Coinbase Executive Backs CLARITY Act Delay Amid Crypto Frustration

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-01-03Востаннє оновлено о 2026-01-03

Анотація

Coinbase executive John D'Agostino supports the CLARITY Act's delay, emphasizing that the comprehensive market structure legislation requires careful consideration due to its foundational role in regulating digital assets. Unlike the simpler GENIUS Act passed earlier, the CLARITY Act involves defining jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight across multiple regulators, which takes time but is crucial for long-term industry growth. Despite causing frustration and contributing to capital outflows, the delay is seen as necessary to avoid future regulatory confusion. The White House has signaled potential progress in January, aiming to curb talent migration and provide clarity. While the act may not immediately impact markets like Bitcoin's price, its proper implementation is prioritized over haste, with potential to reshape U.S. digital asset operations for decades.


The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, widely known as the CLARITY Act, continues to test the patience of the US crypto industry. However, a senior executive at Coinbase says the delay is both expected and necessary, given the scope of what the legislation aims to achieve.

Speaking on CNBC on Friday, Coinbase’s institutional head of strategy John D’Agostino said he fully understands why the bill has not yet crossed the finish line.

“I completely understand why this is taking longer,” D’Agostino said. “It’s the kind of bill that is more foundational for the growth of crypto or any real asset class.” He added that lawmakers need time because the CLARITY Act addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate in the United States.

CLARITY Act faces deeper complexity than GENIUS Act

D’Agostino contrasted the CLARITY Act with the recently passed GENIUS Act, which became law in July. While he described the GENIUS Act as transformative, he said it focused on issues that were structurally simpler.

According to him, market structure legislation requires lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators. These factors naturally slow progress but also increase the long-term value of the outcome.

As a result, Coinbase believes patience now could prevent regulatory confusion later, especially as crypto markets grow and intersect more deeply with traditional finance.

White House signals progress in January

Optimism around the bill has not disappeared. Just weeks ago, White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks said lawmakers were close to advancing the CLARITY Act early next year.

“We are closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation,” Sacks said on Dec. 19, adding that the administration plans to “finish the job in January.”

Supporters argue that the bill could reduce uncertainty that has driven talent and capital overseas. D’Agostino echoed these sentiments and pointed out that the “massive talent migration” away from the US crypto sector is contributing to the pressure to legislative action.

Market impact and industry reaction

Nevertheless, despite these assurances, delays had impacted market sentiment. Asset manager CoinShares recently linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to prolonged regulatory uncertainty tied to the CLARITY Act.

However, not everyone expects the legislation to move markets immediately. Veteran trader Peter Brandt said the bill, while important, may not significantly affect Bitcoin’s price in the short term.

“Is it world-shaking? No,” Brandt added. “It’s necessary but not value-definiting.”

Looking ahead

Coinbase, as well as most of the crypto industry, is focused on getting the right framework rather than hastened regulation. Even as frustration mounts, it seems CEOs place greater emphasis on having the right framework in place.

If Congress delivers clarity in 2026, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades, even if the wait proves difficult in the near term.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Can Dogecoin Sustain Its Recovery Above $0.135?

TagsBlockchainCoinbaseCryptocrypto regulationStablecoin

Пов'язані питання

QWhy does Coinbase executive John D'Agostino believe the delay of the CLARITY Act is necessary?

AHe believes the delay is necessary because the CLARITY Act is a foundational bill that addresses the structural core of how digital asset markets should operate, requiring lawmakers to define jurisdictional boundaries, compliance standards, and oversight responsibilities across multiple regulators, which naturally takes more time.

QHow does the CLARITY Act differ from the recently passed GENIUS Act according to the article?

AThe CLARITY Act addresses more complex structural issues like market jurisdiction and regulatory oversight, while the GENIUS Act, though transformative, focused on structurally simpler issues.

QWhat did White House AI and crypto czar David Sacks say about the progress of the CLARITY Act?

ADavid Sacks stated that lawmakers were closer than ever to passing the landmark crypto market structure legislation and that the administration plans to 'finish the job in January'.

QWhat market reaction has been linked to the delays in the CLARITY Act's passage?

AAsset manager CoinShares linked nearly $952 million in weekly outflows from crypto investment products to the prolonged regulatory uncertainty caused by the delay of the CLARITY Act.

QWhat is the long-term potential impact of the CLARITY Act if passed, according to the article?

AIf passed, the CLARITY Act could reshape how digital assets operate in the US for decades by providing a clear regulatory framework, reducing uncertainty, and preventing future regulatory confusion.

Пов'язані матеріали

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报34 хв тому

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报34 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News52 хв тому

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News52 хв тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1 год тому

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1 год тому

Торгівля

Спот
活动图片