Bitwise Head of Technology Sees Stronger Case for Crypto Growth Amid Five Key Shifts

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-08-25Last updated on 2026-08-25

Abstract

The head of the investment department at Bitwise Asset Management argues that five key structural changes now provide stronger fundamental reasons for cryptocurrency optimism compared to previous cycles (2014, 2018, 2022). These changes are: regulatory progress, the scaling of stablecoins, the growth of tokenization, crypto assets generating real revenue and buybacks, and demand driven by currency devaluation. He highlights that stablecoins have exceeded $300 billion in value, providing a core utility for trading and payments. Tokenization is evolving from an experiment into regulated infrastructure in major markets. Certain crypto projects are now generating substantial revenue, with mechanisms to buy back and burn their tokens. Finally, increased sovereign borrowing and potential currency devaluation are seen as drivers for Bitcoin demand, with a Bitwise model suggesting a theoretical fair value of $224,000 for Bitcoin based on sovereign default risk. This perspective extends beyond short-term price movements, suggesting these foundational shifts strengthen the long-term case for cryptocurrencies even as Bitcoin trades below its all-time high.

Five structural factors now give cryptocurrency investors more fundamental reasons for an optimistic outlook than during previous cycles, according to Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise Asset Management, in an August 24 post on X. He compared the current situation to 2014, 2018, and 2022, when he believes it was significantly more difficult to maintain optimism.

Noting that in 2014, 2018, and 2022 it was "hard to be optimistic," Hougan stated:

"The most amazing thing about 2026 is how easy it is to be optimistic: progress in regulation, scaling of stablecoins, growth of tokenization, assets with real revenue and buybacks, and demand driven by currency debasement."

This viewpoint extends the market argument Hougan made on July 1st, when Bitcoin was overcoming leverage accumulated during the previous rally. He identified extreme fear, undervaluation, and negative funding rates as potential signals of a bottom and concluded that a new bull market could begin in the fall. His latest post expands this reasoning beyond price and positioning, given that Bitcoin continues to trade significantly below its all-time high.

Each of those years had its own obstacles to optimism, starting with the collapse of Mt. Gox in February 2014—then one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges. The 2018 downturn followed the speculative boom of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) and regulatory tightening. In 2022, rising interest rates and the collapses of Terra, Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, and FTX caused widespread losses and industry deleveraging.

Regulation and Stablecoins Strengthen the Prospects

The rulemaking process in the U.S. has advanced with a proposal from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) published on August 18, although the corresponding regulatory framework is not yet adopted. The "Crypto Assets" regulation will allow for qualified offerings of up to $5 million over four years or $75 million within a 12-month period. It also proposes a conditional "safe harbor" for investment contracts; the comment period ends on October 20.

Legislative uncertainty still makes it difficult to determine the timing for comprehensive rules governing the U.S. market structure, even as regulators implement individual initiatives. Hougan previously argued that crypto could survive the failure of the CLARITY Act but could not withstand prolonged uncertainty. He also noted that stablecoins and tokenization have reached "escape velocity," meaning their adoption can continue regardless of the outcome of any single Congressional vote.

Stablecoins serve as one of the most visible confirmations of Hougan's arguments about structural shifts: by mid-2026, their aggregate value is projected to exceed $300 billion. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies designed to be pegged to stable underlying assets, most commonly the U.S. dollar, and facilitate trading, payments, remittances, and settlements.

Tokenization, Revenues, and Debt Strengthen the Argument

Tokenization is also transitioning from an experimental stage to regulated financial infrastructure in several major markets worldwide. U.S. and U.K. authorities have expanded collaboration on digital assets, stablecoins, payments, and tokenized markets, including efforts to reduce cross-border barriers. British plans cover blockchain-based representations of securities, deposits, collateral, and funds, while U.S. agencies continue to develop rules for stablecoins and market structure.

Revenues serve as a separate argument for valuing crypto assets, which previously relied heavily on network growth and anticipated adoption. In an August 12 analysis of crypto revenues and buybacks, Hougan wrote that Hyperliquid earned over $800 million last year and allocated approximately 99% of that sum to purchasing and burning HYPE tokens. He cited Uniswap and Aave as other projects using similar mechanisms.

Currency debasement completes Hougan's five-part argument, linking demand for Bitcoin to rising government borrowing and declining trust in state-issued money. A sovereign default model developed by Bitwise Europe estimated a fair value for Bitcoin at $224,000 (this is not a target price), as governments and corporations prepare to borrow $29 trillion in 2026. The result depends on the probability of default and the cost of insured sovereign bonds.

Related Questions

QAccording to Matt Hougan from Bitwise, what are the five key structural changes that make it easier to be optimistic about cryptocurrencies in 2026 compared to previous cycles?

AThe five key structural changes are: progress in regulation, the scaling of stablecoins, the growth of tokenization, assets with real revenue and buybacks, and demand driven by currency devaluation.

QWhat specific historical events made it difficult to be optimistic about the crypto market in 2014, 2018, and 2022, as mentioned in the article?

AIn 2014, it was the collapse of the Mt. Gox exchange. In 2018, it followed the speculative ICO boom and regulatory tightening. In 2022, it was triggered by rising interest rates and the collapses of Terra, Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, and FTX.

QHow does the article describe the current status and impact of stablecoins in the cryptocurrency market?

AThe article states that stablecoins have reached 'escape velocity,' meaning their adoption can continue independently of specific regulatory votes. Their combined value is projected to exceed $300 billion by mid-2026, and they serve critical functions in trading, payments, remittances, and settlements.

QWhat role do 'real revenues and buybacks' play in the new investment thesis for crypto assets, according to Matt Hougan's analysis?

AThey serve as a separate argument for valuing crypto assets, moving beyond reliance on network growth and expected adoption. Hougan cites examples like Hyperliquid, which earned over $800 million last year and used roughly 99% of that to buy back and burn its HYPE tokens, similar to mechanisms used by projects like Uniswap and Aave.

QWhat is the connection made between currency devaluation and Bitcoin demand in the article's five-part argument?

AThe argument links demand for Bitcoin to rising government borrowing and declining confidence in state-backed money. A sovereign default model developed by Bitwise Europe suggests a fair value for Bitcoin of $224,000 (not a target price) as governments and corporations prepare to borrow $29 trillion in 2026, based on default probability and the cost of insured sovereign bonds.

Related Reads

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru17m ago

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru17m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit27m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit27m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit37m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit37m ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片