UK Lawmakers Push to Ban Crypto Donations Over Transparency and Foreign Influence Risks

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-01-12Last updated on 2026-01-12

Abstract

A group of seven senior UK Labour MPs is urging Prime Minister to ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties, citing three major risks: a lack of transparency that hides donor identities, the potential for foreign interference, and the ability to bypass donation limits by splitting payments. Although the government acknowledges these dangers, it considers an immediate ban too complex to implement and may not include it in the upcoming election bill. The issue gained urgency after Reform UK became the first party to accept crypto donations, including a large fiat donation from a crypto investor, raising concerns about crypto wealth influencing politics. The push for a ban is growing to protect trust in elections and uphold financial rules.

A group of seven senior Labour MPs is asking Prime Minister Keir Starmer to ban cryptocurrency donations to political parties and wants this ban to be included in the UK election bill that is expected to be introduced ahead of the local elections in 2026. They are arguing that the crypto donations are a serious risk to democracy.

Three Risks Driving Calls to Ban Crypto Political Donations

The MPs say that the crypto donations create three major problems.

Lack of transparency: Cryptocurrency can hide the sender of the money, and it would be very hard to find out who is donating to the politicians.
Foreign Interference risk: Elections could be influenced by hidden donors, including foreign actors and illegal sources, without voters or regulators being able to see it, which breaks the normal political finance rules.
Easy to escape from the donation limits – Crypto can be split into many small payments that fall below disclosure thresholds.

The UK Government acknowledges the risks but officially says that the full ban may be too complex to implement immediately. As a result, the ban may not be included in the upcoming elections bill. So even though the ministers and MPs accept the danger, they are moving slowly.

The debate is heating up now because Reform UK became the first UK political party to accept crypto donations. Things become more serious when it is revealed that Reform UK received a 9 million GBP donation from a crypto investor in traditional fiat currency, not crypto. This made lawmakers worry that crypto wealth is entering politics.

The major reason for this debate is not about crypto technology but about building trust in the election. These lawmakers could fear that the crypto could undermine the political and financial rules, and voters won’t know who is backing political parties. That’s why Labour MPs are calling for a complete ban, and the support for the ban is growing beyond the Labour MPs.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌U.S. SEC Delays on Canary PENGU and T. Rowe Price Crypto ETFs, Opens Grayscale Options Comments

Bitcoin: Why institutions, not retail, will decide BTC’s next move

Bitcoin's price has consolidated above $90,000, with a decisive break above $92,500 still pending. According to Bitwise analysis, the primary constraint on Bitcoin's upward movement is weak institutional demand, not retail behavior or long-term holder selling. Institutional investors, sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, have shown caution, reflected in significant outflows from U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs—totaling $4.66 billion since November 2025. However, improving U.S. unemployment data (down to 4.4%) may boost economic confidence and risk appetite, potentially renewing institutional interest. While corporate Bitcoin reserves grew slightly, retail netflows have recently turned negative, indicating short-term selling pressure. Ultimately, institutional demand remains the key driver for Bitcoin's next major price move.

ambcrypto13m ago

Bitcoin: Why institutions, not retail, will decide BTC’s next move

ambcrypto13m ago

Coin Stock Barometer丨Strategy Invested $1.25 Billion Last Week to Add 13,627 BTC, Total Holdings Unrealized Profit Exceeds $10.55 Billion; Bitmine Holdings Increase to 4.168 Million ETH, Unrealized Loss of $3.225 Billion (January 13)

Crypto Market Weekly Roundup: Strategy Invests $1.25B in Bitcoin, BitMine Expands ETH Holdings Last week saw traditional equities and precious metals rally, while crypto-linked stocks remained subdued with only a few like BKKT and RIOT posting gains. Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) invested $1.25 billion to acquire 13,627 BTC, bringing its total holdings to 687,410 BTC. With an average cost of $75,353, its unrealized profit now exceeds $10.55 billion. Institutional analysis suggests digital assets are transitioning from speculative instruments to financial infrastructure in 2026, driven by clearer stablecoin regulations and real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. South Korea lifted its nine-year ban on corporate crypto investments, now allowing listed firms to allocate up to 5% of net assets to top cryptocurrencies. On the Ethereum front, BitMine increased its ETH holdings by 24,266 tokens, bringing its total to 4.167 million ETH. However, its position shows an unrealized loss of $3.225 billion with an average cost of $3,862. The company's chairman urged shareholders to approve a proposal to authorize more shares to prevent a slowdown in its ETH accumulation strategy. Other notable moves include Bit Digital holding over 155,000 ETH, ALT5 Sigma maintaining its WLFI token treasury, Bakkt acquiring stablecoin infrastructure firm DTR, and AIxCrypto planning a $10 million strategic investment in Faraday Future.

marsbit18m ago

Coin Stock Barometer丨Strategy Invested $1.25 Billion Last Week to Add 13,627 BTC, Total Holdings Unrealized Profit Exceeds $10.55 Billion; Bitmine Holdings Increase to 4.168 Million ETH, Unrealized Loss of $3.225 Billion (January 13)

marsbit18m ago

Polygon hits 3.9B transactions in 2026 – Are POL traders ‘READY’ for…

Polygon's network activity surged in early 2026, reaching 3.9 billion transactions, largely fueled by a significant increase in micropayments totaling $67.7 million. This growth reflects broader adoption, particularly in decentralized finance (DeFi), and underscores Polygon’s role as a leading Ethereum scaling solution. Following a cryptic tweet from Polygon Foundation CEO Sandeep Nailwal on January 10th, which sparked speculation and anticipation, taker buy dominance rose sharply, indicating aggressive buying pressure. At the time of writing, POL was trading around $0.15 and testing a key long-term resistance level. While the RSI suggested potential short-term consolidation, the MACD supported continued bullish momentum. Traders awaited a decisive breakout to confirm a broader trend shift.

ambcrypto28m ago

Polygon hits 3.9B transactions in 2026 – Are POL traders ‘READY’ for…

ambcrypto28m ago

BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

Crypto custody firm BitGo is targeting a valuation of up to $1.96 billion in its upcoming U.S. IPO, planning to raise $201 million by offering 11.8 million shares priced between $15 and $17. Despite a volatile market environment and recent selloffs, BitGo aims to leverage positive momentum in early 2026. The company, which secured a national trust charter from the OCC, has enlisted Goldman Sachs and Citigroup as lead managers for the offering. It plans to list on the NYSE under the ticker "BTGO," joining other major crypto firms entering public markets.

bitcoinist42m ago

BitGo Targets Nearly $2 Billion Valuation As It Prepares For IPO In The US

bitcoinist42m ago

Is the Crypto Market Doomed to Face Pressure in Q1? Progress of the CLARITY Act Becomes a Key Factor

The CLARITY Act, introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on May 29, 2025, aims to provide regulatory clarity for the digital asset market. It is currently stalled in the Senate after being received and referred to committee. Market participants are concerned that without significant progress in Q1, the bill faces increasing obstacles. Key reasons include the limited legislative window in the Senate from January to March, which is typically reserved for complex, non-urgent bills like CLARITY. If no substantive committee action occurs in January, the bill risks being sidelined by the legislative schedule. The Act is not a minor policy adjustment but a restructuring of regulatory authority, making it slow-moving, highly amendable, and prone to delays rather than outright rejection. If delayed until after the midterm elections, its prospects become even more uncertain due to potential shifts in Congressional power. Should Democrats gain influence post-election, the bill’s chances would likely decrease. Democratic leadership generally favors broader SEC authority, regulatory flexibility, and is hesitant to limit enforcement discretion—contrary to CLARITY’s goal of defining regulatory boundaries and reducing regulation by enforcement. In a Democrat-led Senate, the bill could be substantially rewritten, broken into smaller pieces, or indefinitely postponed. These factors explain the anxiety among U.S. crypto stakeholders and contribute to current market pessimism.

marsbit1h ago

Is the Crypto Market Doomed to Face Pressure in Q1? Progress of the CLARITY Act Becomes a Key Factor

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Futures

UK Lawmakers Push to Ban Crypto Donations Over Transparency and Foreign Influence Risks

Abstract

Three Risks Driving Calls to Ban Crypto Political Donations

Related Questions

Related Reads