Uniswap’s $591mln burn sparks a deflation loop – UNI at $7.2 ONLY IF…

ambcryptoPublished on 2025-12-28Last updated on 2025-12-28

Abstract

Uniswap's community overwhelmingly approved a proposal to burn 100 million UNI tokens, worth approximately $591 million, from its treasury. This deflationary measure will use future protocol fees to conduct ongoing token burns, creating a deflationary loop aimed at reducing supply and potentially increasing the token's value. Following the burn, UNI's price surged 5.2% to $6.3, with trading volume rising 52% to $297 million. Key indicators, including moving averages and momentum, turned bullish. If buying pressure continues, UNI could target $7.2; however, a loss of momentum might lead to a retracement to $5.7.

Deflationary measures have become increasingly popular across major crypto projects, especially token buybacks and token burns.

These mechanisms have played a significant role in market stability, helping avoid major price crashes and absorb selling pressure. Amid this growing trend, Uniswap joined the wave, with the community approving token burns.

Uniswap treasury burns $591 million of UNI

The Uniswap community approved the UNIfication proposal with 99.9% support, marking a significant shift in the protocol’s economics.

More than 125 million UNI tokens were cast in favor of the proposal compared to 742 tokens against it. After Uniswap’s [UNI] fee-burning proposal was approved, the Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI, worth approximately $591 million.

Under the approved deflationary measure, the future protocol fees collected by Uniswap will be used to burn the tokens.

At the same time, it set fees to zero on its web app, wallet, and extension. The move activated revenue from V2 and select V3 pools, as well as Unichain sequencer proceeds.

All the revenue from these sources will be directed to ongoing UNI burns.

Following the token burns, the amount of UNI held by Uniswap Treasury dropped from $2.1 billion to $1.6 billion.

This step effectively creates a deflationary loop as the coin supply decreases while the protocol usage increases. In turn, prices make sustained upward gains if demand from the open market follows suit.

How did the market react?

After token burns, UNI recorded a positive response, with demand following across the market. In fact, Uniswap jumped to a local high of $6.4 before retracing.

At press time, UNI traded at $6.3, up 5.2% on daily charts. Over the same window, its volume hiked 52% to $297 million, while the market cap touched a monthly high of $4.6 billion.

The altcoins’ volume and market cap surged in tandem, reflecting increased on-chain activity and steady capital inflows.

Additionally, the market recovered from a recent distribution phase, as evidenced by Accumulation and Distribution Volume.

The accumulation side volume surged to 744.6k, and flipped the smoothed average of 500k, signaling increased buy-side activity.

Although the accumulation volume remains below 1.2 million peaks, buyers stepped into the market and displaced sellers. As such, the Buyers v Sellers index showed this shift in market dynamics, as UNI recorded a positive Netflow of 0.116.

Can the momentum hold?

As UNI faced reduced scarcity, the altcoin’s upward momentum strengthened, backed by organic demand. The altcoin flipped the 50 and 20 Moving Averages, indicating strong short-term upward momentum.

At the same time, its Stochastic Momentum Index made a bullish crossover and surged to 37, breaking out of oversold territory. These market conditions position UNI on a positive trajectory, setting it up for further gains.

Therefore, if buyers continue to accumulate, supporting the Uniswap token burn initiative, UNI could clear $6.4 resistance, reclaim $6.6, and target $7.2.

However, if the market impact is short-term and demand declines, UNI could retrace to $5.7.


Final Thoughts

  • Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI, worth approximately $591 million.
  • UNI surged 5% to a local high of $6.4, as the market recovered from the distribution phase.

Related Questions

QWhat was the value of the UNI tokens burned by the Uniswap treasury and how many tokens were burned?

AThe Uniswap treasury burned 100 million UNI tokens, worth approximately $591 million.

QWhat was the community's level of support for the UNI token burn proposal?

AThe proposal received 99.9% support, with over 125 million UNI tokens cast in favor and only 742 tokens against it.

QWhat is the new mechanism for the protocol fees collected by Uniswap after the proposal was approved?

AFuture protocol fees collected by Uniswap will be used to burn UNI tokens, creating a deflationary loop.

QWhat was the immediate market reaction to the token burn in terms of UNI's price and trading volume?

AFollowing the burn, UNI's price increased by 5.2% to $6.3, and its trading volume surged 52% to $297 million.

QWhat are the potential price targets for UNI if the positive market momentum continues?

AIf buyers continue to accumulate, UNI could clear the $6.4 resistance, reclaim $6.6, and target $7.2.

Related Reads

Robinhood vs. Coinbase: The Final Showdown of Financial Super Apps in 2026

The article analyzes the escalating competition between Robinhood and Coinbase to become the dominant financial "super app" by 2026. Robinhood is building a traditional, all-in-one platform for managing personal banking, spending, and investing. Its strategy focuses on product aggregation, targeting a younger demographic with its Robinhood Gold subscription (offering a credit card, high-yield cash, and IRA matching). Its revenue is diversified across options, crypto (21%), and net interest income (35%). Coinbase is also building a super app but with a crypto-native approach and a dual strategy. It aims to be a front-end for users' on-chain and off-chain financial lives (with new stock trading, prediction markets, and a DEX aggregator) while simultaneously acting as the essential backend infrastructure for traditional finance (TradFi) institutions. Its "Crypto as a Service" platform, custody for major ETFs, and stablecoin services form a robust B2B revenue stream, with subscription services now making up 41% of its income. While both are encroaching on each other's territories with plans for 24/7 trading and prediction markets, their core visions differ. Robinhood bets on being the primary platform for the great wealth transfer to a younger generation. Coinbase bets on the broader migration of the global economy on-chain, positioning itself as the indispensable infrastructure provider. Both face risks: Robinhood's costly incentives and Coinbase's stagnant user growth. Ultimately, Robinhood aims to be the user's financial home, while Coinbase aims to be the pipes that power everyone else's.

比推Hace 1 hora(s)

Robinhood vs. Coinbase: The Final Showdown of Financial Super Apps in 2026

比推Hace 1 hora(s)

Trading

Spot
Futures

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片