Why Zcash Is Back in the Game

marsbit2026-05-18 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-05-18 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

The article, an update from ZODL founder Josh Swihart, outlines Zcash's evolution from a "privacy coin" into a broader financial privacy infrastructure. Its core mission is to build a parallel financial system free from mass surveillance, enabling users to privately hold and spend ZEC anywhere. The strategy emphasizes focus: building essential protocol and product (Zodl wallet) capabilities in-house, accelerating development by integrating with external products/chains (e.g., NEAR Intents for swaps), and rejecting non-essential "side quests." Recent progress includes the Zodl iOS 3.4.0 release, updates to Swift/Android SDKs, and testing of in-wallet Coinholder Polling for governance. The Zcash Core team is working on shortening block times, fixing shielding issues, and advancing the Zallet alpha wallet. Upcoming features for Zodl include automatic server switching and multi-currency conversion. The piece highlights a shift towards holistic user adoption, connecting financial privacy, wallet experience, cross-chain utility, and community governance. It concludes with updates on an upcoming ZODL Summit, new team hires, grant applications, and recent positive media coverage, asserting that focused execution is paving the road to a private financial future for billions.

Editor's Note: This article is a periodic update by Josh Swihart, founder of ZODL, on the recent roadmap and ecosystem progress of Zcash. The article defines Zcash's long-term goal as: building a parallel financial world without mass financial surveillance, where users can freely hold, transfer, and use assets with privacy protection by default. Its core value proposition can be summarized in one sentence: Hold ZEC privately, and spend it anywhere.

Focusing on this goal, the ZODL team emphasizes that the key going forward is not infinite feature expansion, but maintaining strategic focus: Core capabilities that must be built natively at the protocol layer and within Zodl products should be prioritized; functionalities that can be composed with external products and public chains should be accelerated through partnerships; and "side quests" unrelated to the mission need to be actively rejected.

In terms of specific progress, Zodl iOS 3.4.0 has been released, Swift and Android SDK 2.5.0 have been updated synchronously, the in-wallet Coinholder Polling voting feature is in testing, and features like automatic server switching, multi-server transaction submission, and multi-currency conversion have been scheduled for later development. Meanwhile, Zcash Core continues to iterate on foundational work, focusing on reducing block time, fixing shielding transaction issues, advancing the Zallet alpha, and optimizing the synchronization engine.

Overall, Zcash is attempting to shift from a single "privacy coin narrative" to more complete privacy financial infrastructure construction. Financial privacy, wallet experience, cross-chain usability, and community governance are being connected into a path towards mass user adoption. For Zcash, privacy is not just a technical feature; it is the prerequisite for financial sovereignty.

Original text follows:

Our destination is clear: we are building a parallel world without mass financial surveillance. There, law-abiding individuals can trade freely and privately; financial privacy is the default state; and access to markets is a fundamental right. Without privacy, there is no sovereignty.

Our work is to build the road there for billions of people. From user onboarding and secure storage, to spendability and actual utility, this road must be wide enough to carry sufficient traffic, and robust enough to withstand the test of time.

Every road needs a foundation. Our simplified value proposition is: hold privately, pay anywhere. Holding ZEC privately protects us from others prying into our wealth and transaction history; paying anywhere means we can truly use our private assets regardless of the recipient's preferred currency.

Ben Horowitz once said the only job is to ship the right product at the right time. Both parts must be true simultaneously. After a decade of continuous refinement, we finally have both.

We lay stones on the foundation. These stones represent the major bets that truly propel us forward quickly: they create value, bring new utility, and drive broader adoption. They are not things that impede user progress. Every step a user takes towards the destination must be simple enough.

We also fill gravel between the stones to reinforce the road. These include UI tweaks, minor protocol improvements, and various optimizations. Gravel alone is not the road's foundation; without stones, it would quickly wash away in the rain. It is important, but only after the stones are laid.

Our time is limited, but there is much to build. We cannot linger too long in towns along the way; we cannot build the road too wide, adding extra things that don't help us reach the destination faster; nor can we build it too narrow, excluding future travelers. We cannot each carve multiple paths just because we prefer our own solutions; and we certainly cannot build towards someone else's destination. We must constantly self-correct, confirm our direction, and maintain the discipline to build only what is truly necessary.

It is this focus and execution discipline that allows us to categorize and prioritize our work.

· What we must do ourselves: Those capabilities that must be built natively at the protocol layer and within Zodl products.

· What we can compose: Things that other products and public chains already provide and can be combined with our core capabilities to unlock greater utility faster. Our partnership with NEAR Intents to support swaps and CrossPay is a good example.

· What we choose to reject: Side quests, superfluous features, or activities misaligned with the mission that do not sufficiently advance us towards the destination.

We plan to share, test, and recalibrate our work around these categories at the upcoming ZODL Summit in July. I also hope the entire Zcash community can remain aligned and move forward cohesively, allowing us to maximize our collective advantage rather than going our separate ways. For a decentralized protocol like Zcash, diverging paths are inevitable: different ideas and perspectives are normal. But if we can align on the work of "laying the stones" as much as possible, we will reach the destination. We will build this road for billions.

Here is this week's ZODL update.

Zodl (Product)

Zodl iOS 3.4.0 has been released. Version 3.3.0 introduced the ability to disconnect a Keystone hardware wallet from Zodl; version 3.4.0 ensures a smoother reconnection process. Together, these versions allow users to complete the full hardware wallet setup management cycle within Zodl: connect, disconnect, reconnect. See the release post for details.

The underlying Swift SDK 2.5.0 and Android SDK 2.5.0 have also been released, completing the 2.5.0 cycle on both platforms and bringing rewind/rescan pipeline and synchronizer state work, setting the stage for the next wave of mobile features.

The implementation and review of Coinholder Polling have been completed on both iOS and Android, a collaborative effort with the Valar Group team. The code is now merged and in internal testing. The first in-wallet coinholder vote is planned for the upcoming NU7 opinion vote as scheduled.

The design, UX, and UI for Coinholder Polling have been updated based on the latest round of feedback, including a bottom sheet picker allowing users to choose which organization publishes the currently valid voting list; boundary scenario interfaces for voting and viewing results have also been added.

Going forward, the product side will continue to advance:

· Continue testing and refining Coinholder Polling.

· Continue addressing iOS sync errors.

Upcoming features include: automatic server switching, multi-server transaction submission, multi-currency conversion.

Finalize the design updates for Coinholder Polling and shift focus to multi-account support design.

Zodl iOS Data

Unique Installs: 41.9k(+0.5k)

Total Downloads: 49.9k(+0.7k)

App Store Rating: 4.9★ (unchanged)

Zodl Android Data

Install Base: 15.6k(+0.3k)

Total Installs (including Open Beta): 50k(+0.5k)

Play Store Rating: 4.24★ (-0.02)

Zcash Core (Including R&D)

This week, discussions on the proposal to reduce block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds have converged.

Diagnosed and fixed a shielding (transferring to the shielded pool) failure issue (librustzcash #2347). This issue affected Android Zashi/Zodl users holding many small transparent UTXOs, a typical scenario for miners receiving regular small payments.

Multiple ZEWIF fixes have landed, including a blob size correction and a redeem-script handling fix, further improving wallet and data exchange reliability. Conception of a follow-up zewif2 also began this week.

Zallet alpha.4 progress: Reviewed and merged alpha version breaking change detection. Old alpha wallets will now refuse to run on incompatible builds instead of corrupting state data.

Reviewed a set of PRs for shielded-voting Swift SDK and multi-server transaction submission implementation, both directly serving the mobile work mentioned above.

Completed follow-up work on CompactBlock messages, reducing legacy burden and protocol overhead.

Unified zcash_client_backend's handling of sending and receiving transparent UTXOs (librustzcash #2260), fixing inconsistencies in the transparent UTXO path.

Going forward, the Core side will focus on:

· Focusing on the remaining scope for Zallet alpha.4.

· Completing review of z_shieldcoinbase RPC support.

Three synchronization engine works are progressing sequentially: put_blocks / store_decrypted_tx refactoring to unify shielded and transparent processing paths; supporting full-block scanning in zcash_client_backend; migrating to Zaino's new ChainIndex trait.

Extending Zallet's zcashd migration capability to support all legacy key types, and building integration tests around keys generated by historical versions of zcashd.

Other

Community review has begun for a set of NU7 opinion vote questions (forum post, X post). This vote will be conducted simultaneously via ZCAP and coinholders and will implement the first in-wallet coinholder vote via Zodl. Hardware wallet users can participate via Zodl + Keystone.

ZODL Summit invites are open (forum post, X post). The ZODL Summit, formerly the Z|ECC Summit, is the biannual working gathering for Zcash contributors and ecosystem partners. It will be held in Prague, Czech Republic, from July 8-10. Apply here.

Cypherpunk Policy Dinner: Continued community communication around the main ZCG grant application. This is a side event of the 2026 DC Privacy Summit. Once approved, next steps include recruiting more Zcash ecosystem sponsors while ensuring the event remains focused on Zcash.

New team members are joining in the coming weeks. Harry will join as Senior Mobile QA; Danny Willems will join on May 27th as Principal Cryptography Engineer; Giulia will join as Marketing Assistant.

A Coinholder Grant application for Zcash Core work has been submitted. See the post.

Miner BD: Outreach process has commenced, with codebase maintainers directly contacting miners to enhance communication and collaboration with the mining community.

Marketing: The ECC blog is back. Zodl x Slope brand engagement continues.

Market & Ecosystem

This week, Zcash was covered by The Wall Street Journal, Forbes, and Fast Company. Six years ago, some were declaring Zcash dead.

Still holding solZEC? Shield it, folks. It's easy.

Watch out for Bankless' podcast episode on Zcash this week.

Keep Building, Forward.

İlgili Sorular

QWhat is the simplified core value proposition of Zcash as outlined in the article?

AThe simplified core value proposition is to privately hold ZEC and spend it anywhere, enabling users to hold assets privately away from surveillance and use them for payments regardless of the recipient's currency preference.

QWhat are the three categories used by the ZODL team to classify and prioritize their work?

AThe three categories are: 1) Things we must do ourselves (core capabilities to be built at the protocol layer and in Zodl products), 2) Things we can combine (leveraging external products/chains to accelerate utility, like the NEAR Intents partnership), and 3) Things we choose to refuse (side quests, extra features, or activities not aligned with the mission).

QWhat significant new feature is being implemented for the upcoming NU7 opinion vote in Zodl mobile wallets?

AThe significant new feature is Coinholder Polling, which is being implemented for in-wallet voting. It has completed development and review for iOS and Android and is now in internal testing, with its first use planned for the upcoming NU7 opinion vote.

QWhat specific protocol-level improvement is being discussed regarding Zcash's block time?

AThe protocol-level improvement being discussed is a proposal to shorten the block time from 75 seconds to 25 seconds.

QAccording to the article, what broader narrative is Zcash attempting to shift towards, beyond being just a 'privacy coin'?

AZcash is attempting to shift from a singular 'privacy coin narrative' towards building a more complete infrastructure for private finance, connecting financial privacy, wallet experience, cross-chain usability, and community governance into a path for mass adoption.

İlgili Okumalar

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

Last month, Garrick Wilhelm lost a $567 bet on the Polymarket prediction platform about whether a ceasefire would be reached with Hezbollah. When a truce was announced, some traders argued it counted, but Wilhelm disagreed. The dispute was settled not by Polymarket, but by a decentralized group of UMA token holders who vote on such disagreements. As trading surges, resolving ambiguous outcomes is a growing challenge for prediction markets. Unlike competitors like Kalshi that decide internally, Polymarket outsources dispute resolution to UMA. Its token holders, mostly anonymous and with voting power weighted by holdings, arbitrate cases. Critics argue this system is prone to manipulation, as voters can also bet on the same markets they judge. A Wall Street Journal analysis found that over the past year, at least 60% of active UMA voters had corresponding Polymarket accounts and held positions in disputes they voted on. Voting power is also concentrated among a few large holders. Polymarket says only 0.2% of bets go to UMA and that the system disperses authority. Its founder has acknowledged flaws and promised fixes. UMA's backers deny any proven manipulation, dismissing critics as sore losers. The platform penalizes voters in the minority to incentivize "correct" outcomes. Disputes are rising, covering topics from a streamer's pregnancy announcement to Iran. This model also helps Polymarket argue it's an offshore platform outside U.S. regulation, a shift made after a 2022 settlement with the CFTC. Some losing traders have formed groups to protest, targeting entities like UMA.rocks, which aggregates votes. Its founder says traders often blame UMA for their own mistakes. A recently ousted committee member, Scout, admitted to both betting and voting but argued involved voters research more thoroughly. He highlighted the dilemma: "Either you have conflicted traders deciding, or you have uninformed outsiders voting. There is no perfect answer right now."

marsbit5 dk önce

WSJ: Unveiling the Secret Jury That Controls Disputes on Polymarket

marsbit5 dk önce

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

The article describes how the valuation logic for major Chinese AI model companies has undergone three dramatic shifts between 2022 and 2026, driven by capital's changing priorities. The first phase (around 2022) was **technology-driven valuation**, where funding was based on model performance and benchmark scores. This logic was disrupted when DeepSeek's R1 model demonstrated that comparable capabilities could be achieved at a fraction of the cost, challenging the notion of technical superiority as an unassailable moat. The second phase shifted to **IPO window-driven valuation**. Following favorable listing conditions in Hong Kong, capital flowed to companies like Zhipu and MiniMax with the clearest path to a public listing. However, this focus on liquidity over fundamentals became apparent as their Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) lagged far behind international peers like Anthropic. The third and current phase is **national strategy-driven valuation**. This shift was marked by the state-backed "Big Fund" leading a major investment in DeepSeek, signaling that leading domestic AI models are now viewed as strategic national assets comparable to semiconductor manufacturing. This new logic, combined with soaring US valuation benchmarks (e.g., OpenAI at $850B), propelled the combined valuation of China's top AI firms ("The Four Dragons"/"Five Strong") past 1 trillion RMB. The article presents a "pricing leap model": each shift is triggered by a key event that invalidates the old logic, leading to rapid capital reallocation under a new narrative before its flaws (particularly the gap in fundamental ARR metrics) become evident. It concludes that the next major test for these valuations will be a return to scrutinizing core business fundamentals, specifically ARR growth, suggesting a fourth pricing shift is imminent.

marsbit30 dk önce

China's AI Circle Has Just Established a Pecking Order, and Capital Is Already Changing the Rules Again

marsbit30 dk önce

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

Summary: Donald Trump's First Quarter stock trades, totaling 3,642 transactions, have been disclosed. While the White House maintains the trades were managed by an advisor and complied with disclosure laws, they reveal a portfolio heavily aligned with his policy agenda. The trades show a rotation away from major tech stocks like Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, and into semiconductor and AI hardware companies such as NVIDIA, AMD, Broadcom, Dell, and Intel. Notably, Trump's account purchased Dell stock before he publicly praised the company, after which its stock rose. The Dell family also pledged funds to a Trump-affiliated policy project. A critical case is Intel. The Trump administration converted $8.9 billion in CHIPS Act subsidies into a 9.9% equity stake, making the U.S. government Intel's largest shareholder. Months later, Trump's personal account also bought Intel stock. This intertwines national industrial policy with potential personal financial interest. Unlike typical insider trading concerns, this situation creates a "closed loop": policy decisions (e.g., subsidies, tariffs, crypto regulation) can boost the value of his holdings, and those holdings may, in turn, influence future policy directions. This blending of presidential power and personal portfolio, while legally disclosed, raises profound questions about conflicts of interest that current rules do not address.

marsbit46 dk önce

'Stock God' Trump's 3,642 Trades Disclosed: The 'Perfect Closed Loop' of Policy and Portfolio

marsbit46 dk önce

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

Title: Figure's Founder on the $39B Valuation and the Ambition to Mass Produce a Million Humanoid Robots In a Sourcery podcast interview, Figure founder and CEO Brett Adcock discusses the rapid rise of his humanoid robotics company. With a valuation that surged 15x in 18 months to $39 billion, Figure aims to create general-purpose humanoid robots for work in factories and homes. Adcock states that the company's primary goal is to make robots that perform real, paid work autonomously. He shares Figure's aggressive scaling plan: producing thousands of robots this year, with an ultimate ambition to reach one million units annually. Adcock explains Figure's vertically integrated strategy, designing its own motors, sensors, and joints to control its supply chain and destiny. He details the challenges, including achieving long-term, reliable, end-to-end autonomous operation—a feat no one has yet accomplished. The biggest risk is executing this complex vision at scale, but Adcock believes the potential market is enormous, representing a significant portion of global GDP. The interview also covers his departure from OpenAI, citing that Figure's internal AI team eventually surpassed OpenAI's capabilities for robotics applications. Adcock concludes by highlighting his focus for the year: large-scale commercial deployment of robots and advancing toward a "general robot" capable of any human task, potentially seeing the first signs of AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) in the physical world at Figure.

marsbit46 dk önce

Dialogue with Figure Robotics Founder: Behind the $39 Billion Valuation Lies Ambition to Mass-Produce Millions of Units

marsbit46 dk önce

İşlemler

Spot
Futures
活动图片