Wall Street Traders Shift Crypto Market Activity to Weekdays

cryptonews.ru2026-07-27 tarihinde yayınlandı2026-07-27 tarihinde güncellendi

Özet

For decades, Wall Street adhered to a strict Monday-Friday schedule, a rhythm initially challenged but not fully overturned by the 24/7 nature of cryptocurrencies. However, institutional adoption is now fundamentally reshaping crypto market dynamics, shifting most price discovery and trading activity to traditional U.S. market hours (9:30 AM - 4:00 PM ET). According to Kaiko Research, weekend trading volume has fallen from roughly 25% to about 16% of the total. This concentration creates a significant "liquidity vacuum" on weekends when institutional support withdraws. Analysis by BridgePort shows the market becomes more vulnerable: trading costs rise by an average of 11% due to wider spreads, market depth for $100k trades worsens by nearly 9%, and displayed liquidity drops over 5%. Consequently, smaller trades can trigger sharper price swings. The massive success of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs has been a key driver of this structural shift. While providing steady weekday demand, their complete inactivity on weekends exacerbates the liquidity gap. Large capital movements, like the over $0.5 billion withdrawn from U.S. spot ETFs since October 2023, are easily absorbed on weekdays but can cause significant turbulence on thinner weekends. Ultimately, weekend trading now requires heightened caution due to a "thin" market, absent major market makers, and multiplied risks of sudden price jumps and slippage. Understanding these hidden liquidity mechanisms has become crucial for naviga...

For decades, the rhythm of life on Wall Street followed a strict schedule—Friday evening meant market close and weekend rest. The 24/7 nature of cryptocurrencies has only partially forced institutional players to reconsider one of their oldest habits: waiting for Monday.

The continuous trading environment is changing market participants' approaches to risk management and reacting to price movements, even as traditional stock exchanges continue to take weekends off. Big money is forced to adapt to digital assets that 'never sleep'.

Institutional adoption, which was supposed to bring stability and reduce volatility, has in practice led to a structural shift and a mismatch in liquidity. In the early days of the crypto industry, weekends were the time of the most active price movements, accounting for about 25% of total trading volume.

Today, this picture has changed. According to data from research company Kaiko Research, the share of trading on weekends has shrunk to 16%, as price discovery has almost completely moved to US market hours, i.e., from 9:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. As soon as trading desks in New York close, the institutional 'safety net' disappears, leaving the market alone with heightened unpredictability.

The reduced activity of major players on Saturdays and Sundays makes moving significant capital more expensive and risky. Analytics from BridgePort, a company specializing in crypto infrastructure, clearly demonstrates the market's vulnerability during hours when Wall Street is not working.

In particular, trading costs on weekends increase by an average of 11% due to widening spreads. Simultaneously, the effective market depth for trades worth $100,000 deteriorates by almost 9%, and overall displayed liquidity falls by more than 5% compared to weekdays. In other words, far less trading volume is required on weekends to trigger a sharp price change, turning minor dips into large-scale chain reactions.

The huge success of US spot Bitcoin ETFs has become the very factor that fundamentally changed the DNA of the crypto market and exacerbated this difference. Although exchange-traded funds provide steady demand during the work week, their complete absence on weekends creates a real liquidity vacuum. To understand the scale of traditional instruments' influence, one only needs to look at fund flows: since October 2025, investors have withdrawn over $5 billion from US spot ETFs, an amount easily absorbed by deep markets on weekdays but capable of causing serious turbulence on weekends.

As a result, trading on weekends now requires increased caution, as a 'thin' market and the absence of large market makers multiply the risks of sudden jumps and slippage. Understanding these hidden liquidity mechanisms has become the main key to success in the new financial reality.

end-content

İlgili Sorular

QAccording to the article, what is the main factor that has fundamentally changed the DNA of the cryptocurrency market?

AAccording to the article, the huge success of spot Bitcoin ETFs in the US has been the main factor that fundamentally changed the DNA of the cryptocurrency market and exacerbated the liquidity differences between weekdays and weekends.

QHow has the proportion of cryptocurrency trading volume on weekends changed, as reported by Kaiko Research?

AAccording to Kaiko Research, the share of cryptocurrency trading on weekends has fallen from about 25% in the early days of the industry to 16% currently, as price formation has almost completely shifted to US market hours.

QWhat are the specific consequences of reduced Wall Street activity on cryptocurrency markets during weekends, according to data from BridgePort?

AAccording to data from BridgePort, on weekends: trading costs increase by an average of 11% due to wider spreads; effective market depth for $100,000 trades deteriorates by almost 9%; and overall displayed liquidity falls by more than 5% compared to weekdays.

QWhy does the article state that trading on weekends now requires greater caution?

AThe article states that trading on weekends requires greater caution because the market is 'thin', with the absence of major market makers, which significantly increases the risks of sudden price jumps and slippage. A much smaller trade volume can trigger sharp price changes, turning minor dips into large chain reactions.

QWhat phenomenon does the article describe as disappearing once trading desks in New York close?

AThe article describes that once trading desks in New York close for the weekend, the institutional 'safety net' disappears, leaving the market alone to face increased unpredictability.

İlgili Okumalar

Why P2P and Exchangers Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them

Titled "Why P2P and Exchanges Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them," this article discusses the evolution of stablecoins, particularly USDT, from a trading tool to a global payment method. However, converting crypto back to fiat for daily expenses remains a challenge. The process of using P2P platforms or crypto exchanges has become increasingly risky and complex due to stricter banking anti-fraud measures, new legislation in Russia, and rampant fraud schemes like "triangles," where sellers can inadvertently receive stolen funds. The article highlights that while P2P was convenient, banks now scrutinize frequent peer-to-peer transfers, often freezing accounts. Exchanges also pose risks like unfavorable rates and unclear compliance. The market is therefore shifting towards integrated services that eliminate the manual conversion step. It cites OneSix as an example—a crypto wallet accessible via Telegram and web that embeds currency conversion directly into payment and withdrawal scenarios. Users can pay bills or send money as if using a bank app, with the crypto-to-fiat exchange happening seamlessly in the background. It also offers invoicing for freelancers and conducts AML checks, returning suspicious transactions instantly instead of freezing them. In conclusion, as crypto integrates into everyday finance, the demand for manual, risky exchange methods is declining. The future lies in unified platforms that combine storage, compliance, conversion, and payments into a single, secure user experience.

cryptonews.ru36 dk önce

Why P2P and Exchangers Are Becoming Obsolete, and What Will Replace Them

cryptonews.ru36 dk önce

The CEO of MARA Holdings Compares AI Operations to Bitcoin Mining! Which is More Profitable?

Fred Thiel, CEO of MARA Holdings (a major Bitcoin mining company), states that the rapid growth of the artificial intelligence (AI) sector is transforming mining companies' business models. He claims that powering data centers for AI is significantly more profitable than Bitcoin mining. In a recent interview, Thiel explained why many mining firms are diversifying into AI infrastructure. According to Thiel, the energy demands of data centers are surging, especially due to the spread of generative AI applications. This creates new revenue opportunities for Bitcoin mining companies with robust power infrastructure. MARA Holdings is among those monitoring this shift and aims to develop its energy and infrastructure services for AI data centers. Thiel emphasized that this move toward AI does not mean the end of Bitcoin mining. He stated that Bitcoin mining remains a sustainable business model, especially for miners in regions with low electricity costs, and it is still a crucial field for utilizing excess or idle power capacity. In recent years, many Bitcoin mining companies have begun using their energy-intensive infrastructure not just for block production but also for high-performance computing (HPC) and AI applications. This strategy aims to diversify revenue sources and increase resilience against cryptocurrency market volatility. Analysts note that the growing energy demand in the AI sector presents significant transformation opportunities for mining companies. The need for high-power, uninterrupted electricity supply, particularly for large data centers, gives Bitcoin miners with existing energy infrastructure expertise a considerable advantage.

cryptonews.ru47 dk önce

The CEO of MARA Holdings Compares AI Operations to Bitcoin Mining! Which is More Profitable?

cryptonews.ru47 dk önce

Ratio's CEO Says Multi-Currency Stablecoins Could Eliminate Costly FX Conversions in Asia

The CEO of Ratio, John Cho, argues that multi-currency stablecoins could save Asia billions by eliminating costly foreign exchange conversions in regional trade. While USD stablecoins like USDT and USDC work for global settlements, local Asian trade is conducted in local currencies like the Korean won or Singapore dollar. Forcing these transactions through USD intermediaries creates unnecessary costs and currency risk. Cho envisions a complementary ecosystem where local-currency stablecoins work alongside USD stablecoins, enabling seamless cross-border settlements without conversion friction. A key pain point in traditional banking is the need for pre-funded Nostro and Vostro accounts, which lock up vast amounts of working capital. Blockchain-based settlement layers like Ratio offer a 24/7 alternative, using on-chain liquidity to enable instant execution even when traditional channels are closed. Modern Web3 infrastructure providers are focusing on pragmatic integration with existing corporate systems like ERPs, allowing businesses to gradually shift volumes to digital channels for better speed, cost, and reduced slippage. Clear regulation is cited as the critical catalyst for widespread institutional adoption. As jurisdictions like the U.S. advance legislation (e.g., the CLARITY Act) and Asian countries are expected to pass their own stablecoin laws within 12-24 months, regulatory uncertainty is receding. The ultimate vision is for regulated stablecoins to become an invisible settlement layer integrated into national payment systems, where payments simply happen on-chain, erasing the boundary between traditional banking and digital assets.

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Ratio's CEO Says Multi-Currency Stablecoins Could Eliminate Costly FX Conversions in Asia

cryptonews.ru1 saat önce

Huang Xiaoming, Li Bin, Lei Jun, Liang Wenfeng... Who Are the Biggest Winners in the CXMT IPO Feast?

Changxin Technology, a leading Chinese memory chip manufacturer, successfully listed on the Shanghai Stock Exchange's STAR Market (科创板) on July 8, 2026. Its share price surged from the IPO price of 8.66 yuan to close at 49 yuan on the first day, catapulting its market capitalization to 3.28 trillion yuan, making it the most valuable A-share company and triggering a massive wealth creation event. The biggest winners were the company's founder, Zhu Yiming, and its employees. Zhu Yiming's family wealth skyrocketed nearly 300% to approximately $13.9 billion, with his direct stake in Changxin valued at around 80 billion yuan. Additionally, over 6700 employees benefited from stock ownership plans, creating at least 237 new millionaires (in CNY). Zhu also pledged to donate 768 million shares, worth over 37.6 billion yuan, for future employee incentives over a ten-year period. Several prominent investors and corporate clients also reaped significant paper gains from the IPO. Notable figures include: * **Liang Wenfeng**, founder of DeepSeek, whose funds netted a paper profit of approximately 827 million yuan. * **Kong Jianping**, founder of Nano Labs, saw his indirect holdings valued at roughly 940 million yuan. * **Li Bin**, founder of Nio, whose company's strategic investment of 158 million yuan is now worth about 740 million yuan. * **Lei Jun**, founder of Xiaomi, whose subsidiary holds shares currently showing a paper gain of over 736 million yuan. Xiaomi clarified this is a corporate investment, not direct personal wealth. The article notes that while this IPO created immense wealth for insiders and large investors, retail investors who were lucky enough to win an allotment in the lottery typically profited by around 20,000 yuan. The listing solidifies Changxin's position as China's premier domestic memory chipmaker.

marsbit1 saat önce

Huang Xiaoming, Li Bin, Lei Jun, Liang Wenfeng... Who Are the Biggest Winners in the CXMT IPO Feast?

marsbit1 saat önce

İşlemler

Spot
活动图片