Justin Sun: HT Is Seriously Undervalued Compared to BNB

HuobiPubblicato 2022-10-21Pubblicato ultima volta 2022-10-24

Introduzione

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB.

On the evening of October 20, Justin Sun, the global advisor of Huobi Global, talked about the price of HT in a Twitter Space live broadcast. He believes that the price of HT is seriously undervalued compared to BNB. Here are several reasons:

● These two tokens have the same circulation

● Huobi Global has more tools to empower HT

● Popular coins such as APT have a higher trading volume on Huobi Global

Is it real?

Firstly, look at the circulation. The total supply of BNB is 200 million, while the total supply of HT is 500 million, 300 million more than its compatitor. However, nearly 300 million HTs have already been burnt through the “HT Token Burn Program Community Vote”. From the perspective of circulating supply, the current circulating supply of HT is around 130 million, and the circulating supply of BNB is 160 million. The circulating supply of HT is less than that of BNB. Focusing on non-circulating HT, with 200 million in circulation compared to 160 million, the price of BNB is around 270 US dollars per token, while the price of HT is only 7 US dollars per token, the gap is indeed too wide.

From the burning curve below, by burning 150 million HT in March 2020, the burning speed of HT was significantly accelerated, while BNB was relatively slow.

Second, when HT was initially released, part of it was used to buy point cards as gifts, and HT could be used to purchase VIP members, and also could be used to vote for listing. Since the end of 2020, the empowerment actions will be significantly reduced. In addition, the Chinese users would force to leave in 2021, and the empowerment actions of HT were basically suspended. However, the empowerment of BNB actions was continuous, which lead to a rebound in the price of BNB at the end of 2021, and widens its price gap with HT. The empowerment move of HT is indeed a little weaker, but there is no fundamental difference between them by circulation and brand influence, if HT could follow the BNB in the empowerment perspective, the price gap may see a quick narrowing in the short run.

Lastly, take the trading volume of the popular currency APT as an example to analyze the gap between the giants. According to the data of Coingecko, the trading volume of the APT/USDT trading pair in Binance for the last 1 day is around 120 million US dollars, while in Huobi it is about 40 million US dollars. the gap was just about 3 times. This gap is much narrower than the price gap between HT and BNB.

The following are quoted from Justin in the live broadcast. You can tell for yourself whether it makes sense or not:

“I personally believe that HT is definitely undervalued because the circulation of HT and BNB is exactly the same, about 160 million. Now a BNB coin is a few hundred dollars, while HT is only 7-8 dollars, I think HT is still undervalued. Although Binance has a strong network effect, Huobi Global is still an excellent exchange.

For example, in the past two days, Huobi Global is still the main battlefield for the trading of APT which is a new and top-level project. To a certain extent, the price of HT does not match the users, trading depth, and capital of Huobi global. In another word, HT is still underestimated.

I’m not trying to spread FOMO emotion to you guys. Suppose I’m not a Huobi Global consultant, my judgment of the undervalue of HT will still be firm. So HT now is definitely will be a profitable investment. The reason HT was undervalued is that Huobi Global did not empower HT. Now that I am a Huobi Global consultant, I must ensure that Huobi Global will focus on empowering HT. In meetings for the last few days, I have emphasized more than 50 times to make sure that our organization's top priority is to empower HT and turn the direction of operation back to HT prosperity. "

Letture associate

The United States Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

The White House has published a page titled "Lab Leak: The True Origin of Covid-19," presenting the laboratory leak from a Wuhan facility as the most likely cause of the pandemic. This conclusion is based on a report by a US House of Representatives subcommittee investigating the virus's origins. Key arguments cited include the virus's unique biological features not found in nature, a single suspected spillover event into humans, and the proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which conducted gain-of-function research on coronaviruses. The report also notes that WIV staff exhibited COVID-like symptoms in autumn 2019, prior to the official outbreak. It criticizes a prominent paper on the virus's natural origin, alleging it was promoted by Dr. Anthony Fauci. The congressional subcommittee's report led to the suspension and subsequent five-year debarment of the EcoHealth Alliance and its president, Peter Daszak, from US federal funding, following findings of grant violations related to the Wuhan research. A Department of Justice grand jury is also investigating. While this US government position is presented, the scientific community, including WHO working groups, continues to debate both natural zoonotic and laboratory origins. The investigation underscores the pandemic's immense human (nearly 15 million deaths per WHO) and economic toll (over $4 trillion), highlighting the geopolitical weight of assigning blame and the future need for robust global biosecurity protocols.

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

The United States Officially Recognizes the Laboratory Origin of the Coronavirus

cryptonews.ru2 min fa

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, the Place to Lose Money is Called the Stock Market. The article depicts a future (2026) where global stock markets, particularly tech stocks, are exhibiting behaviors and risks reminiscent of the cryptocurrency world. The narrative centers on a sharp crash in South Korea's KOSPI index and leading stocks like SK Hynix, highlighting widespread retail losses, leverage-induced liquidations, and extreme volatility. It argues that a significant shift in market dynamics is underway: pricing is increasingly driven by narratives (like the AI boom) over fundamental valuation, amplified by high leverage and the rapid, emotion-fueled consensus formed on social media. Former crypto traders, seeking new opportunities, brought their high-risk strategies—chasing narratives, using leverage—into equity markets, focusing on sectors like AI and semiconductors. Ironically, data suggests some major tech stocks have recently shown greater volatility and faster crashes than Bitcoin, which is becoming relatively more stable and "stock-like" through institutional adoption. The piece details how leveraged ETFs in Korea, particularly those tied to single stocks, created a vicious cycle of forced selling that exacerbated the market plunge. It concludes that while stocks retain underlying fundamentals, the *trading* of them has undergone a "de-rationalization": markets now prioritize themes, social media sentiment, and leveraged bets over traditional analysis. In a paradoxical twist, Bitcoin is striving to become more like a traditional asset, while a segment of the stock market is becoming more like crypto—a cycle of grand stories, crowded trades, easy leverage, and the pervasive, often misplaced, belief that one can exit before everyone else. The final, poignant wish from a Korean retail investor—to go back to life before trading and get their money back—underscores that markets offer no refunds.

marsbit20 min fa

Welcome to the New Crypto World: Only This Time, The Place Where You Lose Money Is Called the Stock Market

marsbit20 min fa

Feishu Has Become Doubao

This may be the most important day in the ten-year history of Feishu. On July 30, ByteDance announced a major restructuring via internal email. Feishu, an independent operation for a decade, will no longer function separately and will lose its independent sales and marketing teams. Its product team is being integrated into Doubao AI, and its Go-to-Market strategy merges into the Volcano Engine's To B system. This move signals a strategic pivot, not a failure of Feishu. The era where Feishu sought to be an all-encompassing super-app for productivity is ending. AI has become the dominant logic. Industry trends show a shift from building platform "entrances" to embedding AI directly into workflows, as seen with Microsoft Copilot and Google's Gemini. Data reveals the driver: over 90% of Feishu's new clients in Q2 2026 purchased its AI products. Enterprises are now buying integrated AI solutions, not standalone software. By integrating Feishu's deep enterprise workflow scenarios, Doubao evolves from a consumer-facing chatbot into a powerful enterprise productivity engine. This gives Doubao a critical asset: real-world business application. Concurrently, ByteDance established the "Creative Services Platform," unifying its previously fragmented sales fronts (Feishu, Doubao, Volcano Engine) into a single customer-facing entity. This represents ByteDance's first genuine shift to thinking like a true To B company, organizing around client needs rather than internal product silos. The restructuring underscores that AI is no longer just a business line but foundational infrastructure. Doubao is becoming the new organizational core, mirroring TikTok's past ascendancy. This demonstrates a profound shift: AI is beginning to reshape corporate structures, determining resource allocation and strategic priorities. ByteDance is likely just the first of many companies to undergo such an AI-driven reorganization.

marsbit31 min fa

Feishu Has Become Doubao

marsbit31 min fa

Trading

Spot
活动图片