Data: 75% of Traders on Hyperliquid Are Losing Money. What Are the Profitable Ones Using?

marsbitPubblicato 2026-05-20Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-05-20

Introduzione

On Hyperliquid, approximately 75% of addresses are losing money, indicating that manual traders are increasingly competing against automated systems. Profitable traders primarily employ one of three approaches: 1) Running systematic, high-frequency strategies (e.g., one address executed 261k trades with a 64.75% win rate), 2) Placing high-conviction, asymmetric bets with large positions (e.g., 50 trades yielding $4.48M at a 28% win rate), or 3) Using algorithms for execution while making manual macro judgments. The article argues that traditional methods like chart patterns or reacting to social media news are often already priced in by bots, making such traders the "exit liquidity" for systematic players. Success now depends on unique narrative timing, structural insights, or conviction during market capitulation.

Author: Stacy Muur

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Guide: Three-quarters of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. It's not bad luck; the rules of the game have changed. While you're still looking at candlestick patterns for formations, arbitrage bots have already made their profit. Data shows that truly profitable traders either use algorithmic systematic execution or place large bets on asymmetric opportunities with high conviction. Manual retail traders watching screens are becoming the exit liquidity for others.

About 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are in a loss-making position.

The reality is that people trading manually on Hyperliquid are competing against systems that never rest. The trading opportunity you just discovered has likely already been priced in by the system.

When you see a certain pattern, chances are it has already been arbitraged.

Extreme funding rates are balanced in an instant.

Technical patterns have already appeared across more than 50 order books.

News headlines are priced in as soon as they appear.

What the most profitable traders are doing:

→1. Running systematic strategies (the second most profitable address executed 261,000 trades this month with a 64.75% win rate)

→ 2. Holding high-conviction positions, betting on asymmetric returns (a wallet made $4.48 million with just 50 trades and a 28% win rate)

→ 3. Using algorithms as execution tools while making macro judgments manually

If you have timing in narratives, structural insight, or conviction when everyone else capitulates, you can still make profitable trades.

But if your trades are based on chart patterns or news you saw on X, you are likely just exit liquidity.

Domande pertinenti

QAccording to the article, what percentage of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money, and what is presented as the primary reason?

AApproximately 75% of addresses on Hyperliquid are losing money. The primary reason is that manual traders are competing against automated, systemized strategies that execute trades faster and more efficiently, often pricing in opportunities before a human trader can act.

QWhat are the two main strategies used by the most profitable traders on Hyperliquid, as described in the article?

AThe two main strategies are: 1. Running systematic, automated strategies (one example executed 261,000 trades with a 64.75% win rate). 2. Holding high-conviction positions to bet on asymmetric opportunities (one wallet made $4.48M with only 50 trades, despite a 28% win rate).

QThe article suggests that several common trading signals are often ineffective. Name at least three of these signals.

AThree common but often ineffective signals mentioned are: 1. Technical chart patterns (which appear across many order books). 2. Extreme funding rates (which get arbitraged instantly). 3. News headlines (which are priced in immediately upon release).

QWhat role does the article suggest algorithms can play for a trader who still wants to make manual, high-level decisions?

AThe article suggests using algorithms as an execution tool. A trader can make macro or high-level directional judgments manually, and then use an algorithm to handle the rapid, systematic execution of trades based on that judgment.

QAccording to the article's conclusion, what kind of manual trader is most likely to succeed, and what kind is most likely to fail?

AA manual trader who succeeds is likely one acting on deep narrative timing, unique structural insights, or having strong conviction when others are capitulating. A manual trader who fails is likely one whose decisions are based on commonly seen chart patterns or news headlines found on social media (like X), as they become 'exit liquidity' for others.

Letture associate

Harvard and Others Exit, Six Core Talents Depart in a Month: What's Happening to Ethereum?

Ethereum faces significant internal and external pressures, marked by a wave of high-profile departures from its core development team and a loss of confidence from major institutional investors. Within four months, at least seven key figures—including researchers, protocol leads, and a former executive director—have left the Ethereum Foundation. This exodus, partly triggered by controversy over a new "mission statement" requiring employee sign-off, risks derailing critical roadmap upgrades like PeerDAS and Verkle trees, and has already contributed to delays in the planned Glamsterdam upgrade. Compounding the internal instability, major institutions are reducing their exposure. Goldman Sachs slashed its iShares Ethereum Trust holdings by approximately 70%, and Harvard's endowment fund completely exited its $87 million Ethereum ETF position. Concurrently, the Ethereum Foundation itself has been unstaking and selling ETH for "treasury rebalancing," further unsettling the market. These challenges emerge as Ethereum's competitive dominance erodes. Its share of the total DeFi market has fallen to around 54%, with rivals like Solana and Base gaining ground. In fee revenue, it was recently outpaced by newer chains like Hyperliquid. Furthermore, a trend of institutions exploring proprietary or hybrid blockchains (exemplified by Circle's Arc) threatens Ethereum's position as the premier settlement layer for institutional assets. While founder Vitalik Buterin's vision for Ethereum as a secure, decentralized "technical sanctuary" and "world computer" remains clear, its realization is threatened by the concurrent loss of execution capability, institutional patience, and market share during a critical competitive phase.

链捕手6 min fa

Harvard and Others Exit, Six Core Talents Depart in a Month: What's Happening to Ethereum?

链捕手6 min fa

IOSG | After the Halving of Developer Count: Crypto Isn't Dead, It's Just Handing Over Talent to AI

IOSG Report: Crypto's Developer Exodus Masks a "Talent Deleveraging" and Migration to AI The number of monthly active crypto developers on GitHub has roughly halved from its 2022 peak to around 23,000. This decline is not a sign of industry collapse but a "talent deleveraging." The exodus consists largely of newcomers who entered during the bull market, while the cohort of established developers (2+ years of experience) has grown to a record high, now contributing about 70% of the code. These core builders are consolidating in ecosystems with real users and activity, like Bitcoin and Solana. The crypto industry has forged a unique skill set: building operational, trusted systems from scratch in environments with no external authority, near-zero tolerance for error, and missing rules. This involves creating trust through pure code/mechanisms and making judgments under profound technical and economic uncertainty. This capability is finding new, high-value applications in the AI era, which faces structurally similar problems: trust in opaque autonomous systems, a lack of governance frameworks, and coordination among self-interested AI agents. Key migration patterns include: 1. **Direct Hardware/Infrastructure Translation:** Projects like CoreWeave pivoted from GPU mining to AI compute supply. 2. **Mechanism Design & Trust Engineering:** Crypto's experience in decentralized coordination and incentive design (e.g., via tokenomics, staking/slashing) is being applied to critical AI challenges: * **Compute Aggregation & Verification:** Solving trust and efficiency problems in decentralized GPU networks (e.g., Hyperbolic). * **AI Agent Governance:** Using cryptoeconomic mechanisms to align the behavior of multiple autonomous AI agents (e.g., EigenLayer's approach). * **Autonomous Agent Payments:** Leveraging stablecoins and programmable money for fast, permissionless micro-transactions between AI agents (e.g., x402 protocol). The builder's role is evolving from "writing smart contracts" to "designing trust mechanisms for autonomous AI systems." This convergence is reflected in hiring trends at major firms and significant capital allocation from top venture funds like Paradigm and a16z into the crypto-AI intersection. While regional approaches differ—with the US focusing more on foundational protocol innovation and Asia on application-layer integration—the core thesis remains: the systemic skills honed in crypto's trustless environments are becoming a scarce and critical asset for scaling AI.

marsbit7 min fa

IOSG | After the Halving of Developer Count: Crypto Isn't Dead, It's Just Handing Over Talent to AI

marsbit7 min fa

From Farm to Entrepreneur: After Building Flying Cars, He Bet on the Robot Sector and Created a $39 Billion Giant

From Farm to Tech Tycoon: Brett Adcock's Journey to a $39B Robot Giant Brett Adcock, a serial entrepreneur from an Illinois farm, has built his third major venture, humanoid robotics company Figure AI, into a $39 billion behemoth backed by NVIDIA, Intel, and others. His path began with the sale of his recruiting platform Vettery for $110 million in 2018. He then co-founded and took electric air taxi company Archer Aviation public in 2021 before departing over strategic differences. Adcock founded Figure AI in 2022 with a 30-year vision to create general-purpose humanoid robots that can work in human-designed environments, aiming to address labor shortages in manufacturing, logistics, and retail. The company gained attention through live-streamed robot sorting challenges and a viral demo, though it faces skepticism over its high valuation versus early commercial progress. A key moment was Figure's split from OpenAI in 2024 after a brief collaboration, with Adcock claiming OpenAI provided limited value and deciding to develop AI models internally—a move OpenAI contested. Adcock's pattern is tackling capital-intensive, long-term tech frontiers, moving from software to aviation to robotics, betting on AI and automation as the future of labor.

marsbit39 min fa

From Farm to Entrepreneur: After Building Flying Cars, He Bet on the Robot Sector and Created a $39 Billion Giant

marsbit39 min fa

How to Become a Pro Claude User in 30 Days?

"How to Become a Claude Power User in 30 Days" outlines a structured month-long program to transform from a casual user into someone who leverages Claude as a core productivity system. The first week focuses on mastering prompt structure (Role, Context, Task, Format, Constraints), understanding context windows, and setting up foundational Projects and Memory for personalized context. The second week involves building reusable workflows for research, writing (using a two-step outline-first process), and decision-making. The third week shifts to automation: using Claude Cowork for autonomous file tasks, connecting tools like Google Drive and Slack, and setting scheduled automation. The final week is for compounding gains: optimizing all workflows based on feedback, building a personal knowledge repository, teaching the system to a colleague, and designing a complete, ideal "Claude Operating System." By day 31, the user operates with an autonomous assistant that handles routine tasks with deep context, freeing them for high-value creative and strategic work. The core message is that consistent, systematic configuration over 30 days creates a powerful, personalized productivity advantage.

marsbit1 h fa

How to Become a Pro Claude User in 30 Days?

marsbit1 h fa

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

The article outlines five core architectural patterns for effective AI Agents, emerging from tools like Codex and Claude, that move beyond simple prompts towards reusable, process-based capabilities. 1. **Skills**: Reusable, parameterized workflows that function like method calls, allowing a single process (e.g., "/investigate") to handle various tasks based on input parameters. 2. **Thin Harness**: A lightweight execution framework (~200 lines) that manages the AI model's "hands and feet"—handling loops, file I/O, and context—without becoming bloated. 3. **Resolvers**: Routing tables that map tasks to specific Skills, preventing "context corruption" when managing dozens of Skills and ensuring outputs go to the correct locations. 4. **Latent vs. Deterministic Layer**: A critical separation where LLMs handle judgment, synthesis, and pattern recognition, while deterministic code handles tasks requiring precision, consistency, and low cost (like calculations). 5. **Memory**: A persistent, accumulating knowledge base (e.g., a markdown folder) with a "current trusted conclusion" section and an append-only timeline, enabling the system to learn and retain context over time. Together, these patterns create a "process power"—a durable competitive advantage. Unlike one-off prompt-based applications whose value quickly commoditizes, a well-designed AI Agent system encodes experience into reusable, parameterized workflows, offloads stable rules to code, and continuously learns through memory. This creates a structured, hard-to-replicate capability that can provide sustained value for individuals or businesses, such as an accountant automating client reviews while preserving privacy and accumulating expertise.

marsbit1 h fa

Five Core Forms of AI Agent in YC's Eyes

marsbit1 h fa

Trading

Spot

Futures