Storj Labs, qui avait attiré 35 millions de dollars d'investissements, dépose une demande de faillite

cryptonews.ruPubblicato 2026-07-27Pubblicato ultima volta 2026-07-27

Introduzione

La société Storj Labs, qui avait levé 35 millions de dollars d'investissements, a déposé une demande de mise en faillite. Elle justifie cette décision par la nécessité de régler des "obligations historiques" accumulées au fil des années, affirmant que cette dette entravait son développement et que la seule croissance des revenus était insuffisante pour résoudre le problème. Storj Labs assure que la procédure de faillite n'interrompra pas le fonctionnement de sa plateforme de stockage de données décentralisée. Le réseau continuera à opérer, le service client sera maintenu et la société mère, Inveniam, soutiendra les activités pendant la procédure judiciaire. La direction prévoit de proposer un mécanisme permettant aux détenteurs du jeton natif STORJ d'obtenir une participation dans l'entreprise réorganisée, aux côtés des investisseurs actuels et du management. Fondé en 2014, Storj est l'un des plus anciens projets d'infrastructure de l'industrie crypto, offrant un réseau de stockage en cloud décentralisé et open source. Par ailleurs, la société Movement Labs, développeur de blockchain, a également déposé une demande de faillite au Delaware, avec des actifs estimés entre 100 000 et 500 000 dollars pour des dettes allant de 1 à 10 millions de dollars.

La société a expliqué que la décision d'engager une procédure de faillite était motivée par la nécessité de régler des "engagements historiques" accumulés au cours des années précédentes. Selon les représentants de Storj Labs, la charge de la dette limitait le développement ultérieur de l'entreprise, et la seule croissance des revenus s'est avérée insuffisante pour résoudre le problème.

Storj Labs a assuré que la procédure de faillite n'arrêterait pas le fonctionnement de la plateforme. Le réseau de stockage de données décentralisé continuera de fonctionner, le service client ne sera pas interrompu et la société mère Inveniam continuera de soutenir les activités opérationnelles tout au long de la procédure judiciaire, indique la déclaration de l'entreprise.

La direction de Storj Labs a fait part de son intention de proposer un mécanisme permettant aux détenteurs de jetons natifs STORJ d'obtenir une participation dans l'entreprise réorganisée, aux côtés des investisseurs actuels et de la direction.

Storj est l'un des projets d'infrastructure les plus anciens de l'industrie crypto. Le projet a été lancé en 2014 en tant que réseau de stockage en cloud décentralisé et open source, permettant de louer de l'espace disque libre à d'autres participants du réseau plutôt que d'utiliser des services cloud centralisés.

Précédemment, le développeur de blockchain Movement, la société Movement Labs, avait déposé une demande de faillite devant le tribunal du Delaware. Selon les documents judiciaires, les actifs de l'entreprise sont estimés entre 100 000 et 500 000 dollars, tandis que les passifs envers les créanciers s'élèvent de 1 à 10 millions de dollars.

end-content

Crypto di tendenza

Domande pertinenti

QQuelle est la raison donnée par Storj Labs pour avoir déposé son bilan ?

AStorj Labs a expliqué que sa décision de déposer le bilan était motivée par la nécessité de régler des "obligations historiques" accumulées au cours des années précédentes, qui limitaient le développement futur de l'entreprise.

QLe service de la plateforme Storj s'arrêtera-t-il à cause de la procédure de faillite ?

ANon. Storj Labs a assuré que la procédure de faillite n'arrêtera pas la plateforme. Le réseau de stockage décentralisé continuera de fonctionner, le service client ne sera pas interrompu et la société mère Inveniam continuera de soutenir les activités opérationnelles pendant la procédure judiciaire.

QQuelle opportunité est offerte aux détenteurs du jeton natif STORJ selon l'annonce ?

ALa direction de Storj Labs a annoncé son intention de proposer un mécanisme permettant aux détenteurs du jeton natif STORJ d'obtenir une participation dans l'entreprise réorganisée, aux côtés des investisseurs actuels et de la direction.

QEn quelle année le projet Storj a-t-il été lancé et quel est son concept principal ?

ALe projet Storj a été lancé en 2014. C'est un réseau de stockage en cloud décentralisé et open-source qui permet aux participants de louer leur espace disque inutilisé à d'autres, comme alternative aux services de cloud centralisés.

QQuelle autre entreprise de l'industrie de la blockchain a récemment déposé son bilan, selon l'article ?

ASelon l'article, Movement Labs, le développeur de la blockchain Movement, a également déposé son bilan auprès du tribunal du Delaware. Ses actifs sont estimés entre 100 000 et 500 000 dollars, pour des dettes allant de 1 à 10 millions de dollars.

Letture associate

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

Has the crypto utopia collapsed? The industry is at an inflection point as the hype fades. The prevailing view is that crypto has become an outlet for excess liquidity, with many participants leaving as financial returns have fallen short of past-decade expectations. The 2021 boom has been revealed as an illusion, placing the industry in the "trough of disillusionment" on Gartner's Hype Cycle. This forces a return to first principles: re-evaluating token value, securing DeFi protocols, and finding real-world applications. The core failure is a repetitive cycle of reflexive speculation, driven by the premature liquidity of tokens. The industry's incentives prioritized short-term gains over genuine innovation. While curiosity drives invention, recent DeFi hacks signal a need for engineering and iteration, including token models. The culture is shifting; the industry is no longer in its early stages. Positioned at a turning point on the technology adoption curve, crypto faces the immense challenge of rebuilding finance from scratch, a process of inevitable iteration and failure. Regarding crypto VC, claims of its death are overstated. The exceptional returns of 2016-2021 were an anomaly. The initial crypto-anarchist ethos has largely been co-opted by Wall Street and regulators. The utopian vision is over; the industry is being assimilated into the existing system, becoming a business. Current viable project categories include stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenized assets/RWA, perpetual contracts, and AI/agent integration. Crypto is converging with fintech, far from the envisioned DeFi revolution, and must find killer apps within regulatory boundaries. A reconciliation is possible: cryptocurrency may change value storage and transfer in subtle, imperceptible ways that integrate into existing systems, rather than through revolutionary fanfare. True creativity often emerges from adversity. There remains much to build for those driven by genuine curiosity.

marsbit3 min fa

Has the Crypto Utopia Collapsed? The Industry Reaches an Inflection Point After the Frenzy Subsides

marsbit3 min fa

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

On July 28th, Changxin Technology's stock price on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board experienced minor fluctuations. The company had made a historic market debut the previous day, becoming the first A-share stock to record a single-day trading volume exceeding 1 trillion yuan. This led to significant paper gains for its strategic investors. Among them, Xiaomi's wholly-owned subsidiary was allocated 18.24 million shares with an initial investment of approximately 158 million yuan. Reports estimated a paper profit of 717 million yuan for Xiaomi founder Lei Jun based on his shareholding structure. However, a Xiaomi executive clarified that this was a corporate investment and should not be conflated with personal wealth. Other major beneficiaries included Alibaba and Nio. Alibaba, an early investor, held nearly a 5% stake through two entities, with an estimated paper gain exceeding 160 billion yuan. Nio, participating in the strategic placement, also saw substantial paper returns. Additionally, state-owned banks and insurance institutions that invested in Changxin recorded potential gains in the hundreds of billions. Conversely, companies like Country Garden reportedly missed out on nearly 50 billion yuan in potential gains after divesting their stakes before the IPO due to liquidity pressures. The article notes that these are paper profits based on the listing price, as the allocated shares are subject to lock-up periods, and final realized gains will depend on future stock performance. An employee from Changxin Technology commented that ordinary staff remain focused on their salaries and benefits rather than the market hype.

marsbit12 min fa

Lei Jun Earns 7 Billion in One Day from CXMT's IPO? Xiaomi Executive Responds

marsbit12 min fa

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

"The Token vs. Outcome Sale: Key Paradoxes in the AI Business Model By mid-2026, the AI industry shows rapid growth in revenue and token usage, yet the underlying business models differ significantly. This article analyzes four structural paradoxes defining the current landscape, all pointing to the commoditization of intelligence and the concentration of profits in few segments. **The Cost Paradox: Cheaper Tokens, Heavier Bills** Despite a >95% price drop for equivalent AI capability since 2023, total spending has skyrocketed due to the Jevons Paradox: lower prices expand usage into previously uneconomical tasks. Furthermore, the shift to autonomous agents operating 24/7 multiplies consumption. However, efficiency gains often remain unrealized due to unchanged organizational workflows (the Solow Paradox). The focus is shifting from optimizing token price to optimizing the task itself. **The Hierarchy Paradox: The App is King vs. The App is Dead** While conventional wisdom holds that value accrues at the application layer, the AI stack is inverted. Infrastructure (chips) captures ~70% of industry revenue and ~80% of gross profit, while application-layer margins are thin (0-30%). Fast-evolving base models threaten "thin" apps. Sustainable applications are those that embed intelligence into specific contexts, possessing private data, workflows, or delivery capabilities that become more valuable as the base model improves. **The Responsibility Paradox: Profit Follows Accountability** Growth rates alone don't guarantee profit. A key differentiator is a company's willingness and ability to take responsibility for specific outcomes. Selling by the token competes for IT budgets; selling by the outcome (e.g., a resolved support ticket) taps into larger human labor budgets. Low-responsibility, high-volume tasks (e.g., generic客服) face commoditization. High-stakes, regulated domains (e.g., law, healthcare) where vendors assume heavier liability for results command higher margins, as seen with companies like Harvey in legal tech. **The Open-Source Paradox: Open Wins Traffic, Closed Wins Revenue** Open-source models dominate in usage share and developer adoption, often being 5-20x cheaper. However, closed-source models still capture the majority of enterprise spending (~89%). Enterprises pay a premium for closed-source reliability, support, compliance, and accountability. The total cost of ownership (TCO) is converging as closed-source prices fall faster than open-source builds trust, leading to hybrid deployments. Profit is migrating from the model layer itself to upstream (compute) and downstream (orchestration, data, services)."

marsbit13 min fa

Selling Tokens or Selling Outcomes: Several Paradoxes of the AI Business Model

marsbit13 min fa

Trading

Spot

Articoli Popolari

Come comprare STORJ

Benvenuto in HTX.com! Abbiamo reso l'acquisto di STORJ (STORJ) semplice e conveniente. Segui la nostra guida passo passo per intraprendere il tuo viaggio nel mondo delle criptovalute.Step 1: Crea il tuo Account HTXUsa la tua email o numero di telefono per registrarti il tuo account gratuito su HTX. Vivi un'esperienza facile e sblocca tutte le funzionalità,Crea il mio accountStep 2: Vai in Acquista crypto e seleziona il tuo metodo di pagamentoCarta di credito/debito: utilizza la tua Visa o Mastercard per acquistare immediatamente STORJSTORJ.Bilancio: Usa i fondi dal bilancio del tuo account HTX per fare trading senza problemi.Terze parti: abbiamo aggiunto metodi di pagamento molto utilizzati come Google Pay e Apple Pay per maggiore comodità.P2P: Fai trading direttamente con altri utenti HTX.Over-the-Counter (OTC): Offriamo servizi su misura e tassi di cambio competitivi per i trader.Step 3: Conserva STORJ (STORJ)Dopo aver acquistato STORJ (STORJ), conserva nel tuo account HTX. In alternativa, puoi inviare tramite trasferimento blockchain o scambiare per altre criptovalute.Step 4: Scambia STORJ (STORJ)Scambia facilmente STORJ (STORJ) nel mercato spot di HTX. Accedi al tuo account, seleziona la tua coppia di trading, esegui le tue operazioni e monitora in tempo reale. Offriamo un'esperienza user-friendly sia per chi ha appena iniziato che per i trader più esperti.

172 Totale visualizzazioniPubblicato il 2024.12.12Aggiornato il 2026.06.02

Come comprare STORJ

Discussioni

Benvenuto nella Community HTX. Qui puoi rimanere informato sugli ultimi sviluppi della piattaforma e accedere ad approfondimenti esperti sul mercato. Le opinioni degli utenti sul prezzo di STORJ STORJ sono presentate come di seguito.

活动图片