UK Bitcoin Company Discovers: Repurchasing Own Stock Earns 24% More Than Directly Buying Bitcoin

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-21Last updated on 2026-07-21

Abstract

British bitcoin holding company B HODL discovered that, when its share price trades below the value of its bitcoin holdings, repurchasing its own stock can be a more efficient way to increase bitcoin exposure per share than directly buying more bitcoin. In its first week of buybacks, the company spent approximately £37,985 to cancel 823,400 shares. Before fees, this resulted in a 24% greater increase in satoshis (the smallest unit of bitcoin) per share per pound spent, compared to using the same cash to purchase bitcoin directly. The analysis highlights a capital allocation strategy for treasury companies trading at a discount to their net asset value (NAV): issuing shares when it increases bitcoin per share, and buying them back when the stock itself offers cheaper bitcoin exposure. The decision, however, depends on factors like cash reserves and operational needs.

Author:CryptoSlate

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: When a Bitcoin treasury company's stock price falls below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share may not be buying Bitcoin, but rather repurchasing its own stock. UK-listed company B HODL tested this paradox with real money, and the results were surprising—what does this mean for the entire Bitcoin treasury industry?

When a Bitcoin treasury company trades below the value of the Bitcoin it holds, the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share might be repurchasing its own stock.

UK-listed company B HODL tested this inversion phenomenon during the first week of its repurchase. The company spent approximately £37,985 (pre-fees) to cancel 823,400 shares, generating an increase in total satoshis per pound per share that was about 24% higher than using the same cash to buy Bitcoin.

This 24% advantage is pre-fee data, and these figures do not show the full picture of net asset value (NAV) growth per share.

B HODL's official dashboard on July 19th showed holdings of 166.487 BTC, a share price of 5.25 pence, and a market capitalization of £7.385 million. Based on the displayed Bitcoin price of £48,237, these holdings were worth approximately £8.031 million, leaving a gap of about £646,000.

Using the latest announced post-cancellation share count and the same share price, the equity value is approximately £7.378 million, about £652,000 or 8.1% lower than the Bitcoin value. Both sides of the comparison are in constant flux.

Why Buying Stock Beats Buying Bitcoin

B HODL's £100,000 share repurchase authorization became effective on July 9th. Disclosures covering purchases on July 9th, 10th, 13th, 15th, and 16th show a total of 823,400 shares, with a calculated weighted average price of 4.613 pence. Pre-fees, these purchases used about 38% of the authorized amount.

Following the announced cancellations, the share count decreased from 141,366,091 to 140,542,691 shares. Keeping the 166.487 BTC unchanged, the total Bitcoin per share increased from 117.77 satoshis to 118.46 satoshis, a gain of 0.69 satoshis or 0.59%.

At the same Bitcoin price of £48,237, £37,985 could purchase approximately 0.787 BTC. Spreading this purchase across the original share count would increase the total satoshis per share by about 0.557, while the buyback delivered an increase of 0.690. Under these matching assumptions, canceling equity increased value per pound spent by about 24%.

Why B HODL Can Buy and Sell Its Own Shares

B HODL is keeping its At-The-Market (ATM) program open while conducting the buyback. Its ATM only allows issuing shares when it is accretive based on the company's modified Net Asset Value (mNAV) framework for Bitcoin.

These instruments together create a capital allocation switch: issue equity when it can increase Bitcoin per share, then repurchase equity when the stock itself offers cheaper Bitcoin exposure.

The company's latest interim balance sheet is historical data, so the first week demonstrates growth in total satoshis per share under stated assumptions, not current NAV per share growth.

For other Bitcoin treasury companies trading below their Bitcoin value per share, this insight is conditional but clear.

Whether this is the correct move still depends on cash reserves, debt, trading liquidity, and operational needs—a discipline increasingly shaping the broader treasury industry.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the surprising finding of the British bitcoin company B HODL regarding its stock buyback?

AB HODL found that in its first week of buybacks, repurchasing its own stock generated about 24% more growth in satoshis per share per pound spent compared to using the same cash to directly buy Bitcoin.

QWhat is the significance of a Bitcoin vault company's stock trading below the value of its Bitcoin holdings?

AWhen a Bitcoin vault company's stock trades below the value of its Bitcoin holdings (a discount to NAV), the cheapest way to increase Bitcoin exposure per share for existing shareholders may not be to buy more Bitcoin, but to repurchase and cancel the company's own discounted shares.

QHow does B HODL's 'capital allocation switch' work with its ATM program and buyback authorization?

AB HODL operates a 'capital allocation switch' by combining its share buyback authorization with its At-The-Market (ATM) issuance program. The ATM only issues new shares when it increases satoshis per share under the company's mNAV framework. The company can then use the buyback to repurchase shares when they offer a cheaper source of Bitcoin exposure than buying Bitcoin directly.

QWhat key metric increased for B HODL shareholders as a result of the stock buyback, and by how much?

AAs a result of the share buyback and cancellation, the total satoshis (sats) per share for B HODL increased from 117.77 sats to 118.46 sats, a rise of 0.69 sats or 0.59%.

QAccording to the article, what important factors should a Bitcoin vault company consider before deciding on a stock buyback?

ABefore deciding on a stock buyback, a Bitcoin vault company must consider factors such as its cash reserves, existing debt, trading liquidity, and ongoing operational requirements, not just the discount of its share price to the value of its Bitcoin holdings.

Related Reads

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

China's Humanoid Robot Market Domination and US Response According to a report by Smart Analytics Global (SAG), Chinese manufacturers supplied over 97% of the global humanoid robot shipments (approximately 19,100 units) in the first half of 2026, a 272% year-on-year increase. Shanghai-based AGIBOT led with a 44% market share, followed by Unitree Robotics with 31%. Together, these two firms accounted for about 75% of global shipments. China itself represented over 85% of global demand for these devices, with industrial and commercial applications now comprising more than 70% of shipments. Key factors driving China's leadership include strong state support, abundant funding, expanding production capacity, IPO waves for developers, and a vast manufacturing ecosystem for rapid testing and deployment. Furthermore, over 90% of key components for humanoid robots are now sourced domestically. In response, the US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) banned federal agencies and subsidy recipients from purchasing or using foreign "advanced robotic devices," including humanoid and quadruped robots, citing national security concerns in July 2026. SAG forecasts global shipments to approach 60,000 units for full-year 2026, with industry revenue around $1.6 billion, projecting 500,000 units by 2030. The analysis notes potential challenges for Chinese expansion, such as reputational risks from alleged ties to China's defense sector and the precedent of trade disputes seen in solar panels and batteries, potentially triggered by the current low average robot price.

cryptonews.ru8m ago

China Monopolizes the Humanoid Market: The U.S. Is Forced to Defend Itself

cryptonews.ru8m ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

On August 10, 2024, Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin revealed an updated technical roadmap, highlighting significant changes in priorities and new focus areas. Key new additions include: - **Strong Privacy Protection**: Elevated to a top-tier protocol concern. Proposals like EIP-8250 (keyed nonces for concurrency), EIP-8272 (recent roots for verification), and EIP-8182 (shared protocol-level privacy pools) aim to enable private transfers of ETH and ERC-20s, moving toward default private accounts. - **Quantum Resilience**: Priority increased. The plan addresses risks to ECDSA/BLS signatures, KZG commitments, and ZK systems, exploring solutions like leanSPHINCS signatures, STARK proofs (considered quantum-resistant), and streamlined verification processes. A full L1 upgrade is tentatively targeted for ~2029. - **Native Rollups**: A novel concept where rollups could reuse Ethereum's core validation infrastructure via a new EXECUTE precompile (EIP-8079 draft). This aims to reduce custom code and enhance security for certain L2s, while specialized chains will continue to exist. - **Protocol Simplification & Formal Verification**: Leveraging AI tools to make full-protocol formal verification feasible, aiming for more rigorous and machine-verifiable specifications. Other notable shifts: - State storage is evolving from Verkle trees to a Partitioned Binary Tree (PBT, EIP-8347 draft). - Some 2023 items like VDFs and certain EVM improvements were deprioritized. - Long-term discussions include blob/gas futures and non-EVM instruction sets (e.g., RISC-V). The "Strawmap" outlines potential upgrades through ~2029 but is a directional guide, not a firm timeline. Key milestones to watch include the Glamsterdam (Q4 2026) and Hegotá (2027) forks. Many proposals remain in draft or research phases.

marsbit29m ago

What's New in Ethereum's Roadmap: Privacy, Quantum Security, Native Rollup?

marsbit29m ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

Hyperliquid, a leading decentralized perpetuals trading platform, has seen its open interest surge to a record high above $11 billion, capturing roughly 9% of the global market share. Trading volume remains robust, nearing $178 billion over 30 days, driven largely by the explosive growth of third-party markets offering tokenized real-world assets (RWAs) like stocks and commodities. Despite this growth, the platform's protocol revenue has declined for four consecutive quarters, falling 43% from its Q3 2025 peak of $357 million to approximately $202 million in Q2 2026. This divergence is primarily attributed to the HIP-3 governance proposal, which allows external developers to launch their own markets and keep up to half of the generated fees. These third-party markets now account for nearly 50% of total volume. Consequently, the share of revenue redistributed to developers, market makers, and the treasury has tripled from 6% to 18% in a year. This directly reduces the funds allocated to the platform's buyback-and-burn mechanism for its native HYPE token, weakening a key price support. HYPE's price has fallen 28% from its all-time high. The platform's growth is also heavily concentrated, with a single entity, Trade.xyz, responsible for over 90% of HIP-3 open interest, introducing systemic risk. Additionally, the ecosystem lacks diversity beyond HYPE, faces ongoing token unlocks adding sell pressure, and is encountering increased regulatory scrutiny and new competition from platforms like Robinhood Chain. While still a major revenue generator in crypto, Hyperliquid's model of sharing fees to fuel expansion is currently compressing its own earnings and token economics.

marsbit29m ago

Hyperliquid Trading Volume Soars, So Why Are Profits Falling?

marsbit29m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

1.7k Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片