国内若干大户加密货币遭税务稽查个人所得税

吴说区块链Published on 2023-01-06Last updated on 2023-01-06

Abstract

也有观点认为,对加密货币的征税需求,或许有可能倒逼加密货币行业在中国的合法化。

某大户向吴说爆料,2022年初以来,某地税务部门向其要求稽查个人所得税。遭到稽查的大户还有多人与详细名单。目前程序进行了接近一年,仍未最终结束、产生最终的稽查征收结果。该大户出金约数千万人民币。

2022年初,某些主流境内交易所也向税务部门提供了大量有关部分大户的交易等详细信息。税务相关人士解读:个人所得税中财产转让所得的纳税比例为个人利润/收益的20%,在上述具体案例中,应为出金收益的20%。

全球各地目前都已经陆续完善对加密货币的相关税法。中国由于将加密货币全盘定义为非法,因此征税推进存在一些争议,因为对加密货币征税很大程度即代表承认它的合法地位。这与央行等金融管理部门的立场存在冲突。

2021年10月,国税总局旗下中国税务报刊登文章《防范虚拟货币带来的税收风险》,一定程度代表税务部门的立场。

文章称,根据“法不溯及既往”的原则,境外交易所此前向我国境内居民提供的服务,可以视为“法无明文禁止”,但必须按照我国税法,就其从我国境内取得的收入,缴纳增值税、企业所得税、印花税等相关税费。

按照各虚拟货币交易所此前的交易额与收入情况测算,交易所行业总体税收规模相当可观,其余相关行业税收更有待进一步厘清。

文章称,尽管我国当前对虚拟货币形式的非法金融活动进行了严格限制,但是从当前情况看,比特币等虚拟货币在全球范围内的交易很难在短时间内消失,未来发展的方向也无法确定。

同时,在当前法律框架内,我国对于个人持有比特币等虚拟货币并未禁止,而虚拟货币的交易被定义为一种“无效的民事行为”,却并未从法律上明确禁止。

文章强调:我国应完善相关财产申报登记机制,对持有大量虚拟货币的用户进行实名登记与动态追踪。在罚没收缴、重组并购、破产清算等司法领域,要对虚拟货币的处置方式予以明确,避免国家税款流失。

此外,税务部门应当主动与央行、金融监管、市场监管、公安司法等部门联动,严厉打击虚拟货币用于地下经济、走私、洗钱、逃税等非法行为。

值得注意的是,上述交易所提供信息与对大户开展稽查,无疑就是“对持有大量虚拟货币的用户进行实名登记与动态追踪”。

吴说亦了解,此前某头部矿机厂商与大量矿工也遭到税务稽查,但可能更多是企业行为而非针对个人。

某资深税务人士对吴说表示,中国对个人所得税法规定的非常宽泛,按照他的理解,任何中国国籍的人士,在境内或境外取得的收入,都应该缴纳个人所得税。

从这个角度来看,税务部门有其征税的依据。从过去2年来看,发生很多针对直播网红、明星的案例,共同富裕旗号下对大户的税收稽查变得更加严格,近期税务局也通过 CRS 信息交换对高净值个人的海外收入开展了调查。

但另一方面,中国检察官报文章也指出,因比特币等虚拟货币存在极大金融风险,近年来我国对其管制趋严,如果说2013年时还将其视为特定的虚拟商品,那么当前在我国宏观金融政策层面则一律禁止虚拟货币相关业务活动,体现其财物属性的兑换、买卖及定价服务等均不被我国法秩序认可。

在此背景下刑法不应将比特币等虚拟货币作为财物来保护。2021年《通知》第1条第4款规定,“任何法人、非法人组织和自然人投资虚拟货币及相关衍生品,违背公序良俗的,相关民事法律行为无效,由此引发的损失由其自行承担;涉嫌破坏金融秩序、危害金融安全的,由相关部门依法查处”。

如果加密货币及相关活动不属于合法,征税的最大难题也就卡在了此处。早在2008年围绕网游的虚拟币就有过大量类似的讨论。

因此也有观点认为,对加密货币的征税需求,或许有可能倒逼加密货币行业在中国的合法化。

目前大力推进 WEB3 发展的香港的情况则是:根据香港税务条例释义及执行指引第39号(《DIPN 39》)的修订版,增加关于数字资产税收的部分,税务局会参考并运用「营商标记法则」原则,以确定所持有的数字资产是否应缴纳香港利得税。

至于加密货币交易,将考虑获利的性质,产生获利的操作,以及获利活动的地点而决定应否缴税。

Related Reads

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

Anthropic's updated privacy policy, effective July 8th, has sparked misinterpretations in Chinese social media, primarily concerning new identity verification and data sharing with law enforcement. A detailed comparison reveals these claims are largely unfounded. First, identity verification (including submitting government ID and a live selfie via third-party provider Persona) is not a new July policy. This mechanism was actually implemented in mid-April 2026 for certain high-use or flagged accounts, particularly Claude Max subscribers. The July update merely formally documents this existing practice in the policy text under a new "Verification Data" section. Second, the widespread claim that the new policy lowers the threshold for sharing user data with law enforcement is incorrect. Comparing the new text with the old version (dated September 28, 2025) shows no substantive tightening. While the new policy more clearly structures the conditions for disclosure—including having a "good-faith belief" it's necessary for legal compliance, preventing harm, fraud detection, or enforcing terms—the old policy already allowed Anthropic to disclose data based on its judgment for similar reasons (e.g., protecting safety, preventing fraud, or complying with law). The term "good-faith belief" acts as a limiting standard, not a lowered barrier. A 2025 court case where Anthropic resisted disclosing user data in a copyright lawsuit further demonstrates the complexity of such standards. The policy's actual substantial changes address data flows for Claude's Agent capabilities. New clauses clarify that when users connect third-party services or instruct Claude to perform multi-step tasks (reading files, sending messages), their inputs, outputs, and instructions are shared with those third parties, governed by the third parties' own policies. This update fills a compliance gap for Claude's evolving functionality beyond simple Q&A. Other additions include a "Research Participation Data" section and refined marketing legal bases. Anthropic reaffirms core commitments: not selling user data, keeping Claude ad-free, and allowing users to control if chats are used for model training. Overall, this update is primarily a compliance catch-up to existing product features, not a significant new privacy tightening. The heightened concern stems from conflating April's verification rollout, standard legal clauses, and the genuine new provisions regarding Agent tasks.

marsbit9m ago

Claude Requires ID Verification and Facial Recognition? The Facial Recognition Requirement is an Old Story from Two Months Ago, and "Sharing Data with Police" is a Misinterpretation

marsbit9m ago

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

After only a few days of the World Cup, AI models are being widely used for match predictions, with mixed early results. These models analyze details like scores, upsets, red cards, and key players, offering users in prediction markets an extra layer of analysis beyond odds and news. Qwen gained early attention for its remarkably accurate calls on the opening day, correctly predicting Mexico's 2-0 win over South Africa and Korea's 2-1 victory over the Czech Republic, while also highlighting red card risks and match flow. Copilot had its own highlights, accurately forecasting the Mexico 2-0 result, the Korea 2-1 win, and a surprising 1-1 draw between Brazil and Morocco. However, it also misjudged several matches, like predicting a Swiss win that ended in a draw with Qatar and missing Australia's upset over Turkey. ChatGPT provided detailed pre-match analysis and correctly called the Mexico 2-0 score, explaining factors like home-field advantage. Yet, it struggled to anticipate upsets, often siding with the stronger team on paper, as seen in its missed calls for the Australia-Turkey and Japan-Netherlands matches. Social media tests pitted models like Gemini, Grok, and Claude against each other for the same games, revealing different predictive "scripts" even for the same fixture. Overall, while AI models like Qwen and Copilot have shown promising, high-profile successes in early matches, their consistency and ability to predict genuine upsets remain in question. As the tournament progresses, more data will be needed to determine which models offer the most reliable insights for prediction markets.

Odaily星球日报13m ago

The World Cup Has Only Just Begun, But AI Predictions Already Have Models Hailed as 'Godly' and Others Flipping Over

Odaily星球日报13m ago

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

Following a major fundraising round involving several prominent investment institutions, DaXiao Robotics, a company backed by SenseTime, has secured hundreds of millions of US dollars in financing for the first half of 2026. This move signals SenseTime's renewed and substantial bet on "Physical AI" through embodied intelligence, following the relative underperformance of its autonomous driving unit, Jueying. While Jueying achieved mass production partnerships in the smart vehicle sector, it failed to become a pivotal player in the high-level autonomous driving landscape, leading to its gradual independence from SenseTime's core financials. DaXiao Robotics now emerges as SenseTime's next major venture into the physical world. The new funding will focus on developing a "world model" and integrated hardware-software solutions for commercial applications like retail, security, and hospitality. This ambition is significantly more complex and capital-intensive than previous projects. A world model requires understanding spatial relationships, physics, and causality to guide robots in long-term tasks, demanding immense computational resources, data, and engineering. The article highlights several challenges. First, the massive funding, while substantial, may still be strained by the high costs of R&D, data collection, and commercial deployment. Second, SenseTime itself, despite narrowing losses, continues its high-investment growth model and cannot solely bankroll this new, expensive endeavor. Third, DaXiao Robotics, led by SenseTime co-founder Wang Xiaogang, carries the technical heritage and resources of its parent company but also potentially its organizational inertia. It operates in a field increasingly dominated by agile, young technical founders. Ultimately, DaXiao Robotics represents SenseTime's attempt to secure a leading industrial position in embodied intelligence—a goal its Jueying unit did not fully achieve in autonomous driving. The new venture starts with strong capital backing, but faces the critical task of rapidly transitioning from technological narrative to sustainable commercial delivery in an early-stage, costly, and highly competitive arena.

marsbit23m ago

The Unfinished Tale of Jueying, DaXiao Robotics Swiftly "Raises Funds"

marsbit23m ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Title: Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Four-Year Cycle Prediction for the Encryption Industry This article outlines a detailed, stage-by-stage prediction for the crypto industry from the present to 2029, focusing on tangible shifts rather than abstract theory. Key predictions include: **2026 Mid-Year:** The market shifts focus from traditional tokens to synthetic perpetual contracts for private company shares (e.g., SpaceX on Hyperliquid), which become primary price discovery tools for pre-IPO assets. Most altcoins languish as the market seeks assets with real underlying value. **2026 Year-End:** The "AI + crypto" narrative fades as the AI industry itself does not require crypto infrastructure, except for prediction markets betting on model performance. Concurrently, a quiet institutional adoption of asset tokenization (e.g., money market funds) begins under new regulations like the CLARITY Act, creating a dual economy. **2027:** Major public blockchain foundations pivot decisively to serve institutional clients with compliance tools and enterprise sales, while quietly building infrastructure for a future wave of accredited retail investors. Three sectors hit growth ceilings: private perpetual contracts (due to legal restrictions on marketing), stablecoins (due to political uncertainty ahead of the 2028 US election), and tokenized assets (due to cautious institutional scaling). **2028:** Speculative trading diminishes as market efficiency drains liquidity. A major liquidation cascade in synthetic perpetual contracts exposes the flaw of lacking a legally enforceable underlying asset. In response, regulations are revised to allow marketing of private security secondary sales to accredited investors. This creates a legal, direct market for private company equity, absorbing much of the demand previously met by synthetic derivatives. **2029:** A new bull market emerges, driven not by tokens but by tradable equity in innovative private companies (biotech, robotics, AI). Tokens without legally enforceable claims to real assets lose all liquidity. Successful blockchains become invisible settlement infrastructure. Stablecoins grow steadily at a policy-capped rate. Speculation becomes a niche. Core Questions Answered: 1. **Token Value:** Determined solely by legally enforceable claims to real-world assets. 2. **Tech Adoption:** Achieved through blockchain-based primary/secondary markets for private equity, not through forcing tokens onto tech firms. 3. **Crypto as Infrastructure:** The transition happens silently; the technology becomes a mundane, unseen utility like traditional settlement systems. The entire thesis hinges on one testable variable: by late 2028, whether accredited retail investors gain legal, direct access to private asset markets. If not, the core premise—that legal frameworks, not technology, are the main bottleneck—fails.

Foresight News31m ago

Crypto 2029: The Ultimate Forecast for the Four-Year Cycle of the Cryptocurrency Industry

Foresight News31m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片