael Burry, the famed "Big Short" investor, has once again captured Wall Street's attention with a series of short positions against major tech and semiconductor stocks, most notably Nvidia. In late June and July, through his "Cassandra Unchained" newsletter, Burry disclosed short bets against Nvidia, Tesla, Applied Materials, Caterpillar, the SOXX semiconductor ETF, and later, Micron Technology. His core thesis revolves around potential distortions in the AI infrastructure boom, specifically questioning whether extended depreciation schedules (e.g., 6 years vs. a realistic 2-3 years for AI chips) by cloud giants like Microsoft and Google artificially inflate profits. He also raises concerns about possible "off-balance-sheet circular financing," where chip demand might be propped up by vendor-backed funding to clients. Nvidia's stock experienced volatility following these disclosures, briefly dipping but largely holding near Burry's reported entry points, leaving his positions roughly flat or slightly underwater as of late July. This move is part of a pattern for Burry, whose track record since his legendary 2008 bet is mixed. He has faced notable losses, such as on Tesla in 2021, while scoring on broader market turns like the 2020 pandemic crash. His methodology focuses intensely on free cash flow and scrutinizing original financial documents to spot overvaluation and structural risks, but it often struggles with timing the market. The article contrasts Burry's stance with other prominent investors. Steve Eisman, another "Big Short" figure, is not shorting Nvidia, citing strong fundamentals but expressing nervousness about sustainability. Jim Chanos agrees with the broad "accounting mismatch" concern—comparing it to the dot-com bubble—but targets financial leverage in private equity firms rather than the chip stocks themselves. While Nvidia's short interest remains relatively low at 1.3-1.4% of float, the massive stock size means absolute short losses have been significant, exceeding $5 billion earlier this year. The piece concludes that for ordinary investors, the key takeaway is not replicating specific short bets but learning from the critical frameworks these investors use: questioning rosy accounting, identifying structural vulnerabilities, and maintaining skepticism during market euphoria, even if pinpointing the exact catalyst for a downturn remains elusive.

marsbit8m ago

Wall Street's Most Famous 'Cassandra' Now Has His Sights Set on Nvidia

marsbit8m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

PANews Weekly Digest: Market Turmoil, Tech Breakthroughs, and Crypto Developments. The week saw significant volatility across global markets. South Korea's KOSPI index experienced extreme turbulence, including multiple trading halts, largely driven by sharp declines in AI hardware stocks like SK Hynix. In contrast, China's Changxin Xinqiao (CXC) achieved a landmark IPO with a market cap surpassing 4 trillion yuan, marking a major success for the domestic DRAM industry after a decade of losses. In the crypto and Web3 space, several key narratives emerged. AI is driving demand for new infrastructure, with projects like AI agent wallets and programmable payments gaining traction, attracting interest from firms like Coinbase. The Bitcoin mining sector is pivoting, with companies like MARA focusing on energy management as electricity becomes a core AI-era asset. Meanwhile, the RWA (Real World Assets) sector faces a "utilization puzzle," with hundreds of billions in on-chain assets remaining dormant. Notable market movements included a historic single-day surge of over 17% for the KOSPI index and a significant migration of $16.5 billion in staked ETH within the Lido ecosystem. Michael Saylor announced a target to re-peg the STRC stablecoin around September 8th. Other highlights include discussions on Ethereum's ambitious 2030 roadmap for scaling and privacy, analysis showing high protocol revenues not always translating to token price gains, and warnings from Citi about potential extreme commodity price shocks by late 2026.

marsbit13m ago

Weekly Selection丨Epic Stock Market Volatility, Changxin Tech's IPO Reshapes Storage Landscape, Saylor Aims to Re-Anchor STRC Around September 8th

marsbit13m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

In late July 2026, five major US tech giants—Alphabet, Intel, Microsoft, Meta, and Apple—released their Q2 earnings reports. While all companies exceeded revenue and profit expectations, driven by strong AI-related business growth, investor reactions diverged sharply due to concerns over escalating AI capital expenditures (capex) and their impact on free cash flow. Alphabet reported strong revenue growth and a surging cloud business, but its stock fell after announcing a doubled year-on-year capex and negative quarterly free cash flow for the first time. Intel posted its strongest revenue growth in over 15 years, but its stock experienced volatile trading after significantly raising its full-year capex guidance. Microsoft saw its stock surge after beating estimates and, crucially, lowering its capex forecast while projecting positive free cash flow. Meta faced the most severe sell-off as its profits declined despite revenue beats, with free cash flow plunging over 90% and its capex guidance raised. Apple reported record June-quarter results, but its stock plummeted after providing Q4 revenue guidance that fell short of expectations, citing supply chain constraints and forex headwinds. The overall takeaway is that the market's focus has shifted from validating AI demand to scrutinizing the timeline for returns on massive AI investments. Companies demonstrating a clearer path to managing capex and preserving free cash flow, like Microsoft, were rewarded, while those signaling continued aggressive spending faced investor skepticism.

Odaily星球日报22m ago

When the Market Begins to Question AI Capex: A Full Analysis of Q2 Earnings Reports from Five Tech Giants

Odaily星球日报22m ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

This article, "From Companies to DAOs: How DUNA Could Become the Next Organizational Form," traces the 500-year evolution of business collaboration. It begins with medieval structures like the *commenda* and Florentine *compagnia*, which exposed partners to personal risk. The modern corporation, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company (VOC), was a revolutionary leap, enabling large-scale, capital-intensive ventures by offering limited liability and reducing coordination costs. However, corporations introduced new challenges like principal-agent problems and bureaucratic overhead. The piece argues that software and internet-native protocols are now reducing these traditional overheads. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) emerged as a new model for coordination without centralized management. Yet, DAOs face a significant legal vacuum: they lack legal recognition, leaving members exposed to unlimited personal liability, and their tokens are vulnerable to being classified as securities under unclear regulations (e.g., the Howey Test). This has forced projects into suboptimal workarounds like offshore foundations. The article identifies the Decentralized Unincorporated Nonprofit Association (DUNA) as a potential solution. Recently legalized in states like Wyoming, the DUNA provides a legal wrapper for decentralized networks. It grants key protections—legal personality, limited liability, and perpetual existence—to a group without imposing a traditional hierarchical management structure. This allows token-holder communities to govern, hold assets, and contract as a single legal entity, aligning with their decentralized nature. While DUNA doesn't solve all governance challenges or magically resolve securities law questions, it represents a crucial step. It fills the legal recognition gap, offering a native legal form for internet-scale, decentralized collaboration and extending the separation of personal risk from organizational venture into a new domain.

marsbit1h ago

a16z: From Companies to DAOs, DUNA May Become the Next Generation Organizational Form

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

The 2026 Mid-Year Report on On-Chain RWA highlights a significant growth in tokenized stock market capitalization, which nearly doubled from $951 million in March to $1.89 billion by July. However, the report reveals a fundamental contradiction in this "layer 2.5" ecosystem: products with the strongest legal foundation (like regulated U.S. infrastructure) lack liquidity and distribution, while freely tradable offshored wrapper products often lack substantive ownership rights. The increase is driven largely by a few products (SECZ, FGRS, STRCx) and platforms (Ondo, xStocks, Securitize collectively hold over 85% share). While distributed value across networks like Ethereum, Solana, and BNB Chain has grown, the market remains fragmented. Products referencing the same underlying asset (e.g., Apple stock) are distinct legal liabilities with different intermediaries and jurisdictional rules, offering varying degrees of legal claim. The report cautions that headline numbers are misleading, as they reflect changes in distributed token value—driven by issuance, conversions, and price movements—not pure investor inflows. True "canonical shares" with legal ownership, wide wallet distribution, institutional liquidity, and independent on-chain price discovery do not yet exist at scale. Tokenized treasuries show stronger product-market fit, and ETFs may be easier to scale than single stocks. The core takeaway is a trade-off: legal certainty versus liquidity and composability.

marsbit1h ago

2026 Mid-Year Report On-Chain RWA: Tokenized Stock Market Cap Doubles in a Year, But 90% of Rights Are Hollow Shells

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片