Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capitals Frenziedly Betting on New Public Blockchains? The Answer Lies in These Three Points

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-14Last updated on 2026-05-14

Abstract

Recently, a wave of major funding announcements for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo signals a significant industry shift. This article analyzes the driving forces behind this surge. Firstly, regulatory clarity is a key catalyst. These massive investments, including Circle's Arc ($222M), Digital Asset's Canton ($300M), and Stripe's Tempo ($500M), all followed the US passage of the *Genius Act* in July 2025. This suggests that clear legislation is unlocking institutional capital. The anticipated, broader *Clarity Act* could further accelerate growth, particularly in tokenization and compliant infrastructure. Secondly, built-in privacy is emerging as a critical design feature. Unlike Ethereum or Solana, these new chains natively support confidential transactions. This directly addresses real-world business needs, where public transparency can be a liability for corporate dealings or personal salary data, making privacy a potential killer application. Finally, the entry of traditional giants marks a new competitive phase. These projects are backed by major firms: Arc by Circle, Canton by a consortium including Goldman Sachs and Nasdaq, and Tempo by Stripe with partners like Visa. While crypto-native projects remain strong contenders, this institutional involvement brings substantial capital, execution capability, and operational rigor. In conclusion, the convergence of regulatory progress, demand for privacy, and competition from established financial and t...

Industry news often emerges in clusters. Such moments deserve high attention, as a major trend is undoubtedly unfolding behind them.

Just this Monday, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that its new blockchain project, Arc, completed a $222 million funding round, reaching an overall valuation of $3 billion. The investor lineup is impressive, including top-tier institutions like BlackRock, Apollo Funds, and the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange, among others.

Just the day before, news emerged about another emerging blockchain, Canton Network, developed by Digital Asset: led by a16z, it raised $300 million at a valuation of $2 billion.

Similarly, Stripe's blockchain, Tempo, has been leading the track: it completed a $500 million funding round at the end of last year, reaching a valuation of $5 billion, and later announced strategic partnerships with companies like DoorDash and Visa.

Arc, Canton, and Tempo are all public blockchains tailored for stablecoin and asset tokenization scenarios. This wave of concentrated funding activity has led me to summarize three crucial insights for the crypto industry.

Capital Always Follows Regulatory Legislation

These several hundred-million-dollar funding rounds all occurred after the US Congress passed the 'Genius Act' in July 2025.

I have always believed that before the act's passage, the sluggish and slow progress of US crypto legislation directly dampened industry investment enthusiasm; major institutions were unwilling to rashly deploy capital or build blockchain infrastructure amid unclear regulatory prospects. Now, with regulation clarified, the industry landscape is changing.

No one can be sure whether these projects could maintain their current valuations or secure such large funding rounds without the protection of the 'Genius Act,' but it is certain that regulatory clarity has played a key facilitating role.

For investors, the most thought-provoking question is: If the comprehensive market structure bill for the crypto industry, the 'Clarity Act,' successfully passes Congress, how much industry opportunity will it unlock?

The coverage breadth of the 'Clarity Act' far exceeds that of the 'Genius Act,' and the final text of the bill is not yet set, making it impossible to precisely predict its impact scope at this time. However, it is certain that the asset tokenization track and compliant financial infrastructure will be the biggest beneficiaries. I also hope the final version of the bill will simultaneously benefit decentralized finance, innovative token design, and other areas, but specifics will depend on the official text. The 'Clarity Act' deserves everyone's continuous tracking.

Privacy Protection May Become a Phenomenal Core Application

Arc, Canton, and Tempo share a common feature, which is also their biggest distinction from Ethereum and Solana: all three blockchains natively have private transaction functionality built-in.

As crypto assets gradually integrate into mainstream commercial scenarios, this design logic fits real-world needs very well. The public transparency of a public blockchain, originally the cornerstone of trust-building, can become a shortcoming in commercial settings.

Businesses do not want every pending transaction to be publicly visible, and professionals do not want their salary details to be easily queryable by anyone via a block explorer. In these cases, public transparency is no longer an advantage but a real pain point.

Even the staunchest supporters of blockchain transparency must admit: the business world inherently requires a degree of privacy and confidentiality of information. These three emerging blockchains have pre-embedded privacy features at the foundational design level, accurately addressing the genuine needs of traditional institutions. The recent rounds of high-value funding confirm: the direction of this track is completely correct.

Traditional Giants Officially Enter the Race

The most special aspect of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their backing by top-tier enterprises and financial institutions.

· Arc is led and developed by the publicly-traded company Circle;

· Canton's backers include Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, Virtu, among others;

· Tempo is jointly built by payment giant Stripe and crypto VC Paradigm, with companies like Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI participating in the project's architecture design.

In contrast, the older generation of blockchains is quite different: Ethereum was initiated by a 19-year-old dropout on a Bitcoin forum, and Solana was conceived from a moment of inspiration by a Qualcomm engineer.

Of course, this does not mean traditional giants are guaranteed to win. Personally, I remain more bullish on crypto-native projects in the long term. However, it is undeniable that the entry of banks and large tech corporations brings more substantial capital, stronger execution capabilities for real-world implementation, and more professional, standardized operations to the industry.

Competition fosters growth. I believe that through the bidirectional competition between giants and native projects, the innovation speed and developmental boundaries of the entire crypto industry will be further expanded.

After all, steel sharpens steel; competition and cooperation give rise to progress.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main reason behind the recent surge in large-scale funding for new public blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo according to the article?

AThe recent surge in large-scale funding is primarily attributed to the clarification of U.S. regulatory landscape, specifically following the passage of the *Genius Act* by the U.S. Congress in July 2025, which reduced regulatory uncertainty and boosted investor confidence.

QWhat is a key technological design feature that distinguishes Arc, Canton, and Tempo from established chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AA key distinguishing feature of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their native, built-in private transaction functionality, addressing the privacy needs of mainstream business applications where public transparency can be a disadvantage.

QWhich traditional financial and corporate giants are mentioned as being involved in the development or backing of the new public blockchains discussed?

AThe article mentions involvement from major traditional institutions: Arc is led by Circle; Canton's backers include Goldman Sachs, Citadel, DTCC, Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu; Tempo is built by Stripe and Paradigm, with design input from Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI.

QWhat potential future legislation does the article suggest could unlock even greater opportunities for the crypto industry, and in which areas?

AThe article suggests the potential passage of the broader *Clarity Act* could unlock significant opportunities, particularly in the areas of asset tokenization and compliant financial infrastructure, possibly also benefiting decentralized finance (DeFi) and innovative token design.

QHow does the article contrast the origins of new chains like Arc, Canton, Tempo with those of older chains like Ethereum and Solana?

AThe article contrasts their origins by noting that Arc, Canton, and Tempo are backed by established corporations and financial giants, whereas Ethereum was founded by a teenager on a Bitcoin forum and Solana was conceived by a former Qualcomm engineer, highlighting a shift from crypto-native origins to institutional involvement.

Related Reads

Wall Street Morning Report: Nvidia Falls for 7 Consecutive Days, AI Stocks Continue to Bleed Out; U.S. Treasury Buybacks Criticized as Temporary Fix, Inflation and Deficit Are the Real Big Problems

Wall Street Morning Report: Tech and Treasury Tensions U.S. stocks were mixed. The Dow gained 0.26%, supported by defensive and consumer staples stocks, while the S&P 500 fell 0.28% and the Nasdaq dropped 0.76% amid a sell-off in AI hardware. The U.S. announced new sanctions targeting Iran's key economic sectors, temporarily easing oil prices (Brent -2.35%). However, concerns over potential disruption to the Strait of Hormuz could pressure European natural gas prices. Meanwhile, the Treasury's upcoming bond buyback plan faced criticism from major banks (Goldman Sachs, Deutsche Bank, Citadel), who argue it doesn't address the root causes of high long-term yields: persistent inflation and the massive fiscal deficit. The 10-year Treasury yield dipped slightly to around 4.70%. Gold rose, with Citi raising its short-term target to $4,800/oz. The AI hardware and semiconductor sector saw intense selling. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell nearly 3%. NVIDIA dropped 2.91%, marking its seventh consecutive daily decline—its longest losing streak since 2022—due to pre-earnings caution despite strong analyst estimates. Memory chip stocks (Micron -6%, others down 5-6%) fell after Samsung's shareholder returns disappointed, raising cycle peak fears. Optical communications was also a big loser, led by Applied Optoelectronics (-14%) on equity dilution concerns. Wall Street is growing wary of off-balance-sheet credit risks in AI infrastructure financing. In other moves, Tesla fell 3.83% on a major China recall. Meta rose 1.66% on news of its upcoming "Hatch" AI platform. Defensive stocks like Visa and Walmart supported the Dow. Key upcoming events include the Jefferies Semiconductor Conference (Aug 25-26), Gamescom (Aug 26-30), and NVIDIA's earnings report (Aug 28).

marsbit15m ago

Wall Street Morning Report: Nvidia Falls for 7 Consecutive Days, AI Stocks Continue to Bleed Out; U.S. Treasury Buybacks Criticized as Temporary Fix, Inflation and Deficit Are the Real Big Problems

marsbit15m ago

Analog Chip Giants TI and ADI Are Stepping Up

Analog chip giants Texas Instruments (TI) and Analog Devices (ADI) have both reported strong quarterly results, signaling an industry recovery. TI's Q2 2026 revenue reached $5.463 billion, a 23% year-over-year (YoY) increase. ADI's Q3 FY2026 revenue hit $4.022 billion, up 40% YoY, marking a new quarterly record. Both companies benefited from rising demand in industrial and data center markets, though their growth paths differed. TI experienced broad-based strength across its segments. Industrial revenue (33% of total) grew approximately 30% YoY, while data center revenue (9%) doubled. The automotive segment (33%) also showed a strong rebound, attributed to demand from China's EV/hybrid market and low inventory levels at automakers. ADI's growth was led by its industrial (49% of revenue, +53% YoY) and communications (16%, +84% YoY) segments, with data center products constituting 80% of the latter. Management highlighted a significant "AI exposure," with data center and ATE-related businesses now accounting for 20% of total revenue. Key differences emerged in their strategies and supply chain dynamics. ADI attributed a larger portion of its growth to AI infrastructure demand and has built "strategic inventory" to a record high of ~$1.93 billion to support future growth, despite channel inventory being below target levels. Its product lead times have extended to up to six months, and price increases are contributing to margin expansion. TI's inventory remained high at $4.6 billion but saw improved turnover. The company emphasized that its growth is primarily volume-driven, with minimal contribution from recent price hikes. TI maintains a competitive lead time below 13 weeks and expressed confidence in its capacity sufficiency for the next three years. In summary, both companies are riding a recovery wave fueled by industrial and AI/data center demand. TI's approach leverages its broad market presence and prepared capacity, while ADI is more focused on AI-driven growth and strategic inventory buildup. Their differing paths highlight the evolving structure of demand within the analog semiconductor market's rebound.

marsbit40m ago

Analog Chip Giants TI and ADI Are Stepping Up

marsbit40m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片