Bittensor (TAO) Gains Strength: Uptrend Continuation or a Short-Term Pop?

TheNewsCryptoОпубліковано о 2026-03-24Востаннє оновлено о 2026-03-24

Анотація

Bittensor (TAO) has surged 7.05%, with its price rising from an opening of $279.23 to a high of $319.84, breaking key resistance levels. Currently trading around $308.60, its daily volume increased by 74.73% to $747.93 million, while $3.03 million in TAO was liquidated. Technical analysis shows bullish signals: the MACD indicates strong upward momentum, the CMF suggests mild buying pressure, and the RSI at 62.52 shows room for further gains. The Bull Bear Power reading of 31.5 confirms bullish dominance. If the uptrend continues, the price could reach $318.45, but a downturn might see it retrace to support at $303.21 or lower.

Bittensor (TAO) has noticeably registered a 7.05% surge in value. The opening price of the asset was noted at $279.23, the lowest range of the day. Besides, with the bullish shift within the TAO market, the price rose to $319.84. Significantly, a few crucial resistance levels have been tested and broken to confirm the positive outlook.

At press time, Bittensor traded at around $308.60, with the daily trading volume of the asset having exploded by over 74.73%, reaching the $747.93 million range. Notably, the Coinglass data shows that the market has witnessed a liquidation of $3.03 million worth of TAO in the last 24 hours.

The 4-hour chart of Bittensor exhibits a current upside move, with the price climbing to the $313.72 resistance range. With a sturdy pressure on the upside, the golden cross may form, and the bulls could push the asset’s price up to a high of around $318.45.

If a downtrend emerges for TAO momentum, the price could immediately retrace toward the support level at $303.21. Assuming the bears gain more traction, the death cross might emerge, eventually, leading the asset’s price below $298.26 or even lower.

Can Bittensor Bulls Push the Momentum Higher?

Bittensor’s technical analysis reveals that the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line is above the signal line, and both are above the zero line. It indicates a strong bullish sign. The trend is moving upward with solid momentum, and this supports a continued uptrend.

Besides, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator stationed at 0.06 suggests mild buying pressure in the TAO market. Also, the capital is flowing into the asset, with the buyers having a small edge. It is not strong, but there is some accumulation happening.

The daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) at 62.52 implies the market is clearly leaning bullish. The buyers are in control, and the price has been moving up with steady momentum, but it is not overheated. There is still room for the upside to continue, though if it pushes closer to 70.

TAO’s Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of 31.5 shows strong bullish dominance, which pushes the price above its average level. Notably, this reflects real strength in the trend, though if it keeps rising fast, short pullbacks can still happen.

Top Updated Crypto News

Zcash (ZEC) at a Battle Zone: Bounce Back or Breakdown Ahead?

Пов'язані питання

QWhat was the opening price of Bittensor (TAO) and how much did it surge?

AThe opening price of Bittensor (TAO) was $279.23, and it registered a 7.05% surge in value.

QWhat does the MACD indicator being above the signal line and zero line suggest for Bittensor?

AIt indicates a strong bullish sign, showing that the trend is moving upward with solid momentum and supports a continued uptrend.

QWhat is the significance of the RSI reading at 62.52 for TAO?

AAn RSI reading of 62.52 implies the market is clearly leaning bullish, with buyers in control and steady upward momentum, but it is not overheated, leaving room for further upside.

QAccording to the analysis, what are the potential price targets if the bulls maintain control?

AIf the bulls maintain control, they could push the asset's price up to a high of around $318.45.

QWhat does the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value of 0.06 indicate about the TAO market?

AA CMF value of 0.06 suggests mild buying pressure in the TAO market, indicating that capital is flowing into the asset and buyers have a small edge, though it is not strong.

Пов'язані матеріали

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbit9 хв тому

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbit9 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

A zero-knowledge proof tool can help modern Bitcoin wallets migrate assets before quantum attacks in milliseconds. However, approximately 1.1 million bitcoins mined by Satoshi Nakamoto before 2012 are fundamentally unprotected by such solutions, as they reside in older P2PK addresses lacking the hierarchical structure required for this cryptographic rescue. This exposes a critical divide: post-2012 HD wallets can potentially "upgrade" signatures using tools like Project Eleven's, while early coins are cryptographically isolated. The community faces a political, not technical, dilemma with four contentious options: 1) Let quantum attackers seize the coins, risking market instability; 2) Hard fork to freeze vulnerable addresses, seen as violating property rights; 3) Implement extreme spending limits to slow any attack; 4) Redistribute "orphaned" coins, breaking immutability. Each solution threatens a core Bitcoin tenet. The market is already pricing in this governance risk, as evidenced by institutional divestment citing uncertainty. The true crisis isn't the arrival of quantum computing, but the community's inability to reconcile its foundational principles with an existential technological shift.

marsbit17 хв тому

Quantum Computers Haven't Arrived Yet, but Satoshi's 1.1 Million Bitcoin Pose the First Problem

marsbit17 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Matt Hougan, Bitwise's CIO, identifies the fusion of traditional finance and on-chain finance as the core driver for the next crypto bull market. He expects this cycle, propelled by real-world utility and global finance adoption, to be the largest yet, centered on stablecoins, asset tokenization, 24/7 trading, instant settlement, and institutional DeFi growth. The article outlines two primary investment approaches tied to this trend. The first focuses on native crypto applications with strong revenues and sustainable tokenomics, exemplified by Hyperliquid (HYPE). Its Layer-1 chain is gaining significant trading volume from traditional assets like oil and equities. Its model of using 99% of revenues for token buybacks is a key strength. The second approach targets established traditional firms building at scale on crypto rails, like Robinhood. The launch of its Robinhood Chain, enabling global trading of tokenized stocks and DeFi activities, represents a major move towards this fusion. The author also notes other serious contenders like Coinbase, Figure, BlackRock, and JPMorgan. Ultimately, the thesis is that the most profound success will come when blockchain technology seamlessly integrates into finance, becoming invisible to end-users. Investors are advised to position ahead of this convergence.

Foresight News21 хв тому

Where Will the Next Bull Market's Main Battlefield Be? The Answer Lies in These Two Types of Assets

Foresight News21 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbit28 хв тому

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbit28 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbit37 хв тому

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbit37 хв тому

Торгівля

Спот