Attention! Tomorrow: An Altcoin Will Receive a Major Update! It Has Been Heavily Criticized

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-27

Introduzione

The privacy-focused cryptocurrency project Zcash is preparing to activate its network upgrade NU6.3, codenamed Ironwood, on July 28, 2026. The upgrade will be deployed on the mainnet at block height 3,428,143. Ironwood will introduce a new shielded transaction pool and a v6 transaction format to the Zcash network. Key features include "confidential recoveries," designed as a safeguard against future quantum computing risks, and a "turnstile" mechanism. This mechanism aims to strengthen verification of the total $ZEC supply, addressing previous criticism and concerns about a potential vulnerability in the old Orchard pool that could have allowed counterfeit $ZEC creation. The goal is to enforce stricter control over supply stability when funds are moved to the new pool. The activation height in the test network was previously set at block 4,134,000.

The privacy-focused cryptocurrency project Zcash is preparing to activate the network update NU6.3, codenamed Ironwood, on July 28, 2026.

According to the Zebra 6.0.0 release notes, the update will be deployed on the mainnet at block height 3,428,143. This block height is expected to be reached around 16:00 Turkish time on July 28.

The Ironwood update will add a new shielded transaction pool and a v6 transaction format to the Zcash network. The new pool will use the Action structure from the Orchard system and the Proof-of-Work system from Halo2, while having its own note commitment tree, nullifier set, chain value pool, and transaction history metadata.

Among the most notable features of the update are privacy records designed for recovery in the event of future quantum computing risks, as well as a 'turnstile' mechanism aimed at strengthening the verification of the $ZEC supply.

This mechanism aims to strengthen control over the total supply due to concerns about a potential security vulnerability in the old Orchard pool, which could have led to the production of counterfeit $ZEC. With Ironwood, the goal is to more strictly control supply stability when transferring funds into the new pool. Previously, there was significant criticism regarding the possibility of token counterfeiting due to the inability to verify Zcash's supply volume.

Previously, the Ironwood network activation level in the testnet was set at block height 4,134,000.

*This is not investment advice.

end-content

Domande pertinenti

QWhich cryptocurrency project is preparing to activate the network update NU6.3 'Ironwood'?

AThe cryptocurrency project preparing to activate the network update NU6.3 'Ironwood' is Zcash, a privacy-focused project.

QWhat is the scheduled date and approximate time for the Ironwood update activation on the main network?

AThe Ironwood update is scheduled to activate on the main network on July 28, 2026, at block height 3,428,143, which is expected to be reached at approximately 16:00 Turkish time on that date.

QWhat is one of the key security features introduced by the Ironwood update to address concerns about potential token counterfeiting?

AOne of the key security features introduced by the Ironwood update is the 'turnstile' mechanism. It aims to strengthen the verification of the $ZEC supply and provide stricter control over supply stability when funds are moved to the new transaction pool.

QWhat specific vulnerability or concern was the 'turnstile' mechanism in the Ironwood update designed to mitigate?

AThe 'turnstile' mechanism was designed to mitigate concerns regarding a potential security vulnerability in the old Orchard pool that could have led to the production of counterfeit $ZEC tokens. It addresses criticism about the impossibility of verifying Zcash's supply volume.

QBesides the 'turnstile' mechanism, what is another notable feature of the Ironwood update, and what is its purpose?

AAnother notable feature of the Ironwood update is the introduction of confidential records. They are intended to provide recovery capabilities in the face of future risks associated with quantum computing advancements.

Letture associate

Charles Schwab Calculated and Revealed the Fair Value of Bitcoin (BTC)! Here's What It Should Be!

The article discusses a recent analysis by Charles Schwab's head of crypto research, Jim Ferraroli, on Bitcoin's fair value. Despite Bitcoin's price dropping to around $63,000 due to market sell-offs and Federal Reserve interest rate concerns, Ferraroli asserts its fair value is approximately $95,000. This valuation is based on Bitcoin mining economics, specifically production costs, rather than short-term market sentiment. He notes that while efficient miners produce one BTC for about $60,000, the cost can rise to $95,000 for less efficient operations. Ferraroli compares this to traditional commodities, where production costs are a key valuation metric. He emphasizes that the $95,000 figure is an economic estimate, not a price target. Additionally, he identifies the ~$60,000 mining cost level as a crucial fundamental support zone for Bitcoin, aligning with its 200-week moving average. Ferraroli concludes that it's uncertain whether Bitcoin will reach $95,000 within the next six months. The piece includes a standard disclaimer that this is not investment advice.

cryptonews.ru8 min fa

Charles Schwab Calculated and Revealed the Fair Value of Bitcoin (BTC)! Here's What It Should Be!

cryptonews.ru8 min fa

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbit12 min fa

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbit12 min fa

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit22 min fa

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit22 min fa

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit22 min fa

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit22 min fa

Tokyo Stock Exchange Urges 270 Companies to Lower Entry for Retail Investors

On July 28th, the Tokyo Stock Exchange (TSE) urged 270 listed companies to consider conducting stock splits. This initiative aims to lower the high minimum investment cost, which was at least 500,000 yen (about $3,050) per lot of 100 shares as of late June, thereby making it easier for retail investors to participate. The TSE's call responds to investor demand for more affordable lots around 100,000 yen, as highlighted by the exchange in April. To further this goal, the TSE has established a working group focused on promoting small-lot investments, with meetings starting in October. Recent data shows progress: of the 276 companies that split their stocks in the 12 months to June 30, about 70% targeted post-split prices in the hundreds of thousands of yen. Before the splits, 45% of these companies had lots priced at 500,000 yen or more; after the splits, that figure dropped to just 2%. Overall, 762 companies have executed stock splits since the TSE's previous request in October 2022. Notable examples include Tokyo Electron and Organo, which plan significant splits effective October 1st.

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

Tokyo Stock Exchange Urges 270 Companies to Lower Entry for Retail Investors

cryptonews.ru31 min fa

Trading

Spot