Aave CEO’s ‘no vote’ on token alignment proposal sparks more backlash

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-22Last updated on 2025-12-22

Abstract

Aave's internal conflict over a proposal to transfer brand assets from Aave Labs to the DAO has intensified. CEO Stani Kulechov opposed the plan, advocating for a structured process instead of a yes/no vote, and escalated the issue to a Snapshot vote for token holders. This move was criticized by Marc Zeller of the Aave Chan Initiative as "unprecedented interference." The proposal, initiated following allegations that Kulechov directed $10M in annual DAO revenue to Aave Labs, has divided the community. Amid the turmoil, AAVE's price dropped 10% in 24 hours and 17% since the proposal, with a whale selling $37.8M in tokens at a loss. The voting is set to conclude on December 26th.

Aave’s internal struggle appears far from over.

The recent token alignment proposal, which aims to have the DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) control Aave’s brand assets (domain, naming rights, social handles, etc.) from Aave Labs, has taken another twist.

Aave CEO opposes the proposal

Aave founder and CEO Stani Kulechov, who also leads Aave Labs, one of the service providers tasked with developing the DeFi platform, strongly opposed the proposal.

He openly stated that he would be “voting no”, adding that there needs to be a “structured process” to achieve a resolution, rather than a ‘yes/no’ vote.

Now, the CEO has escalated the issue from the Aave governance forum to Snapshot, allowing individual token holders to also vote on the issue. But the move also sparked more backlash from critics.

Macr Zeller slams the CEO

Marc Zeller, Aave Chan Initiative founder and one of the vocal members calling out Aave Labs for overreach into DAO assets, slammed the CEO’s latest move as “interference in the DAO governance process.”

“We’ve posted our position in response to this unprecedented interference in the DAO governance process. Worst outcome that was entirely preventable.”

The voting on the proposal is expected to end by the 26th of December, a schedule Zeller said was chosen to coincide with a holiday period and intended to sabotage the process.

The proposal was first floated a week ago, following allegations that Kulechov directed some of the DAO’s revenue (estimated at $10M annually) to Aave Labs.

For critics, this directly undermined AAVE tokenholders, as the DAO drives token buybacks and value accrual programs.

In contrast, Kulechov supporters are okay with Aave Labs monetizing some Aave brand as a necessary incentive to continue building the DeFi platform’s long-term goals.

AAVE price dumps 10%

Amid internal escalation, AAVE dumped by 10% in the past 24 hours to $159. In fact, since the proposal was floated on the 16th of December, AAVE has dumped by 17%, led by whale sell-offs.

On-chain data showed that a whale offloaded $37.8 million in AAVE at a loss, underscoring the risk-off mode if the escalation got out of control.


Final Thoughts

  • Aave’s internal struggle has escalated as stakeholders seek a resolution by the 26th of December.
  • However, the crisis weighed on the AAVE price, prompting whales to exit positions to cut losses.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main issue that the Aave token alignment proposal addresses?

AThe proposal aims to have the Aave DAO take control of the protocol's brand assets, such as domain names, naming rights, and social media handles, from Aave Labs.

QHow did Aave CEO Stani Kulechov respond to the token alignment proposal?

AStani Kulechov strongly opposed the proposal, stating he would be 'voting no' and that a structured process was needed instead of a simple yes/no vote.

QWhy did Marc Zeller criticize the Aave CEO's actions?

AMarc Zeller slammed the CEO's move to escalate the issue to a Snapshot vote as an 'unprecedented interference in the DAO governance process' and suggested the timing was intended to sabotage the proposal.

QWhat event initially sparked the creation of this token alignment proposal?

AThe proposal was created following allegations that CEO Stani Kulechov had directed an estimated $10 million of the DAO's annual revenue to Aave Labs.

QWhat has been the impact of this internal conflict on the AAVE token price?

AThe AAVE token price dumped 10% in 24 hours to $159, and has fallen 17% since the proposal was introduced, with on-chain data showing a whale selling $37.8 million worth of AAVE at a loss.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit2h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片