Russian Miners Refused Exclusion from 'Take and Pay' Scheme

cryptonews.ruPublished on 2026-07-31Last updated on 2026-07-31

Abstract

The Russian Ministry of Energy has clarified that cryptocurrency mining companies will not be excluded from the new "take-or-pay" pricing scheme, despite ongoing discussions and complaints. Under this mechanism, set to take effect from January 1, miners will have to pay for nearly all the kilowatts of their maximum declared power capacity, not just for their actual electricity consumption. While the draft document is being adjusted, primarily to exempt utility companies (water and heat suppliers), miners face stricter rules: they are placed in a separate category and will be subject to the scheme regardless of their connection date, with a minimum payable volume set at 90% of their declared capacity (compared to 70% for others). The scheme, targeting industrial consumers with over 670 kW capacity and expected to fully launch by 2027, requires payment based on maximum possible consumption. Utility companies had argued that inclusion would at least double their costs, which would then be passed on to consumers via tariffs. They also criticized the proposed power thresholds as lacking technological or economic justification, claiming they would generate extra revenue for grid operators. Mining companies oppose the plan. Firm "Algorithm" warned in a study that rising energy costs are already making continuous grid-powered mining economically unviable in Russia within 2-3 years, putting the country at a competitive disadvantage against major US companies. In a letter to the Mini...

Even if their comments are considered, nothing will change for miners, the Ministry of Energy clarifies: cryptocurrency mining companies will not be removed from the scope of the new mechanism—meaning they will have to pay starting January 1 not based on actual consumption, but for nearly all kilowatts of their maximum power capacity.

The document is being amended primarily for the benefit of utility companies. Specifically, it is proposed not to apply the new mechanism to heat, water supply, and wastewater disposal enterprises, writes the publication citing participants of a working group meeting.

Utility companies complain about costs and point out that, according to the draft ministry resolution, they are required to have backup power sources, which will have to be paid for additionally. Expenses could at least double, and ultimately these costs will be factored into tariffs and fall on the shoulders of the population, utility companies lament. Additionally, they note that the threshold power values proposed by the draft have no technological or economic connection to the actual costs of power grid companies, leading to extra revenue for grid operators, complain working group participants.

The Ministry of Energy explained to Kommersant journalists that large data centers (DCs) and mining facilities have been placed in a separate group—the mechanism will apply to them in any case, regardless of their grid connection date—that is, for both new and all existing electricity buyers. Moreover, for miners, the minimum payable volume is proposed to be set immediately at 90% of the company's declared capacity, not at 70% as for others.

The 'take or pay' principle implies that consumers will pay for electricity not based on actual consumption, but based on the maximum possible volumes of electricity consumption. The scheme will affect industrial enterprises with a capacity exceeding 670 kW. The Ministry of Energy expects the new mechanism to come into effect in 2027.

Previously, the mining company 'Algorithm' conducted a study showing that within the next two to three years, the model of continuous operation of mining farms from the power grid will become economically unviable in Russia. Due to rising energy costs, Russia is already 'losing competition to large American companies,' the study's authors concluded.

'Algorithm' sent a letter to the Russian Ministry of Energy requesting abandonment of the 'take and pay' principle. The letter argued that under current unfavorable economic conditions, miners could become energy-balancing organizations—capable of utilizing power capacities during idle periods and, conversely, limiting consumption when the grid is under strain.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main regulatory change affecting cryptocurrency miners in Russia according to the article?

AThe main change is the implementation of a 'take-or-pay' principle starting January 1, where miners will have to pay based on almost all kilowatts of their maximum contracted power capacity, not based on their actual electricity consumption.

QWhich specific sector is proposed to be exempted from the new 'take-or-pay' mechanism, and why?

AThe communal sector (heat, water supply, and sewerage companies) is proposed to be exempted. The reason is that these companies complain about increased costs, including the need for expensive backup power sources, which would ultimately raise tariffs for the population.

QHow does the minimum payable volume for miners under the new scheme differ from that for other industrial consumers?

AFor cryptocurrency miners, the minimum payable volume is proposed to be set at 90% of their declared power capacity. For other consumers subject to the scheme, it is set at 70%.

QWhat potential benefit did the mining company 'Algorithm' suggest miners could provide to the energy system in their appeal to the Ministry of Energy?

AThe 'Algorithm' company suggested that miners could act as energy-balancing organizations. They could load up power capacities during periods of low demand (when capacity is idle) and limit consumption during peak load times on the grid.

QWhat conclusion did the 'Algorithm' company's research reach regarding the future of grid-powered mining farms in Russia?

AThe research concluded that within the next two to three years, the model of continuously operating mining farms from the grid would become economically unprofitable in Russia. Rising energy costs are already making Russia lose competitiveness to large American companies.

Related Reads

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

Amidst a generally stagnant crypto market in June and July, UNI, the governance token of Uniswap, saw a significant surge, nearly doubling in price from around $2.3 to $4.6. This rally represents a delayed but significant value reassessment, triggered by the practical implementation of its long-debated "fee switch" mechanism. The key turning point was the on-chain execution of the UNIfication proposal in December 2025. It activated a protocol fee on select pools, directed Unichain sequencer revenue (net of costs) to a communal treasury, executed a one-time burn of 100 million UNI, and established a system where all protocol revenue flows into a "TokenJar" contract. This treasury has a single exit: purchasing and permanently burning UNI via a "Firepit" contract. Initially, the market reacted tepidly as the generated revenue and corresponding burn rate were modest. The narrative shifted dramatically in July 2025 with two major developments. First, the launch of Robinhood Chain, tailored for tokenized stocks, rapidly became a primary source of volume and fees for Uniswap, at one point contributing nearly half of its weekly fees. Second, governance votes successfully expanded the fee mechanism to v4 pools and initiated a temperature check for fees on Robinhood Chain. The activation of v4 fees caused the protocol's daily revenue earmarked for UNI burns to nearly triple. The core of UNI's recent price action is the transition from a pure governance token to a cash-flow asset with a permanent, protocol-funded buyer. Its effectiveness is amplified by UNI's mature and widely distributed supply, with no major impending unlocks to dilute the impact of the buybacks. The sustainability of this rally now hinges on whether the transaction volume, particularly on Robinhood Chain, persists after its initial gas subsidies expire, determining if this is a genuine value realization or a subsidy-fueled spike.

marsbit12m ago

UNI Doubles in Two Months Against the Trend: A 5-Year-Overdue Value Realization

marsbit12m ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

Google Earth's newly launched "Create image" feature, powered by the Nano Banana 2 AI image generation model, was abruptly withdrawn shortly after its release due to being "played" by users. The feature allowed users to generate and overlay AI-created visuals directly onto real-world satellite and 3D maps in Google Earth. The tool enabled creative applications like historical recreations (e.g., visualizing ancient Pompeii), generating informational graphics for landmarks, and envisioning architectural projects or futuristic cityscapes on real terrain. It operated under "geospatial grounding," meaning the AI respected the underlying geography, topography, and perspective of the chosen map view. The model also integrated with Gemini to retrieve relevant factual information. However, upon release, users quickly tested its limits. A prominent example involved reimagining Philadelphia's historic Independence Hall as a post-apocalyptic ruin overrun by "happy" zombies, evil clowns, and giant alien mechs. This highlighted both the feature's playful potential and its risks regarding the generation of inappropriate or misleading content on realistic maps, leading to its swift temporary removal. Google stated it would re-release the feature after implementing "enhanced guardrails." Analysts note this move strategically leverages Google's vast proprietary geospatial data, positioning its AI not just for artistic generation but for spatially accurate world visualization—a unique advantage in the competitive AI image generation landscape.

marsbit1h ago

Breaking: Google Earth Urgently Pulls Back Nano Banana 2 Image Generation Feature!

marsbit1h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

Sam Altman has revised his earlier predictions about AI rapidly replacing jobs, admitting he overestimated the speed at which AI would eliminate entry-level white-collar roles. Speaking on the "Invest Like the Best" podcast, he stated that people do not truly want an AI CEO, as accountability and human connection remain critical. He found that individuals prefer interacting with people who can be held responsible for decisions. Similarly, NVIDIA's Jensen Huang argued that the narrative of AI destroying jobs is misguided. He distinguishes between tasks and jobs, noting that while AI can automate specific tasks, entire jobs—encompassing communication, judgment, coordination, and accountability—are not eliminated. He cited examples like radiologists and software engineers, where demand for these roles has increased as AI handles repetitive tasks, allowing for business expansion and the creation of more positions. Data from a University of Maryland and LinkUp study supports this, showing that U.S. job postings for new graduates have actually risen, countering the fear of vanishing entry-level roles. However, a significant shift is occurring: the traditional entry-level tasks that help newcomers gain experience are being automated, making initial career access more challenging. The key insight is that as AI takes over standardized tasks, the enduring value of human work shifts toward areas of responsibility, trust-building, and final decision-making—aspects that AI cannot replicate. The real "moat" for professionals lies in these irreplaceable human elements.

marsbit1h ago

Altman Admits: Overestimated AI Snatching Jobs! Huang Renxun: The Unemployment Narrative Is Completely Backwards

marsbit1h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731) provides a curated selection of deep analysis, filtering out market noise. Key themes from this week include: **Macro & Policy:** The Federal Reserve's upcoming meeting is marked by high uncertainty, balancing cooling inflation data against persistent price pressures. Meanwhile, the U.S. crypto regulatory Clarity Act faces critical political hurdles, with its 2026 passage probability seen as low. **Investing & Crypto:** Analysis suggests long-term crypto success depends on conviction through volatile cycles, focusing on assets like Bitcoin and core smart contract platforms. A trend noted is the increasing similarity between global equity markets (especially tech) and crypto, driven by narrative and leverage. Several major crypto protocols show strong revenue growth, but this isn't always translating to token price appreciation due to sell pressure and structural factors. **AI & Semiconductors:** Nvidia's rising credit default swap rates signal market concern over AI infrastructure financing risks. The storage sector experienced volatility as markets began pricing in potential 2027 oversupply. Despite a record profitable quarter, SK Hynix's results were deemed "below expectations," reflecting heightened investor demands for future growth visibility. **Markets & DeFi:** TradeXYZ demonstrated remarkable accuracy in pre-market pricing for a major A股 listing. The token ONDO saw gains, linked to its growing role in the on-chain tokenized stock ecosystem. **Ethereum:** Post-Pectra upgrade, a major structural shift is underway as Lido begins migrating millions of ETH to new validator architectures designed for capital efficiency. **Also Highlighted:** Butian's bullish stock market move; OpenAI's Altman promising major advances; Samsung and SK Hynix securing large AI chip deals; Apple reaching a $5T market cap; and ongoing discussions around exchange security following Poolin's bankruptcy case.

marsbit2h ago

Weekly Editor's Picks (0725-0731)

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片