ARM's Stock Price Soars 30% Against the Trend, Is ARM, Now Making AI Chips, Winning Big?

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-22Last updated on 2026-05-22

Abstract

ARM's stock surged over 15% on May 21, 2026, reaching a record high of $259, driven by its strategic pivot beyond its traditional IP licensing business. For over three decades, ARM has profited by licensing chip designs to companies like Apple and Qualcomm, earning mere cents per chip. However, with the mobile market maturing, growth stalled. In March 2026, ARM announced a historic shift: it would design and sell its own finished chips for the first time. Its "AGI CPU," built for AI data centers, targets the growing computational needs of AI Agents—tasks like workflow orchestration and data preprocessing where CPUs are crucial. This move positions ARM directly in the high-value server CPU market, competing with some of its own licensees. Analysts believe the rise of Agentic AI will dramatically increase demand for data center CPUs. Bernstein set a $300 price target, forecasting ARM's annual revenue could reach $26 billion by 2030 as the server CPU market expands. Major customers like Meta and OpenAI have already signed on for the AGI CPU, with committed demand reportedly doubling to over $2 billion within six weeks of launch. While this transformation offers massive upside, risks remain. ARM's valuation is extremely high (P/E ~300), pricing in future success. The company must also navigate potential conflicts with existing partners and execute flawless chip manufacturing. Nevertheless, Wall Street is betting that ARM's move from a "tax collector" to an AI infrastructure pr...

When AI Agents need more than just GPUs, ARM is welcoming its own era.

In September 2023, ARM went public on Nasdaq at $51 per share. SoftBank sold less than 10% of its stake, cashing out approximately $4.9 billion. It was the largest tech IPO of that year, but many secretly harbored a question—how could a company that doesn't manufacture chips but only sells design blueprints justify a $54.5 billion valuation?

In less than three years, ARM has provided an answer no one anticipated.

On May 21, 2026, ARM's stock price surged over 15% in a single day, hitting a record high of $259. From around $201 at the end of April, it climbed 27% in just three weeks. By the intraday session on May 22, the stock price briefly touched $285.

From the IPO price of $51 to now, it has more than quintupled in less than three years.

This isn't a simple earnings report rally or analyst hype. ARM is undergoing the most profound identity transformation in its 35-year history. Can it completely reinvent itself?

AGI CPU: For the First Time in 35 Years, ARM is Manufacturing Its Own Chips

To understand ARM's current rally, one must first grasp how it made money in the past.

ARM's business model is unique in the semiconductor industry. It doesn't produce any chips itself. Instead, it licenses the underlying chip designs to other companies—Apple, Qualcomm, MediaTek, Samsung, and even Nvidia. Clients pay an upfront licensing fee to get the design blueprints, and then pay ARM a royalty for every chip produced based on ARM's architecture.

According to ARM's disclosures at IPO, the average royalty per chip is about 5 cents.

With this model, ARM's architecture found its way into 99% of the world's smartphones. By the time of its IPO, cumulative shipments of chips based on ARM designs exceeded 160 billion. But the problem was clear—the global smartphone market had essentially stopped growing.

ARM's revenue for fiscal year 2023 was $2.68 billion, even showing a slight year-over-year decline. A company that dominated the mobile computing era saw its revenue stagnating. The 5-cents-per-chip royalty model, in an era of plateauing phone markets, was destined to deliver only linear growth.

To break through the ceiling, ARM had to find a new growth engine.

The AGI CPU launched by ARM|Image source: Livemint

On March 24, 2026, ARM held a launch event in San Francisco, announcing something the company had never done in its history—releasing and selling a finished chip of its own design.

This chip is named "AGI CPU," based on ARM's latest Neoverse V3 architecture, featuring up to 136 cores, manufactured using TSMC's 3nm process, with a TDP of 300 watts. It's not for training large models (that's the GPU's job), but specifically designed for "CPU-side" work in AI data centers—data preprocessing, model inference scheduling, network management, and most crucially, the orchestration of AI Agent workflows.

CEO Rene Haas said one sentence at the launch: "This is a pivotal turning point for the company."

This statement carries more weight than it appears on the surface. For 35 years, ARM adhered to one principle—we only sell designs, we don't compete with our customers. Apple uses ARM's architecture for its M-series chips, Qualcomm for Snapdragon, Nvidia for Grace. Everyone takes what they need, staying in their own lanes. Now, by stepping into chip manufacturing itself, ARM is essentially competing with its own customers for the same market.

But ARM's confidence stems from finding a new battlefield its customers haven't yet occupied.

The Underlying Logic of Data Centers is Being Rewritten

Over the past few years, everyone talked about GPUs. Nvidia's H100 and B200 are the hard currency of the AI era, with data center construction logic revolving around GPUs. CPUs? Just supporting actors, matched alongside GPUs at ratios like 1:4 to 1:8.

But Agentic AI is changing this equation.

Unlike traditional chatbots, AI Agents need to autonomously call tools, manage multi-step tasks, and coordinate multiple subsystems. These tasks are inherently serial and logic-intensive, precisely what CPUs excel at, not GPUs. When an Agent is busy calling APIs, waiting for external responses, or performing security checks, the expensive GPU next to it is essentially idling.

ARM's assessment is that, in the AI Agent era, the demand for CPU cores per gigawatt of data center power will surge from 30 million to 120 million—a fourfold increase. TrendForce research also points out that the CPU-to-GPU ratio in Agentic AI deployments will shift from the current 1:4 to 1:8, to 1:1 to 1:2.

Morgan Stanley further predicts that by 2030, Agentic AI could bring $32.5 to $60 billion in new demand to the data center CPU market, pushing the total server CPU market size beyond $100 billion.

Simply put, GPUs are the "engines" of the AI era, but the Agent era also needs a "dispatch center," and that's the CPU. This is precisely the position ARM's AGI CPU is targeting.

ARM's data center product lineup including the AGI CPU|Image source: ARM

ARM's AGI CPU is not a mere concept. Its initial customer list reads like the AI industry's "Hall of Fame"—Meta is a co-development partner and launch customer, with commercial contracts signed with OpenAI, Cerebras, Cloudflare, SAP, and SK Telecom. Server manufacturers like Lenovo, Supermicro, and Quanta have already begun offering integrated systems equipped with AGI CPUs.

Santosh Janardhan, Meta's Head of Infrastructure, stated that Meta co-developed this chip with ARM and will deploy it alongside Meta's in-house MTIA accelerators to optimize computational density in its "gigawatt-scale" AI data centers. Sachin Katti, Head of Industrial Computing at OpenAI, said the AGI CPU will become an integral part of OpenAI's infrastructure, responsible for the orchestration layer coordinating large-scale AI workloads.

What excites Wall Street even more is the speed of growth.

ARM revealed during its early-May earnings call that committed customer demand for the AGI CPU for FY2027-2028 already exceeds $2 billion—and this figure was only $1 billion six weeks ago when the product was just launched. Doubling in six weeks, this pace of demand acceleration is extremely rare in the hardware industry.

Meanwhile, ARM's traditional business is also accelerating. Q4 FY2026 revenue reached $1.49 billion, a 20% year-over-year increase, with licensing revenue soaring 29% to $819 million, setting a historical record for the best single-quarter performance.

ARM Repriced

The real catalyst for this rally was a heavyweight research report released by Bernstein analyst David Dai on May 19.

Dai initiated coverage on ARM with an Outperform rating, directly setting a $300 price target. His core logic was clear—AI is transitioning from chatbots to Agentic AI, which will drive structural growth in CPU demand, and ARM, with its power efficiency advantage, will be the biggest winner. He estimates that by 2030, the server CPU market will quadruple to $137 billion, with ARM's annual revenue surpassing $26 billion and earnings per share reaching $9.83.

Bernstein isn't alone. Jefferies raised its target price from $210 to $290, TD Cowen from $165 to $265, and Bank of America gave a $300 target. Citi also confirmed management's 2031 targets—$25 billion total revenue and $9 earnings per share.

This isn't optimism from a single firm; it's Wall Street collectively reframing ARM's valuation model. The market is no longer pricing ARM as a "chip IP licensing company" but starting to value it as an "AI infrastructure platform."

Interestingly, in the same month ARM launched its AGI CPU, Nvidia also announced it would sell its ARM-based Vera CPU as a standalone product. On May 19, Nvidia VP Ian Buck personally delivered the first Vera CPU systems to Anthropic, OpenAI, Oracle, and SpaceXAI. A GPU giant and an IP licensing giant simultaneously entering the CPU market in the same month—this in itself is the most powerful endorsement of the judgment that "Agentic AI is reshaping CPU demand."

Returning to ARM's business logic. In the past, selling blueprints earned 5 cents to $2 per chip in royalties. Now, manufacturing and selling its own chips means a data center CPU sells for thousands of dollars. It has jumped from the bottom to the mid-to-upper end of the value chain, boosting unit revenue by a factor of a thousand.

Of course, the risks are equally enormous. ARM's current P/E ratio is nearly 300, and its P/S ratio is close to 167. This valuation isn't pricing ARM of 2026, but ARM of 2030 or beyond. If the adoption pace of Agentic AI lags expectations, if execution missteps occur in the journey from IP design to mass chip production, if self-manufacturing chips alienate existing licensing customers and damage relationships—a problem in any single link could trigger a sharp correction.

Notably, ARM insiders have sold approximately $31.9 million worth of shares over the past three months. Management is signaling through action that they, too, find the current price not cheap.

But the market is clearly willing to buy into this story. Because what ARM is doing is transitioning from a "tax collector" to an "infrastructure supplier." If Agentic AI truly explodes as everyone expects, and CPU demand really quadruples, then today's ARM might just be getting started.

For the first time in 35 years, what ARM holds in its hand isn't just a blueprint, but an actual chip. Whether this chip can support a completely new ARM might not be revealed until after mass production ramps up post-2028.

But at least for now, Wall Street has already cast its vote of confidence in advance.

This article is from the WeChat public account "GeekPark" (ID: geekpark), author: Hualin Wuwang, editor: Jingyu

Related Questions

QWhat is ARM's new chip called, and why is its launch considered a significant shift in the company's strategy?

AARM's new chip is called the 'AGI CPU'. Its launch is a significant strategic shift because for the first time in its 35-year history, ARM is not just licensing chip designs but also manufacturing and selling its own finished chip product. This moves the company up the value chain into direct competition with some of its own customers for a new market segment.

QAccording to the article, what is the key factor driving the predicted surge in demand for CPUs in data centers?

AThe key factor driving the predicted surge in CPU demand is the rise of Agentic AI. Unlike traditional chatbots, AI Agents perform complex, multi-step tasks requiring orchestration, tool calling, and sequential logic—operations that are better suited for CPUs rather than GPUs. This changes the typical CPU-to-GPU ratio in data centers, leading to a forecasted fourfold increase in CPU core demand per gigawatt of data center power.

QWhat financial impact does the article suggest ARM's move into selling its own chips could have compared to its traditional licensing model?

AThe article suggests the financial impact is massive. Under the traditional licensing model, ARM earns roughly 5 cents in royalty per chip. By selling its own AGI CPU data center chip, which costs thousands of dollars per unit, ARM's revenue per unit could increase by a factor of over a thousand, moving the company up the value chain from the bottom (IP licensing) to the mid-upper tier (finished product sales).

QWhich major companies are listed as early commercial customers or partners for ARM's AGI CPU?

AThe article lists several major companies as early partners or customers for the AGI CPU. Meta is named as a co-development partner and launch customer. Other commercial customers include OpenAI, Cerebras, Cloudflare, SAP, and SK Telecom. Server manufacturers like Lenovo, Supermicro, and Quanta are also providing systems equipped with the new chip.

QWhat are some of the key risks highlighted for ARM's new strategy and its current high valuation?

AKey risks highlighted include: 1) The high valuation (nearly 300x P/E, 167x P/S) depends on the future success of Agentic AI, which may develop slower than expected. 2) Execution risks in moving from IP design to large-scale chip manufacturing. 3) Potential for deteriorating relationships with existing licensing customers who may see ARM as a new competitor. 4) The article also notes significant insider stock sales, suggesting management may believe the current price is high.

Related Reads

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

**Summary: The Value Distribution of Stablecoins** The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from mere trading tools into broader channels for dollar access. It divides the stablecoin ecosystem into four layers to analyze how value is distributed: 1. **Issuance Layer:** Mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the spread between reserve yield and user costs (e.g., Tether, Circle). This layer currently earns the largest profit margin. 2. **Infrastructure Layer:** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and asset management (e.g., Bridge, BVNK). This is the "unglamorous" but critical work, building the essential bridges between crypto and real-world finance. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer:** Integrates stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and provides enterprise financial software (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase). They act as the access point for businesses. 4. **Application Layer:** The end-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlements, or as a store of value. They benefit from convenience but have little pricing power. The core thesis is that while the issuance layer currently dominates profits, the often-overlooked **infrastructure layer holds significant long-term potential**. The real challenge and barrier to mass adoption is not the on-chain transfer of stablecoins (which is simple), but the complex "last mile" integration into existing business workflows, banking systems, and regulatory frameworks across different countries. Companies in this layer are currently in a "land grab" phase, investing heavily to build networks, secure bank partnerships, and establish compliance pathways. While their position is currently pressured by the profitable issuers above and distribution platforms below, the article suggests that if stablecoins become a default financial rail for businesses, the infrastructure providers who have done the hard work of integration will ultimately gain strong pricing power and become entrenched, essential players.

marsbit4h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

marsbit4h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins The article argues that stablecoins are evolving from a mere trading tool into a broad "dollar channel." It analyzes the industry's value chain through four layers: 1. **Issuance Layer (e.g., Tether, Circle):** The top layer that mints stablecoins, holds reserve assets, and captures the thickest interest rate spread. 2. **Infrastructure Layer (e.g., Bridge, BVNK):** Connects stablecoins to the traditional financial system, handling critical but complex "dirty work" like fiat on/off-ramps, banking integration, compliance (KYC/AML), and cross-border settlement. 3. **Acquiring/Distribution Layer (e.g., Stripe, Coinbase):** Embeds stablecoins into merchant systems, manages payment flows, and integrates with enterprise software. 4. **Application Layer:** End-users and businesses that ultimately use stablecoins for payments, settlement, or storing value. The author posits that while the issuance layer currently captures the most profit, the most overlooked and potentially critical layer is infrastructure. The core challenge for stablecoin adoption isn't the on-chain transfer (which is simple), but bridging the gap between blockchain and the real-world financial system. This involves solving practical problems for businesses: fiat conversion, reconciliation, tax handling, and user onboarding. Infrastructure companies are currently in a difficult "land-grab" phase—building networks, securing banking relationships, and achieving compliance country-by-country. They face pressure from both the profitable issuance layer above and distribution platforms below. However, the author suggests this layer is building a crucial moat. Once stablecoins become a default business rail, the infrastructure players who have done the hard work of integration may gain significant, durable value and pricing power.

链捕手4h ago

The Value Distribution of Stablecoins

链捕手4h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

No one truly teaches you how to do research. You're often given a desk, a pre-selected problem, and vague instructions to "create something new." Consequently, many people reverse-engineer the job based on visible outputs—papers, posts, announcements—learning only how to *appear* like a researcher rather than how to *become* one. True research capability is built from stacking small, trainable skills, nearly all of which can be developed through deliberate practice. **Pick Your Own Problem:** Most researchers absorb problems from advisors or trends, lacking the underlying reasoning. Choosing a problem you genuinely care about, as John Schulman advises, leads to original work. Develop "taste" like a muscle: predict experiment outcomes, guess paper results from methods, and track which findings remain important over time. **Upgrade Your Inputs:** Relying on shared reading lists (arXiv hot lists, filtered group chats) leads to unoriginal conclusions. Undervalued old literature often holds crucial insights (e.g., MoE, LSTM, backpropagation). Richard Sutton's "The Bitter Lesson" or Claude Shannon's 1952 talk on creative thinking are more predictive than lengthy modern surveys. Breadth matters as much as depth: draw from neuroscience, mechanism design, hardware knowledge, and honest statistics. Read papers directly, especially appendices and limitations sections. **Write Everything Down:** As Paul Graham noted, writing exposes flaws in seemingly mature ideas. Writing is the cheapest defense against self-deception. Following Feynman's principle, Darwin programmatically wrote down facts contradicting his theory to combat memory bias. Maintain a detailed log of hypotheses, setups, predictions, results, and updated understandings. Reviewing past logs fosters essential humility.

marsbit6h ago

How to Do Research Well: Deliberately Practice the Real Skills That Matter

marsbit6h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片