Ethereum's Last Major Buyer: How Much Longer Can It Hold On?

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-11Last updated on 2026-06-11

Abstract

The article examines the precarious situation of Bitmine, a major and aggressive institutional buyer of Ethereum (ETH), which is nearing its goal of accumulating 5% of the total ETH supply. Despite holding significant unrealized losses exceeding $10.5 billion due to a high average purchase price, Bitmine continues to buy ETH, recently financing its purchases through a $274 million perpetual preferred stock offering with a 9.5% annual dividend. The analysis highlights several critical pressures on this model. Bitmine relies heavily on ETH staking yields (3-4%) to potentially cover its high dividend obligations. However, if ETH's price remains low or falls further, these yields, paid in ETH, lose dollar value, creating a sustainability gap. The article questions what will support ETH's price once Bitmine completes its 5% target and potentially slows or stops its purchases, as other institutional buyers like ETFs have shown net outflows. The conclusion outlines three scenarios: a pessimistic view where financing dries up and ETH could fall sharply; a base case of continued buying and range-bound prices; and an optimistic outlook driven by new institutional demand and favorable regulation. Ultimately, the piece questions who will become the next major marginal buyer to support ETH's price if Bitmine's "flywheel" of buying slows down.

As the crypto market continues its decline, with BTC and ETH once falling near $60,000 and $1,500 respectively, both Strategy and Bitmine are facing floating losses exceeding tens of billions of dollars. At the end of May, Strategy sold 32 BTC, breaking its long-held narrative of not selling coins, putting the 'raise funds to buy coins' model into a stress test phase.

Against this backdrop, Bitmine has high-profile announced the issuance of Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock with a 9.5% annual yield, raising approximately $274 million net proceeds. As of press time, Bitmine purchased 127,000 ETH last week and accumulated a purchase of 125,000 ETH over the past 3 days. Its total holdings currently stand at about 5.66 million ETH, less than 400,000 ETH away from its 5% target.

As the most persistent and aggressive marginal buyer of ETH in the current market, Bitmine continues to add to its positions despite floating losses in the tens of billions. Now, even it needs to rely on preferred stock to replenish its funding flywheel. Once changes occur in the financing market, forcing this hoarding machine to slow down, who will be left to support Ethereum's price?

Buying 5% Before Year-End, Then What?

Bitmine began accumulating ETH in the second half of last year, planning to complete its "5% Alchemy" within 5 years. Data shows that between July 2025 and June 2026, Bitmine raised $19.2 billion through 50 equity offerings, with all funds used to purchase ETH.

As of press time, Bitmine's Ethereum holdings have reached approximately 5.66 million, less than 400,000 away from the 5% target, achieving over 90% of the planned progress in about a year.

Among these, about 4.719 million ETH have been staked, accounting for over 85% of total holdings, with expected annual staking returns of approximately $230 million to $296 million. This staking system is supported by the company's self-built MAVAN validator node network, considered the key structural design that distinguishes Bitmine from Strategy.

However, the price of aggressive accumulation is also evident. With ETH currently around $1,650, the company's average cost is about $3,500. Its ETH treasury value is only about $9.3 billion, resulting in an overall company loss of $10.5 billion, a drawdown of over 50%. The company's stock price has fallen nearly 90% from its peak.

10x Research points out that Bitmine's investors face two layers of losses: the floating loss from ETH's decline is the first layer. Investors paid a premium of about $4.6 billion over the underlying ETH net asset value when purchasing BMNR stock, constituting the second layer. These two layers combined amplify the actual loss magnitude for shareholders.

Facing massive floating losses, Tom Lee has characterized this decline as superficial. He believes the existing financial system harbors a large amount of fraudulent trading, whereas Ethereum has never experienced fraudulent transactions, operates at lower costs, and both on-chain transaction volume and daily active addresses have hit record highs. The price correction is driven by macro factors and leverage unwinding, with fundamentals unharmed. The longer-term bet is that AI agent systems will rely on blockchains to operate, ETH supply continues to contract, and Ethereum is the most direct beneficiary.

Tom Lee recently revealed that Bitmine expects to complete the 5% target by the end of 2026, at which point it may no longer need to continue accumulating. He also mentioned the company is likely to be formally included in the Russell 1000 Index by the end of June. Based on market cap calculations at that time, this could bring at least $2.15 billion in passive fund inflows for BMNR.

How Can 3% Staking Yield Support a 9.5% Dividend?

On June 5th, Bitmine completed pricing for its Series A Perpetual Preferred Stock: 3.5 million shares, issue price $80 per share, par value $100, net proceeds about $274 million. The dividend yield is 9.5%, paid weekly in cash, and continues to accrue even if the board does not declare a dividend. The annualized dividend obligation is approximately $33.25 million based on par value.

Bitmine holds an early redemption right: it can redeem at 110% of par within 18 months of issuance, at 105% of par between 18 months and 3 years, and at 100% of par after 3 years, with any accumulated unpaid dividends also paid upon redemption.

At first glance, the math seems manageable. By the end of May, Bitmine had cumulatively staked 4.7 million ETH, with expected annual staking returns of $230 million to $296 million, 8 to 9 times the annualized dividend obligation.

However, the prediction exceeding $200 million is based on the assumption that the recent 4.7 million ETH are fully staked. According to the prospectus, for the six months ended February 28, 2026, the company's staking revenue was $11.18 million, annualizing to about $22 million.

It's worth noting that staking rewards are denominated in ETH, not USD. If ETH continues to fall, the company's staking income will shrink proportionally.

Here lies a fundamental difference between Bitmine and Strategy. BTC has no native yield. For STRC to pay dividends, Strategy can only rely on BTC price appreciation or selling coins, as detailed by ChainCatcher in 'Strategy Cashes Out $2.5 Million, Bitcoin Market Cap Evaporates $80 Billion'.

ETH's staking mechanism offers Tom Lee a different path: even if the price remains stagnant, staking rewards still generate income without touching the underlying holdings. This is the real stress-resistance advantage of the Bitmine model in the current bear market.

But this path doesn't seem sustainable for long. Crypto KOL chenmo points out that in the early stages with limited issuance, covering dividends with staking revenue might not be a problem. However, as the preferred stock issuance scale continues to expand, a 3-4% staking yield is destined to be unable to cover a 9.5% annual interest rate. At that point, only a rise in ETH price can sustain this logic.

Analyst Yuyue also noted that Strategy's STRC model is already under pressure in the current market. Following up with preferred stock issuance at this time, even if a short-term positive, could be interpreted by the market as a worse signal.

According to CointelegraphMT research, two details in the prospectus warrant attention. The auditor was changed to KPMG on April 27th, with simultaneous disclosure of material weaknesses in internal controls. The audit is not yet complete, and financial data may be subject to restatement.

Additionally, the board has complete discretionary power over dividend payments. The sole enforcement mechanism for preferred shareholders is the right to nominate two directors after 18 consecutive months of not receiving dividends.

If Bitmine Stops Buying After Reaching 5%, Where Will ETH's Price Go?

On-chain analyst Yu Jin stated that at the current buying pace, the target could likely be reached next month. So, will they continue buying after reaching it? If they stop, with the market's last steadfast bull disappearing, what will support ETH?

Bitmine has been the most persistent and aggressive marginal buyer in the ETH market over the past year. Other potential buying forces are scattered and weak. ETH spot ETFs saw a net outflow of $173 million overall last week. Although turning briefly positive on June 8th after 17 consecutive days of outflows, the inflow strength was far less than the previous outflow scale.

Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs reduced its ETH ETF holdings by about 70% in Q1 2026. Harvard University's endowment fund completely liquidated its approximately $87 million ETHA holdings, selling all after holding for just one quarter. Details on institutional fund movements can be found in 'Harvard and Other Institutions Liquidate, Six Core Talents Depart in One Month: What's Wrong with Ethereum?'.

Furthermore, stablecoin legislation and institutional incremental demand brought by RWA tokenization are slow-moving variables, difficult to fill a gap of Bitmine's scale in the short term.

Without an overall reversal in the crypto market, it's foreseeable that the treasury flywheel will be difficult to sustain. The transmission effect would be: ETH price continues to fall, BMNR stock price faces pressure, the premium over net assets narrows, the window for additional fundraising shrinks, the buying pace slows, and ETH further loses marginal support. This cycle doesn't even require Bitmine to actively sell a single ETH; the mere disappearance of buying power is sufficient.

Image Source: AI Generated

In a pessimistic scenario, if the financing market's acceptance of preferred stock weakens, BMNR keeps hitting new lows, buying significantly slows, ETH could potentially test the next key consensus level (around $1,000). DWF Labs co-founder Andrei Grachev believes Strategy and Bitmine have a significant chance to create the largest market crash in cryptocurrency history. This is a tail risk judgment, not a baseline expectation.

In the baseline scenario, Bitmine maintains buying, staking returns provide a buffer, preferred stock is digested smoothly, and ETH consolidates at a bottom in the $1,500 to $2,000 range. Although Bitmine is severely battered and ETH's short-term recovery is difficult, the 10x Research report mentions that when a stock falls deep enough, the underlying asset becomes almost irrelevant. What investors are buying is essentially a pure option—a free call option on ETH's future rebound, which is not yet fully priced by the market.

In an optimistic scenario, formal inclusion in the Russell 1000 brings passive funds, and the enactment of legislation like the GENIUS Act removes barriers for institutional entry. Standard Chartered maintains its year-end 2026 ETH target price of $4,000, believing the recent price drop does not reflect the continued improvement in Ethereum's network fundamentals. It compares the current situation to Amazon's phase after the 2001 bubble burst—where price temporarily disconnected from network value, but infrastructure building never stopped. The bank expects the ETH/BTC exchange rate to recover to about 0.08 by the end of this decade, with a target price of $40,000 by the end of 2030.

Conclusion

Ultimately, how long this financing can extend the life of Bitmine's flywheel comes down to ETH's price. However, Bitmine's buying itself is an important part of supporting that price.

So the core question is: after Bitmine completes its 5% target and gradually steps back, who will pick up the baton? Traditional institutions are pulling back, ETF funds flow in and out, and real incremental demand from stablecoins and RWA has yet to manifest on a large scale.

Perhaps Ethereum lacks no narratives, but when will the liquidity inflection point appear, and where will the new marginal buyers come from? These are the key questions that will determine ETH's price trajectory going forward.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Why P2P and Exchangers Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them

Titled "Why P2P and Exchanges Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them," this article discusses the evolution of stablecoins, particularly USDT, from a trading tool to a global payment method. However, converting crypto back to fiat for daily expenses remains a challenge. The process of using P2P platforms or crypto exchanges has become increasingly risky and complex due to stricter banking anti-fraud measures, new legislation in Russia, and rampant fraud schemes like "triangles," where sellers can inadvertently receive stolen funds. The article highlights that while P2P was convenient, banks now scrutinize frequent peer-to-peer transfers, often freezing accounts. Exchanges also pose risks like unfavorable rates and unclear compliance. The market is therefore shifting towards integrated services that eliminate the manual conversion step. It cites OneSix as an example—a crypto wallet accessible via Telegram and web that embeds currency conversion directly into payment and withdrawal scenarios. Users can pay bills or send money as if using a bank app, with the crypto-to-fiat exchange happening seamlessly in the background. It also offers invoicing for freelancers and conducts AML checks, returning suspicious transactions instantly instead of freezing them. In conclusion, as crypto integrates into everyday finance, the demand for manual, risky exchange methods is declining. The future lies in unified platforms that combine storage, compliance, conversion, and payments into a single, secure user experience.

cryptonews.ru41m ago

Why P2P and Exchangers Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them

cryptonews.ru41m ago

The CEO of MARA Holdings Compares AI Operations to Bitcoin Mining! Which is More Profitable?

Fred Thiel, CEO of MARA Holdings (a major Bitcoin mining company), states that the rapid growth of the artificial intelligence (AI) sector is transforming mining companies' business models. He claims that powering data centers for AI is significantly more profitable than Bitcoin mining. In a recent interview, Thiel explained why many mining firms are diversifying into AI infrastructure. According to Thiel, the energy demands of data centers are surging, especially due to the spread of generative AI applications. This creates new revenue opportunities for Bitcoin mining companies with robust power infrastructure. MARA Holdings is among those monitoring this shift and aims to develop its energy and infrastructure services for AI data centers. Thiel emphasized that this move toward AI does not mean the end of Bitcoin mining. He stated that Bitcoin mining remains a sustainable business model, especially for miners in regions with low electricity costs, and it is still a crucial field for utilizing excess or idle power capacity. In recent years, many Bitcoin mining companies have begun using their energy-intensive infrastructure not just for block production but also for high-performance computing (HPC) and AI applications. This strategy aims to diversify revenue sources and increase resilience against cryptocurrency market volatility. Analysts note that the growing energy demand in the AI sector presents significant transformation opportunities for mining companies. The need for high-power, uninterrupted electricity supply, particularly for large data centers, gives Bitcoin miners with existing energy infrastructure expertise a considerable advantage.

cryptonews.ru52m ago

The CEO of MARA Holdings Compares AI Operations to Bitcoin Mining! Which is More Profitable?

cryptonews.ru52m ago

Ratio's CEO Says Multi-Currency Stablecoins Could Eliminate Costly FX Conversions in Asia

The CEO of Ratio, John Cho, argues that multi-currency stablecoins could save Asia billions by eliminating costly foreign exchange conversions in regional trade. While USD stablecoins like USDT and USDC work for global settlements, local Asian trade is conducted in local currencies like the Korean won or Singapore dollar. Forcing these transactions through USD intermediaries creates unnecessary costs and currency risk. Cho envisions a complementary ecosystem where local-currency stablecoins work alongside USD stablecoins, enabling seamless cross-border settlements without conversion friction. A key pain point in traditional banking is the need for pre-funded Nostro and Vostro accounts, which lock up vast amounts of working capital. Blockchain-based settlement layers like Ratio offer a 24/7 alternative, using on-chain liquidity to enable instant execution even when traditional channels are closed. Modern Web3 infrastructure providers are focusing on pragmatic integration with existing corporate systems like ERPs, allowing businesses to gradually shift volumes to digital channels for better speed, cost, and reduced slippage. Clear regulation is cited as the critical catalyst for widespread institutional adoption. As jurisdictions like the U.S. advance legislation (e.g., the CLARITY Act) and Asian countries are expected to pass their own stablecoin laws within 12-24 months, regulatory uncertainty is receding. The ultimate vision is for regulated stablecoins to become an invisible settlement layer integrated into national payment systems, where payments simply happen on-chain, erasing the boundary between traditional banking and digital assets.

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Ratio's CEO Says Multi-Currency Stablecoins Could Eliminate Costly FX Conversions in Asia

cryptonews.ru1h ago

Huang Xiaoming, Li Bin, Lei Jun, Liang Wenfeng... Who Are the Biggest Winners in the CXMT IPO Feast?

Changxin Technology, a leading Chinese memory chip manufacturer, successfully listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's STAR Market (科创板) on July 8, 2026. Its share price surged from the IPO price of 8.66 yuan to close at 49 yuan on the first day, catapulting its market capitalization to 3.28 trillion yuan, making it the most valuable A-share company and triggering a massive wealth creation event. The biggest winners were the company's founder, Zhu Yiming, and its employees. Zhu Yiming's family wealth skyrocketed nearly 300% to approximately $13.9 billion, with his direct stake in Changxin valued at around 80 billion yuan. Additionally, over 6700 employees benefited from stock ownership plans, creating at least 237 new millionaires (in CNY). Zhu also pledged to donate 768 million shares, worth over 37.6 billion yuan, for future employee incentives over a ten-year period. Several prominent investors and corporate clients also reaped significant paper gains from the IPO. Notable figures include: * **Liang Wenfeng**, founder of DeepSeek, whose funds netted a paper profit of approximately 827 million yuan. * **Kong Jianping**, founder of Nano Labs, saw his indirect holdings valued at roughly 940 million yuan. * **Li Bin**, founder of Nio, whose company's strategic investment of 158 million yuan is now worth about 740 million yuan. * **Lei Jun**, founder of Xiaomi, whose subsidiary holds shares currently showing a paper gain of over 736 million yuan. Xiaomi clarified this is a corporate investment, not direct personal wealth. The article notes that while this IPO created immense wealth for insiders and large investors, retail investors who were lucky enough to win an allotment in the lottery typically profited by around 20,000 yuan. The listing solidifies Changxin's position as China's premier domestic memory chipmaker.

marsbit1h ago

Huang Xiaoming, Li Bin, Lei Jun, Liang Wenfeng... Who Are the Biggest Winners in the CXMT IPO Feast?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片