Behind the Coinbase Acquisition of USDH: Hyperliquid’s Interest-Driven Choice

Odaily星球日报Published on 2026-05-15Last updated on 2026-05-15

Abstract

The article discusses the transition of the Hyperliquid ecosystem's native stablecoin, USDH, following its acquisition by Coinbase. Last September, USDH, issued by Native Markets, was a focal point in the ecosystem. Recently, Coinbase announced it will become the official USDC treasury deployer on Hyperliquid. Native Markets granted Coinbase the rights to purchase the USDH brand assets, leading to the gradual phase-out of USDH. Users can convert USDH to USDC or fiat without fees during this period. USDC is now Hyperliquid's official stablecoin. The move is framed as a three-way win: * **Coinbase & Circle:** Deepen ties with Hyperliquid's on-chain economy. Both companies are staking HYPE tokens. Circle had already invested in HYPE previously. * **Hyperliquid:** Becomes the primary beneficiary, set to receive the vast majority (estimated ~90%) of the reserve yield income from the ~$5.16 billion in USDC on its platform. This could translate to significant daily HYPE buybacks. The alliance with Coinbase may also offer regulatory advantages in the US. * **Native Markets:** While exiting the stablecoin business, the team reportedly received economic compensation from Coinbase for the USDH brand assets, framing it as a successful conclusion to USDH's role. However, the article notes criticism from some Hyperliquid community members. They view the shift as a step back for decentralization and argue that the original USDH issuer vote was driven by internal interests rather th...

Original|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina)

Author|Wenser(@wenser 2010)

In September of last year, the battle over the Hyperliquid native stablecoin USDH once became a focal point in the industry; now, this once highly anticipated stablecoin has suddenly welcomed its own "exit moment."

Last night, Coinbase announced it would become the official treasury deployer for USDC on Hyperliquid, while Native Markets, the issuer of the Hyperliquid native stablecoin USDH, granted Coinbase the right to purchase USDH brand assets. Subsequently, the USDH market will be gradually phased out, during which users can still convert USDH to USDC or fiat currency without transaction fees.

From this point on, the once-famous USDH has become an asset absorbed by Coinbase, while USDC is officially established as the official stablecoin and quote asset of Hyperliquid. Odaily Planet Daily will briefly analyze the details and subsequent impacts of this event in this article.

USDH Exits, USDC Rises: The Economic Calculations Behind $50 Billion

This grand play of the "Hyperliquid Ecosystem Stablecoin Battle" ultimately concluded with a win-win-win outcome for the three parties: Coinbase & Circle, Hyperliquid, and Native Markets, the USDH issuer.

Coinbase further deepened its integration with the Hyperliquid ecosystem through this move; Hyperliquid secured the majority of the revenue from USDC stablecoin reserves within its ecosystem; Native Markets, as the ultimate beneficiary of USDH, received its reward in the form of "selling the USDH brand assets."

Coinbase & Circle: Binding to Hyperliquid's On-Chain Economy, Continuously Increasing Investment in HYPE

Currently, the scale of USDC on Hyperliquid is approximately $5.164 billion, a year-on-year increase of 2 times.

As the official partner and revenue-sharing party for USDC, Coinbase's action undoubtedly aims to deeply integrate with the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Additionally, according to official Hyperliquid announcement information, both Coinbase (funds deployer) and Circle (responsible for CCTP and native cross-chain infrastructure technical deployment) have committed to staking HYPE to activate AQAv2 (Aligned Quote Asset v2).

It is worth mentioning that in September last year, Circle had already purchased HYPE tokens, and its current HYPE token staking scale has increased to around 500,000.

Hyperliquid: Secures the Lion's Share of USDC Reserve Revenue, Enjoys the Convenience of Being a Coinbase Ally

As for the biggest winner of this cooperation, it is undoubtedly Hyperliquid as the foundational ecosystem.

According to the official announcement, Coinbase will subsequently share the majority (vast majority) of reserve revenue income with the Hyperliquid protocol. Although the specific split ratio has not been disclosed, if based on the previous USDH revenue-sharing mechanism, Hyperliquid will actually receive approximately 90% of the reserve revenue.

According to calculations by Hyperliquid community members, based on a scale of $4.7 billion and a 3.8% interest income rate, this revenue corresponds to approximately $160 million; in other words, it corresponds to a daily HYPE token buyback of about $440,000.

Furthermore, with the CLARITY Act passing the vote in the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, the deep integration between Hyperliquid and Coinbase also means that HYPE and Hyperliquid have gained a certain level of support in terms of U.S. regulation.

Native Markets: USDH's Historical Mission Accomplished

As the issuer of the Hyperliquid native stablecoin USDH, Native Markets might seem like the biggest loser in this "absorption event," but judging from its official statement, its ending can also be considered a "successful retirement."

On one hand, USDH provided a model and template for the revenue sharing of USDC between Coinbase and the Hyperliquid protocol; on the other hand, Coinbase likely directly acquired the USDH-related brand assets. The USDH stablecoin issued by the Native Markets team was essentially "acquired by Coinbase," thus providing the team with a certain economic return.

Subsequently, Native Markets also stated it would remain independent and seek developments in other areas.

After USDH's Exit, In a Win-Win-Win Situation, Only USDH Users Get Hurt

Of course, Native Markets' exit has not been met with universal "praise." Hyperliquid community users have also expressed disapproval of its so-called "sitting at the negotiation table" narrative.

Some believe that the exit of USDH signifies a complete regression of the decentralization era;

Others point out that during the original USDH stablecoin issuer vote, Paxos should have been chosen, as they at least considered users and stablecoin growth. Those who voted for Native Markets were merely aligning with factions and internal interests. Ultimately, users gained nothing. These remarks have garnered considerable agreement and support.

Thus, the drama from a year ago, filled with "dominant pursuit," "resistance against giants," has finally come to an end.

However, looking back now at the scene of Hyperliquid "shaking hands and making peace" with Coinbase and Circle is somewhat poignant and slightly ironic.

In the end, everything was merely about the distribution of interests, not the once-loudly proclaimed slogans of "for the community" or "for Hyperliquid."

Recommended Reading

Hyperliquid Stablecoin USDH Becomes the "Industry's Favorite," Giants Trigger Chaotic Battle for Distribution Rights

USDH Vote in Progress: "Prearranged Script," "Dominant Pursuit," "Stepping Down Bravely" Take Turns on Stage

Related Questions

QWhat major announcement did Coinbase make regarding Hyperliquid, and what does it mean for USDH?

ACoinbase announced it will become the official USDC treasury deployer on Hyperliquid. Additionally, USDH issuer Native Markets granted Coinbase the right to purchase the USDH brand assets. This means the USDH market will gradually be shut down, and USDH will effectively be 'acquired' by Coinbase, while USDC is established as Hyperliquid's official stablecoin and quote asset.

QAccording to the article, why is Hyperliquid considered the biggest winner in this arrangement?

AHyperliquid is considered the biggest winner because it will receive the vast majority (estimated around 90%) of the revenue generated from the USDC reserves on its platform. This represents significant, ongoing income. Furthermore, the deep partnership with Coinbase provides regulatory support and convenience for the Hyperliquid ecosystem in the US market.

QWhat benefit does the article state that Coinbase and Circle gain from this partnership with Hyperliquid?

ACoinbase and Circle gain a deeper economic and strategic bond with the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Coinbase strengthens its role as a major stablecoin infrastructure provider. Both companies have also committed to staking HYPE tokens to support the platform's AQAv2 (Aligned Quote Asset) mechanism, with Circle having already increased its HYPE stake significantly.

QHow is the outcome for Native Markets, the issuer of USDH, described in the article?

AThe outcome for Native Markets is described as achieving a 'graceful exit' or 'mission accomplished.' While they are stepping away from USDH, they are reportedly receiving financial compensation from Coinbase for the sale of the USDH brand assets. The team will remain independent to pursue other ventures, having paved the way for the USDC revenue-sharing model.

QWhat is one of the main criticisms from the Hyperliquid community regarding the shutdown of USDH?

AOne major criticism from the community is that the shutdown of USDH represents a step back for decentralization. Some users also expressed disappointment, arguing that the initial vote for the USDH issuer was driven by internal interests and 'bandwagoning' rather than choosing an issuer (like Paxos) that would prioritize users and the stablecoin's growth, leaving end-users with nothing.

Related Reads

Kraken Changed Its Vote at the Last Minute, Solana's Inflation Policy Narrowsly Passes by 0.33 Percent

Kraken’s last-minute vote reversal secured the passage of SGP-0002, a pivotal Solana governance proposal to accelerate the network’s annual inflation reduction from 15% to 30%. The final vote tally was 67.001%, narrowly exceeding the required 66.667% supermajority by just 0.334 percentage points. This change will bring Solana’s terminal inflation rate of 1.5% forward to around 2029, reducing future SOL issuance over six years by approximately 18.9 million tokens (about 2.6% of current supply). The vote, the first major test of Solana’s new on-chain governance system, saw intense drama. The Kraken 2 validator, controlling about 8.9 million staked SOL, switched from support to opposition hours before the deadline, pushing the "yes" vote below the passing threshold. A flurry of lobbying, including direct outreach by Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz, ensued. Kraken ultimately flipped back to supporting the proposal, and JitoSOL holders used the "staker override" mechanism to bypass opposing validators and vote directly with their stake. While SGP-0002 passed, a companion proposal (SGP-0003) to restructure transaction fees failed, indicating community willingness to adjust token supply but hesitance to change fee economics. The approved proposal now moves to a technical implementation phase, requiring client teams to code and activate the change. The event highlighted both the power of large validators and the resilience of Solana’s governance mechanisms, marking a significant, albeit messy, step in decentralized monetary policy management.

marsbit8m ago

Kraken Changed Its Vote at the Last Minute, Solana's Inflation Policy Narrowsly Passes by 0.33 Percent

marsbit8m ago

Trading Volume Surges 10 Times in a Month, Who's Driving UNI's Soaring Price?

The article discusses the recent surge in the price of UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, which reached a high above $5.4 on August 31, marking a three-month increase of over 100%. The resurgence is attributed primarily to two key developments. First, Uniswap was designated as the primary Automated Market Maker (AMM) on the newly launched Robinhood Chain. Data shows Uniswap generated $4.29 million in fees in 24 hours on this chain and facilitated a tenfold increase in stock token trading volume over a month, reaching approximately $130 million daily. Second, a fundamental change in UNI's tokenomics, approved in December 2025, activated a "fee switch" mechanism. A portion of protocol fees is now directed to a "TokenJar" contract. Arbitrage bots can destroy an equivalent value of UNI tokens to claim these fees, creating a perpetual buy-and-burn pressure. This mechanism has led to the burning of over 110 million UNI tokens (worth $630 million), with recent daily burns exceeding $400,000 in value, nearly half contributed by activity on Robinhood Chain. The symbiotic relationship is highlighted: Uniswap gains a substantial new source of on-chain revenue to fuel its token deflation, while Robinhood Chain leverages Uniswap's deep liquidity and decentralized infrastructure for its stock token offerings. This integration represents a deeper convergence of traditional and decentralized finance.

marsbit22m ago

Trading Volume Surges 10 Times in a Month, Who's Driving UNI's Soaring Price?

marsbit22m ago

Marvell: Can't Compare to NVIDIA, Can't Meet Expectations, Overvaluation Gets Squeezed First?

Marvell Technology (MRVL.O) reported its Q2 FY2027 earnings (ending July 2026) after market close on August 27. Key points include: The company raised its full-year revenue outlook for FY2027 to $12 billion (from $11.5B) and for FY2028 to $18 billion (from $16.5B). However, these upward revisions were only slightly above market expectations and significantly trailed NVIDIA's recent explosive guidance. The Data Center segment, accounting for 79% of revenue, grew 19% quarter-over-quarter to $2.17 billion, primarily driven by connectivity products. For FY2028, management forecasts over 60% growth for this segment, again below NVIDIA's >70% outlook. A major disappointment for investors was the lack of an upward revision to the Custom ASIC business guidance, despite Marvell's recent partnership agreement with Google. The market had anticipated potential gains from Google's TPU orders, but the maintained guidance for "over 100% growth" in FY2028 (with no specific target for FY2027) led to concerns that the Google deal may be a less favorable "framework agreement" where Marvell holds a weaker negotiating position. Adjusted gross margin was flat at 58.3%. Q3 revenue guidance is $3.15 billion, slightly above consensus. Overall, the report was largely in line with expectations, but the subsequent stock decline is attributed to growth forecasts that failed to meet heightened market expectations (particularly versus NVIDIA) and lingering uncertainty around the tangible benefits of the Google ASIC partnership. High valuation faces near-term pressure, but expectations for >50% growth in the coming years and long-term ASIC opportunity may provide support.

marsbit1h ago

Marvell: Can't Compare to NVIDIA, Can't Meet Expectations, Overvaluation Gets Squeezed First?

marsbit1h ago

US Stock Market Trend (August 31st): Kashkari's Hawkish Remarks Weigh on Chip Stocks, US-Iran Weekend Strikes Boost Oil Prices

U.S. stock markets ended lower on Friday following hawkish remarks from Federal Reserve Chair Wash at the Jackson Hole symposium, which sharply increased the probability of a September rate hike from 35% to nearly 60%. Major indexes fell: the S&P 500 dropped 0.25%, the Nasdaq declined 0.52%, and the Dow was essentially flat. This shift in interest rate expectations pressured rate-sensitive assets, leading to significant declines in chip stocks. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index fell 3.47%, with Nvidia dropping 4.57%, erasing about half its post-earnings gains. Geopolitical tensions also escalated over the weekend as the U.S. and Iran exchanged military strikes, raising concerns over the security of oil transit through the Strait of Hormuz. This pushed oil prices up over 2% in early Asian trading on Monday, reintroducing a geopolitical risk premium. In other energy news, former President Trump announced a landmark 25-year oil deal with Venezuela, aiming to significantly increase the country's oil production. However, this long-term supply boost was overshadowed in the short term by the Middle East conflict and the dominant market focus on interest rates. The core market narrative for the coming week revolves around the interplay between re-priced hawkish rate expectations and escalating geopolitical risks. Key areas to watch include the trajectory of Treasury yields, the evolution of U.S.-Iran tensions and its impact on oil prices, and whether the sell-off in high-valuation tech and semiconductor stocks stabilizes or continues under the pressure of higher rates.

marsbit1h ago

US Stock Market Trend (August 31st): Kashkari's Hawkish Remarks Weigh on Chip Stocks, US-Iran Weekend Strikes Boost Oil Prices

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片