Trading Time: Bitcoin Remains Under Pressure, Gold Price Falls Below Key Moving Average, Market Focus on Tonight's CPI

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-10Last updated on 2026-06-10

Abstract

**Market Overview: Risk Assets Under Pressure Ahead of Key US CPI Data** Major risk assets faced selling pressure on Tuesday, with heightened geopolitical tensions and caution ahead of pivotal US inflation data weighing on sentiment. The Nasdaq fell 0.97%, led lower by a sharp sell-off in major tech stocks like Apple. Oil prices (WTI) plunged over 3% to around $88.50. **Key Assets in Focus:** * **Gold:** Spot gold tumbled to the $4,200 level, breaking below its 200-day moving average. Analysts cited ETF outflows and higher real yields, with support now eyed near $4,100. * **Bitcoin:** Continued its decline, with ETFs seeing net outflows. Analysts warn a break below $60,000 could trigger a move toward $50,000. * **Stocks:** Tech and semiconductor stocks were hit hard. Super Micro Computer sank on dilution fears, while a bearish research report triggered a crash in optical communication stocks like AAOI and Coherent. **Tonight's Macro Catalyst: US CPI** All eyes are on the US May CPI report. Headline inflation is forecast to rise to multi-year highs (~4.3%), driven by energy, while core CPI is expected to show moderation. **Asia-Pacific Markets Tumble** Asian markets followed US tech losses. South Korea's KOSPI index crashed 6.46%, briefly triggering a trading halt, and Japan's Nikkei 225 fell 2.49%. Semiconductor stocks like Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix led declines. **Crypto Market Notes:** Ethereum shows weakness with declining open interest. Two tokens, SAHAR...

Daily market key data review and trend analysis, produced by PANews.

Macro Markets

Tech stock selling caused sharp intraday volatility in US stocks on Tuesday, with the Nasdaq index at one point falling over 4%, closing down 0.97% below last Friday's low. The S&P 500 fell 0.26% to 7386.65 points, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged up 0.17% to 50872.11 points, supported by defensive sectors like consumer goods.

Geopolitical tensions escalated again. In response to the downing of a US military helicopter, US forces completed strikes on 20 targets within Iran. Iran subsequently retaliated against US bases in Jordan and Bahrain. Affected by this, the crude oil market saw intense volatility, with WTI crude oil briefly falling below $87, eventually closing sharply down over 3% near $88.50.

Gold prices were also impacted, with spot gold falling to the $4200 mark, hitting a nearly three-month low and already below the 200-day moving average. Analysts at Standard Chartered pointed out that as inflation rises and real yields climb, ETF funds are accelerating their outflow. The current ETP holdings structure is relatively fragile, potentially amplifying downward price pressure, with the next key technical support located near $4100. Notably, Citigroup analysts stated in a Monday report that if the Strait of Hormuz remains closed until late summer, gold prices could fall to $3500. Despite this, Ed Yardeni, founder of Yardeni Research, remains bullish, believing $4000 is a solid floor and sees potential up to $10,000.

US May inflation data will be released tonight at 8:30 PM. Wall Street institutions generally predict that, driven by surging energy prices, the May headline CPI year-on-year may rise to 4.2%~4.3%, hitting a nearly three-year high. However, the month-on-month core CPI is expected to be only 0.17%~0.22%, significantly below market consensus, with cooling in components like housing and auto insurance potentially being key to the slowdown in core inflation. The market is currently closely watching this data to gauge the policy stance of the new Federal Reserve Chairman, Kevin Warsh, at next week's interest rate meeting.

US Stock Dynamics

US stocks performed poorly after the AI frenzy subsided, with tech stocks experiencing heavy selling. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index at one point plunged as much as 8.6%; ARM and Marvell Technology fell over 10% during the day; Micron Technology and Intel also fell up to 7% and 5% respectively. Apple, failing to deliver super-expected surprises at the WWDC conference, led the decline with its stock plummeting 3.64%. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) announced up to $7 billion in equity financing to purchase AI server components, with severe concerns about equity dilution causing its stock to crash over 10% in a single day, closing down 7.62%.

The optical communications sector experienced a "massacre" triggered by a research report. The prominent AI research firm SemiAnalysis released a report stating that NVIDIA's 800VDC power architecture and CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) large-scale production will be delayed until 2028. This expectation hammered the supply chain directly: Applied Optoelectronics (AAOI) plummeted 17% in a single day, Lumentum fell 8%, and chip giant COHERENT crashed 11.44%. Although NVIDIA Vice President Gilad Shainer strongly refuted this at the Computex exhibition, calling CPO "the most exciting technology today" and stating it would ramp up in the second half of the year, it failed to stop the spread of panic. The market began betting on NPO and traditional pluggable modules as transitional substitutes.

Meanwhile, Oracle is scheduled to release its earnings report after the US market close on Wednesday. The market generally expects revenue to reach $19.1 billion. TD Cowen and UBS have raised their price targets to $300 and $285 respectively, believing there is still room for acceleration in the cloud infrastructure business. Jefferies analyst Brent Thill stated that strong demand in the cloud infrastructure business will be a key factor driving the stock price. The options market indicates traders expect the company's stock price could swing up to 11% in a single week after the earnings release.

Cryptocurrency

Bitcoin continues to face pressure. Bitcoin ETFs saw a net outflow of $77.43 million yesterday, with total assets falling back to $775.8 billion, completely erasing the incremental funds since Trump's election victory.

The market remains cautious about the upcoming US CPI data. Analysts point out that if inflation remains high, it could further dampen the rationale for Bitcoin as a hedge tool. Bitwise research shows Bitcoin often reacts ahead of traditional markets, so its current trend may indicate a broader risk adjustment. Glassnode's MVRV model warns that once $60,000 is decisively lost, the deep value zone of $50,000 will become the next ruthless magnetic attraction point.

Ethereum is also weak. Options market data shows that ETH's open interest has fallen 25% since the May high, indicating weakening investor confidence in future price movements. Although institutions like Bitmine bought 75,000 ETH worth $122 million against the trend, analyst Ash Crypto warned that if it falls below $1500, Ethereum could head straight to $1000.

On-chain black swan events have intensified panic. Sahara AI saw its token halved by nearly 60% in a single day due to a rumor about a CCIP cross-chain bridge supplementing liquidity being misinterpreted as a sell-off. The Humanity project suffered a devastating blow, with hackers invading employee computers and wildly minting 1 billion H tokens. Currently, both H and SAHARA token prices have somewhat rebounded.

Today's Outlook:

  • Informed sources: SpaceX will determine the issuance price as early as June 11, with the stock listing on June 12.

  • Upbit 24-hour trading volume ranking: SAHARA, WLD, XRP, BTC, ETH.

  • Magic Eden (ME) will unlock approximately 172 million tokens worth about $10.4 million on June 11.

  • HOME (HOME) will unlock approximately 750 million tokens worth about $40.2 million.

Top gainers among the top 100 cryptocurrencies by market cap today: BEAT up 48.7%, UB up 21.2%, WBT up 13.3%, STABLE up 12.9%, MORPHO up 7.6%.

Asia-Pacific Market

Asia-Pacific stock markets failed to stay immune. Under the dual pressure of Middle East conflict and the rout of US tech stocks, they experienced a major plunge.

The South Korean KOSPI index faced extremely severe selling, plummeting 6.46% and triggering circuit breakers at one point. The Japanese Nikkei 225 index also plunged over 1600 points, down 2.49%. Arjun Jayaraman, portfolio manager at Causeway Capital, pointed out that the proliferation of retail funds with high leverage and new ETFs in Japanese and Korean markets is amplifying this panic-driven volatility manifold.

Semiconductor giants became the epicenter of the selling wave in the Asia-Pacific market. Despite *The Korea Economic Daily* reporting the positive news that Samsung Electronics plans to build an advanced packaging plant in Gwangju, it seemed pale in the face of macro panic. Samsung Electronics stock plunged over 7%, and SK Hynix fell more than 8%. The Japanese chip contingent also retreated, with Advantest and Kioxia both falling nearly 4%. Not only that, even SoftBank Group saw its stock crash over 9% in a single day due to its attempt to use OpenAI shares as collateral for a $6 billion loan being blocked.

Amid the wailing, the A-share market walked its own independent logic due to strong data and World Cup expectations. China's May export data shone brightly, with a year-on-year surge of 19.4% in US dollar terms. Among them, integrated circuits skyrocketed 111%, and computer equipment surged 66%. Xing Zhaopeng, strategist at ANZ, remarked that the global AI hardware frenzy is substantively reshaping China's trade landscape. On the consumer side, with less than 48 hours until the US-Canada-Mexico World Cup opening, expectations for the "midnight viewing" late-night snack economy sparked by the time difference ignited the beer sector. Hui Quan Beer hit the daily limit up, while Zhujiang Beer and Yanjing Beer rose over 5%, becoming a rare bright spot in the gloomy market.

Related Questions

QWhat are the key factors putting pressure on Bitcoin and gold prices according to the article?

ABitcoin is under pressure due to net outflows from Bitcoin ETFs and market caution ahead of the US CPI data. Gold fell below the key 200-day moving average to around $4200, pressured by rising inflation, higher real yields, ETF outflows, and geopolitical tensions.

QWhat major event is the market focused on tonight (the night the article was published), and what is the general forecast for the data?

AThe market is focused on the release of the US May CPI (Consumer Price Index) data. Forecasts suggest the headline CPI may rise to 4.2%~4.3% year-over-year, driven by energy prices, but core CPI month-over-month is expected to be significantly lower at 0.17%~0.22%.

QWhich sectors and specific companies in the US stock market experienced significant declines, and what were the main reasons?

AUS tech stocks, especially semiconductors and AI-related companies, saw significant declines. Key losers included Apple (down 3.64% post-WWDC), ARM, Marvell Technology, Micron, Intel, and Super Micro Computer (SMCI, down over 10% on dilution fears). The optical communications sector (e.g., AAOI, Lumentum, COHERENT) crashed due to a bearish analyst report delaying expectations for CPO technology adoption.

QWhat caused the severe sell-off in major Asian stock markets like South Korea's KOSPI and Japan's Nikkei 225?

AThe severe sell-off in Asian markets was caused by a combination of escalating geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and the sharp decline in US tech stocks. The panic was amplified by high levels of leveraged retail money and new ETFs in these markets.

QDespite the broader market downturn, which Chinese sectors showed strength and why?

AChina's A-shares showed relative strength, driven by robust export data (with integrated circuit exports surging 111%) linked to the global AI hardware boom, and positive expectations for the 'late-night snacking' economy ahead of the FIFA World Cup, which boosted beer stocks like HuiQuan Brewery.

Related Reads

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit24m ago

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit24m ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

In June 2026, Reuters investigations revealed that since Donald Trump's return to the White House, his family has accumulated roughly $2.3 billion in profits from four core crypto ventures: World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the $TRUMP meme coin, American Bitcoin, and ALT5 Sigma (later renamed AI Financial). Coincidentally, overall investor losses in these projects were estimated to be a similar amount. The businesses, spanning DeFi, stablecoins, meme coins, Bitcoin mining, and digital payments, largely relied not on technological innovation but on converting the political influence and notoriety of the Trump brand into financial assets sold to the market. This marks a dramatic shift from Trump's earlier skepticism of cryptocurrencies. The ventures operated on a similar logic: leveraging the Trump name to generate market hype and trust, attracting investment through token sales or public listings, and enabling the family to capture profits upfront through equity, token allocations, and fees, while later entrants often bore the brunt of the risk as markets cooled. WLFI, the most profitable venture, generated an estimated $1.6 billion for the family, primarily through sales of its locked, illiquid governance token and its USD1 stablecoin. The $TRUMP meme coin, a direct monetization of the presidential IP, brought in over $600 million for Trump-linked entities before its price crashed nearly 97% from its peak. American Bitcoin gained a "Trump stock" premium for its mining operations, and ALT5 Sigma/AI Financial combined Trump, AI, and crypto themes for a temporary valuation surge. The episode underscores how political influence can be packaged into financial assets, creating substantial wealth for promoters while highlighting the risks for investors who base decisions on hype and brand allegiance over fundamental business models and cash flows.

marsbit1h ago

Trump's Crypto Empire: A $2.3 Billion Wealth Transfer Experiment

marsbit1h ago

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has proposed new rules to establish a clearer regulatory framework for prediction markets. The proposal aims to modify how "event contracts" are reviewed, creating a structured process to determine if contracts involving terrorism, assassination, war, or illegal activities violate the public interest. This moves away from a blanket ban toward a case-by-case assessment of whether a contract's subject matter is acceptable for financial trading. A key focus is distinguishing between predicting the impact of risks and predicting the occurrence of harm. The proposal suggests that many sports-based prediction markets—such as those on game outcomes, scores, or season standings—may be permissible as they can provide price discovery and meaningful information. However, markets on easily manipulated events like specific player injuries, referee calls, or outcomes of youth sports would face stricter scrutiny. The rules directly target insider trading and manipulation risks, highlighting cases where individuals with non-public information or the ability to influence an event's outcome could unfairly profit. This underscores a shift toward ensuring market fairness. The proposal does not end the regulatory debate, particularly with state gambling regulators who argue that sports prediction markets are essentially sports betting and should fall under state jurisdiction. Nonetheless, the CFTC's action signals a move toward formalizing prediction markets, pushing the industry from a phase of rapid, often unregulated expansion into a more institutionalized, rule-based environment that more closely resembles traditional financial markets.

marsbit1h ago

CFTC Proposes New Rules for Prediction Markets, Redefining Which Events Can Be Listed and Who Can Participate

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片